TREEBREEDEX DATA BASE

TREEBREEDEX DATA BASE

Third annual meeting

Arezzo, 25-29/05/2009

Agenda• 17-18/04/07 (Zaragoza): Definition of DB specifications (all partners) –

decision to have only 1 database• 28-30/05/07 (Järvenpää): amendments of specifications (all partners)• 24-25/09/07 (Vantaa): technical workshop: agreement on INRA (Medias)

& METLA roles• 12/07/07: data input templates sent to partners (METLA)• 21/12/07: data-base structure provided by METLA• 15/02/08: test data (INRA, METLA, SKOGFORSK, LFRI)• 18/03/08: ‘final’ input files + queries examples on web• 12/05/08: database model + SQL-script sent to Medias• 22/05/08 (Vantaa): discussion on input files (INRA-Metla)• 4/06/08 (Wageningen):

– Discussion on data-input (last decisions to be taken)– Discussion on editing and queries (1st priority: basic queries agreed on, then

open to more sophisticated ones)– Agenda for data preparation and transfer to INRA

Agenda• Fall 2008: Medias-France developed the web-interface for

data input (file + on-line), editing and correction• End 2008: Preparation of datasets for Scots pine and wild

cherry (all partners)• Introduction of datasets by INRA, control, tuning• INRA/Medias: preparation of statistics/requests/editing –

development of interface• Dec.2008: end-of-contract with Medias-France / transfer of

database on INRA-server• Partners invited to input their datasets themselves / test the

database• INRA starts to input climatic (Worldclim) and soil

(pedological map of Europe) data• End of April: V.Pignot hired by INRA on contract for 4

months to achieve requests interface

What is next ?

• Deadline : Get missing datasets for Scots Pine and Wild cherry !!!!

• Deadline : Input datasets for all other species (Picea, Pseudotsuga, Larix, Med-firs, Acer, Fraxinus, Populus)

• Deadline : tables of synonymous• Deadline : Database content analysis

– Does it fit what we look for?– Combining information

• Deadline : show-case for internet

Statistics

• 119 files inserted (FT, GU, TM + synonymous + climate + soil)

• 1502 field trials

• 50676 genetic units76455 test material922 climate data920 soil data

17 lines, 699 field trialsNb of field trials by type

TOTAL PROV PROG CLON VAR SO ARC CON OTHSpecies Country Organization 699 45 66 1 6 66 13 0 0

Pinus sylvestris Belgium INBO 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris Denmark UoC 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris France INRA 50 12 18 1 6 2 11 0 0Pinus sylvestris Germany vTI 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris Germany NW-FVA 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris Germany SBS 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris Ireland Coillte 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris Lithuania LFRI 99 19 40 0 0 38 2 0 0Pinus sylvestris Poland IDPAN 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris Poland IBL 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris Romania ICAS 18 8 0 0 0 10 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris Slovakia NLC 26 6 4 0 0 16 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris Spain INIA 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris Spain CITA 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris Sweden SKOGFORSK 213 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris Sweden SLU 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris United Kingdom(FR)FC 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scots pine

Is missing:

16 lines, 18421 genetic unitsNb of genetic units by type

TOTAL NAT SYN HSP FSP CLOSpecies Country Organization 18421 1215 781 6814 3772 5839

Pinus sylvestris Belgium INBO 42 0 0 42 0 0Pinus sylvestris Denmark UoC 34 34 0 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris France INRA 3580 132 25 993 1428 1002Pinus sylvestris Germany vTI 320 115 29 0 0 176Pinus sylvestris Germany NW-FVA 345 127 6 206 6 0Pinus sylvestris Germany SBS 100 93 0 0 0 7Pinus sylvestris Ireland Coillte 122 0 0 0 0 122Pinus sylvestris Lithuania LFRI 5326 332 1 2583 235 2175Pinus sylvestris Poland IBL 862 77 7 754 24 0Pinus sylvestris Romania ICAS 690 36 654 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris Slovakia NLC 917 78 3 14 0 822Pinus sylvestris Spain INIA 168 28 1 139 0 0Pinus sylvestris Spain CITA 51 0 0 51 0 0Pinus sylvestris Sweden SKOGFORSK 4111 0 0 2032 2079 0Pinus sylvestris Sweden SLU 106 106 0 0 0 0Pinus sylvestris United Kingdom(FR)FC 1647 57 55 0 0 1535

Scots pine

12 lines, 219 field trialsNb of field trials by type

TOTAL PROV PROG CLON VAR SO ARC CON OTHSpecies Country Organization 219 11 25 67 0 16 4 0 7

Prunus avium Austria BFW 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Prunus avium Belgium CRNFB 13 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 1Prunus avium Belgium INBO 20 1 13 6 0 0 0 0 0Prunus avium Denmark UoC 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Prunus avium France INRA 84 0 10 61 0 3 4 0 6Prunus avium Germany NW-FVA 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Prunus avium Germany SBS 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Prunus avium Ireland Coillte 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Prunus avium Italy CRA 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Prunus avium Romania ICAS 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0Prunus avium Slovakia NLC 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0Prunus avium Spain XG - CIFAL 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Wild cherry

11 lines, 10224 genetic unitsNb of genetic units by type

TOTAL NAT SYN HSP FSP CLOSpecies Country Organization 10224 73 498 316 205 9132

Prunus avium Belgium CRNFB 177 23 0 0 0 154Prunus avium Belgium INBO 179 6 0 17 0 156Prunus avium Belgium ALTERRA 2 2 0 0 0 0Prunus avium Denmark UoC 238 2 0 55 0 181Prunus avium France INRA 8217 6 2 62 205 7942Prunus avium Germany NW-FVA 373 20 19 182 0 152Prunus avium Germany SBS 82 14 68 0 0 0Prunus avium Ireland Coillte 54 0 0 0 0 54Prunus avium Romania ICAS 409 0 409 0 0 0Prunus avium Slovakia NLC 213 0 0 0 0 213Prunus avium Spain XG - CIFAL 280 0 0 0 0 280

TREEBREEDEX: DATABASE : Input of data - current situation (May 20, 2009)

FT GU TM FT GU TM FT GU TM FT GU TM FT GU TM FT GU TM FT GU TM FT GU TM FT GU TM

P1 y y y y y y y y y y y y

P2 y w w - - -

P3 y y y - - - y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y

P4 y y y y y y y y y

P5 w w w w w w

P6 - - - y y y

P7 y y y y y y

P8 y y y y y y

P9 y y y y y y y y y y

P10 - - - y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y y

P11 - - - y y w

P12 y ? ? ? ? ?

P13 - - - y y y

P14 - - - - - -

P15 y y y y y y

P16 y y y y y y

P17 - - - - - -

P18 - - - y w w

P19 - - - y y y y y y y ? y y y y y y y

P20 y y y y y y

P21 - - - y y y

P22 y y y y y y

P23 - - - y y ?

P24 y y y - - -

P25 - - - y y y

P26 - - - - - -

P27 - - - y y y

P28 ? ? ? ? ? ?

y = data providedw = file in preparation/correction '-' = not concerned by the species? = no answer to my mails

Wild CherryScots Pine Larches Douglas-fir Acer BeechNorway spruce Populus Fraxinus

Input of datasets• Through Excel sheets (3: FT – GU – TM)• Or on-line

• Start in the order: FT > GU > TM• Respect all sheet headlines, columns order, etc• Fullfill all mandatory fields !• But other fields are useful too !!!• Respect codes !!• Use -9999 exceptionally !!!

• An « extra»- « automatic » service : access to some climatic and soil consolidated/standardised information

But…if no geographic coordinates… no information possible

• Each line in each file must be unique !

• In FT: one national_code/ trial• In GU: one national_code/ gu• In TM: one national_code for site x one Entry_id

code

• Specific pb. of TM file: link betw. FT & GU files

• The less information you will provide, the less interesting will be the data base

• Nobody can say: « I do know what is the relevant information »

Policy: to let it open for other species

Policy: to let it open for other institutes

Please enter file in following format:

P15-Pa-Data20050518-GU-LT.xls

Partner-species-Datadate-file-country.xls

Validate - insert Error messages + e-mail

Can extract tables in xls or cv

The « owner » is the one who has entered the data. He/she will be the only one who can delete and correct his/her dataset + administrator

Files can be read by everybody

General statistics

Synonym head Synonym1 Synonym2 Synonym3 Synonym4 Synonym5

Synonym6

Synonym7

Synonym8

GR

OU

P_N

AM

E

SP

EC

IES

_ID

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

N

NB

_SY

N

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

Genetic Unit type:

Added field !!

NAT

SYN

HSP

FSP

CLO

VAR

OTH

262 field trialsSpecies Country Organization National test ID Trial type ID Locality Year of plantation Latitude Longitude Altitude (m) Area (hectares) Spacing Nb of GU Design ID

Larix kaempferi Belgium CRNFB 104-401/26-27/S01-01PROG Vonêche 2003 50.0444 4.9667 370 0.01 2x2,5 79 RCBLarix kaempferi Denmark UoC (H):B-27 Kronheden 60 a 1961 56.49 8.35 1 1.4 x 1.25 23 OTLarix kaempferi France INRA 1.3002.01_01 PROV FD Coat-An-Noz 1960 48.53 -3.35 200 0.6 4 x 4 10 RIBLarix kaempferi France INRA 2.3002.03_01 PROG Croze 1999 45.8 2.18 740 1.9 3 x 3 41 RIBLarix kaempferi France INRA 5.3002.01_03 SO Fond de la Montagne 1995 47.83 2.73 150 1.5 5 x 5 12 OTLarix kaempferi France INRA 7.3002.ORLEANS_PC19ARC Orléans - INRA 1993 47.82 1.9 106 0.49 5 x 4 41 OTLarix kaempferi France INRA 2.3002.02_02 PROG Ronno/St Apollinaire 1997 45.98 4.43 750 1.85 3 x 3 44 RIB

Species Country Organization National test ID Locality Area (hectares) Latitude Longitude Aspect Soil1 Soil2 Soil3 Soil4 Soil5 Soil6 Soil7 Soil8 Soil9 Soil10 Soil11 Soil12 Soil13 Soil type detailed Bio1 Bio2 Bio3 Bio4 Bio5 Bio6 Bio7 Bio8 Bio9 Bio10 Bio11 Bio12 Bio13 Bio14 Bio15 Bio16 Bio17 Bio18 Bio19Larix kaempferi Belgium CRNFB Vonêche 0.01 50.0444 4.9667 370 Dystric Cambisol Cambisol stony loam Medium (18% < clay < 35% and sand > 15%,or clay < 18% and 15% < sand < 65%)Deep (80 - 120 cm) Very deep ( > 120 cm) Low (1-2%) Medium (50 - 75 %) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) High (140 - 190 mm/m) Very high ( > 190 mm/m) 84.04 79.68 33.96 5682.32 211.07 -21.5 232.57 19.71 69.93 155.71 11.04 1044.04 106.36 71 10.68 302.14 235.32 262.25 286.43Larix kaempferi Denmark UoC (H):B-27 Kronheden 60 a 1 56.49 8.35Larix kaempferi France INRA Orléans - INRA 0.49 47.82 1.9 106 FLAT Gleyic Luvisol Luvisol residual loam Medium (18% < clay < 35% and sand > 15%,or clay < 18% and 15% < sand < 65%)Deep (80 - 120 cm) Moderate (40 - 80 cm) Low (1-2%) Medium (50 - 75 %) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Medium (15-40 cmol(+)/kg)High (140 - 190 mm/m) Medium (100 - 140 mm/m) gravel/sandy soil with low wat108.813 90 36.375 5633.19 244.875 1.25 243.625 73 71.5 180.625 35.625 645.25 64.125 47 8.0625 170.75 147.625 153.125 162.313Larix kaempferi France INRA 5.LEU-VG-001_302 Vayrieres 5 44.6 1.35 250 S Orthic Luvisol Luvisol ferruginous residual clay Coarse (clay < 18 % and sand > 65 %)Very deep ( > 120 cm) Very deep ( > 120 cm) very low (<1%) High ( > 75 %) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Medium (100 - 140 mm/m) High (140 - 190 mm/m) rocky clay soil 120.179 104.75 40 5575 262.75 4.3929 258.357 56.8929 106.821 191.286 47.6429 832.464 83.4643 52.5357 11.9643 227.321 190.857 198.107 219.429Larix kaempferi France INRA 5.3002.01_03 1.5 47.83 2.73 150 FLAT Dystric Podzoluvisol Podzoluvisol residual loam Coarse (clay < 18 % and sand > 65 %)Deep (80 - 120 cm) Moderate (40 - 80 cm) Low (1-2%) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) High (140 - 190 mm/m) High (140 - 190 mm/m) on limestone (Cretacic), pH 6 109.364 91 36 5741.59 246.864 0.2273 246.636 166.455 71.8182 182.636 34.7727 670.955 67.6364 46.4545 9.1364 179.409 148.136 167.955 167.864Larix kaempferi France INRA 2.3002.03_02 Arfons 4.44 43.43 2.13 710 E Orthic Luvisol Luvisol micaschist Coarse (clay < 18 % and sand > 65 %)Deep (80 - 120 cm) Very deep ( > 120 cm) very low (<1%) High ( > 75 %) High ( > 50 %) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Medium (100 - 140 mm/m) High (140 - 190 mm/m) deep sandy clay soil on metamo112.727 93.4545 36.0909 5700.45 254.273 -0.0909 254.364 133.273 185.636 186.545 40.6364 860.182 88.8182 47.1818 14.2727 240.636 184.182 187.636 224.818Larix kaempferi France INRA 2.3002.03_01 Croze 1.9 45.8 2.18 740 W Leptic Podzol Podzol granite Medium (18% < clay < 35% and sand > 15%,or clay < 18% and 15% < sand < 65%)Deep (80 - 120 cm) Very deep ( > 120 cm) Medium (2-6%) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) High (140 - 190 mm/m) High (140 - 190 mm/m) forest brown soil on granit be 85.2712 98.2373 39.7966 5390.32 222.712 -22.7458 245.458 107.068 45.8136 154.271 16.8136 933.576 102.525 65.2373 13.2542 259.831 202.186 241.644 223.729Larix kaempferi France INRA 2.3002.02_02 1.85 45.98 4.43 750 SW Dystric Cambisol Cambisol acid to intermediate plutonic rocksMedium (18% < clay < 35% and sand > 15%,or clay < 18% and 15% < sand < 65%)Moderate (40 - 80 cm) Very deep ( > 120 cm) Low (1-2%) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) High (140 - 190 mm/m) High (140 - 190 mm/m) forest brown soil on sandstone93.2115 87.6538 33.0962 6129.98 237.115 -22.7308 259.846 154 26.5962 171.923 14.0577 844.115 93.6731 52.1538 18.3269 248.404 167.712 244.25 170.115

Species Country Organization National test ID Locality Area (hectares) Latitude Longitude Aspect Soil1 Soil2 Soil3 Soil4 Soil5 Soil6 Soil7 Soil8 Soil9 Soil10 Soil11 Soil12 Soil13 Soil type detailed Bio1 Bio2 Bio3 Bio4 Bio5 Bio6 Bio7 Bio8 Bio9 Bio10 Bio11 Bio12 Bio13 Bio14 Bio15 Bio16 Bio17 Bio18 Bio19Larix kaempferi Belgium CRNFB Vonêche 0.01 50.0444 4.9667 370 Dystric Cambisol Cambisol stony loam Deep (80 - 120 cm) Very deep ( > 120 cm) Low (1-2%) Medium (50 - 75 %) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) High (140 - 190 mm/m) Very high ( > 190 mm/m) 84.04 79.68 33.96 5682.32 211.07 -21.5 232.57 19.71 69.93 155.71 11.04 1044.04 106.36 71 10.68 302.14 235.32 262.25 286.43Larix kaempferi Denmark UoC (H):B-27 Kronheden 60 a 1 56.49 8.35Larix kaempferi France INRA Orléans - INRA 0.49 47.82 1.9 106 FLAT Gleyic Luvisol Luvisol residual loam Deep (80 - 120 cm) Moderate (40 - 80 cm) Low (1-2%) Medium (50 - 75 %) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) High (140 - 190 mm/m) Medium (100 - 140 mm/m) gravel/sandy soil with low wat108.813 90 36.375 5633.19 244.875 1.25 243.625 73 71.5 180.625 35.625 645.25 64.125 47 8.0625 170.75 147.625 153.125 162.313Larix kaempferi France INRA 5.LEU-VG-001_302 Vayrieres 5 44.6 1.35 250 S Orthic Luvisol Luvisol ferruginous residual clay Very deep ( > 120 cm) Very deep ( > 120 cm) very low (<1%) High ( > 75 %) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Medium (100 - 140 mm/m) High (140 - 190 mm/m) rocky clay soil 120.179 104.75 40 5575 262.75 4.3929 258.357 56.8929 106.821 191.286 47.6429 832.464 83.4643 52.5357 11.9643 227.321 190.857 198.107 219.429Larix kaempferi France INRA 5.3002.01_03 1.5 47.83 2.73 150 FLAT Dystric Podzoluvisol Podzoluvisol residual loam Deep (80 - 120 cm) Moderate (40 - 80 cm) Low (1-2%) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) High (140 - 190 mm/m) High (140 - 190 mm/m) on limestone (Cretacic), pH 6 109.364 91 36 5741.59 246.864 0.2273 246.636 166.455 71.8182 182.636 34.7727 670.955 67.6364 46.4545 9.1364 179.409 148.136 167.955 167.864Larix kaempferi France INRA 2.3002.03_02 Arfons 4.44 43.43 2.13 710 E Orthic Luvisol Luvisol micaschist Deep (80 - 120 cm) Very deep ( > 120 cm) very low (<1%) High ( > 75 %) High ( > 50 %) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Medium (100 - 140 mm/m) High (140 - 190 mm/m) deep sandy clay soil on metamo112.727 93.4545 36.0909 5700.45 254.273 -0.0909 254.364 133.273 185.636 186.545 40.6364 860.182 88.8182 47.1818 14.2727 240.636 184.182 187.636 224.818Larix kaempferi France INRA 2.3002.03_01 Croze 1.9 45.8 2.18 740 W Leptic Podzol Podzol granite Deep (80 - 120 cm) Very deep ( > 120 cm) Medium (2-6%) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) High (140 - 190 mm/m) High (140 - 190 mm/m) forest brown soil on granit be 85.2712 98.2373 39.7966 5390.32 222.712 -22.7458 245.458 107.068 45.8136 154.271 16.8136 933.576 102.525 65.2373 13.2542 259.831 202.186 241.644 223.729Larix kaempferi France INRA 2.3002.02_02 1.85 45.98 4.43 750 SW Dystric Cambisol Cambisol Moderate (40 - 80 cm) Very deep ( > 120 cm) Low (1-2%) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 50 %) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) Low ( < 15 cmol(+)/kg) High (140 - 190 mm/m) High (140 - 190 mm/m) forest brown soil on sandstone93.2115 87.6538 33.0962 6129.98 237.115 -22.7308 259.846 154 26.5962 171.923 14.0577 844.115 93.6731 52.1538 18.3269 248.404 167.712 244.25 170.115

262 field trialsSpecies Country Organization National test ID Locality Nb of GU Nb of plants test unit Survival Diameter Height Biomass Bud flush Bud set Flowering phenology Flowering quantity Stem quality Branching Wood anatomy Wood physical quality Wood chemical quality Biological resistance insects Biological resistance pathogens Abiotic resistance wind Abiotic resistance cold Abiotic resistance drought Other Description of other

Larix kaempferi Belgium CRNFB 104-401/26-27/S01-01Vonêche 79 1833 XLarix kaempferi Denmark UoC (H):B-27 Kronheden 60 a 23 300Larix kaempferi France INRA 1.3002.01_01 FD Coat-An-Noz 10 25 X X X X X XLarix kaempferi France INRA 2.3002.02_02 Ronno/St Apollinaire 44 47 X X X X XLarix kaempferi France INRA 2.3002.03_01 Croze 41 53 X X X X game damageLarix kaempferi France INRA 2.3002.03_02 Arfons 39 50 X X X X XLarix kaempferi France INRA 5.3002.01_03 Fond de la Montagne 12 20 X X

Experimental data

Ecological data

Measurement data

Search for gu present in different tests sites through the synonymous search

Synonymous issue

• This new table allows connecting the same GU recoded differently by several partners (e.g. IUFRO trials / EU-trials, etc)

• Interest: find out which genotypes have been commonly tested, by who, where and when ; find out shared gu in collections, etc

Need

1) to identify shared material (susceptible to be used by others)

2) to find out correspondance betw. material,

3) to prepare Excel file

Synonym head Synonym1 Synonym2 Synonym3 Synonym4 Synonym5

Synonym6

Synonym7

Synonym8

GR

OU

P_N

AM

E

SP

EC

IES

_ID

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

N

NB

_SY

N

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

CO

UN

TR

Y

NA

TIO

NA

L_ID

How to organise all this ?

• Synonym group/description• Synonym head: national GU code of the donor• Synonyms: national GU codes of receivers

Synonymous issue

Synonymous issue

• -9999 issue

• Mandatory fields

Field_trials DATA, search for -9999 in Mandatory Fields 72 Records

countrynational_test_id

municipalityorganization_id

species_id

year_of_plantation

duration area latitude longitude spacingnumber_of_genetic_units

number_of_blocks

number_of_plants_plot

number_of_plants_test_unit

design_id

7.4700.ORLEANS_PC01P

OT Ardon 42 2001 L -9999 47.82 1.9 variable 22 0 1 -9999 OTCRASELIPA

V2190 Alife 53 1990 L 1 -9999 -9999 3 x 4 20 3 50 3000 CRS21F781A4 Vaggeryd 42 1980 L -9999 57.5 13.9 -9999 0 0 -9999 -9999 RIBS21F891114

0 -9999 42 1989 L 0.1 55.9 13.1 2.0 x 2.0 4 2 -9999 32 RIB05171MA-

003 Senec 42 1974 L 4.05 48.25 17.36 6x8 36 0 -9999.00 713 OT

05172SE-001 -9999.00 42 1981 L 4 -9999 -9999 -9999.00 36 0 -9999.00 -9999 OTF21MMP La Losa 42 2002 L 2 -9999 -9999 2.5 x 2.5 76 3 4 -9999 RIB

QUERY against Genetic_units for ORIGINE and PROVENANCE dataSome Records out of the Table for Species = Scots Pine

national_id species_idoriginal_cou

ntryoriginal_loc

alityoriginal_pro

venanceoriginal_latit

udeoriginal_lon

gitudeoriginal_altit

udeprovenance

_countryprovenance

_localityregion_of_provenance

provenance_latitude

provenance_longitude

provenance_altitude

1000 42 DE NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL DE NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL

1360+GHD 42 RU Roscinskaya

Daca St.

Petersburg 60.25 29.9 NULL RU

Roscinskaya Daca

St. Petersburg

60.25 29.9 NULL

1361+GHD 42 RU Kondeszkoe St.

Petersburg 59.97 33.5 NULL RU Kondeszkoe

St. Petersburg

59.97 33.5 NULL

1362+GHD 42 RU Serebryansk

oe Luga 58.83 29.12 NULL RU

Serebryanskoe

Luga 58.83 29.12 NULL

1376+GHD 42 HU Pornoapati Pornoapati 47.33 16.47 NULL HU Pornoapati Pornoapati 47.33 16.47 NULL1380+GHD 42 DE NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL DE Minden 85105 NULL NULL NULL1381+GHD 42 DE NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL DE Wolfgang 85105 NULL NULL NULL

1382+GHD 42 CN NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL CN Wan Shou

Shan Arboretum

Peking NULL NULL NULL

1383+GHD 42 DE NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL DE Gartow 85103 NULL NULL NULL

3300/59X224 42 DE NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL DE NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL

992 42 DE NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL DE NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL997 42 DE NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL DE NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL

ARDENNES 42 NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL BE NULL NULL 50.77 4.43 110

B 2514 42 DE Neubrück,

329b1 Kolpin NULL NULL NULL DE

Waldsieversdorf

85104 52.56 14.1 50

B 2524 42 DE Neubrück,

329b1 Kolpin NULL NULL NULL DE

Waldsieversdorf

85104 52.56 14.1 50

B 2527 42 DE Neubrück,

329b1 Kolpin NULL NULL NULL DE

Waldsieversdorf

85104 52.56 14.1 50

BABENHAUSEN, ABT.

316 42 NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL DE NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL

BABENHAUSEN, ABT.

316, BAUM 9 42 NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL

BLECKEDE, ABT. 287 42 NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL DE NULL NULL 53.2 10.83 NULL

21230028 42 NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL21230031 42 NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL

4700.C.00272 42 PL Taborz Tolim 53.82 19.95 120 PL Tolim NULL 53.82 19.95 1204700.C.00273 42 PL Taborz Sardol 53.82 19.95 120 PL Sardol NULL 53.82 19.95 1204700.C.00278 42 PL Taborz Perku 53.82 19.95 120 PL Perku NULL 53.82 19.95 1204700.C.00279 42 PL Taborz Perku 53.82 19.95 120 PL Perku NULL 53.82 19.95 120

Show-case issue

• Objective: – Inform about existence of DB– Draw attention of potential users

• Some attractive pages needed– What is in?– What can be done with it? Can I find relevant

information for my research?– Good examples needed.

Up-dating issue

• To be of interest a database must be kept alive:– Regularly up-dated– Completed when too many missing information– Think about new developments (link with GIS

tools ?)

Prunus avium – genetic trials across Europe

Euforgen

Deadlines:

– Input of data for other species?– Synonymous tables– DB content analysis– Show-case for internet