Treatment options and new agents for serious Gram-negative infections Yehuda Carmeli, MD, MPH Tel Aviv Medical Center, Israel
Treatment options and new agents for serious Gram-negative
infections
Yehuda Carmeli, MD, MPH
Tel Aviv Medical Center, Israel
I have received grants, honoraria, travel support, consulting fees, and other forms of financial support from:Achaogen Inc, Allecra Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, BasileaPharmaceutica LTD, Biomerieux SA, Cepheid, DaVolterra, Durata Therapeutics, Inc, Intercell AG, Merck & Co. Inc, PPD, Proteologics, Rempex Pharmaceuticals, Rib-X Pharmaceuticals, Syntezza Bioscience LTD, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd.
Disclaimer
CRE infections are associated with severe outcomes
Ben-David D. CMI 2011
CR A. baumannii BSI is associated with 14 days 50% CFR
Nutman A. CMI 2014
Colistin efficacy is doubtful
Yahav D et al. Clin Microbiol Infec 2012;18:18–29
All-cause mortality: Colistin vs. comparator antibiotics for sepsis
• 125 patients with KPC KP BSI
• The overall 30-day mortality – Monotherapy: 54.3% – Combination: 34.1%
Combination Therapy
Tumbarello M et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:943–950Akova M et al. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:439–448
Highest failure
Colistin/rifampin
Colistin/carbapenem
Colistin/tigecycline
Colistin/sulbactam
Colistin/aminoglycosides
Colistin/mixed comparator
Paul M et al. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:2305–2309
Activity of novel agentsAcinetobacterPseudomonas
spp.CarbapenemasesAmpCESBL
MBLOxa48-likeSerine (KPC)
-++----+Ceftolozane-tazobactam*
-++-+++++++Ceftazidime-avibactam*
-++++++++++Aztreonam-avibactam
-+-++++++Imipenem-relebactam(MK7655)
-+-++++++Meropenem-RPX7009
++-++++++++++Eravacycline
+++++++++++++Plazomicin
*FDA approved
• Novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin with potent anti-pseudomonal activity
Ceftolozane (CXA-101)
v
Zhanel GG et al. Drugs. 2014;74:31–51Shlaes D. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1277:105–114
Ceftolozane-tazobactam
• Ceftolozane is hydrolysed by ESBLs and carbapenemases and by some strains harboring stably derepressed AmpC β-lactamases
• The addition of tazobactam provides protection from some of these enzymes
Zhanel GG et al. Drugs. 2014;74:31–51aFixed tazobactam concentration of 4 mg/L
Zhanel GG et al. Drugs. 2014;74:31–51
• In December 2014 ceftolozane-tazobactam was approved by the FDA to treat cIAI & cUTI• Warning: Decreased efficacy in patients with baseline CrCl of 30 to ≤50 mL/min
Popejoy M et al. ID week 2014; abstract 260http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/206829lbl.pdfaComparators include levofloxacin for cUTI and meropenem for cIAI
Stachyra T et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:5132–5138
Avibactam (NXL104) is a strong inhibitor of class A and class C enzymes
KPC carbapenemase
Avibactam – spectrum of β-lactamase inhibition
Older TEM & SHV, ESBLs: new TEM, SHV
& CTX-M
Class C Class D Class B
Amp C NDM-1VIM-1
OXA
b-lactamases
Metallo-enzymesSerine enzymes
Class A
CMY, FOX, DHA
Avibactam
Available BLIs
Lagacé-Wiens PRS et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:2434–2437
Avibactam in P. aeruginosa126 European isolates
Levasseur P et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:1606–1608
Effect of avibactam on CAZ MIC of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
Livermore D et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:390–394
0
5
10
15
20
25
<0.06 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 >512
MIC (mg/L)
Nu
mb
er
of
iso
late
s
CeftazidimeCeftazidime +avibactam 4 mg/L
MICs of 42 KPC-producingK. pneumoniae collected in the US
Endimiani A et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:3599–3601
Current status
• FDA approved ceftazidime-avibactam* based on Phase 2 data– cIAI, in combination with metronidazole compared with meropenem
– cUTI including pyelonephritis compared with imipenem
– Warning: decreased clinical response in patients with baseline CrCl30-50 mL/min
• Phase 3 studies– cIAI (completed)1
– Resistant pathogen study (completed)2
– cUTI (ongoing)
– VAP (ongoing; ELF penetration 30-35%)
1. Mazuski JE et al. ECCMID 2015; 01912. Carmeli Y et al. ECCMID 2015; LBEV0366a
* In patients who have limited or no alternative treatment options
Clinical response rate (95% CI) at TOC visit(mMITT population)
Per-patient microbiological response rate (95% CI) at TOC visit (mMITT population)*
REPRISE: resistant pathogen study
*Per-patient microbiological outcomes for cIAI patients were presumed from clinical response
Carmeli Y et al. ECCMID 2015; LBEV0366a
• Open-label Phase 3 study of ceftazidime-avibactam and best-available-therapy (97% carbapenems) in patients with cIAI or cUTI caused by CAZ-R Gram-negative pathogens
Imipenem-cilastin + relebactam (MK7655)
• PK phase 1 study - completed1
• Phase 2 studies of imipenem-cilastin + relebactam (MK7655)vs imipenem-cilastin
– cIAI completed2
– cUTI ongoing3
• ELF 53% of plasma1
1. Rhee EG. ICAAC 2013; abstract A-10282. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01506271
3. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01505634
Livermore D et al. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:2286–2290
Among 1101 P. aeruginosa isolates from the SMART surveillance program• 67% susceptible to imipenem (MIC 2)• 365 non-susceptible
• 205 (56%) rendered susceptible by MK 7655
Badal R et al. ICAAC 2013; abstract E-1163Livermore D et al. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:2286–2290
Meropenem-RPX7009
• RPX7009 is a cyclic boronateβ-lactamase inhibitor
– Initially developed byRempex to be combinedwith biapenem, but later combined with meropenem
With permission from Hecker SJ. J Med Chem. 2015;Epub ahead of print. Copyright (2015) American Chemical Society
With permission from Hecker SJ. J Med Chem. 2015;Epub ahead of print. Copyright (2015) American Chemical Society
* *
*9f = meropenem-RPX7009
In vitro activity of meropenem-RPX7009 against100 KPC-producing strains
Antimicrobial
agent
Cumulative % inhibited at MIC (µg/mL):
0.25≤ 0.5 1 2 4 8
Meropenem 0.0 1.0 3.0 9.0 24.0 42.0
MER/RPX 4 mg/L 74.0 78.0 83.0 88.0 92.0 96.0
MER/RPX 8 mg/L 79.0 85.0 91.0 97.0 98.0 98.0
Castanheira M et al. IDWeek 2014; abstract 257
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02168946
Efficacy & Clinical development
• Phase 3 started late 2014meropenem 2 g - RPX7009 2 g IV, q8h:
– Efficacy, safety and tolerability in patients with cUTI or pyelonephritis(vs. piperacillin-tazobactam)
– Pathogen-directed study in approximately 150 patients with suspected or known serious infections due to CRE across multiple indications (vs. BAT)
• A Tetraphase compound– synthetic tetracycline (fluorocycline)
– both IV and oral formulations
• Active against1: – Gram +, including MRSA and Enterococci
• MIC50 ≤0.06 mg/L; MIC90 ≤0.25 mg/L
– Enterobacteriaceae including carbapenemase-producers (including MBLs)• MIC50 ≤0.25 mg/L; MIC90 ≤4 mg/L
– Acinetobacter, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia but not P. aeruginosa• MIC50 ≤0.5 mg/L; MIC90 ≤2 mg/L
– Various anaerobes including Bacteroides fragilis
• In evaluation in Phase 3 – cIAI – enrolled 541 patients, met primary endpoint vs. ertapenem2
– cUTI – Failed in reaching the primary outcome non-infriority against Levofloxacin1. Sutcliffe JA et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:5548–5558
2. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT018448563. Globe news wire Sept. 8, 2015
Eravacycline
Plazomicin
• Semi-synthetic aminoglycoside
• Stable against all transferable aminoglycosides modifying enzymes
– however, ribosomal methyltransferases (carried in NDM strains)lead to resistance
Galani I et al. J Chemother. 2012;24:191–194
Plazomicin clinical development
• Completed successfully Phase 2 cUTI study1
• Conducting superiority Phase 3 study in bacteraemia & VAP by CRE2
– comparing plazomicin and colistin
– in combination with either meropenem or tigecycline
• ELF penetration 13%
1. Riddle V et al. ICAAC 2012; abstract L2-2118a2. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01970371
Summary
• New treatment modalities are emerging
• New BL-BLI combinations expand treatment options against MDR Gram-negative organisms– Improved activity against Pseudomonas, ESBLs, AmpC & carbapenemases
• Treatments against MDR Acinetobacter are required
• Clinical efficacy still needs to be demonstrated in difficult to treat infections