Page 1
jcperezvarela@ yahoo.es www.ortodonciaperezvarela.com
facebook Clinica Ortodoncia Perez varela
Juan Carlos Pérez Varela Santiago de Compostela
Spain
Treatment of Skeletal Class III in Adult Orthodontic Patients : Camouflage vs. Orthognathic Surgery. Is There Another Alternative?
Page 2
50 % of my patients are ADULTS
Page 3
20% of whom are Skeletal Class III
Page 4
3 QUESTIONS : My objective in this conference is to answer
1. Should all of them be treated with Orthognatic Surgery ?
2. Which cases can be treated only with orthodontics ?
3. Is there any other alternative ?
Page 5
- Ellis E; Mc.Namara JA; Am. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.1984- Guyer EC; Ellis E; Mc Namara JA;
Angle Orthod. 1986- Mouakeh M; Am. J. Orthod.2001
Skeletal Class III. Adults CRANEOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY
If we analyze the craneofacial morphology of Skeletal Class III Adult Patients, we are going to
see TWO main points in most articles -
1. The maxilla is shorter and retrusive 2. The mandible is larger and normally positioned
Page 6
Facial AestheticsFor this reason, some patients
have problems with their facial aesthetics. -Concave Profile
-Lack of malar support -Prominent Chin
Page 7
Many of the patients have dental compensations such as upper incisors proclined and lower incisorsretroclined that can sometimes compromise the dental
compensation/camouflage.
Page 8
1. Should all of them be treated with Orthognatic Surgery ?
NO I believe this is only necessary for patients with an initial Wits Appraisal of less than -7
mm and patients who are looking for significant facial changes.
Page 12
Significant Facial Changes
Le Fort Advancement
Page 17
2. Which cases can be treated only with orthodontics ?
I believe that this is possible in patients with a Wits Appraisal greater than -7 mm who do not want significant facial
changes and who don´t have excessive retroinclination of the lower
incisors
Page 20
- Skeletal Class III
SNA : 77º ANPg : - 4 mm Wits : -7mm -Dolicofacial SN/ GoGn 40º -MAX.INC. INCLINAT 117º -MAND. INC. INCLINAT 94 º
-Man.Inc.Compensat. -1/ Apg 9 mm
Page 25
Is there any other alternative without the retrusion of the lower
incisors?
YES!
I believe we can perform SARPE+ FORWARD TRACTION.
Page 26
The indications for me to perform this is when the patient doesn´t want any significant facial changes, they reject orthognatic
surgery, they want a cheaper alternative, they prefer local anesthesia and
camouflage is not indicated
INDICATIONS FOR SABAME
+ Maxillary Protraction
Page 27
Alicia, 29 years Smile Aesthetics , Occlusion
Page 30
Transversal Hypoplasia of the Maxilla
Page 31
WITS -10 mmShe rejected Orthognatic Surgery
Sagittal Hypoplasia of the Maxilla
Page 35
SARPE Local Anesthesia and
sedation
UPPER MINIPLATES LOWER SCREWS
Page 40
Complete Occlussion
3D models
Page 43
WITS -10 mm WITS -3 mm
Page 45
LinkedIn Juan Carlos Perez Varela INSTAGRAM
dr.juan.carlos.perezvarela
jcperezvarela@ yahoo.es facebook ortodoncia perezvarela facebook Juan Carlos Perez Varela
Santiago de Compostela SPAIN