Top Banner
Transportation Infrastructure Outlook Ed McSpedon, HNTB May 2, 2012
7
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Transportation Infrastructure Outlook Ed McSpedon, HNTB May 2, 2012.

Transportation Infrastructure Outlook

Ed McSpedon, HNTB

May 2, 2012

Page 2: Transportation Infrastructure Outlook Ed McSpedon, HNTB May 2, 2012.

2

Voters Support Infrastructure

• People are willing to pay when they see what they will get and that there will be accountability to deliver

• More than 70 percent of local infrastructure funding issues have passed in the last five years

70%

Page 3: Transportation Infrastructure Outlook Ed McSpedon, HNTB May 2, 2012.

Americans Willing to Pay for Transportation Improvement

Almost 3 in 4 (74 percent) Americans would be willing to spend more on various transportation expenses or taxes if the money was put toward long-term transportation improvement. Among those wiling to spend more, the most popular expenditure would be a flat-rate increase: tolls on roads and bridges (44 percent).*

* According to HNTB’s America THINKS survey series research.

Page 4: Transportation Infrastructure Outlook Ed McSpedon, HNTB May 2, 2012.

Americans Willing to Spend to Save Time in Traffic

More than half (58 percent) of Americans would pay more each month to reduce the time they spend in traffic by 20 percent. These citizens would spend an average of $13 per month – more than $150 a year – to make it happen.*

* According to HNTB’s America THINKS survey series research, Feb. 2011

Page 5: Transportation Infrastructure Outlook Ed McSpedon, HNTB May 2, 2012.

Americans Support Improvements to Major Corridors

Nearly 7 in 10 (69 percent) of Americans are either somewhat or extremely likely to support funding long-term improvements to the six interstate highways designated as “Corridors of the Future” by the U.S. Department of Transportation.*

* According to HNTB’s America THINKS survey series research.

Page 6: Transportation Infrastructure Outlook Ed McSpedon, HNTB May 2, 2012.

6

• 19 “self-help counties” represent 81 percent of the population of the state, or roughly 30 million people

• Taxes are authorized up to 1 cent (1 percent) and are subject to two-thirds voter approval and usually have a duration of 20-30 years

• Represent a total investment of more than $140 billion

Residents of 19 California Counties Voted to Impose Sales Taxes to Improve Transportation

County DurationEst. 2010

Revenue ($m)

Alameda 2002-22 122

Contra Costa 1989-2034 65

Fresno 1987-2027 57

Imperial 1990-2050 10

Los Angeles (1% tax) Permanent 1,333

Los Angeles (Measure R) 2009-2039 667

Madera 1990-2027 7

Marin 2005-25 21

Orange 1991-2041 266

Riverside 1989-2039 133

Sacramento 1989-2039 95

San Bernadino 1990-2040 142

San Diego 1988-2048 223

San Francisco 1990-2034 78

San Joaquin 1991-2041 43

San Mateo 1989-2033 64

Santa Barbara 1990-2040 29

Santa Clara 1996-2036 167

Santa Clara (BART ext. 0.125%) 2013-43 (Est) 42

Sonoma (0.25% Tax) 2005-25 18

Sonoma-Marin (SMART 0.25%) 2009-29 29

Tulare 2007-37 23

TOTAL $ 3,634.00

Page 7: Transportation Infrastructure Outlook Ed McSpedon, HNTB May 2, 2012.

Transportation Infrastructure Outlook

Ed McSpedon, HNTB

May 2, 2012