Top Banner
Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit Anna C. McCreery Ohio State University Rich Quodomine NY Department of Transportation Association of American Geographers’ annual meeting, Tampa, FL, 8 April 2014
24

Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Feb 20, 2017

Download

Science

Anna McCreery
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Transportation Ecoefficiency and

Economic Structure

Six case studies of occupational patterns and

public transit

Anna C. McCreery

Ohio State University

Rich Quodomine

NY Department of Transportation

Association of American Geographers’ annual meeting, Tampa, FL, 8 April 2014

Page 2: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Transportation Ecoefficiency

� Environmental impact of transportation, per unit of travel

� Measured by proxy as the index of:� Population density

� % of commuters driving to work alone (sign reversed)

� % of commuters taking public transit

� % of commuters walking or bicycling

McCreery, A.C. 2013. “Transportation Ecoefficiency: Quantitative Measurement of Urban Transportation Systems with Readily Available Data” Environment and Planning A 45(8): 1995-2011.

Page 3: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Measuring TE: Pop. Density

� Proxy for travel distance

� Associated with other built environment features that affect travel

Page 4: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Measuring TE: Commuting

� Commuting:� A major share of personal travel

� The most basic and fixed form of daily travel

� Likely to co-vary with other trips

� Different commute modes have vastly different environmental impacts:� Driving alone is very eco-inefficient

� Public transit, walking, and cycling are generally more ecoefficient modes

Page 5: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Economic Structure and TE

� Industrial shift - is the transition from “rustbelt” to stronger post-industrial associated with changes in TE?

Page 6: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Economic Structure and TE

� Does the creative class create transit-friendly neighborhoods?

Page 7: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Economic Structure and TE

� Do “Eds and Meds” encourage healthier transportation?

Page 8: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Predicting TE: ColumbusVariable Beta

% of workers in the Construction industry -0.130***

% in the Manufacturing industry -0.126***

% in Finance, insurance, real estate, rental industries -0.093**

% in Education, health care, social assistance industries 0.091*

% in Management, business, science, arts occupations -0.156*

% of population under 18 years old -0.165***

% of adults below the poverty level 0.711***

% of population over age 25 with a bachelor's degree 0.251***

% female -0.071*

a p<0.1, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001

N=431 R2 = 0.767

Page 9: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Predicting TE: ClevelandVariable Beta

% of workers in the Construction industry -0.088**

% in Finance, insurance, real estate, rental industries 0.090*

% in Education, health care, social assistance industries 0.167***

% in Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation and food service industries

0.141***

% in Other services industries 0.154**

% of the population under 18 years old -0.109**

Per capita income, in 2012 inflation-adjusted $ -0.115*

% of adults below the poverty level 0.530***

% of population over age 25 with a bachelor's degree 0.173***

% unemployed 0.123*

a p<0.1, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001

N=632 R2 = 0.665

Page 10: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Predicting TE: Pittsburgh

a p<0.1, * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001 N=702 R2 = 0.739

Variable Beta

% of workers in the Manufacturing industry -0.074*

% in the Information industry 0.099***

% in Finance, insurance, real estate, rental industries 0.204***

% in Professional, scientific, management, administrative, waste management industries

0.125***

% in Education, health care, social assistance industries 0.321***

% in Arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation and food service industries

0.197***

% in Other services industries 0.060*

% in Management, business, science, arts occupations 0.145**

% of the population under 18 years old -0.100***

Per capita income, in 2012 inflation-adjusted $ -0.142**

% of adults below the poverty level 0.516***

% Private wage and salary workers 0.040a

Page 11: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Columbus, OH TE Scores

Page 12: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Columbus, OHEds and Meds

Page 13: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Cleveland, OHTE Scores

Page 14: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Cleveland, OHEds and Meds

Page 15: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Pittsburgh, PATE Scores

Page 16: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Pittsburgh, PAEds and Meds

Page 17: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Eds and Meds

Page 18: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

A look at Buffalo Occupations as a TE Explainer

� Buffalo = “Classic Rust Belt City”

� Marked by:� Significant population decline:

� 560,000 [1950 pop] to 265,000 [2010 pop]

� Significant suburbanization

� Industrial patterns change: not only do they leave the city, the occupations change from industrial type to medical

� Eds and Meds take over core wealth generation

Page 19: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Buffalo Occupational Shift and Transit Modal Choice

•Poverty in Blue Areas•Wealthier areas in pale yellow / brown•Medical management represented as red dots, yellow with medical service occupations•Correlated with wealthier districts and less available transit

Page 20: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Baltimore

� Previously declining industrial city, recently re-strengthened through downtown core development

� Emphasis on Eds and Meds sector: Johns Hopkins, UMBC and Towson St

� Maryland Institute College of Arts

� Innovation from 1990s: Buy a house for extremely little, but one must improve it and own for a minimum of 5 years

Page 21: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Baltimore by Creative Class

� http://bit.ly/1kEmW0o

� Still classic ring city issues

� However, core concentrated downtown redevelopment with Eds and Meds, plus adding high-end entertainment (Football, Baseball, a first-rate aquarium) anchor the high-income producer

Page 22: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Cautionary tale: Boston

� Boston is a city that� Is traditionally centered around Eds, Meds and

finance

� Has extensive, well-known transit system

� Has an established national and international tourism base that did not need to be re-developed

� Has a very diverse economy and as Eds and Meds has driven growth since 1975, the basis for growth has stayed intact

� Transit System has generally expanded to meet demands of local populace, including current westward development

� End Result: Boston isn’t a very good study

Page 23: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Conclusions

� Transportation Ecoefficiency and resultant Analytics with Occupations, particularly in shifting economies, can show where demand for “greener transport” is increasing… and perhaps even more importantly, what occupations it may favor

� It is important to establish these “deeper analytics” so that planners and policymakers can develop transportation policy in line with economic growth

Page 24: Transportation Ecoefficiency and Economic Structure: Six case studies of occupational patterns and public transit

Contact Information

Anna McCreery, [email protected]

Richard D. Quodomine, MA, AAGTwitter: @[email protected]