FINAL REPORT MARCH 2005 REPORT NO. 04-04A TRANSPORTABILITY TESTING OF THE M872 A4 SEMI-TRAILER, TP-94-01, REVISION 2, JUNE 2004 "TRANSPORTABILITY TESTING PROCEDURES" Prepared for: Distribution Unlimited: Program Executive Office Combat Support & Combat Service Support 6501 E. 11-Mile Rd ATTN: SFAE-CSS-TV-TR Mail Stop 440 Warren, MI 48397-5000 VALIDATION ENGINEERING DIVISION MCALESTER, OKLAHOMA 74501-9053
31
Embed
Transportability Testing of the M872 A4 Semi-Trailer, TP-94-01 ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
FINAL REPORTMARCH 2005
REPORT NO. 04-04A
TRANSPORTABILITY TESTINGOF THE M872 A4 SEMI-TRAILER,
TP-94-01, REVISION 2, JUNE 2004"TRANSPORTABILITY TESTING PROCEDURES"
Prepared for: Distribution Unlimited:
Program Executive OfficeCombat Support & Combat Service Support6501 E. 11-Mile RdATTN: SFAE-CSS-TV-TRMail Stop 440Warren, MI 48397-5000
DFEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYUS ARMY DEFENSE AMMUNITION CENTER
I C TREE ROAD
REPLY TO MCALESTER, OK 74501-9053ATTENTION Of
SJMAC-DEV (70-1pp) 13 April 2005
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION
SUBJECT: Report No. 04-04A, "Transportability Testing of the M872 A4 Semi-Trailer,TP-94-01, Revision 2, June 2004 "Transportability Testing Procedures"
1. Enclosed please find subject report dated March 2005.
2. The POC is the undersigned, SJMAC-DEV, DSN 956-8908.
FOR THE DIRECTOR:
Encl /JERR W. BEAVERas Chief, Validation Engineering Division
DISTRIBUTION:
Commander,US Army Tank-automotive and Armaments Command (SFAE-CSS-TV-TR), John Yee,Mail Stop 440, 6501 E. 11-Mile Road, Warren, MI 48397-5000
Transportation Engineering Agency (MTTE-DPE) Mr. Lloyd Cato, Military TrafficManagement Command, 720 Thimble Shoals Blvd, Suite 130, Newport News, VA 23606-2574
ARDEC Logistics Research & Engineering Directorate (AMSRD-AAR-AIL-P) Al Galonski,Bldg 455, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5001
U.S. Army Joint Munitions Command (AMSJM-TI) Richard Nesbitt, Rock Island, IL61299-6000
ARDEC Logistics Research & Engineering Directorate (AMSRD-AAR-AIL-P-(R))Dave Piskorik, Rock Island, IL 61299-7300
U.S. Army Aviation & Missile Command (AMSAM-MMC-MM-DT), Redstone Arsenal, AL35898-5070
U.S. Army Materiel Command (AMSAM-LG), 5001 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA22333-0001
(CONT)
SJMAC-DEVSUBJECT: Report No. 04-04A, "Transportability Testing of the M872 A4 Semi-Trailer,TP-94-01, Revision 2, June 2004 "Transportability Testing Procedures"
DISTRIBUTION (CONT):~/rector,
Defense Technical Information Center, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 0944, Fort Belvoir,VA 22060-6218
Commandant,U.S. Army Ordnance Missile & Munitions Center & School
(ATSK-CMT-Z), James Kisner, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35897-6095U.S. Army Transportation School (ATSP-CDT), Fort Eustis, VA 23604
2
"AVAILABILTY NOTICE
A copy of this report will be furnished each attendee on automatic distribution.
Additional copies or authority for reprinting may be obtained by written request
from:
DirectorU.S. Army Defense Ammunition CenterATTN: SJMAC-DEV1 C Tree Road, Bldg. 35McAlester, OK 74501-9053
DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS
Destroy this report when no longer needed. Do not return.
Citation of trade names in this report does not constitute an official endorsement.
The information contained herein will not be used for advertising purposes.
REPORT NO. 04-04A MARCH 2005TRANSPORTABILITY TESTING OF THE
M872 A4 SEMI-TRAILER, TP-94-01, REV. 2, JUNE 2004"TRANSPORTABILITY TESTING PROCEDURES"
ABSTRACT
The U.S. Army Defense Ammunition Center (DAC), Validation Engineering
Division (SJMAC-DEV), was tasked by the Program Manager Trailers to conduct
transportability testing on the M872 A4 Semi-Trailer manufactured by Talbert
Manufacturing, Inc., Rensselaer, Indiana. The testing was conducted in
accordance with TP-94-01, Revision 2, June 2004 "Transportability Testing
Procedures." The testing included Hazard Course, Road Trip, Panic Stops, and
Washboard Course.
The objective of the testing was to evaluate the M872 A4 Semi-Trailer when
transportability tested in accordance with TP-94-01, Revision 2, June 2004.
The significant changes in the currently tested trailer over the previously
tested trailer included:
a. Relocation of the tie-down rings from the trailer deck to the trailer side rail.
b. Removal of the steel side channels and replacing them with wood deck
boards. The trailer now has a full width wood deck.
The M872 A4 Semi-Trailer tie-down rings and anchors performed adequately
during testing. The test loads were effectively and efficiently secured utilizing the
tie-down provisions as designed. As currently designed, the M872 A4 Semi-
Trailer is adequate for transport of bulk ammunition.
Prepared by: Reviewed by:
PHILIP W. BARICKMAN JERRY W. BEAVERLead Validation Engineer Chief, Validation Engineering Division
U.S. ARMY DEFENSE AMMUNITION CENTER
VALIDATION ENGINEERING DIVISIONMCALESTER, OK 74501-9053
REPORT NO. 04-04ATRANSPORTABILITY TESTING OF THE M872 A4 SEMI-TRAILER,
TP-94-01, REVISION 2, JUNE 2004 "TRANSPORTABILITY TESTINGPROCEDURES"
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART PAGE NO.
1. INTRO DUCTIO N ............................................................................................. 1-1A. BACKG RO UND ........................................................................................... 1-1B. AUTHO RITY ................................................................................................ 1-1C . O BJECTIVE ................................................................................................ 1-1D. CO NCLUSIO N ............................................................................................ 1-1
3. TEST EQ UIPM ENT .......................................................................................... 3-1
4. TEST PRO CEDURES .................................................................................... 4-1A. RAIL TEST ................................................................................................. 4-1B. O N/O FF ROAD TESTS .............................................................................. 4-3
1. HAZARD CO URSE .............................................................................. 4-32. ROAD TRIP ......................................................................................... 4-43. PANIC STO PS ...................................................................................... 4-44. W ASHBOARD CO URSE ..................................................................... 4-4
C. O CEAN-GO ING VESSEL TEST ............................................................... 4-4
5. TEST RESULTS .............................................................................................. 5-15.1 TESTING DATE -28 O CTO BER 2004 .......................................................... 5-1
A. O N/O FF ROAD TESTS .......................................................................... 5-21. HAZARD CO URSE ............................................................................. 5-22. ROAD TRIP ......................................................................................... 5-33. PANIC STO PS .................................................................................... 5-34. HAZARD CO URSE ............................................................................ 5-35. W ASHBOARD CO URSE .................................................................... 5-3
B. CO NCLUSIO N .......................................................................................... 5-4
5.2 TESTING DATE -2 NO VEM BER 2004 .......................................................... 5-5A. O N/O FF ROAD TESTS ............................................................................ 5-5
1. HAZARD CO URSE ............................................................................. 5-52. ROAD TRIP ......................................................................................... 5-63. PA NIC STO PS .................................................................................... 5-74. HAZARD CO URSE ............................................................................ 5-75. W ASHBOARD CO URSE .................................................................... 5-7
B. CO NCLUSIO N .......................................................................................... 5-8
5.3 TESTING DATE -3 NO VEM BER 2004 .......................................................... 5-9
6. DRAW ING S ...................................................................................................... 6-1
PART 1 - INTRODUCTION
A. BACKGROUND. The U.S. Army Defense Ammunition Center (DAC), Validation
Engineering Division (SJMAC-DEV), was tasked by the Program Manager Trailers to
conduct transportability testing on the M872 A4 Semi-Trailer manufactured by Talbert
Manufacturing, Inc., Rensselaer, Indiana. The testing was conducted in accordance
with TP-94-01, Revision 2, June 2004 "Transportability Testing Procedures."
B. AUTHORITY. This test was conducted lAW mission responsibilities delegated by
the U.S. Army Joint Munitions Command (JMC), Rock Island, IL. Reference is made to
the following:
1. AR 740-1, 15 June 2001, Storage and Supply Activity Operation.
2. OSC-R, 10-23, Mission and Major Functions of U.S. Army Defense Ammunition
Center (DAC) 21 Nov 2000.
C. OBJECTIVE. The objective of the testing was to evaluate the M872 A4 Semi-
Trailer, when transportability tested in accordance with TP-94-01, Revision 2, June
2004.
D. CONCLUSION. The significant changes in the currently tested trailer over the
previously tested trailer included:
1. Relocation of the tie-down rings from the trailer deck to the trailer side rail.
2. Removal of the steel side channels and replacing them with wood deck boards.
The trailer now has a full width wood deck.
The M872 A4 Semi-Trailer tie-down rings and anchors performed adequately during
testing. The test loads utilized were effectively and efficiently secured using the tie-
down provisions as designed. As, currently designed the M872 A4 Semi-Trailer is
adequate for transport of bulk ammunition.
1-1
PART 2 - ATTENDEES
ATTENDEE MAILING ADDRESS
Philip Barickman DirectorDSN 956-8992 U.S. Army Defense Ammunition Center(918) 420-8992 ATTN: SJMAC-DEV
1 C Tree Road, Bldg. 35McAlester, OK 74501-9053
Patrick Dougherty DirectorDSN 956-8225 U.S. Army Defense Ammunition Center(918) 420-8225 ATTN: SJMAC-DET
1 C Tree Road, Bldg. 35McAlester, OK 74501-9053
John Yee U.S. Army Tank-automotive andDSN 786-6561 Armaments Command(586) 574-6561 6501 E. 11-Mile Road
SFAE-CSS-TV-TR, Mail Stop 440Warren, MI 48397-5000
1. Figure 5 lists the average speeds of the test load through the Hazard Course.
2. Inspection following the completion of Pass #3 revealed that the pods had
moved 0.25 inches toward the passenger side.
5. WASHBOARD COURSE:
Remark: Inspection following the completion of the Washboard Course revealed
that the pods moved 0.25-0.75 inches toward the passenger side and 0-0.25
inches toward the front.
5-3
Photo 3. Washboard Course Testing of the M872 A4 Semi-Trailerwith the MLRS Pods.
B. CONCLUSION:
1. The semi-trailer tie-down rings and anchors performed adequately during
testing.
2. The wood deck width on the semi-trailer was adequate to support the
MLRS Pods.
5-4
5.2
Testing Date: 2 March 2005
Test Specimen: M872 A4 Semi-Trailer
Payload: Eighteen Pallets of 155MM Separate Loading Projectiles
Test Gross Weight: 54,740 pounds (including the M872 A4 Semi-trailer, M1088
tractor, and the 155MM SLP)
Payload Weight: 15,540 pounds
Photo 4. 155MM Separate Loading Projectileson the M872 A4 Semi-Trailer
A. ON/OFF ROAD TESTS.
1. HAZARD COURSE.
5-5
Photo 5. Hazard Course Testing of the M872 A4 Semi-Trailerwith the 155MM Separate Loading Projectiles
IPass No. IElapsed Time IAvg. Velocity (mph)f1 29 Seconds 5.3
2 28 Seconds 5.5
Figure 6.
Remarks:
1. Figure 6 lists the average speeds of the test load through the Hazard Course.
2. Inspections following Pass #2 revealed that the payload had moved 0.25
inches toward the front on the driver's side.
2. ROAD TRIP:
Remarks:
1. The Road Trip was conducted between the Road Hazard Course Passes #2
and #3.
2. Inspection following the completion of the Road Trip revealed no additional
movement.
5-6
3. PANIC STOPS:
Remarks:
1. The panic stops were performed during the Road Trip.
2. Inspection following the completion of the panic stops revealed no additional
movement.
4. HAZARD COURSE:
M Pass No. IElapsed Time IAvg. Velocity (mh)3 25 Seconds 6.14 27 Seconds 5.7
Figure 7.Remarks:
1. Figure 7 lists the average speeds of the test load through the Hazard Course.
2. Inspection following Pass #3 revealed that the payload had moved 0.25-0.5
inches toward the rear of the trailer.
3. Inspection following Pass #4 revealed that the payload had moved an
additional 0.25 inches toward the rear of the trailer on the passenger side.
5. WASHBOARD COURSE:
Remark: Inspection following the completion of the Washboard Course testing
revealed that the payload had moved an additional 0.5 inches toward the rear on
the driver's side and 0.5 inches toward the front on the passenger side. The
payload also moved 0.25 inches toward the passenger side.
5-7
Photo 6. Washboard Course Testing of the M872 A4 Semi-Trailer withthe 155MM Separate Loading Projectiles
D. CONCLUSION:
1. The semi-trailer tie-down rings and anchors performed adequately during
testing.
2. The flat wooden deck on the trailer had sufficient width so that the 155MM
Separate Loading Projectiles could be loaded six pallets per row in accordance
with drawing 1948 4901/1 "Loading Tie Down, and Unloading Procedures for
Separate Loading Projectiles in/on Tactical Vehicles," page 18.
5-8
5.3
Testing Date: 3 March 2005
Test Specimen: M872 A4 Semi-Trailer
Purpose: Determine if two Container Roll-In/Out Platforms (CROPs) could be
secured to the M872 A4 Semi-Trailer.
Sequence of Events:
a. The empty CROP was loaded onto the front of the trailer using a
forklift. The CROP could not be secured to the M872 A4 Semi-
Trailer due to the CROP interfered with the forward deck recessed
tie-downs.
b. The empty CROP was loaded on the rear of the trailer using a
forklift. The CROP interfered with using the recessed tie-downs in
the center of the trailer. Also, at the end of the trailer there was not
sufficient room to secure and tighten the chains and binders.
c. An empty CROP was loaded onto the trailer using the PLS Truck.
The CROP could not be placed far enough forward to secure the
CROP at the rear of the trailer. The CROP interfered with using the
recessed tiedowns at the end of the trailer.
d. A loaded CROP (24,700 pounds) could not be loaded onto the
trailer using the PLS Truck. The rollers on the CROP would drop
into the channel of the recessed tie-down rings and misalign when
the CROP contacted the end of the deck boards. The CROP could
not be properly aligned on the trailer and overhung the side of the
trailer.
5-9
Photo 7. Interference of CROP with the Recessed Tiedowns
Observation: As designed, the M872 A4 Semi-Trailer cannot transport two
CROPs.
5-10
PART 6- DRAWINGS
The following drawing represents the load configuration that was subjected to
the test criteria.
6-1
MLRS
LOADING, TIEDOWN, AND UNLOADINGPROCEDURES FOR THE ROCKETPOD/CONTAINER (RP/C) FOR THEMULTIPLE LAUNCH ROCKET SYSTEMIN/ON TACTICAL VEHICLES
ITEN PAGE(S)
EN6tAL NOTES AND IMATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS- - -- - - - - - - - - --- 2CONTAINER DETAILS- - - - - - - - --------------------------------- 3LOAD GUIDANCE NOTES AND CHARTS- ---- 4-3TIEDOWN PROCENUES FOR ONE CONTAINER ------------------------ 6TIEOOWN PROCEIUES FOR TWO CONTAINES (METHOD I) -- 7TIEDOWN PROCURES FOR TWO CONTAINES (MIETHOD II) -8aTIEDOWN PROCEOLURES FOR THE CONTAIlSNES------ 9TIEDOWN PROCJMRES FOR FOUR ANIOR EIGHT CONTAINERS (METH0D I) ---- 10,11TIEDOWN PROCES FOR FOUN ANDA'R EIGlT CONTAINERS- (METHOD II) ---- 12,13PECIAL TIEDOIN PRDCURES FOR LOAnINS ONE THOUGH
FOUR CONTAI"NS ON THE I0-TON N'77AUl HEIITT -------------- ---- 14-1ISPECIAL TIDOWN PRONURES FOR LOADING ONE ANe WOCONTAINE=S ON THE 1 1-TON HE19 T ------------------------- 19-20SPECIAL TIBIOWN PROCEDURES FOR LOADING ONE THOUGHFOUR CONTAII•RS ON THE 11-TON IIUSAI HEMAT -------------------- 21-24DETAILS ------------------------------------------------- 25-32
U.S. ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND DRAWING.ra U.S. mw Now 1UI iK -o
B. LEON"W J. SIMONS
myý IN WIWSDU Gm wa, U.S. OZYIII IVuuzON Imi m om II IIIII-I
= •"FEBRUARY 1982U.S. fmu muim MO SDu•.2w• wL I l IIII
DO NOT SCALE I 19 48 8152 GIII7RSISEE THE REVISION LISTING ON PAGE 3
PROJECT WI 725-60
LIF/r .W FITTING UUTEUTT EAI ASINLE~TL
PAE 3. PSITON @ ASUUYASM DEANCOHM3
50*3~~~~~a POSk 5 ~l I NF~ATE 4.BTYPE it MON muM 1ES :
(70OKUT LOCATIM USMN, AS T liSEEm *wLOAD GJIDNCE SIWP 5
EAC SINAMT). IBLT( ).DlA
SNDICATE MSTHE KAIEY U AMSE 4 US
DOWN TRIA , ( SlPOINAI' TILY A (B.MO (SE T. CTAITLAFT TIEWN ASSEMBV. ONSPRI TO. PR-OWS PRW AT TMN PROMUS U
INMCOS ADUSTALE, SlOE O ADJAENTF TO AH UIFT/T1W FMITIDSCLFF SLEEES ON WD U TiEW lOIN CONTAINR ATD IN L0INEERICALYSTRAP TIMM ASOMY SEE SECIAL NOTES AND 5 NPAGOE 13.FST
TOAGE V513. PSTION 0 ADSSEBYAH A T O! IF N8)AAS PSIN L STANDM VRAE T TINE PLCEATTOLABOTTOM OF ASMSLY SE PCA E ON PON.
-0 STRAP 'UEOO ASSBY (4 RO). DTLLASlOK VIL CEEONSIST TOF AW STRAUWEPS 11 UOE7Oie WT EINCIRCL ATL NE CONTAINER ATE. THMESIVORTE NON-RAIDET. DII C S1~TOA SF TIEEAT MW MONS. TAKE UP MISSM 14iI STRAP 5NOE RATCHET TIGHT. MWM. DOTE 0 MSTHE
SE 11RLMM'r FN XON PAME 2.
PAMAT LOATON MIGK TOTIFl A TETEI3 AN OOPPOSIT SIM CF;a.P~lMSTA Slr
1. A MAXDI LO O IMW CUITAII ItSH INA 22-1/2-15N 1M1 NME1NIUl NYIUVl dUSIC x OFW WIDE BY 34, LIG. - X G' X 30* QI lM)..• /,/ " EACH PmB: TO THE
2. 1HE WD.E 3S0N VAS 30AU AS TiW MLY AND XofPMimvn'OdVROWS 011OF OW ODWSUSS 3i4O1 HIM A SLWMET IF NAILS.UWMITY OF TIMM AI.IM LOCATIO ON THE 16L. MAYa UB 70 T1O WUT 1. LOWD 14.
3. FOIT1 11i0 STACKS OF W pNA F"I AT ALOCATII THAT VIJ. ALLOV SM A•S 10 a 1 r-V X F XK W (2 M).P31130r AT 116E AWMI•TE LOCATIN SUM. NOTE NAIL BE0 PIKE TO THE"INXT 116 AFT W OF 7W6 COADM M POANTZI 2' X W PIEM V,•10d1MA U6 IUARD 00 OF 71E WOU0.E. AISlN TH1T NAILS.IN fADC~M PlS O 6 101r CWNTAMU AM NATO 116MA INJ 1411 ON OTHTOP 116W CIAIW.
4. P3115611 TWSl1P AUJKLIE A AM TOSPAGNASSNJE C AS L~DUl 0 1111. 4 .rxrxw I
S. 116 H T A1 Y A P • -W iN TO PIt U.116 SM F~M s TO I0 ZSTII1T F sITH6 W4ADSHS - WdPUWT. PU-P31113 amVE6E FLOOR ANAOR 91 TOP OF A ON3TAlW AS LOGAOB 1ON PI I=.
SPMUC ASSEISY C
6. THE 1AW ASO.Y A PIKES• ME 1 =MlO TO SPAPERA-SYT
CIETW OP 11O LlPT/r M5 FI17105 0 LATERALLYADACWlA DIMI. FI.-POIITiN 16M3PIES AT11TE LCATIUOS SWO AS LGAOM PR031.
7. IFTELODIS WINRM M O ANU HIMEOUMU SE1 N= 7 ON PAS 4, NOTE 11AT THE
AIlWIU LOA D6 116 3 W)2 II. 1M6T7S OFS ICWADMi. DE TO COATADW I51.
0. A TOTAL. OF a STRAP TIMM A6.SSLIESWE -OEDR 6 LOAD M1. ABOVE.
iETADW E.Oi, 2 X 4° X 5--,.7 (C 2 li).NAIL To 10116 IIMT PiK•E V-lod NAILS.
LOADING, TIEDOWN, AND UNLOADINGPROCEDURES FOR SEPARATE LOADINGPROJECTILES IN/ON TACTICAL VEHICLES
WMAL m.0115 A MMII *l4. SPICIFICATIONSIlWMID INi""SICUEMIT OF PALIETI3D SWAPNAU LOA01NG 1•1SC.... 6-19
SWCUUMINIET 0 L005 SEPARIA 10MO1G P*OACTItLS . .. 9SiCURKIM OF LO K A0I0 N PAUTlInD SIP IN TRIUC,
TACTICAL. HEAVY EPANOID MOIIiUTY I HNI1T).WICKr M" NION M40 w ~4
SICUMMT OF LOM lMIMI SIP IN 7W".OOS PROJ'CTILI IMStRAINT SYSM I LPS)" V 44-Si
TI T PROCEURO,$S CPICTE WITHIN THIS DIAWING ARE Lth
FOR I-HIGIWAY USL HOWM. THEY MAY ALSO KUM FOR N•41IGHWAY USE, IF DESIKA i i - i
_________ ARMY AMC DRAWING__....... •JANUARY 1986
19 401/1CA
00MC CA01- 2CAE 70
LpaIIC UMOIP
A. MAMMA= LO" OP SONIrf-A PA MUSP UWm SIP U SHOW 04 ASSIIIIMA, 3640M. MIS, NW#W ONAONIU OP 4W~b1 (@0 IV4 VAN. S4 MOPS 4 WOW. I WMO40 A MIRE @•AsWVlI SOmS
w N. @m va, I POP aNcf. w vaUN "m 41. €. e uMaa UN4A•141E1UICM A rvWA O4IY, AND SS OOIrla DWAONIC, WUG u4WI A 10S41CN GUAM4Nff OP TMC04 AN-. I5, k=ATM £4045 tHE IM WAY N VIM POP A MAlL CP FPMIML LOe.
3. A ?MTAL OP flVWV4WO WEE SelF 1IN AMEOMUS All ROO1MSWC
4. THE we4 36556 MIAP It poll45l APMINIS vwid flm LOOM OPMIE WIt#. MEG, THI @J&D4W OP ~MUM No4 UNO MWY UCMwie s AS Ens. POP lUMPS. "mO "ON mn" M115365FWJE PALIUS VeN APOs @45 vOw OP P55 PMLES. in msPM MOP
U @4 Mel 4.
6-
MOM 15656 iOWO @ 55I OP Nin @43 O P US
WiSE, TOA UEP I M ASI ( 116555lI), K mE0 AP 1t4 UN".1.
1 SU Sl 0=I MI. SESIE $PON" mm 01
I MOPS 9 Allnd•1Is S* @41Mel S.4 ALOPE ?la AIIS 19I @4 PASS . MO
lm(fi=A m•II•wfr).oww"II)
(55 GE~In MOPSA Sm Is am powS.
5565 OP.~( We sum wwoHE ASO. cC aW 4m. wwSML wme SNA vO one4MOM A 1(6054 MESCON 04 obe OP ofta 4084 fWlO PAULSE@
OP. TOP Ah =&A" MCHO 0 WMUP ENDS SME IN TH MEK.U. TiI3L~~~TAK UP15 INII EHOP IN MAP50me01311101m N L. sall 13 Sf5
NON W6 '3 MiS ON AO# 2. 50M1 MOPS .MIS '0to o W MNl NS. 914 MOPS ( @4 POM 1. NUAS VIO PER MOP S Si