I N THEUNITED ST TES DISTRI T OURT FORTHE E STERN DI STRI T OF VIRGINI LEX NDRI DIVISION PRO-FOOTBALL, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) as e No. 1:14-cv-01043-GBL.IDD ) AMANDA BLACKHORSE, et al., ) ) MEMOR NDUMOPINION N D OR R THIS MATTER isbeforethe Cour t on twosetsofcross-motions forsummary judgme nt . First, Plaint iff Pr o- Foo tball, Inc . ( PFI ), Defendant s Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs- Cl oud, Phi llipCover, Jil lia n Pappan, and Cou rt ne y Tsotig h ( Blackhorse De fe ndants ), and the United States of America filed cross-motions for summary ju dg menton PFI s claims challenging the co nsti tu tional it y of Se ction 2(a)ofthe Lanham Act (C ounts III- VI) (Docs. 54, 105, and 108). Second, Bl ac kh or se De fendan ts and PFI filed cros s- motions for summary judgme nt on PF I claims contesting the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board s ( TTAB ) Order cancelling the registrations of six of PFI s trademarks onthe grounds that they consisted of matter that may dis par age Native Am ericans and bring them intocon temptordis r epute, and thatthedefense of laches does not bar the claims (Counts I, II, and VII) (Docs. 69 and 79). This case concerns Blackhorse Defendants petition to cancel the registration ofsix trademarks owned by PFI on the grounds that the marks consisted of matter that may disparage a subs tantial composite of Native Americans and bring them into contempt or disrepute under Section 2(a) o f the Lanham Act, 15 U. S. C. § 1052(a ) ,at the time of thei r re gi str at io ns (196 7, 1974 , 1978, and 1990).