Trademark law and cyberspace #1 (Lecture at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 2014)

EmmanuelGILLET,PhDEmail:[email protected]:CCBY-NC-ND4.0|2014


1. A Large Diversity of Situations 2. Conflicting rights 3. Trademarks and Auctions Websites 4. Trademarks and Search Engines 5. Liability of ISPs

Trademark Law and Cyberspace #1

EmmanuelGILLET,PhD|CCBY-NC-ND4.0|[email protected]|14March2014,TheHongKongPolytechnicUniversity

1. A Large Diversity of Situations ▪ Social Networks ▪ Auction websites ▪ Search engines ▪ Domain names



2. Conflicting rights 2.1. Trademark rights v. Freedom of expression





2. Conflicting rights 2.2. Trademark rights v. Trademark rights

Internet Rule / First come first served

Tip! Register the name of the trademark with the major social networks, blogs providers, etc.



3. Trademarks and Auctions Websites

Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc. [No 04 Civ. 4607 (RJS) (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2008)]




v.




Legal Aspects of E-Commerce ⑥  Trademarks in Cyberspace (part 1) (7 March 2014)

3. Trademarks and Auctions Websites Court’s decision

¡  “the Court finds that eBay’s use of Tiffany’s trademarks in its advertising, on its homepage, and in sponsored links purchased through Yahoo! and Google, is a protected, nominative fair use of the marks.”

¡  On the contributory liability question, the court reiterates that the standard is “whether eBay continued to supply its services to sellers when it knew or had reason to know of infringement by those sellers.” eBay’s response to take down notices satisfied this standard. “The law does not impose liability for contributory trademark infringement on eBay for its refusal to take such preemptive steps in light of eBay’s “reasonable anticipation” or generalized knowledge that counterfeit goods might be sold on its website. Quite simply, the law demands more specific knowledge as to which items are infringing and which seller is listing those items before requiring eBay to take action.” The court brushed aside Tiffany’s complaints about the policing costs it had to bear.

¡  The court rejects dilution because Tiffany hasn’t shown a likelihood of dilution; and even if it did, eBay’s use would be protected as a nominative use.



Internet Statistics for 2012 Internet users worldwide 2.4 billion (1/3 of the world population) Webpages 46 billion Searches on Google 1.2 trillion

4. Trademarks and Search Engines



Scenario#1




Sou

rce:

Goo

gle




Sou

rce:

Goo

gle




Sou

rce:

Goo

gle




Sou

rce:

Goo

gle




Scenario#2




Sou

rce:

Goo

gle




Sou

rce:

Goo

gle













First cases (all in France)

Nanterre court of first instance, 13 October 2003, Ste Viaticum v. Google

Paris court of first instance, 4 February 2004, Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Google

Nanterre court of first instance, 14 December 2004, CNNRH v. Google et al.




USA

UK

AustriaBelgiumDenmarkGermanyHungaryItalyTheNetherlandsPolandSwedenSwitzerland

Australia

Spain

Source:D

arts-IP

India




Potential legal issues




Legal issue for advertisers Infringement of trademarks

rights

4. Trademarks and Search Engines > Legal Issues for Advertisers



Legal issue for advertisers Infringement of trademarks

rights






European Law (3 major decisions) ▪  CJEU, Google v. Louis Vuitton Malletier, Viaticum and CNRRH (23 March

2010), Joined Cases C-236/08 to C-238/08 ▪  CJEU, Portakabin v. Primakabin (8 July 2010), C-558/08

▪  CJEU, Interflora v. Marks & Spencer (22 September 2011), C-323/09


u  Ordinary Trademarks “Trademarks owners are entitled to prevent a competitor from advertising – on the basis of a keyword which is identical with the trade mark and which has been selected in an internet referencing service by the competitor without the proprietor’s consent – goods or services identical with those for which that mark is registered, where that use is liable to have an adverse effect on one of the functions of the trade mark”. Trademarks owners are not entitled to prohibit an advertiser from advertising the resale of goods manufactured and placed on the market in the European Economic Area by that proprietor or with his consent, unless there is a legitimate reason, which justifies him opposing that advertising, such as use of that sign which gives the impression that the reseller and the trade mark proprietor are economically linked or use which is seriously detrimental to the reputation of the mark.




u  Well-known Trademarks Owners of well-known trademark are entitled to prevent a competitor from advertising on the basis of a keyword corresponding to that trade mark, which the competitor has, without the proprietor’s consent, selected in an internet referencing service, where the competitor thereby takes unfair advantage of the distinctive character or repute of the trade mark (free-riding) or where the advertising is detrimental to that distinctive character (dilution) or to that repute (tarnishment). Owners of well-known trademark are not entitled to prevent advertisements displayed by competitors on the basis of keywords corresponding to that trade mark, which put forward an alternative to the goods or services of the proprietor of that mark”.




Legal issues for Google

4. Trademarks and Search Engines > Legal Issues for Google



Infringement of Trademark Rights by Google?

4. Trademarks and Search Engines > Legal Issues for Google > Infringement of TM Rights?



CJUE, Google v. Louis Vuitton Malletier, Viaticum and CNRRH (23 March 2010), Joined Cases C-236/08 to C-238/08 An internet referencing service provider which stores, as a keyword, a sign identical with a trade mark and organizes the display of advertisements on the basis of that keyword does not use that sign within the meaning of Article 5(1) and (2) of Directive 89/104 or of Article 9(1) of Regulation No 40/94.




Liability as an ISP?

4. Trademarks and Search Engines > Legal Issues for Google > Liable as an ISP?



Article 14 of the Directive 2000/31/EC on electronic commerce

Hosting

1. Where an information society service is provided that consists of the storage of information provided by a recipient of the service, Member States shall ensure that the service provider is not liable for the information stored at the request of a recipient of the service, on condition that: (a) the provider does not have actual knowledge of illegal activity or information and, as regards claims for damages, is not aware of facts or circumstances from which the illegal activity or information is apparent; or (b) the provider, upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove or to disable access to the information. (…)




CJEU, Google v. Louis Vuitton Malletier, Viaticum and CNRRH (23 March 2010) Joined Cases C-236/08 to C-238/08

“Article 14 of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (‘Directive on electronic commerce’) must be interpreted as meaning that the rule laid down therein applies to an internet referencing service provider in the case where that service provider has not played an active role of such a kind as to give it knowledge of, or control over, the data stored. If it has not played such a role, that service provider cannot be held liable for the data which it has stored at the request of an advertiser, unless, having obtained knowledge of the unlawful nature of those data or of that advertiser’s activities, it failed to act expeditiously to remove or to disable access to the data concerned.”




CJEU, Google v. Louis Vuitton Malletier, Viaticum and CNRRH (23 March 2010) Joined Cases C-236/08 to C-238/08

Principle: -  the ISP cannot be held liable Exceptions: -  The ISP can be held liable if:

-  It has played an active role on the creation, choice… of the data (here, keywords and description of the advertisement)

-  Having knowledge of the unlawful nature of the data, it failed to act expeditiously to remove or to disable the data




Cooperation between ISPs and trademarks owners 2013: Memorandum of Understanding between Taobao and Louis Vuitton 2014: EU Memorandum of Understanding between various ISPs and various trademarks owners (version 2)


