Vinay Devaki Elfego Cruz Mehernosh H. Amroli TOYOTA The Accelerator Crisis
Jan 03, 2016
Vinay DevakiElfego Cruz
Mehernosh H. Amroli
TOYOTAThe Accelerator Crisis
Intro
Toyota’s History 3 Priorities The Toyota Way & Toyota Production System Issues Drivers Violation of Principles Recommendations Lessons learned Q&A
Toyota’s History1933 Toyota Motor Corporation established as division of Toyoda Automatic Loom Works.
1937 Toyota Motor Corporation became an independent company.
1957 Established first sales, marketing and distribution subsidiary in US called Toyota Motor Sales, (TMS)
1984 NUMMI (Joint Venture with GM) opened doors
1995 Losing market share and posting it’s first loss since 1950 due to weak Japanese economy and trade friction with the US.
2008 #1 in Global Sales Volume
2009 employed 8,900, supervised 14 regional offices throughout 50 US statesProduced 10 million cars and added 17 production sites. (added the capacity of a Chrysler-sized company)
Toyota’s 3 Priorities
Safety Quality Volume
The Toyota Way
Mandates planning for the long term
Highlighting problems instead of hiding them
Encouraging team work with colleagues and suppliers
Instill self-critical culture that fosters continuous and
unrelenting improvement
Toyota Production System (TPS)Precursor of “lean manufacturing” principles originally called “Just-In-Time”(JIT) production.Designed to remove unnecessary waste from the production (muda) and manufacturing process. (ji-doka)Significantly reduce lead time and production costs
Issues1999 Oil Sludge
2002- 3,400 warranty claims
2007 7.5 million customers to be reimbursed for repairs and incidental expenses
going back as far as 1999.
2009 – Accelerator
Recalled 3.8 million U.S. Vehicles claiming that floor-mat problems could cause
the accelerator to be stuck
2010 recall continued, 2.3 million more
Suspended sales and production of popular models , another 1.1 million. Total
of 8.8 million.
Strategic Drivers
Deviated focus from Safety and Quality to Volume, Cost Reduction and
Growth
Non-family leadership: Concerned on cutting costs and parts to manipulate
short term gains
Rapid establishment of plants and operations around the world; unable to
instill company culture
Poor management of public relations
Strategic DriversLoss of focus on Safety & Quality due to numerous changes in leadership between 1996-2008 with reprioritization of goals (Family vs. Non-family)
`33-`95 Toyoda Family`96-`98 Hiroshi Okuda
Toyota 2005 Vision – Harmonious growth through global master plan and global profit management
`99-`04 Fujio ChoConstruction of Cost Competitiveness for the 21st Century (CCC21)Cut components in car by 50%In 2002, the 2005 Vision changed to Global Vision 2010 : Take 15% of Global Market Share
`05-`08 Katsuabi WatanabeValue Innovation (VI) strategy: Create savings by making the entire process cheaper and faster, further trimming parts, production costs, and time to market.Implemented a high-level of so-called “Customer First” management committee that had the task to coordinate engineering, production, sales, and service issues related to quality. The initiative was never really pushed and scrapped in early 2009.
`09 to current Akio Toyoda (Back to Family)
“Root cause of problems was that the company was hijacked, some years ago, by anti-family, financially oriented pirate.” – Former CEO of TMS, Jim Press (April 2010 in WSJ article)
Strategic Drivers
Rapid Growth
Toyota produced 5.2 million cars in 58 production sites in
2000. But by 2009 increased capacity to produce 10
million cars
Added 17 production sites
TMM employed more than 8,900 people and supervised 14
regional offices throughout the 50 states
Basically added the capacity of a Chrysler-sized company.
Strategic Drivers
Source : www.econed-il.org/icee/docs/2011/zhao.pptx
Media/Press Received unprecedented negative attention from mass media (news, consumer reports and individual blogs)
Structural Drivers
Lack of Communication
Localized consumer data gathered in US and sent to Japan, not
communicated back to US org.
US plants concentrated on advertising and service, financial and technical
matters controlled in Japan
“…every Toyota has a president, and one can’t tell another what to do.” by John Jula (p.8)
Denial
Blamed suppliers and consumers
Unable to discover root cause
Structural Drivers
Centralized design; putting all decision making
in Japan
Lack of communication between US and Japan;
also between the Sales and Dealership
organizations and the engineering group
Cultural Drivers
Japanese culture (p.10)- “based on harmony, consensus decision-
making, and blame avoidance…” – avoid public conflict
negotiations
Managers who disagreed kept silent so not to upset the
relationship
Aggressive global growth strategy stretched it’s supply chain erroneously.
The company began to depend on suppliers outside Japan and outside the
Keiretsu structure, non-Japanese suppliers with which Toyota did not have
prior working experience
Violated Principles Analysis
1. Base mgmt. decisions on a LT philosophy, even at the expense of ST financial goals
• Curbing production• Construction of Cost Competitiveness for the 21st Century 1. designers scrutinized grip-handles mounted above doors 2. reduced no. of parts required by 85% from 34 to 5 3. cut procurement cost by 40% and installation time by 75%• Value Innovation Strategy-aggressive version of CCC21 1. further trimming parts and production costs
11. Respect your extended network of partners and supplier by challenging them and helping them improve
• Toyota told the gov. the pedals were the problem
• Toyota’s pedal supplier, CTS Corp., had to defend itself
• Toyota made no attempt to collaborate with supplier in order to address its suspicion
9. Grow leaders who thoroughly understand the work, live the philosophy and teach it to others.
• Katsuabi Watanabe emphasized CCC21’s $2.2b cost reductions, which he led
• Watanabe further set out to achieve more cost savings thru Value Innovation strategy
• Hiroshi Okuda’s Toyota 2005 Vision: global manufacturing network from Argentina to Thailand to U.S.
• Global Vision 2010 targeted 15% global mrkt share by early 2010Leadership Aim
13. Make decisions slowly by consensus, thoroughly considering all options; implement decisions rapidly
• Nonfamily management was determined to accelerate Toyota’s growth with an aggressive globalization strategy
Violated Principles Analysis
14. Become a learning organization through relentless reflection and continuous improvement.
• Denied warranty coverage• Blamed pedal supplier• Blamed owners• Continued cost cutting strategies 1. Construction of Cost Competitiveness for 21St Cent. 2. Value Innovation Strategy• Continued Rapid Expansion 1. Toyota 2005 Vision 2. Global Vision 2010
2. Create a continuous process flow to bring problems to the surface
• 2005 Watanable promoted a Customer First mgmt. committee but was never implemented
5. Build a culture of stopping to fix problems, to get quality right the first time
• Continuous Recalls 1. nearly doubled from 03-04 (975,902 – 1,887, 471) 2. 9/9/09-3.8m claiming floor mat problems 3. 1/21/10-2.3m claiming stuck accelerator pedals
7. Use visual control so no problems are hidden
• I believe that by examining the problems on site can one make decisions from the customer perspective
12. Go and see for yourself to thoroughly understand the situation
• The root-quality problem was never really identified, thus could not be addressed
6. Standardized tasks and processes are the foundation for continuous improvement and employee empowerment
• US plants concentrated on Advertising & Services
• Financial & Technical matters controlled in Japan
What should Mr. Akio Toyoda do?Regain Customer Confidence
Partner with Government and Safety regulators i.e. NHSTA
Marketing Strategies: Loyalty programs, Extended Warrantee, Customer feedback in Designs
Manufacturing Strategy: Obtain Certifications; APICS & ASQ; ISO9000 & TQM
Re-instill company culture & Brand Reputation:
3 Priorities, The Toyota Way, and Toyota Production System
Focus on quality; sales will follow
Enable regional offices to make decisions based on shared feedback from other
regions using Global Knowledge Center (GKC, Torrance, Ca.)
Improve PR practices
What can other companies learn?
Focus on core competency: Brand Strength Quality;
Luxury; Affordability; Sport
Reflect brand implications of Strategies
Structural; Strategic; Cultural
Acknowledge problems timely
Take accountability and responsibility
BOD & CEO Selection; Family vs Non-family
Measure Expansion Goals: LT sustainability
Thank You
Thank You
Q & A