Top Banner
Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science Policy Studies Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1
15

Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science Policy Studies Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

Dec 20, 2015

Download

Documents

Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

Toxics Loading Studies2006 to 2009

• Science Policy

• Studies Action

• Pragmatic progression

• Formal decision process

1

Page 2: Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

Phase 1 Toxic Chemical Loadings to Puget Sound

• Actors: PSAT, Ecology, DoH, U.S.EPA• Money: U.S. EPA NEP Grant

$135,000• Goal: Identify greatest toxic threats

Obtain credible results Develop strategy for action

2

Page 3: Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

Phase 1 Outcomes• Show first PSP results

• Broad participation

• Initial sketch of known/unknown

3

Page 4: Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

Phase 2 Toxic Chemical Loadings to Puget Sound

• Ecology: “What next?”• Springtime money:

U.S. EPA $300KEcology TCP $300KNOAA $ 55K

• No formal process for prioritization

4

Page 5: Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

Phase 2 Projects• Foci:

• Some of the sidelined pathways• Fill gaps• More details for pathways of greater threat

• Leads: Ecology U.S. EPA WDFW NOAA

• Eight Projects: One abandonedOne scope

changed

5

Page 6: Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

Phase 2 Outcomes To-DateA. Roadways & Surface RunoffB. Wastewater DischargersC. Assess Sediment to Biota TransferD. Ocean BoundaryE. Support Human Health Risk AssessmentF. Box ModelG. Develop Toxics Biological Observing System

6

Page 7: Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

7

Phase 3 Toxic Chemical Loadings to Puget Sound

• Ecology & PSP: “What next?”• Intentions:

Align with Action Agenda(not yet written)

Keep momentum U.S. EPA wants funding

to drive actions

Page 8: Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

8

Phase 3 Projects• 17 Proposed Projects• 11 Received Funding (2 only for half)

1 Project Split; 1 Project MergedPlus 1 Project Funded by WA Legislature

U.S. EPA 2008 NEP Grant$1,983,800

U.S. EPA $ 30,000

U.S. EPA (NOAA / USFWS) $ 475,000

Washington Legislature (PSP) $ 310,000

• Project Leads: Ecology U.S. EPA WDFW NOAA U.S.

FWS

Page 9: Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

9

Phase 3 Year 2 Toxic Chemical Loadings to Puget Sound

• Inter-Agency SC: “What next?”

• Action Agenda for guidance• Remainder of U.S. EPA 2008 NEP Grant• PSP needs inventory of toxic chemical

sources by Spring 2010

Page 10: Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

10

PotentialPhase 3 Year 2 Projects

• Only 3 to 6 projects may be funded• Proposals due to U.S. EPA March 1• Proposed projects:• Continuing Year 1 projects (2)• Link Sources to Sound / Synthesis / Education (3)• Air Deposition (2)• Stormwater (2)• Groundwater (2)• Bioaccumulation• Others

Page 11: Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

11

Toxics Loading Hand-Off• From Various Agencies• To PSP Science Panel

• Phase 3 Year 2 decision process will probably still be “pragmatic.”

• Decision process for potential Oct 2009 funding is to be more formal and rely on recommendations of PSP Science Panel.

Page 12: Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

12

Relationships 2/11/2009

Page 13: Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

13

Possible Future Relationships

Page 14: Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

14

James M. Maroncelli

Washington Department of Ecology

[email protected]

360-407-6588

Toxics Loading Project Website – http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/pstoxics/index.html

Page 15: Toxics Loading Studies 2006 to 2009 Science  Policy Studies  Action Pragmatic progression Formal decision process 1.

15