Towards more proactive theories of creative labour: a literature review Ananay Aguilar University of Cambridge 8th June 2015
Towards more proactive theories of creative labour:a literature review
Ananay AguilarUniversity of Cambridge
8th June 2015
individualisation casualisationincreased competition less in exchangesuppression alienation
anxieties are warranted
Angela McRobbie (2001)
'Clubs to companies: notes on the decline of political culture in speeded up creative worlds'
individualisation casualisationincreased competition less in exchangesuppression alienationanxieties are warranted self-exploitation
decline of the indies loss of workplace policies increase of structural divides
individualisation casualisationincreased competition less in exchangesuppression alienationanxieties are warranted self-exploitation
decline of the indies loss of workplace policies increase of structural divides
scepticism ambivalence exploitationoppression
individualisation casualisationincreased competition less in exchangesuppression alienationanxieties are warranted self-exploitation
decline of the indies loss of workplace policies increase of structural divides
scepticism ambivalence exploitationoppression
recombinant culture limitations
individualisation casualisationincreased competition less in exchangesuppression alienationanxieties are warranted self-exploitation
decline of the indies loss of workplace policies increase of structural divides
scepticism ambivalence exploitationoppression
recombinant culture limitationsconstitutive of life leisure maximises
productivity
1. Critical theory approaches
2. Neo-Foucauldian or governmental approaches
3. Liberal democratic theory (?)
Whichever way the art-commerce relation is being reshaped and
configured, the notion that cultural workers are merely the servile
and alienated victims of global capital or, alternatively, self-
governing agents of 'network sociality' is, to put it bluntly, a
fundamentally problematic one given the diversity of business
models and identity positions that now circulate within the
certainly precarious—but also more open and reflexive—cultural
production field. (185)
We need to hold on to the ambivalence of creative work, and to
recognise that firms and other institutions differ in terms of what
kinds of conditions and experiences they make available for their
workers, including how much they respect autonomy and workers'
needs to make good products. This suggests that there is a highly
significant issue for those concerned with equality and social
justice in relation to creative work, which recent critical accounts
from cultural studies may have served to marginalise. (222)
Eleonora Belfiore and Oliver Bennett (2010)
'Beyond the toolkit approach: arts impact evaluation research and the realities of cultural policy-making'
Government officials use research less to arrive at solutions than to orient themselves
to problems. They use research to help them think about issues and define the
problematics of a situation, to gain new ideas and new perspectives. They use research
to help formulate problems and to set the agenda for future policy actions. And much of
this use is not deliberate, direct, and targeted, but a result of long-term percolation of
social science concepts, theories, and findings into the climate of informed opinion.
(137)
Importantly, Weiss’s research on research utilization shows that policy-makers are well
disposed to this “enlightenment” view of research: “usefulness” for them does not
necessarily mean that the findings are going to be immediately implemented, and
“studies that [help] people think in different and innovative ways” hold a significant
appeal for them. (138)
1. Interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial.
2. REF submissions are flexible
3. Let's be propositional
Final reflections
1. Interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial.
2. REF submissions are flexible.
3. Let's be propositional
Final reflections
1. Interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial.
2. REF submissions are flexible.
3. Let's be propositional.
Final reflections