Toward an Improvement-Focused System of Educator Evaluation

Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness

Toward an Improvement-Focused System of

Educator Evaluation

Jennifer HammondMERA Conference

April 30, 2013


Background on MCEE• Established in June 2011 as part of

Michigan’s teacher tenure reform efforts(PA 102 of 2011).

• Council members were appointed in September 2011.

• Legislature appropriated funding in mid-December 2011.

• The MCEE is a temporary commission with a life of no more than two years.


Membership of MCEE• Deborah Loewenberg Ball (chair)

Dean, University of Michigan School of Education• Jennifer Hammond

Principal, Grand Blanc High School• Joseph Martineau (non-voting member)

Executive director, Bureau of Assessment and Accountability, Michigan Department of Education

• Mark ReckaseProfessor, Michigan State University

• Nicholas SheltrownDirector of measurement, research, and accountability, National Heritage Academies

• David VenselPrincipal, Jefferson High School (Monroe, MI)


MCEE ChargeThe MCEE will submit to the State Board of Education, the Governor, and the state legislature a report that identifies and recommends all of the following: 1. A student growth and assessment tool.2. A state evaluation tool for teachers.3. A state evaluation tool for school administrators. 4. Changes to the requirements for a professional

teaching certificate.5. A process for evaluating and approving local

evaluation tools for teachers and administrators that are consistent with the state evaluation tool for teachers and administrators and the act.


MCEE VisionThe Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness will develop a fair, transparent, and feasible evaluation system for teachers and school administrators. The system will be based on rigorous standards of professional practice and of measurement. The goal of this system is to contribute to enhanced instruction, improve student achievement, and support ongoing professional learning.


Why evaluation matters…

• The evidence that skillful teaching has significant impact on students’ learning

• The need for a more systematic way to support improvement of teaching and learning

• Widespread public interest in and concern about K-12 education


The opportunity and the imperative

• The Common Core State Standards

• Broad interest across states in developing systems for educator evaluation

• Educational improvement largely non-partisan issue

• Consult experts (K-12 practitioners, scholars, policy analysts)

• Help to educate others about practice: its requirements and its improvement, and what is involved in evaluating it appropriately

• Build consensus


The challenges1. Choosing tools that are valid, fair, and feasible– Measure the things we actually care about– Measure things that are appropriate to try to

account for– Measure these things validly and reliably– Affordable and doable

2. Building a system that focuses on improving practice – Provides useful feedback– Is linked to effective learning opportunities


Quiz

True or False?Starting in 2013-14 it is recommended that student growth is included in a teacher’s evaluation.


Quiz

True or False?Student growth is to be based on a one year snap shot.


Quiz

True or False?Starting in 2013-14 it is recommended that student growth is included in a teacher’s evaluation.


QuizTrue or False?The year end evaluation for all teachers shall include specific performance goals that will assist in improving effectiveness for the next school year and are developed by the school administrator or his or her designee conducting the evaluation, in consultation with the teacher.


Quiz

True or False?Midyear progress reports are required for first year teachers and those who received a rating of minimally effective or ineffective in the most recent year-end evaluation.


QuizTrue or False?There is a provision allowing for an exemption of student growth data for a particular subgroup of students.


QuizTrue or False?A teacher may request a review of the evaluation and the rating by the school district superintendent.


Quiz

True or False?Much of the legislation regarding teacher evaluation is mirrored for building and central office administrators.


Quiz

True or False?Teachers must include parent and/or student survey results in their final evaluation.


Observation Practice


Pilot districts and teacher observation tools

5 Dimensions of Teaching and LearningClare Public SchoolsLeslie Public SchoolsMarshall Public SchoolsMt. Morris Consolidated Schools

Charlotte Danielson’s Framework for TeachingGarden City Public SchoolsMontrose Community SchoolsPort Huron Area School District

Marzano Teacher Evaluation ModelBig Rapids Public SchoolsFarmington Public SchoolsNorth Branch Area Schools

The Thoughtful ClassroomCassopolis Public SchoolsGibraltar School DistrictHarper Creek Community Schools


MCEE PilotLessons Learned:• Limited administrator time• Deep understanding of observation tools• Technology Issues• Testing Regime• Senior Testing• Paired Observations• Communication/Readiness of

Superintendents vs. Principals• Training Teachers


Administrator Evaluations

Advisory Council Recommendations

•School Advance, MASA•Marzano Research Laboratory•New Leaders for New Schools•Houghton Mifflin, Reeves



•No Pilot, but Structured Review of Evaluation Systems•Interviews with Stakeholders (admin)•10 ISDs throughout state



Purpose/Intent Results• Summative vs. Formative feedback• MI Standards for Principals• Weighting • Summative Rating



Rubric Results• Simple and Adaptable• Too Lengthy• Focus on Needs• School Board Members• Specificity Needed• Legally Defensible• Lack of Measurement in some areas



Lessons Learned• No validity in any administrator evaluation

system• Feasibility• Training is needed but not always available• Designed for principals but adaptable


Measuring Student Growth

Pilot MEAP, ACT, PLAN, Explore, NWEA

VAM VendorsAmerican Institutes for ResearchPearson (withdrew)SASValue-Added Research Center



VAM IssuesGreat variation in servicesFlexibility vs. Recommended systemSome do not calculate measurement errorEducation of stakeholders



MDE transition plan to Smarter Balance• English/Language Arts K -12• Mathematics K -12• Science 3 -12• Social Studies 3 -12



How will you use standardized data with teachers in non-tested subjects?

How will you handle student growth in world languages, art, music, physical education,…?



Solutions

State assessments (art, music, health, PE)Team-based VAMStudent Learning Objectives (SLO)


Measuring Student GrowthAs proposed by the Michigan Association of Secondary School Principals:


Evaluation Waivers• Allow Districts to waive teacher

and/or administrator evaluation• Clear parameters and guidelines• Must prove reliability and validity

after 3 years• Annual application window• Oversight by State office• November 2011 submissions invalid


Professional Certification

Current law

Thoughts?Reduce requirements?Teacher leader certification?Principal can mandate training?Link to professional goals?


The final recommendations• Maintaining our commitments to the core

elements of our vision (see slide #5)• Seeking to recommend an educator

evaluation system that has the greatest probability of improving teaching and learning

• Balancing local capacity building with clear, high-quality, and common standards

• Maximizing on the cost-benefit ratio and using resources for improvement more than regulation


Implementation recommendations• June 2013: MCEE submits final recommendations• Early fall 2013: Legislature acts on

recommendations• 2013-14 school year: State and school districts

focus on developing the necessary training as well as the required systems, processes, and vendor contracts

• 2014-15 school year: New educator evaluation system launches across the state

This staging is crucial in order to fulfill our charge to build an ethical, transparent, and fair system of evaluating educators, dedicated to educational improvement in the state.


Thank you!Questions?

Our website: www.mcede.org

[email protected]

[email protected] (Cori Mehan, MCEE Project Manager)

http://www.mcede.org/

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Toward an Improvement-Focused System of Educator Evaluation

Documents

education michigan council

mi michigan council

state evaluation tool

educator effectivenessadd

council members

state legislature

school administrators

feasible evaluation