CALICE CALICE Toward a scintillator-based Digital Hadron Calorimeter and Tail-catcher for the LC Manuel I. Martin Northern Illinois University XI International Conference on Calorimetry in High Energy Physics Perugia, Italy, March 29 – April 2, 2004 NICADD formed 2001 employees 25 people
21
Embed
Toward a scintillator-based Digital Hadron Calorimeter and Tail-catcher for the LC
Toward a scintillator-based Digital Hadron Calorimeter and Tail-catcher for the LC. XI International Conference on Calorimetry in High Energy Physics Perugia, Italy, March 29 – April 2, 2004. Manuel I. Martin Northern Illinois University. NICADD formed 2001 employees 25 people. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
CALICECALICE
Toward a scintillator-based Digital Hadron Calorimeter and Tail-catcher
for the LC
Toward a scintillator-based Digital Hadron Calorimeter and Tail-catcher
for the LC
Manuel I. MartinNorthern Illinois University
XI International Conference on Calorimetry in High Energy Physics
Perugia, Italy, March 29 – April 2, 2004
NICADD formed 2001 employees 25 people
Manuel I. Martin
Friday, April 2, 2004
Manuel I. Martin
2Goals for a Hadron Calorimeter DesignGoals for a Hadron Calorimeter Design
• To design a hadron calorimeter with jet resolution better than a conventional caloriemter at reduced cost.
• The HC must be:– Finely Segmented for shower separation inside jets– Hermetic– Reliable– Capable of working in a 5 Tesla magnetic field– Inexpensive
Detector under investigation: A finely segmented hadron calorimeter optimized for Energy Flow Algorithms and cost.
Both performance and cost are driven by the degree of segmentation and the number of thresholds (1,2,3..) and we
have studied both with simulations and prototypes. Although we have done a great deal of R&D only a few highlights will be
Finely segmented Analog HC Finely segmented Digital HC
• PROS• Well understood response• High Dynamic Range• ‘Direct’ measure of Energy
• CONS•High segmentation implies high cost• Probably segmentation limited to 5x5 cm sections• Cost dominated by electronics
• PROS• Very low cost of electronics• Can reach very fine segmentation• Ideal for shower resolution
• CONS• Required extensive research to show proof of principle• Will require development of new algorithms • Will need fine tuning
Trading dynamic range for finer segmentation allows one to see the shower structure inside a jet. The HC acquires tracking capabilities. The Energy Flow algorithm translates into a Particle Flow algorithm. The cost of extra channels is offset by the lower cost of front end electronics as well as cables and infra-structure for the electronics. The Digital HC can have a dynamic range of 2 bits maintaining all the advantages mentioned and improving the relationship between Energy deposit and the number of hits above 3 different thresholds.
Manuel I. Martin
Friday, April 2, 2004
Manuel I. Martin
4DHC Proof OF PRINCIPLEDHC Proof OF PRINCIPLEDigital vs. AnalogDigital vs. Analog
Both hits and energy have the same distributions in the calorimeters, plausible to expect energy-based and hit-based resolutions to be similar
Hits ECAL E ECAL
Hits HCAL E HCAL
10,50 GeV
EM .25cm2
HC 9cm2Tile Sizes
Manuel I. Martin
Friday, April 2, 2004
Manuel I. Martin
5DHC Proof OF PRINCIPLEDHC Proof OF PRINCIPLE
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Incident Energy (GeV)
Nu
mb
er o
f C
ells
Ab
ove
Th
resh
old
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
4cm^2
6cm^2
9cm^2
12cm^2
16cm^2
2cm^2
Single Particles
Number of Cells vs. Pion Energy
For a 0.25 MIP threshold, the # of hits increases monotonically with energy for a wide range of cell sizes.
For lower energy particles the digital approach has excellent resolution! 0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Incident Energy (GeV)
s/E
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
2cm^2 Digital
4cm^2 Digital
6cm^2 Digital
9cm^2 Digital
12cm^2 Digital
16cm^2 Digital
Analog
Single Particle Energy Resolution
Manuel I. Martin
Friday, April 2, 2004
Manuel I. Martin
6DHC Proof OF PRINCIPLEDHC Proof OF PRINCIPLE
• Determine resolution independent of algorithm
• For ZZ events PT order stable MC particles, ignore ’s
• For charged hadrons assume perfect energy (from tracker)
• Smear the energy of other particles– For neutral hadrons use resolutions
for charged pions presented in the previous slide.
– For photons use s ~ 17%/sqrt(E)• Start with highest pT particle and
cluster in 0.7 cone• Repeat for remaining particles• Add individual energies to get jet
energy
Toy Simulation: “Recipe” for a Jet
So the idea holds water: At all energies 3x3 single threshold resolution comparable to analog!
Energy Flow algorithms offer the most promising way, to date, of achieving the unprecedented jet energy resolutions required to fully exploit the physics program of a Linear Collider Detector (LCD).
NICADD has been pursuing the development of algorithms suitable to use in a DHC and preliminary results show compatible performance to those used in analog HC.
Although not shown the inclusion of additional thresholds to compensate for cell saturation also improves response. We have dubbed this a “semi-digital” approach.
Jet Erec/Egen
Digital (2x2) Analog
Manuel I. Martin
Friday, April 2, 2004
Manuel I. Martin
8Digital Hadron Calorimeter DesignDigital Hadron Calorimeter DesignHardware Prototypes: Stack, Hardware Prototypes: Stack, Layer, & Unit CellLayer, & Unit CellHardware Prototypes: Stack, Hardware Prototypes: Stack, Layer, & Unit CellLayer, & Unit Cell
MAPTM
Manuel I. Martin
Friday, April 2, 2004
Manuel I. Martin
9Digital Hadron Calorimeter DesignDigital Hadron Calorimeter DesignCosmic Data with PMT Readout
11Our Extrusion Facility at FNLOur Extrusion Facility at FNL
NICADD owns a double screw extruder intended to develop inexpensive extruded scintillator bars of different shapes and characteristics. The extruder is maintained and run by NICADD in collaboration with FNAL and is a resource for the scientific community.
Manuel I. Martin
Friday, April 2, 2004
Manuel I. Martin
12Put table of light yields herePut table of light yields here
* Extruded material is a low cost, viable alternative to cast material * The ALICE experiment has determined this as well for their EMCAL.
All-in-all it looks like a competitive option….All-in-all it looks like a competitive option….We’ll be moving towards the next prototype towerWe’ll be moving towards the next prototype tower
(and a test beam DHC and Tail Catcher)(and a test beam DHC and Tail Catcher)
All-in-all it looks like a competitive option….All-in-all it looks like a competitive option….We’ll be moving towards the next prototype towerWe’ll be moving towards the next prototype tower
(and a test beam DHC and Tail Catcher)(and a test beam DHC and Tail Catcher)
Simulations indicated that the approach taken is competitive with an analog HC.
Measurements with our prototypes indicate that we have enough sensitivity and linearity.
Although time did not allow presentation, the semi-digital (use of more than one threshold) permits a linearization of the E/Tiles Hit up to ~50GeV.
SiPM and MRS are very promising.
Preliminary prototypes and structure studies show we can control costs.
Manuel I. Martin
Friday, April 2, 2004
Manuel I. Martin
16Test Beam EffortsTest Beam Efforts
• NICADD is collaborating with CALICE & DESY to study the DHC at a test beam
• Contributing hardware and personnel
• Primary goal is to study segmentation and response.
• We are also constructing a combined hadronic tail catcher/muon tracking.
Manuel I. Martin
Friday, April 2, 2004
Manuel I. Martin
17TestBeamMokkaTestBeamMokka• Based on Mokka v02-03• Currently maintained at
NICADD• Actively working with
Mokka development team
• Available for community use
Manuel I. Martin
Friday, April 2, 2004
Manuel I. Martin
18Tail-catcherTail-catcher
Test beam event display
neutrals
charged
charged
EM
HC
TC/
Goals for the TC/Muon System
• Provide a reasonable snapshot of the tail-end of the shower for simulation validation
• Prototype detector with high-fidelity to what is imagined for a generic LCD
• correcting for leakage• understanding the impact of coil• muon reconstruction + e-flow• reduce fake rate of muons
Manuel I. Martin
Friday, April 2, 2004
Manuel I. Martin
19Tail-catcherTail-catcher
Why is it needed ? How to implement it ?
20GeV p
Tail-catcher/Muon System
NICADD proposes to use the Muon System as Tail-Catcher Tracker
A.Raspereza
• Details are important! • Due to physical restrictions the HC for the proposed LC is very thin! • Leakage is inevitable. • We must recover as much information as possible.
Manuel I. Martin
Friday, April 2, 2004
Manuel I. Martin
20Tail-catcherTail-catcher
Erec/Egen 50 GeV p
Manuel I. Martin
Friday, April 2, 2004
Manuel I. Martin
21ConclusionsConclusions• Calorimetry
– DHC Simulations indicate approach competitive with analog calorimetry
– DHC Prototypes indicate there is sufficient sensitivity (light x efficiency), uniformity, and costs can be controlled