Top Banner
Total Physical Response (TPR)
36

Total Physical Response Cpr1[1]

May 06, 2015

Download

Education

Tarik Idrissi

Total Physical Response in Language Learning
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Total Physical Response (TPR)

Page 2: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Total Physical Response

"Babies don't learn by memorizing lists; why should children or adults?“

from a lecture by Dr. Asher at Cambridge University, England.

Page 3: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

What is TPR?

Page 4: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Developed by James Asher in the 1970s, TPR is a language teaching method built around the coordination of speech and action.

Page 5: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Origin

Page 6: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

In psychology, it is linked to the trace theory of memory, which says that the more often a memory connection is traced, the more likely it will be recalled. Tracing and retracing can be both verbal (language) and motor (actions). The combination of the two fosters the recall.In addition, in a developmental sense, Asher claims that speech directed to young children consists primarily of commands, which children respond to physically before they begin to produce verbal responses. The emphasis on developing comprehension skills before the learner is taught to speak links to the so-called Comprehension Approach, the principles of which share the belief that: (1) comprehension abilities precede productive skills in learning a language; (2) the teaching of speaking should be delayed until comprehension skills are established; (3) skills acquired through listening transfer to other skills; (4) teaching should emphasize meaning rather than form; (5) teaching should minimize learner stress (Richards & Rodgers, 1986).

Page 7: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

The learning hypotheses:

Page 8: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

1. Innate bio program: listening before speaking (Natural Approach) and synchronized with body. Second learning language should imitate first language learning.2. Affective Filter: like first language learning, second language learning should take place in a stress-free environment because the lower the stress, the greater the learning. 3. Brain Lateralization: TPR is directed to right –brain hemisphere because the right brain is responsible for motor activities while language activity is situated in the left hemisphere. Right hemisphere activities trigger left hemisphere activities, but right brain activities must occur before the left brain can process language for production.

Page 9: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Left Brain v. Right Brain

Page 10: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Left Brain V. Right Brain

Left brain Right brain

Left Brain: Right Brain:Logical RandomSequential IntuitiveRational HolisticAnalytical SynthesizingObjective SubjectiveLooks at parts Looks at wholes

Page 11: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Principles

Page 12: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Understanding of the target language should be developed before speaking.Meaning can often be conveyed through actions, especially by using commands.Feelings of success and low anxiety facilitate learning.Spoken language should be emphasized over written language.Teachers should be tolerant of errors which are expected to be made by students. Meaning is more important than form.

Page 13: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Goals

Page 14: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

to provide an enjoyable learning experience, having a minimum of the stress that typically accompanies learning a foreign language.

Page 15: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Roles

Page 16: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

The teacher plays an active and direct role because he decides what to teach, he selects and models the material. The learners listen attentively and respond physically to commands. They are expected to recognize and respond to new combinations of taught items and they have to produce new combinations of their own.

Page 17: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Teaching/learning process:

Page 18: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Lessons begin with commands by the teacher. Students demonstrate their understanding by acting these commands out. Teachers recombine their instructions in novel and often humorous ways; eventually students follow suit. Activities later include games and skits.

Page 19: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Interaction

Page 20: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Teacher-Student and student-student: The teacher interacts with individual students and with the group, starting with the teacher speaking and the students responding nonverbally. Later, this is reversed; students issue commands to teacher as well as each other.

Page 21: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Dealing with feelings

Page 22: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

The method was developed principally to reduce the stress associated with language learning. Students are not forced to speak until they are ready and learning is made as enjoyable as possible, stimulating feelings of success and low anxiety.

Page 23: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Aspects of language the approach emphasizes:

Page 24: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Grammatical structures and vocabulary are emphasized, imbedded in imperatives. Understanding precedes production; spoken language precedes the written word.

Page 25: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Role of students’ native language:

Page 26: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Method is introduced in students’ native language, but rarely used later in course. Meaning is made clear through actions.

Page 27: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Response to students’ errors:

Page 28: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Students are expected to make errors once they begin speaking. Teachers only correct major errors, and do this unobtrusively. “Fine-tuning” occurs later.

Page 29: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Means for evaluation:

Page 30: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Teachers can evaluate students through simple observation of their actions. Formal evaluation is achieved by commanding a student to perform a series of actions.

Page 31: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

What are advantages of TPR?

Page 32: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

•Fun and Easy: Students enjoy activity! •Simple TPR activities do not require a great deal of preparation on the part of the teacher. •TPR is inclusive and works well in a class with mixed ability levels. •Good for kinesthetic learners who need to be active in class. •Good tool for building vocabulary. •Actions help build connections in the brain. •Helps learners achieve fluency faster by immersing learners in activities that involve them in situational language use.•Good instructional practice for ESL’s learners in their silent period. •Works well for child and adult learners.

Page 33: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

What are disadvantages of TPR?

Page 34: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

•Most useful for beginners. •Preparation becomes an issue for teachers at higher levels. •Students are not generally given the opportunity to express their own thought in as creative manner. •It is easy to over use TPR and begin to bore students. •May limit teachers in term of scope of language that can be addressed. •Can be a major challenge for shy students.

Page 35: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]

Check your understanding of TPR.

• 1.Asher believes that foreign language instruction can and should be modeled on native language acquisition. What are some characteristics of his method that are similar to the way children acquire their native language?

• 2.One of the principles of TPR is that when student anxiety is low, language learning is enhanced. How does this method lower student anxiety?

Page 36: Total Physical Response     Cpr1[1]