Page 1
arX
iv:1
408.
3626
v1 [
gr-q
c] 1
5 A
ug 2
014
Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff Equations in Modified
Gauss-Bonnet Gravity
D. Momeni(a) and R. Myrzakulov(a)
aEurasian International Center for Theoretical Physics and Department of General &
Theoretical Physics, Eurasian National University,
Astana 010008, Kazakhstan
Abstract
Based on a stringy inspired Gauss-Bonnet (GB) modification of classical gravity,
we constructed a model for neutron stars. We derived the modified forms of Tolman-
Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) equations for a generic function of f(G) gravity. The
hydrostatic equations remained unchanged but the dynamical equations for metric
functions are modified due to the effects of GB term.
Keywords: Modified theories of gravity; Models beyond the standard models; Neutron
stars
Pacs numbers: 97.60.Jd; 12.60.-i; 04.50.Kd
1 Introduction
Observational data show that we live in an accelerating Universe at large scales [1]-
[3]. This behavior is governed beyound the classical dynamics of solar objects and even
beyound the Einstein theory for gravity as a gauge theory,so called as general relativity
(GR). So to explain this acceleration expansion at large cosmological objects we need some
kinds of modifications to the classical GR. This approach is called as modified gravity as
it is believed that it can solve the problem of acceleration without any need to exotic
fluids (for reviews see [4]-[13]). One of the simplest modifications of GR is to replace the
Ricci scalar R by an arbitrary function f(R). It is called as f(R) gravity and originally
proposed by Buchdahl [14] and recently motivated by several authors. In the context
1
Page 2
of Riemmanian geometry the next higher order correction to R is called as GB term is
defined by G = R2 − RµνRµν + RµνλσR
µνλσ. Indeed it is a topological invariant term in
four dimensions and if we add it to the Ricci scalar term in Einstein gravitional action, it
has no contribution to the equations of motion. But a non minimally coupled form of this
topological term induces new features as an alternative for dark energy. This modified
f(G) gravity has been introduced as model for dark energy in [38]. The GB term plays
a very important role in cosmological models as several works have been devoted to the
interesting aspects of this term [15]-[32]. Infact this term is inspired from string theory.
In low energy limit of the stringy action the first second order term is GB. Also if we
study the most general scalar-tensor theory with second order field equation ,we observe
this GB term [33].
From other point of view, dynamics of compact objects are very important problem in
astrophysics. One of the most important objects in neutron star. Neutron stars compact
objects with radius of order 10Km[34]. But they are so massive . For a typical neutron
star, the mass is about 1.4M∗ where M∗ denotes mass of our Sun. Since it is extremely
massive and tiny in comparison to our planet,a surface gravity on this star is much higher
than Earth. The relative order of surface gravity of neutron star with respect to Earth is
about 2× 1011. One important property of neutron stars is they can be charged massive
objects. But the strength of electromagnetic fields of such stars are about some million
times stronger than the one which we have on Earth. In a very close competition with
neutron stars,we can have White Dwarfs or black holes. The main difference is order
of mass of these massive objects. Gravitational collapse is the dominant mechanism in
formaion of all these three types of massive objects.
In GR several models have been studied for neutron stars. In modified gravity f(R)
there are few refrences about neutron stars namely [35]-[37]. But in f(G) gravity there is
no work about neutron stars. In this letter we explore TOV equations for a gravitational
theory with GB term. We derived the full system of equations of motion for a spherically
symmetric static configuration with inhomogenous perfect fluid. We showed that how the
equations of motion will be changed due to GB corrections.
2
Page 3
2 TOV equations in Modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity
Let us to start by the gravitational action of a generic GB model as the following [38]:
S =
∫
d4x√−g
[
R
2κ2+ f(G)
]
+ Sm , (1)
Since this action in defined by commutative connections and in the framework of a Rie-
mannian spacetime, as usual the second order scalar curvature R is defined by the Ricci
scalar. The next higher order correction due to the GB term is denoted by the algebraic
function f(G). We assume that this function is smooth enough to have higher order
derivatives fn≥2(G). It is a necesary condition for linear stability. To include the matter
fields we add a matter action Sm. The conntribution of this term to the field equations
induces the energy momentum tensor Tµν = − 2√−g
δSm
δgµν. Further more, the gravitational
coupling is defined by κ2 = 8πG. Here G is the tiny usual classical Newtonian gravita-
tional coupling. In metric formalism of modified gravity when we take metric as dynamical
variable , the equations of motion from (1) are written as the following form:
Rµν −1
2Rgµν + 8
[
Rµρνσ +Rρνgσµ −Rρσgνµ − Rµνgσρ +Rµσgνρ
+R
2(gµνgσρ − gµσgνρ)
]
∇ρ∇σfG + (GfG − f) gµν = κ2Tµν , (2)
where fGG... =dnf(G)dGn . Further more we adopted the signature of the metric gµν as (+−
−−) , and consequently ∇µVν = ∂µVν−ΓλµνVλ and Rσ
µνρ = ∂νΓσµρ−∂ρΓ
σµν+Γω
µρΓσων−Γω
µνΓσωρ
for the covariant derivative and the Riemann tensor, respectively. There is an additional
conservation law for the matter sector as ∇µTµν = 0.
We suppose that the metric of the neutron star is static-spherically symmetric with
coordinates xµ = (ct, r, θ, ϕ) in the following form:
ds2 = c2e2φdt2 − e2λdr2 − r2(dθ2 + sin2 θdϕ2). (3)
For the matter field, we suppose that the non zero components of energy momentum
tensor are T νµ = diag(ρc2,−p,−p,−p). We insert (3) in (2) and by using theformula given
in appendix, the diagonal components of (2) for (µ, ν) = (ct, ct) and (µ, ν) = (r, r) are
3
Page 4
given by the following equations:
− 1
r2(2rλ′ + e2λ − 1) + 8e−2λ
(
fGG(G′′ − 2λ′G′) + fGGG(G
′)2)(1− e2λ
r2− 2(φ′′ + φ′2)
)
(4)
+(GfG − f)e2λ = κ2ρc2e2λ.
− 1
r2(2rφ′ − e2λ + 1)− (GfG − f)e2λ = κ2pe2λ. (5)
We need an additional equation for metric functions and f(G). We use the trace of (2) .
It gives us:
R + 8Gρσ∇ρ∇σfG − 4(GfG − f) = −κ2(ρc2 − p). (6)
Or with metric (3) it reads as the follows:
2(
φ′′ + φ′2 − φ′λ′ +2
r(φ′ − λ′) +
1− e2λ
r2
)
(7)
+8e−2λ(2φ′
r+
1− e2λ
r2
)(
fGG(G′′ − 2λ′G′) + fGGG(G
′)2)
+ 4(GfG − f)e2λ = κ2e2λ(ρc2 − 3p).
The hydrostatic (continuty equation) follows from the equation , ∇µTµν for ν = r. We
obtain:
dp
dr= −(p+ ρc2)φ′. (8)
The continuty equation is satisfied identically for ν = t. Note that when f(G) = G ,then
(5,5) reduce to the GR equations trivially.
To have proceed in TOV equations, we replace the metric function with the following
expression in terms of the gravitational mass function M = M(r):
e−2λ = 1− 2GM
c2r=⇒ GdM
c2dr=
1
2
[
1− e−2λ(1− 2rλ′)]
. (9)
The plan is to rewrite (5,5,8) in terms of {dp
dr, dM
dr, ρ} in a dimensionless form. For this
purpose,we introduce the following set of the dimensionless parameters,
M → mM⋆, r → rgr, ρ → ρM⋆
r3g, p → pM⋆c
2
r3g, G → G
r4g. (10)
4
Page 5
Here rg =GM⋆
c2= 1.47473Km. From now we use the dimensionless parameters. Continuty
equation converts to the following :
dp
dr= −(p+ ρ)φ′. (11)
But (9) converts to the following:
dλ
dr=
m
r31− r
mdmdr
2mr− 1
. (12)
Using the (11,12) in (5) we obtain:
2
r
1− 2mr
p+ ρc2+
2m
r3− r2g(GfG − f) = 8πp. (13)
For (rr) equation we obtain:
− 2
r2dm
dr+ 8r2g(1−
2m
r)2[
fGG
(
r2gG′′ − r3g
2m
r21− r dm
dr2mr− 1
G′)
+ r2gfGGGG′2]
(14)
×[
− 2m/r3
1− 2mr
+ 2d
dr
(dp
dr
p+ ρ
)
− 2(
dp
dr
p+ ρ
)2]
+ (GfG − f) = 8πρ.
And the last equation for trace, in the dimensionless parameters reads:
2(1− 2m
r)(
− d
dr(
dp
dr
p+ ρ) + (
dp
dr
p+ ρ)2 +
m
r31− r
mdmdr
2mr− 1
(dp
dr
p+ ρ)− 2m/r3
1− 2mr
)
(15)
+8[
− 2dp
dr
r(p+ ρ)− 2m/r3
1− 2mr
][
fGG
(
r2gG′′ − r3g
2m
r21− r dm
dr2mr− 1
G′)
+ r2gfGGGG′2]
4(GfG − f) = 8π(ρ− 3p).
3 Neutron star models in f(G) gravity
We mention here that we need to speciefy the equation of state of the neutron star.
The model has a realistic but so complex form so called as SLy [39] and FPS [40] models:
ζ =a1 + a2ξ + a3ξ
3
1 + a4ξf(a5(ξ − a6)) + (a7 + a8ξ)f(a9(a10 − ξ))+
+(a11 + a12ξ)f(a13(a14 − ξ)) + (a15 + a16ξ)f(a17(a18 − ξ)),
5
Page 6
where
ζ = log(P/dyncm−2) , ξ = log(ρ/gcm−3) , f(x) =1
exp(x) + 1.
The coefficients ai can be found in[34]. Also a linear model is proposed as quark matter
model for neutron stars.
We should write the f(G) = ǫh(G) and write the perturbation solutions as the follow-
ing for different quantities [41],[42]:
ρ = ρ0 + ǫρ1 + ..., p = p0 + ǫp1 + ...,
m = m0 + ǫm1 + ..., G = G0 + ǫG1 + ..., (16)
Where we assume that all functions {ρ0, p0, m0, G0} satisfythe standard TOV equations
in zeroth order of ǫ. One can solve the system of the differential equations (13,15,16)
numerically.
4 Conclusion
Neutron stars are massive,compact astrophysical objects. They can be modelled as
spherically symmetric stars with a speciefic equation of state. In general relativity several
models or neutron stars have been investigated. Specially when we adopted a linear
equation of state,the model has been studied as quark matter star. In modified gravity of
f(R) gravity,this problem has been solved perfectly using an empirical equation of state.
In this work we formulated neutron stars in a Gauss-Bonnet modified gravity,so called
as f(G) gravity in which G denotes the topological invariant term of four dimensional
spacetime. We derived the full set of equations of motion for spherically symmetric
metric filled by cosmic fluid. We also derived the modified Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff
equation. This equation shows the dynamical behavior of the model in terms of the
mass,pressure and energy density. This set of equations is dimensionless. We should
specify the model for f(G). A way to find the solutions is to think about the modified
part as a perturbation. So, we are able to perform perturbations for all variables. But
6
Page 7
a more realistic approach is to solve equations numerically which is beyound our current
letter.
5 APPENDIX
In this appendix we present different geometrical quantities as we used in this let-
ter. For metric (3) the following non zero components of the symmetric connection are
obtained:
Γ112 = φ, Γ2
11 = φ′e2φ−2λ, Γ222 = λ′, Γ2
23 = −re−2λ, (17)
Γ244 = −r sin2 θe−2λ, Γ3
23 =1
r, Γ3
44 = − sin θ cos θ, Γ424 =
1
r, Γ4
34 = cot θ. (18)
So, the non vanishing components of Einstein tensor read:
G11 = −e2φ−2λ(2λ′
r+
e2λ − 1
r2), (19)
G22 = −2φ′
r+
e2λ − 1
r2(20)
G33 = −re−2λ(
φ′ − λ′ + r(φ′′ + φ′2)− rφ′λ′)
(21)
G44 = − sin2 θG33. (22)
For Riemann tensor we obtain:
R1212 = e2φ(φ′λ′ − φ′′ − φ′2), R1313 = −re2φ−2λφ′, R1414 = sin2θR1313, (23)
R2323 = −rλ′, R2424 = sin2 θR2323, R3434 = sin2 θr2e−2λ(1− e2λ). (24)
Thus the Ricci scalar is as the following:
R = −2e−2λ(
φ′′ + φ′2 − φ′λ′ + 2φ′ − λ′
r+
1− e2λ
r2
)
. (25)
The GB term reads:
−e4λG
4=
3(1− e2λ)2
r4+
8e2λφ′2
r2+ 3λ′2φ′2 + 24
φ′λ′
r2+ 6φ′′φ′2 +
8e2λφ′′
r2(26)
−6λ′φ′3 + 3φ′4 +6λ′2
r2+ 3φ′′2 − 2
φ′2
r2− 6λ′φ′φ′′ − 8
e2λφ′λ′
r2− 8
φ′′
r2.
7
Page 8
To derive the hydrostatic equation we use the following equation:
∇µTµ2 = ∂µT
µ2 + Γµ
µσTσ2 − Γσ
µ2Tµσ = 0, ∂µ(−pδµ,2)− pΓµ
µ2 + pΓaa2 − ρc2Γ1
12 = 0,
−dp
dr− (p+ ρc2)Γ1
12 = 0 =⇒ dp
dr= −(p+ ρc2)φ′.
References
[1] A.G. Riess et al., Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998).
[2] S. Perlmutter et al., Nature 391, 51 (1998).
[3] A.G. Riess et al., Astrophys. J. 536, 62 (2000).
[4] S. ’i. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rept. 505, 59 (2011) [arXiv:1011.0544 [gr-qc]].
[5] K. Bamba, S. ’i. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, arXiv:1302.4831 [gr-qc].
[6] K. Bamba and S. D. Odintsov, arXiv:1402.7114 [hep-th].
[7] S. ’i. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, AIP Conf. Proc. 1115, 212 (2009) [arXiv:0810.1557
[hep-th]].
[8] S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, Phys. Rept. 509, 167 (2011) [arXiv:1108.6266
[gr-qc]].
[9] S. Capozziello, L. Consiglio, M. De Laurentis, G. De Rosa and C. Di Donato,
arXiv:1110.5026 [astro-ph.CO].
[10] S. Capozziello and A. Stabile, In *Frignanni, Vincent R. (ed.): Classical and Quan-
tum Gravity: Theory and Applications* Chapter 2 [arXiv:1009.3441 [gr-qc]].
[11] S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, Found. Phys. 40 (2010) 867 [arXiv:0910.2881
[hep-th]].
[12] S. Capozziello and M. Francaviglia, Gen. Rel. Grav. 40 (2008) 357 [arXiv:0706.1146
[astro-ph]].
8
Page 9
[13] S. ’i. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, eConf C 0602061, 06 (2006) [Int. J. Geom. Meth.
Mod. Phys. 4, 115 (2007)] [hep-th/0601213].
[14] H. A. Buchdahl, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 150, 1 (1970).
[15] S. Capozziello, F. S. N. Lobo and J. P. Mimoso, arXiv:1407.7293 [gr-qc].
[16] S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis and S. D. Odintsov, arXiv:1406.5652 [gr-qc].
[17] S. Capozziello, M. Francaviglia and A. N. Makarenko, Astrophys. Space Sci. 349
(2014) 603 [arXiv:1304.5440 [gr-qc]].
[18] S. Capozziello, A. N. Makarenko and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 8,
084037 [arXiv:1302.0093 [gr-qc]].
[19] S. Capozziello, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009)
193 [arXiv:0809.1535 [hep-th]].
[20] K. Bamba, S. D. Odintsov, L. Sebastiani and S. Zerbini, Eur. Phys. J. C 67, 295
(2010) [arXiv:0911.4390 [hep-th]].
[21] K. Bamba, C. Q. Geng, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Europhys. Lett. 89, 50003
(2010) [arXiv:0909.4397 [hep-th]].
[22] G. Cognola, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and S. Zerbini, Eur. Phys. J. C
64, 483 (2009) [arXiv:0905.0543 [gr-qc]].
[23] K. Bamba, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, JCAP 0810 (2008) 045 [arXiv:0807.2575
[hep-th]].
[24] S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and P. V. Tretyakov, Phys. Lett. B 651 (2007) 224
[arXiv:0704.2520 [hep-th]].
[25] G. Cognola, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. Odintsov and S. Zerbini, Phys. Rev. D 75
(2007) 086002 [hep-th/0611198].
9
Page 10
[26] S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 66 (2007) 012005 [hep-th/0611071].
[27] M. Cvetic, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Nucl. Phys. B 628 (2002) 295
[hep-th/0112045].
[28] J. E. Lidsey, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, JHEP 0206 (2002) 026 [hep-th/0202198].
[29] S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and M. Sasaki, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 123509
[hep-th/0504052].
[30] S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and O. G. Gorbunova, J. Phys. A 39 (2006) 6627
[hep-th/0510183].
[31] G. Cognola, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and S. Zerbini, Phys. Rev. D 73
(2006) 084007 [hep-th/0601008].
[32] S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and M. Sami, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 046004
[hep-th/0605039].
[33] G. W. Horndeski, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10, 363-384 (1974).
[34] M. Camenzind, ”Compact Objects in Astrophysics”, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidel-
berg (2007).
[35] A. V. Astashenok, S. Capozziello and S. D. Odintsov, arXiv:1405.6663 [gr-qc].
[36] A. V. Astashenok, S. Capozziello and S. D. Odintsov, arXiv:1401.4546 [gr-qc].
[37] A. V. Astashenok, S. Capozziello and S. D. Odintsov, JCAP 1312, 040 (2013)
[arXiv:1309.1978 [gr-qc]].
[38] S. Nojiri., S. D. Odintsov , Phys.Lett. B631,1(2005).
[39] E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P. Haensel, J. Meyer, R. Schaeffer, Nucl. Phys. A 635,
231 (1998); F. Douchin, P. Haensel, Phys. Lett. B 485, 107 (2000); F. Douchin, P.
Haensel, Astron. and Astroph. 380, 151 (2001).
10
Page 11
[40] V.R. Pandharipande, D.G. Ravenhall D.G., Hot nuclear matter in Nuclear Matter
and Heavy Ion Collisions, Eds. M. Soyeur, H. Flocard, B.Tamain, and M. Porneuf
(Dordrecht: Reidel), 103-132 (1989).
[41] S. Arapoglu, C. Deliduman, K. Yavuz Eksi, JCAP 1107, 020 (2011)
[arXiv:1003.3179v3[gr-qc]].
[42] H. Alavirad, J.M. Weller, [arXiv:1307.7977v1[gr-qc]].
11