Top Banner
Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion conte nts
20

Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

Jan 04, 2016

Download

Documents

Meredith Lewis
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto  

TILC09

1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance5. Conclusion

contents

Page 2: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

Motivation

Feature: We can get the tilt date from only one cavity, not necessary two point data.

This monitor measures the beam orbit tilt               with high precision.

It can be a useful tool to monitor beam in many case.

θ

Measure θ with high precision

Beam line Tilted beam

Page 3: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

BP

M BP

M

beam

d

The Longer d leads to the better angle resolution, but relative alignment becomes severer

Our tilt monitor simply detects the beam tilt angle solely.

Angle resolution depends on the “d” and BPM resolution.

Angle detection from two cavity

Page 4: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

Principle-Resonant mode Tilt monitor uses monopole mode.

Monopole mode

Monopole mode is perpendicular to nominal beam axis

excited

E-field

H-field

no excited

Electric field distribution

Nominal beam Tilted beam

U (excited energy) ∝ θ2 (including time transit factor)

Page 5: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

Sensor cavityExcited energy versus cavity width and length

width[m

m]

length[mm]1-degree

Around 100[mm]is good

width

length

Excited energy[J]

Width : length=1:1.1  is almost best set

Page 6: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

Frequency condition

There is a requirement for the frequency from beam bunch interval.

357 [MHz]× n  ( n= 0, 1, 2, ・・・

Considering phase matching, the following condition is required

Determined Sensor cavity size

length:103[mm]

width:95[mm]

height:30[mm]

Monopole frequency

2.142GHz

Page 7: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

How to extract the signal

waveguide

antennaE-field

H-field

The magnetic field of monopole mode is extracted through slit,and transmitted by TE mode.

slit

TE01 mode

TE mode signal is couple to the coaxial antenna.

V(extracted signal) ∝ θ

Page 8: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

Waveguide

TE mode signal is perfect to match with antenna at 2.142[GHz].

TE signalantenna

We must set the cut off frequency. f < 2.0GHz

Monopole mode frequency must be separate waveguide’s resonant frequency.

Page 9: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

Determined waveguide-antenna design

At 2.142Ghz Reflection amplitude is zero

30[mm]

100[mm]180[mm]

22.5[mm]

22.8[mm]

Cut off ~ 1.5GHz

Page 10: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

Total Structure

Sensor cavityWaveguideAntenna

Beam-pipeSlit

Basic shape

Two port for symmetry, and to reduce the coupling.

slit

Cavity

Waveguide Slit design was determined from total simulation.

Page 11: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

Result of total structure simulationLoaded Q was determined such that the signal amplitude becomes 1/e when the next bunch comes

Designed loaded Q 2800

Resonant frequency and Q value from S21(transmission amplitude). S21 stands for resonant curve.

Frequency is 2.142GHz Q-loaded 2784

①②

Page 12: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

Expected performanceEvaluating the extracted power

Thermal noise

The limitation :30nrad

Orbit angle[urad]

Determined by temperature(T) and bandwidth(Δf)

Room temperature 300[K]Bandwidth ~ 3MHz

PTN =1.24×10-14 [W]

Output power[W]∝ θ 2

PTN = KBTΔf

Thermal noise

Page 13: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

3D monitoring type(type2)

Sensor cavity

Coaxial antenna

Beam pipe

mode frequency Loaded Q

Vertical monopole 2.856GHz 2700

Horizontal monopole 3.947GHz 3700

Of course, the TE mode signal in each waveguide couple to antenna at mode frequency

Page 14: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

Expected performance(type2)

Tilt angle [urad] Tilt angle [urad]

Vertical horizontal

The expected sensitivity is about 80[nrad] in vertical direction and 300[nrad] in horizontal direction.

Page 15: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

ConclusionWe have studied about tilt monitor.

The basic design phase was finished. The expected best performance is 30[nrad](vertical)

This is equivalent to 3nm position resolution at 10[cm] distance.

3D monitoring type might be useful as commodity type

PLAN

Study of effective usage.Decision of detecting scheme.Test the prototype.

Page 16: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.
Page 17: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

Back up

Page 18: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

Considering beam route, All we have to do is evaluating R/Q

In case of horizontal difference

1/100

Horizontal difference has almost no influence

Difference(horizontal)[mm]

Back up

Page 19: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

In case of vertical difference In principle, there is no influence

difference along the Z axis[mm]

1/100

ビームパイプ

cavity

We have to be careful around the beam pipe

Back up

Page 20: Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.

In IP-BPM system, the two cavity are used to determine the beam orbit.

Usage example

The distance of two cavity is strongly restricted due to

dynamic range and large angle jitter at IP

BP

M1B

PM2

5~10um Angle jitter Typicaly~100urad

d

d has to be d< 0.1[m].

Angle resolution is not good in such small d. If one BPM resolution is 10[nm],

Angle resolution~150 [nrad]

Tilt monitor can be useful in such narrow space monitoring, and addition the beam orbit information to IP BPM.