Together Building A Better District 1
Jan 16, 2016
Together Building A Better District
1
TOPIC
2
SHARING THE UGU EXPERIENCE IN FIXING
POTHOLES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3
1. INTRODUCTION – Ugu at a glance
2. THE PROBLEM OF POTHOLES
3. THE ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEM
4. THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC PRESSURES
5. THE TECHNOLOGY CHOICE
6. UGU APPROACH
7. RESULTS
8. BENEFITS OF THE UGU MODEL/APPROACH
9. RECOMMENDATIONS
INTRODUCTION
4
One of 10 districts within the Province of KwaZulu-Natal
Extends over 5400 square km in size with an estimated 120 km of beach stretch
Main economic hub is a town of Port Shepstone- 130km south of Durban
Ugu District – made up 6 local municipalities
Population of 704 000 people
84% RURAL
1. UGU AT A GLANCE
6
IN 2001, UGU WAS DECLARED A PRESIDENTIAL POVERTY NODAL POINT
I. Low Skills Base & Education levelsII. Poor coordination of social and economic activitiesIII. High Unemployment RateIV. High HIV/AIDS prevalence
ECONOMIC GROWTH RATE OF <2% IN THE LAST 5 YEARS
LACK OF INVESTMENT INTO OUR MAIN ECONOMIC SECTORS
UGU HAS NOW DEVELOPED A LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT ADDRESSES THE FOLLOWING & SUB-SECTORS: Tourism, Agriculture, Manufacturing, ICT, Trade & Commerce, Transport & Logistics, Construction, Financial & Business Services, Investment Attraction and Retention, as well as Poverty Reduction & Eradication
2. THE PROBLEM OF POTHOLES
7
Potholes are a world-wide phenomenon and the Ugu region is no exception.
In recent years, government has battled with the maintenance of road infrastructure which is very costly and all solutions employed thus far provide relief that is too short.
In our district, the Hibiscus Coast Municipality has been lambasted by the community, rate-payers, business community, newspapers alike, for not provided a more permanent solution to the problem of potholes. The issue of potholes has become a permanent feature in one of our local media publications.
The chip and spray method is cheap but does not last, resulting in loss of public confidence
Current methods rely heavily on machinery
Hot asphalt is dangerous and cumbersome to handle
8
9
3. THE ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEM
10
Too much focus on budgeting for the expansion of infrastructure at the expense of maintenance.
Insufficient funding – MIG focuses on basic infrastructure Absence of a community based approach that also addresses socio-economic needs Inappropriate use of some roads that were designed for low traffic and light motor vehicles Lack of storm water channeling in road design – curbing, etcPoor coordination between government spheres, province and local government in the case of KZN
Lack of training for municipal workers dealing with potholesLack of supervision of contractors resulting in high repeat jobs
Poor preparation of potholes during repairHot asphalt limited where distances are bigger Difficulty of budgeting as hot asphalt has no shelf-life and stock-piling is difficult
4. THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC PRESSURES
11
High Unemployment
Increase in crime targeting the affluent suburbs
Low level of skills and experience (for employment or business establishment)
Pothole inflicted vehicle accidents resulting in litigation cases for the municipality
Decrease in public confidence due to constant negative media reports
Poor rotation of service providers resulting in public dissatisfaction
Powers and functions between district and local municipalities
Barriers of entry for cooperatives into the construction industry ( policies, business start-up, business management)
5. THE TECHNOLOGY
12
Ugu, as far back as 2007, started searching for a approach towards assisting our local municipalities with the problem of Potholes. First pothole repair demonstration was done in August 2007, on busy road frequented by heavy duty vehicles.
In May 2008, Ugu District Municipality and its family of municipalities were then formally introduced to a technology and method of fixing potholes that has the following key advantageous features:
It is based on a cold mix, making it possible to stock-pile the material and budget appropriately in advance
Lasts longer (+/- 4-5 years) before a fixed pothole has to be re-visited again
Labour intensive with the rehabilitation of a pothole done manually, with minimum machinery.
Economic generation potential in the form of a factory and youth entrepreneurial opportunity
June 2008 floods confirmed the strength of the technology, Ugu then startedto formalize the approach with which the technology was going to be applied.
6. UGU APPROACH
13
TECHNICAL TRAINING
14
TECHNICAL TRAINING
15
TECHNICAL TRAINING
16
SAFETY TRAINING
17
ROLL OUT / IMPLEMENTATION
18
Team 7: After just two weeks of site establishment and safety training (always a top priority) and then onto one week of product training and application methods, this was team 7’s very first pothole done independently by the team. This can be inspected now at the very top of Old St Faith’s Road. It just shows, give people a chance and set people up to succeed with the right tools and training and they will deliver.
19
Team 1: Poetry in motion, perfect pothole preparation, attention to quality and detail, a genuine sense of ownership has been achieved, something I truly hope can become a permanent feature with each team in every community throughout our country.
20
7. THE RESULTS
21
1.Over R 300 000.00 was spent on training.
2.Over 5 285 potholes / patches repaired in the region
3.Nearly 5 000 m² of severely damaged roads repaired
4.Nearly 650 tons of material was used in 3 months by our teams along with over 100 tons being used as marketing and promotions by other local municipal teams in the region along with a major trial with training involving Department of Transport
5.Over 200 roads were attended to in the region
6.5 Teams (37 people) now averaging 20 to 30 m² productivity per day. Usage of material in excess of 2.5 to 3.5 tons per day.
7.Local bagging team also established to increase employment and productivity (12 people hired).
End result: Out of 7 teams created, 5 teams became well qualified, highly effective and productive pothole repair units that successfully delivered on local infrastructure to the benefit of themselves and the community as a whole.
8. BENEFITS OF UGU MODEL/APPROACH
22
1. Critical Skills Development – Road Construction and maintenance
2. Local Job creation
3. Cooperative Business Development
4. Investor Confidence – e.g. Tourism and Logistics
5. Nation building
6. Integration of various government policy provisions1. Local Job Creation2. Local Economic Development3. Poverty Reduction4. Co-operative development5. Inter-governmental Relations 6. Expanded Public Works Programme
9. RECOMMENDATIONS
23
1. That a community based approach to the fixing of potholes be considered as a model that will be used in South Africa to develop skills, create jobs and eradicate potholes.
2. That National Government and municipalities be encouraged to budget for road maintenance in order to reduce the emergence of potholes.
3. That where possible, District Municipalities be authorized to share Powers and Functions if it will improve service delivery
4. The Roads Maintenance Fund should encourage technical collaboration between Provinces and Municipalities to assist low capacity municipalities beyond the Asset register prescriptions.
5. That the training interventions be linked to proper unit standards
6. That the Ugu Model be integrated throughout the country.
7. That the entire approach not only be viewed as a technical intervention but also a social intervention
24
25
THANK YOU