. . 2556 16-18 2556 To Study the Employees Satisfaction with Payment, Welfare and Incentives 1* 2 3 1,2,3 E-mail: [email protected] * Kasem Pipatpanyanugoon 1* Chantra Nakvachiratrakul 2 Prangluck Ammaranant 3 1,2,3 Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Burapha University, Chonburi E-mail: [email protected]* 3 8 252 SPSS (85.72%) (77.65%) (73.22%) (85.72%) (85.72%) (85.32 %) (92.19%) (92.07%) (89.21%) Abstract The objective of this research is to study the employee satisfaction with the payment, welfare and motivation of the sample automobile manufacturer because there was a strike and negotiation. The questionnaires were sent out to 252 office employees in 3 from 8 divisions. The questionnaires data were analyzed with SPSS. The results were following: the employees satisfactions with payment were overtime (85.72%), rents (77.65%) and payroll (73.22%). The monetary welfare incentives were free meals (85.72%), the appropriate uniform (85.72%) and the adequate first aid rooms (85.32%). Non- monetary welfare incentives were the society acceptance (92.19%), the job responsibilities and the challenge (92.07%), the satisfaction with the company (89.21%). In addition, the employees who worked in different departments had significantly different of satisfaction in monetary and non-monetary payment and welfare. There were feedbacks from employees that a flexible welfare would be an alternation that can meet the true needs of employees. Keywords: satisfaction, payment, welfare, incentive.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
. . 2556 16-18 2556
To Study the Employees Satisfaction with Payment, Welfare and Incentives
1* 2 3 1,2,3
E-mail: [email protected]*
Kasem Pipatpanyanugoon1* Chantra Nakvachiratrakul2 Prangluck Ammaranant3 1,2,3Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Burapha University, Chonburi
E-mail: [email protected]*
3 8 252 SPSS (85.72%)
(77.65%) (73.22%) (85.72%)
(85.72%) (85.32 %) (92.19%)
(92.07%) (89.21%)
Abstract
The objective of this research is to study the employee satisfaction with the payment, welfare and
motivation of the sample automobile manufacturer because there was a strike and negotiation. The questionnaires were sent out to 252 office employees in 3 from 8 divisions. The questionnaire�s data
were analyzed with SPSS. The results were following: the employees satisfactions with payment were
overtime (85.72%), rents (77.65%) and payroll (73.22%). The monetary welfare incentives were free meals (85.72%), the appropriate uniform (85.72%) and the adequate first aid rooms (85.32%). Non-
monetary welfare incentives were the society acceptance (92.19%), the job responsibilities and the challenge (92.07%), the satisfaction with the company (89.21%). In addition, the employees who worked
in different departments had significantly different of satisfaction in monetary and non-monetary payment and welfare. There were feedbacks from employees that a flexible welfare would be an alternation that
can meet the true needs of employees.
Keywords: satisfaction, payment, welfare, incentive.
. . 2556 16-18 2556
1.
(Human Capital)
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
. . 2556 16-18 2556
2.
2.1
( ) 3 252
8 592 42.57
3 1
2
2 �
23 35 55
5 3
4
260
252
SPSS (Statistical Pack for the
Social Science) Version 12.0
3.
3.1
1.
() ( )
(5) (4) (3)
(2) (1) 1
1
(%)
(%)
73.22 26.78
( ) 77.65 22.35
85.72 14.29
72.22 27.78
77.20 22.80
1
85.72
77.65 73.22
72.22 77.20
2.
12 2
. . 2556 16-18 2556
2
(%)
(%)
1.
69.97 30.07
2.
68.65 31.35
3.
67.06 32.94
.4. /
60.72 39.28
5.
71.43 28.57
6.
82.54 17.56
7.
85.72 14.28
8.
85.72 14.28
9.
85.32 14.68
10.
82.93 17.07
11. ()
84.13 15.87
12.
82.94 17.06
77.26 22.74
2 3 1)
85.72 2)
85.72 3)
85.32 77.26
3.2
8 3
3
(%)
(%)
1. 92.19 7.81
2.
92.07 7.93
3. 89.21 10.79
4.
85.62 14.38
5. 85.40 14.60
6. 83.20 16.80
7. 80.86 19.14
8.
71.13 28.87
90.47 9.53
3
3 1) 92.19 2)
92.07 3) 89.21
90.47
3.3
4
0.05
. . 2556 16-18 2556
4
0 2
3 6
7 9
10
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD df F Sig.
3.28 0.69 3.10 0.73 3.16 0.60 3.28 0.71 3.19 0.71 3.00 1.32 0.27
3.41 0.57 3.35 0.63 3.37 0.58 3.48 0.57 3.40 0.60 3.00 0.75 0.52
5
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD df F Sig.
3.09 0.70 3.09 0.72 3.38 0.68 3.19 0.71 2.00 4.84 0.01
3.32 0.62 3.31 0.60 3.58 0.53 3.40 0.60 2.00 5.76 0.00
3.4
5
0.05
1) 2)
3) 4) 5)
3.5
1. 1)
Ford Global Asia
2) %
3)
2.
1)
2)
3)
4)
3.
1)
Ford & Mazda
. . 2556 16-18 2556
2)
3)
4)
5)
Food Center ()
�
3.6
1) Subcontractor
100 2)
10 15
10 50
15 1
3) 5 20000
1 2
3)
4.
(HR)
30 (
)
. . 2556 16-18 2556
. /
[1] . 2540.
. . .
[2] . 2538.
.
. [3] . 2550. .
. [4] . 2552.
� � 29 .
Related Documents
