-
To: Brian Walters
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Patricia Allegretti
Date: Sun, Sep 9,2012 at 9:15 AMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF
Ordinance CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To:
[email protected]
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT&T from putting a 45 foot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Han. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Hon. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Hon. Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Hon. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Han. Paul
KrekorianHan. Richard Alarcon Han. Bernard C. ParksHon. Joe
Buscaino Hon. Jan PerryHan. Jose Cardenas Han. Bill RosendahlHan.
Mitchell Englander Hon. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please 'Voteto amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT&T from putting a cel! phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful bluffs.
AT&T has applied to the California Coastal Commission to put
a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt. Holyoke( Applicationnumber:5-12-146.)
Please vote to amend the regulations so that we can keep the cell
tower out of the park wheremany of our children play and all of us
enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific Ocean
Placing an industrial commercial wireless telecommunications
facility at: 302 Mount Holyoke Ave., PacificPalisades is completely
incompatible with the use and purpose of the family homes in our R1
zonedneighborhood. Further, this cel! tower is right beside a park
where children play. It would create an aestheticblight since it
would be located next to Palisades Park (a public park) and in a
coastal zone. It would bedetrimental to the health of our families,
the value of our property, the reputation of our local public
schools, andthe character of our neighborhoods.
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemption (BIG!)Expansion of the notice
provisions (to be determined, but currently limited to
"adjoining/abutting/across thestreet" property
owners/occupants)
-
Enhancement 01 the aesthetic provisions (to be determined, but
certainly any enhancement would be animprovement since there are
virtually no such provisions related to towers in the current
ordinance!)Imposition of permit duration limits (again to be
determined; currently there are none)Expansion of the right of
appeal to "all aggrieved persons" (1. e" consistent with appeal
rights under LA ZoningCode for CUPs/private property installations;
currently, appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only afforded tothe
limited number of owners/occupants who received notice -- a highly
restrictive provision which stands aloneamong California
cities),Requirement for the applicant to map all existing wireless
facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs in the area or
community served by the proposed facility,Provision for public
comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for all proposed
installations in residentialzones (currently no such hearings are
provided for),Requirement for the applicant to provde an RF
emissions analysis and/or a certification 01 compliance with
FCCrequirements (again, no such provsion in current
ordinance),Requirement for the applicant to map all existing
wireless facilities and to project anticipated future needs in
thecommunity served by the proposed facility (same),Provide a
temporary moratorium on PROW installations (not onprivate property
installations) while the Ordinance is being draftedRequirement for
the applicant to bear the expense of an independent expert to
assist the City, asneeded, with analysis of technical issues such
as coverage gap claims, RF emissions andalternative location feasi
bility.
Sincerely,
As a society, are we really going to erase the little beauty we
have in urban areas? Is it not possible with a littleeffort to
maintain form with function? Please take a stand for all of us,
Patricia AllegrettiLos Angeles, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Chanqe.orq, viewable at
http://www.cliange.org/petitions/los-angeles-city~council-\;ote-for-regu!ation~of-wti-s,
To respond, click here
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Man, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:37 PM
---------- Forwarded message "---------From: sandra Muh1 Date:
Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 9:36 AMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance
CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec, 63.03,2To: june.!agmay@lacity,org
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63,03,2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT&T from putting a 45 foot tower cell
phone tower on one of our most
-
beautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke( Application number:
5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Han. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Hon. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Han. Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Han. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Han. Paul
KrekorianHan. Richard Alarcon Han. Bernard C. ParksHan. Joe
Buscaino Hon, Jan PerryHan. Jose Cardenas Hon. Bill RosendahlHon.
Mitchell Englander Hon. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT&T from putting a cell phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful bluffs.
AT&T has applied to the California Coastal Commission to put
a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt. Ho!yoke( Applicationnumber:5-12-146.)
Please vote to amend the regulations so that we can keep the cell
tower out of the park wheremany of our children play and all of us
enjoy a spectacular \liew of the Pacific Ocean
Placing an industrial commercial wireless telecommunications
facility at: 302 Mount Holyoke A\le., PacificPalisades is
completely incompatible with the use and purpose of the family
homes in our R1 zonedneiqhborhood. Further, this cell tower is
right beside a park where children play. It would create an
aestheticblight since it would be located next to Palisades Park (a
public park) and in a coastal zone, !t would bedetrimental to the
health of our families, the value of our property, the reputation
of our loca! public schools, andthe character of our
neighborhoods.
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemption (BIG!)Expansion at the notice
provisions (to be determined, but currently limited to
"adjoining/abutting/across thestreet" property owners/ace
upants)Enhancement of the aesthetic provisions (to be determined,
but certainly any enhancement would be animprovement since there
are virtually no such provisions related to towers in the current
ordinance!)Imposition of permit duration limits (again to be
determined; currently there are none)Expansion of the right of
appeal to "all aggrieved persons" (I.e., consistent with appeal
rights under L.A ZoningCode for CUPs/private property
installations; currently, appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only
aiforded tothe limited number of owners/occupants who received
notice -- a highly restnctive provision which stands aloneamong
California cities).Requirement for the applicant to map all
existing wireless facilities and to project antlcipatedfuture needs
in the area or community served by the proposed facility.Provision
for public comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, lor
all proposed installations in residentialzones (currently no such
hearings are provided for),Requirement for the applicant to provide
an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification of compliance with
FCCrequirements (again. no such provlslon in current
ordinance),Requirement for the applicant to map all existing
wireless facilities and to project anticipated future needs in
thecommunity served by the proposed facility (same).Provide a
temporary moratorium on PROW installations (not onprivate property
installations) while the Ordinance is being draftedRequirement for
the applicant to bear the expense of an independent expert to ass
ist the City, asneeded, with analysis ot technical issues such as
coverage gap claims, RF emissions andalternative location
feasibility.
-
Sincerely.
Take a guess!!!
sandra Muhlcanyon country, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at
http://www.change.org/petitions/los-angeles-city-councll-vote-for-regulation-of-wtf-s.
To respond, click here
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:38 PM
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Rachel Scott Date:
Sun, Sep 9,2012 at 10:17 AMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance
CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To: [email protected]
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT&T from putting a 45 loot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Hon. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Hon. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Han. Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Hon. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Han. Paul
KrekorianHan. Richard Alarcon Han. Bernard C ParksHon. Joe Buscaino
Han. Jan PerryHan. Jose Cardenas Han. Bill RosendahlHan. Mitchell
Englander Hon. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT&T from putting a cel! phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful blurts.
-
AT& T has applied to the California Coastal Commission to
put a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt Holyoke( Applicationnumber:5-12-146.)
Please vote to amend the regulations so that we can keep the cell
tower out of the park wheremany 01 our children play and all of us
enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific Ocean
Placing an industrial commercial wireless telecommunications
facility at: 302 Mount Holyoke Ave., PacificPalisades is completely
incompatible with the use and purpose of the family homes in our R1
zonedneighborhood. Further, this cell tower is right beside a park
where children play. It would create an aestheticblight since it
would be located next to Palisades Park (a public park) and in a
coastal zone. It would bedetrimental to the health of our families.
the value of our property, the reputation of our local public
schools, andthe character of our neighborhoods.
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemption (BIG!)Expansion of the notice
provisions (to be determined, but currently limited to
"adjoining/abutting/across thestreet" property
owners/occupants)Enhancement of the aesthetic provisions (to be
determined, but certainly any enhancement would be animprovement
since there are virtually no such provisions related to towers in
the current ordinance!)Imposition of permit duration limits (again
to be determined; currently there are none)Expansion of the right
of appeal to "all aggrieved persons" (i.e., consistent with appeal
rights under L.A. ZoningCode for CUPs/private property
installations: currently, appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only
afforded tothe limited number of owners/occupants who received
notice -- a highly restrictive provision which stands aloneamong
California cities).Requirement for the applicant to map all
existing wireless facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs
in the area or community served by the proposed facility.Provision
for public comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for
all proposed installations in residentialzones (currently no such
hearings are provided for),Requirement for the applicant to provide
an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification of compliance with
FCCrequirements (again, no such provision in current
ordinance),Requirement for the applicant to map all existing
wireless facliities and to project anticipated future needs in
thecommunity served by the proposed facility (same).Provide a
temporary moratorium on PROW installations (not onprivate property
installations) while the Ordinance is being draftedRequirement for
the applicant to bear the expense of an independent expert to
assist the City, asneeded, with analysis of technical issues such
as coverage gap claims,RF emissions andalternative location
feasibility.
Sincerely,
Rachel ScottWhitewater, Wisconsin
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at
http://www.change.org/petitions/los-anqeles-city ..council-vote
..tor-reculatlon-ot-wtt-s. To respond, click here
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:38 PM
---- ..----- Forwarded message ----------From: Katia Riquelme
Date: Sun, Sep 9,2012 at 11:00 AMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF
Ordinance CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To:
[email protected]
-
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09·2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT&T from putting a 45 foot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautilul bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Han. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Hon. Jose HuizarHon. Tom La80nge,
Assistant President Han. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Hon. Paul
KrekorianHan. Richard Alarcon Han. Bernard C. ParksHan. Joe
Buscaino Han. Jan PerryHon. Jose Cardenas Han. Bill RosendahlHon.
Mitchell Englander Hon. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT&T from putting a cell phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful blurts.
AT&T has applied to the Calllornia Coastal Commission to put
a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt. Holyoke( Applicationnumber:5-12-146.)
Please vote to amend the regulations so that we can keep the cell
tower out of the park wheremany of our children play and all of us
enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific Ocean
Placing an industrial commercial wireless telecommunications
facility at: 302 Mount Holyoke Ave" PacificPalisades is completely
incompatible with the use and purpose of the family homes in our Pi
zonedneighborhood. Further, this cell tower is right beside a park
where children play. It would create an aestheticblight since it
would be located next to Palisades Park (a public park) and in a
coastal zone. It would bedetrimental to the health 01our families,
the value of our property, the reputation of our local public
schools, andthe character of our neighborhoods.
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemption (BIG!)Expansion of the notice
provisions (to be determined, but currently limited to
"adjoining/abutting/across thestreet" property
owners/occupants)Enhancement of the aesthetic provisions (to be
determined, but certainly any enhancement would be animprovement
since there are virtually no such provisions related to towers in
the current ordinance!)Imposition of permit duration limits (again
to be determined; currently there are none)Expansion at the right
of appeal to "all aggrieved persons" (i.e., consistent with appeal
rights under L.A. ZoningCode for CUPs/private property
installations; currently, appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only
afforded tothe limited number of owners/occupants who received
notice "- a highly restrictive provision which stands aloneamong
California cities).Requirement for the applicant to map all
existing wireless facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs
in the area or community served by the proposed facility.
-
Provision for public comment and/or a hearing prior to permit
issuance, for all proposed installations in residentialzones
(currently no such hearings are provided for),Requirement for the
applicant to provide an RF emissions analysis and/or a
certification of compliance with FCCrequirements (again, no such
provision in current ordinance),Requirement tor the applicant to
map all existing wireless facilities and to project anticipated
future needs in thecommunity served by the proposed facility
(same).Provide a temporary moratorium on PROW installations (not
onprivate property installations) while the Ordinance is being
draftedRequirement for the appflcant to bear the expense of an
independent expert to ass ist the City, asneeded, with analysis of
technical issues such as coverage gap claims, RF emissions
andalternative location feasibility.
Sincerely,
Katia RiquelmeLima, Ohio
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at
http://www.change.orgfpetitionsflos-angeles-city-council-vote-lor-regulation-ol-wtt-s.
To respond, click here
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:38 PM
"--------- Forwarded message -"--------From: Jim Wilson Date:
Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at11 :53 AMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance
CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To: june. !agmay@!acity.org
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT& T from putting a 45 toot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiiul bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Hen. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Hon. Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Hon. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Han. Paul
KrekarianHan. Richard Alarcon Han. Bernard C. ParksHan. Joe
Buscaino Han. Jan PerryHon. Jose Cardenas Han. Bill RosendahlHon.
Mitchell Englander Han. Dennis P. Zine
-
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers ,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT&T from putting a cell phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful bluffs.
AT&T has applied to the California Coastal Commission to put
a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt Holyoke( Applicationnumber:5-12-146.)
Please vote to amend the regulations so that we can keep the cell
tower out of the park wheremany of our children play and all of us
enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific Ocean
Placing an industrial commercial wireless telecommunications
facility at: 302 Mount Holyoke Ave., PacificPalisades is completely
incompatible with the use and purpose of the family homes in our R1
zonedneighborhood. Further, this cell tower is right beside a park
where children play. It would create an aestheticblight since it
would be located next to Palisades Park (a public park) and in a
coastal zone. It would bedetrimental to the health of our families,
the value of our property, the reputation 01 our local public
schools, andthe character 01 our neighborhoods.
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemption (BIG!)Expansion of the notice
provisions (to be determined, but currently limited to
"adjoining/abutting/across thestreet" property
owners/occupants)Enhancement of the aesthetic provisions (to be
determined, but certainly any enhancement would be animprovement
since there are virtually no such provisions related to towers in
the current ordinance!)Imposition of permit duration limits (again
to be determined; currently there are none)Expansion of the right
of appeal to "all aggrieved persons" (i,e., consistent with appeal
rights under L.A ZoningCode lor CUPs/private property
installations; currently, appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only
afforded tothe limited number of owners/occupants who received
notice -- a highly restrictive provision which stands aloneamong
California cities).Requirement for the applicant to map all
existing wireless facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs
in the area or community served by the proposed facility,Provision
for public comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for
all proposed installations in residentialzones (currently no such
hearings are provided for),Requirement for the applicant to provide
an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification of compliance with
FCCrequirements (again, no such provision in current
ordinance),Requirement for the applicant to map all existing
wireless facilities and to project anticipated future needs in
thecommunity served by the proposed facility (same).Provide a
temporary moratorium on PROW installations (not onprivate property
installations) while the Ordinance is being draftedRequirement for
the applicant to bear the expense of an independent expert to
assist the City j asneeded, with analysis of technical issues such
as coverage gap claims, RF emissions andalternative location
feasibility.
Sincerely,
No regulations on EMF exposure? This IS insane!
Jim WilsonSherman Oaks, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at
http://www.change.org/petitionsl1os-angeles-city-courlcil-\iotc-for-regulation-of-wtf-s.
To respond, click here
-
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Man, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:38 PM
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Alice Gordezky
Date: Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 12:25 PMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF
Ordinance CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To:
[email protected]
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT&T from putting a 45 foot tower cell
phone tower on one 01 our mostbeautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Hon. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Han. Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Hon. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Hon. Paul
KrekorianHon. Richard Alarcon Hon. Bernard C. ParksHon. Joe
Buscaino Han. Jan PerryHan. Jose Cardenas Han. Bill RosendahlHon.
Mitchell Englander Hon. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable CouncHmembers,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT&T from putting a cell phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful bluffs.
AT&T has applied to the California Coastal Commission to put
a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt. Holyoke( Applicationnumber:5-12-146.)
Please vote to amend the regulations so that we can keep the cetl
tower out of the park wheremany of our children play and all of us
enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific Ocean
Placing an industrial commercial wireless telecommunications
facility at: 302 Mount Holyoke Ave., Pacil1cPalisades is completely
incompatible with the use and purpose 01 the family homes in our R1
zonedneighborhood. Further, this cell tower is right beside a park
where children play. It would create an aestheticblight since it
would be located next to Palisades Park (a public park) and in a
coastal zone. It would bedetrimental to the health of our families,
the value of our property, the reputation of our local public
schools, andthe character of our neighborhoods.
-
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemption (BIG!)Expansion of the notice
provisions (to be determined, but currently limited to
"adjoining/abutting/across thestreet" property
owners/occupants)Enhancement of the aesthetic provisions (to be
determined, but certainly any enhancement would be animprovement
since there are virtually no such provisions related to towers in
the current ordinance!)Imposition of permit duration limits (again
to be determined; currently there are none)Expansion of the right
of appeal to "all aggrieved persons" (Le" consistent with appeal
rights under LA ZoningCode for CUPs/private property installations;
currently, appeal of AGF permits in the P ROW is only afforded
tothe limited number of owners/occupants who received notice -- a
highly restrictive provision which stands aloneamong California
cities),Requirement for the applicant to map all existing wireless
faclllties and to project anticipatedfuture needs in the area or
community served by the proposed facility,Provision for public
comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for all proposed
installations in residentialzones (currently no such hearings are
provided for),Requirement for the applicant to provide an RF
emissions analysis and/or a certiiication of compliance with
FCCrequirements (again, no such provision in current
ordinance),Requirement for the applicant to map all existing
wireless tacillties and to project anticipated future needs in
thecommunity served by the proposed facility (same),Provide a
temporary moratorium on PROW installations (not onprivate property
installations) while the Ordinance is being draftedRequirement for
the applicant to bear the expense of an independent expert to
assist the City, asneeded, with analysis of technical issues such
as coverage gap claims, RF emissions andalternative location feasi
billty.
Sincerely,
We did not have a choice about this, They did not notify us.
Later they said it was for better coverage for use onthe freeway,
It is illegal to text or email while driving on the freeway.
Alice GordezkySherman Oaks, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at
http://www.change.org/petitions/los-angeles-city-council-vote,·lor-regulation-of-wtf-s.
To respond, click here
June Lagmay Man, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:39 PMTo: Brian Walters
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Dawn Massey Date;
Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 12:40 PMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance
CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To: june,[email protected]
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
-
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9111/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT&T from putting a 45 foot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Han. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Han. Jose HuizarHon. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Han. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Hon. Paul
KrekorianHan. Richard Alarcon Han. Bernard C. ParksHan. Joe
Buscaino Han. Jan PerryHan. Jose Cardenas Hon. Bill RosendahlHan.
Mitchell Englander Han. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Sprlng StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT&T from putting a cell phone
tower on one oi ourmost beautiful bluffs.
AT&T has applied to the California Coastal Commiss ion to
put a 45 ioot tower at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Applicationnumber:5-12-146.) Please vote to amend the regulations
so that we can keep the cell tower out of the park wheremany of our
children play and all of us enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific
Ocean
Placing an industrial commercial wireless telecommunications
facility at: 302 Mount Holyoke A\Je., PacificPallsades is
completely incompatible with the use and purpose of the family
homes in our R1 zonedneighborhood. Further, this cell tower is
right beside a park where children play. It would create an
aestheticblight since it would be located next to Palisades Park (a
public park) and in a coastal zone, It would bedetrimental to the
health ot our families, the value of our property, the reputation
of our local public schools, andthe character of our
neighborhoods.
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemption (BIG!)Expansion of the notice
provisions (to be determined, but currently limited to
"adjoining/abutting/across thestreet" property
owners/occupants)Enhancement of the aesthetic provisions (to be
determined, but certainly any enhancement would be animprovement
since there are virtually no such provsions related to towers in
the current ordinance!)Imposition of permit duration limits (again
to be determined; currently there are none)Expansion of the right
of appeal to "all aggrieved persons" (i.e., consistent with appeal
rights under L.A. ZoningCode for CUPs/private property
installations; currently, appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only
afforded tothe limited number of owners/occupants who received
notice -- a highly restrictive provision which stands aloneamong
California cities).Requirement for the applicant to map all
existing wireless facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs
in the area or community served by the proposed facility.Provision
for public comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for
all proposed installations in residentialzones (currently no such
hearings are provided for),Requirement for the applicant to provide
an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification of compliance with
FCCrequirements (again, no such provision in current
ordinance),Requirement for the applicant to map all existing
wireless 1acilities and to project anticipated future needs in
thecommunity served by the proposed facility (same).
-
Provide a temporary moratorium on PROW installations (not
onprivate property installations) while the Ordinance is being
draftedRequirement for the applicant to bear the expense of an
independent expert to assist the City, asneeded, with analysis of
technical issues such as coverage gap claims, RF emissions
andalternative location feasibility.
Sincerely,
Dawn MasseyPacific Palisades, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at
http://www.change.org/petitions/los-angeles-city-council-vote-for-regulatior1-of-wtf··s.
To respond, click here
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:39 PM
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Cary Sullivan Date:
Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 3:53 PMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance
CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To: [email protected]
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMe Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT&T from putting a 45 foot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Han. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han. Eric GarcettiHan, Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Han. Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Hon. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Han. Paul
KrekorianHan. Richard Alarcon Han. Bernard C. ParksHan. Joe
Buscaino Han. Jan PerryHan. Jose Cardenas Han. Bill RosendahlHan.
Mitchell Englander Han, Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
-
Dear Honorable Ccuncilmembers.Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT& T from putting a cell phone
tower on one 01 ourmost beautiful bluffs.
AT& T has applied to the California Coastal Commission to
put a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt Holyoke( Applicationnumber:5-12-146.)
Please vote to amend the regulations so that we can keep the cel!
tower out of the park wheremany of our children play and all of us
enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific Ocean
Placing an industrial commercia! wireless telecommunications
facility at: 302 Mount Holyoke Ave., PacificPalisades is completely
incompatible with the use and purpose 01 the family homes in our R1
zonedneighborhood. Further, 'this cell tower is right beside a park
where children play. It would create an aestheticblight since it
would be located next to Palisades Park (a public park) and in a
coastal zone. It would bedetrimental to the health of our families,
the value of our property, the reputation 01 our local public
schools, andthe character of our neighborhoods.
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemption (BIG!)Expansion of the notice
provisions (to be determined, but currently limited to
"adjoining/abutting/across thestreet" property
owners/occupants)Enhancement of the aesthetic provisions (to be
determined, but certainly any enhancement would be animprovement
since there are virtually no such provistons related to towers in
the current ordinance!)Imposition of permit duration limits (again
to be determined; currently there are none)Expansion of the right
of appeal to "all aggrieved persons" (I.e., consistent with appeal
rights under L.A. ZoningCode for CUPs/private property
installations; currently, appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only
afforded tothe limited number of owners/occupants who received
notice -- a highly restrictive provision which stands aloneamong
California cities).Requirement for the applicant to map all
existing wireless facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs
in the area or community served by the proposed facility.Provision
for public comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for
all proposed installations in residentialzones (currently no such
hearings are provided lor),Requirement for the applicant to provide
an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification of compliance with
FCCrequirements (again, no such provision in current
ordinance),Requirement for the applicant to map all existing
wireless facilities and to project anticipated future needs in
thecommunity served by the proposed facility (same).Provide a
temporary moratorium on PROW installations (not onprivate property
installations) while the Ordinance is being draftedRequirement for
the applicant to bear the expense of an independent expert to
assist the City, asneeded, with analysis ot technical issues such
as coverage gap claims, RF emissions andalternative location teas
ibi!ity.
Sincerely,
We have a family close by the tower. We have lived in the
Palisades for over 40 years and are absolutely againstthis. Please
support this petition.
Cary SullivanPacific Palisades, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at
http://www.change.org/petitionsllo5-angelosvcity··council-vote··Tor-regu!ation-ot-wtf-s.
To respond, click here
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Man, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:39 PM
-
June LagmayCity [email protected]
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Stephen Barrie
Date: Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 5:25 PMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF
Ordinance CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec, 63.03.2To:
june,[email protected]
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT&T from putting a 45 loot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Han. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed p
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Han. Jose HuizarHan; Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Han. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Han. Paul
KrekorianHan. Richard Alarcon Hon. Bernard C. ParksHan. Joe
Buscaino Han. Jan PerryHon. Jose Cardenas Hon. 8i1! RosendahlHon.
Mitchell Englander Hon. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council Flie No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT&T from putting a cell phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful bluffs.
AT&T has applied to the California Coastal Commission to put
a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt. Holyoke( Applicationnumber:5-12-146.)
Please vote to amend the regulations so that we can keep the cell
tower out of the park wheremany of our children play and all 01 us
enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific Ocean
Placing an industrial commercial wireless telecommunications
facility at: 302 Mount Holyoke Ave., PacificPalisades is completely
incompatible with the use and purpose of the family homes in our R1
zonedneighborhood. Further, this cell tower is right beside a park
where children play. It would create an aestheticblight since it
would be located next to Palisades Park (a public park) and in a
coastal zone. It would bedetrimental to the health of our families,
the value of our property, the reputation of our local public
schools, andthe character of our neighborhoods.
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:
-
Elimination 01 the utility pole exemption (BIG!)Expansion of the
notice provisions (to be determined, but currently limited to
"adjoining/abutting/across thestreet" property
owners/occupants)Enhancement of the aesthetic provisions (to be
determined, but certainly any enhancement would be animprovement
since there are virtually no such provisions related to towers in
the current ordinance!)Imposition of permit duration limits (again
to be determined; currently there are none)Expansion of the right
of appea! to "an aggrieved persons" (i.e., consistent with appeal
rights under L.A ZoningCode for CUPs/private property
installations; currently, appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only
afforded tothe limited number of owners/occupants who received
notice -- a highly restrictive provision which stands aloneamong
California cities).Requirement for the applicant to map all
existinq wireless facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs
in the area or community served by the proposed facility.Provision
for public comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for
all proposed installations in residentialzones (currently no such
hearings are provided for),Requirement for the applicant to provide
an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification of compliance with
FCCrequirements (again, no such provision in current
ordinance),Requirement for the applicant to map all existing
wireless facilities and to project anticipated iuture needs in
thecommunity served by the proposed facility (same).Provide a
temporary moratorium on PROW installations (not onprivate property
installations) while the Ordinance is being draftedRequirement for
the applicant to bear the expense of an independent expert to
assist the City, asneeded, with analysis of technical issues such
as coverage gap claims, RF emissions andalternative location
feasibility.
Sincerely,
Stephen BarriePacific Palisades, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at
http.r/www.chanqe.orq/petitionsflos"sngeies-city-council-vote-lor-regulation-of-wit-s.
To respond, click here
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Mon, Sep 10,2012 at 12:39 PM
---"------ Forwarded message --------"-From: l.ill Feldman Date:
Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 5:29 PMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance
CF09-2645JAGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To: june.lagmay@lacity,org
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT&T from putting a 45 loot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful bl uffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Appl ication number: 5-12-146.)
-
Sept. 7, 2012.
Hon. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Hon. Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Hon. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Han. Paul
KrekorianHon. Richard Alarcon Han. Bernard C. parksHon. Joe
Buscaino Hon. Jan PerryHon. Jose Cardenas Hon. Bill RosendahlHon.
Mitchel! Englander Hon. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT&T from putting a cell phone
tower on.one of ourmost beautiful blutls.
AT&T has applied to the California Coastal Commission to put
a 45 foot tower at 302 ML Holyoke( Applicationnumber:5-12-146.)
Please vote to amend the regulations so that we can keep the cell
tower out of the park wheremany of our children play and all of us
enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific Ocean
Placing an industrial commercial wireless telecommunications
facility at: 302 Mount Holyoke A've., PacificPalisades is
completely incompatible with the use and purpose of the family
homes in our Ri zonedneighborhood. Further, this cell tower is
right beside a park where children play. It would create an
aestheticblight since it would be located next to Palisades Park (a
public park) and in a coastal zone. It would bedetrimental to the
health of our families, the value of our property, the reputation
of our local public schools, andthe character of our
neighborhoods.
Please vote to provide regulation lor the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemption (BIG!)Expansion of the notice
provisions (to be determined, but currently limited to
"adjoining/abutting/across thestreet" property
owners/occupants)Enhancement of the aesthetic provsions (to be
determined, but certainly any enhancement would be animprovement
since there are 'virtually no such provisions related to towers in
the current ordinance!)Imposition of permit duration limits (again
to be determined; currently there are none)Expansion of the right
of appeal to "all aggrieved persons" (i.e., consistent with appeal
rights under L.A. ZoningCode for CUPs/private property
installations; currently, appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only
afforded tothe limited number of owners/occupants who received
notice -- a highly restrictive provision which stands aloneamong
California cities).Requirement for the applicant to map all
existing wireless facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs
in the area or community served by the proposed facility.Provision
for public comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for
all proposed installations in residentialzones (currently no such
hearings are provided tor),Requirement for the applicant to provide
an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification of compliance with
FCCrequirements (again, no such provision in current
ordinance),RequIrement for the applicant to map all existing
wireless facilities and to project anticipated future needs in
thecommunity served by the proposed facility (same).Provide a
temporary moratorium on PROW installations (not onprivate property
installations) whiIe the Ordinance is being draftedRequirement for
the applicant to bear the expense of an independent expert to
assist the City, asneeded, with analysis 01 technical issues such
as coverage gap claims, RF emissions andalternattve location
feasibility.
Sincerely,
-
Lili FeldmanLa Mesa, Calilornla
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.arg, viewable at
http://www.change.org/petitions/los-angeies-clty-council-lJote-for-regulation.oi-wtf-s.
To respond, click here
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Man, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:40 PM
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: erin jonsson Date:
Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 5:37 PMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance
CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To: [email protected]
Greetings,
I Just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT&T from putting a 45 foot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Hon. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Han. Jose HuizarHon. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Han. Pau! KoretzPro Tempore Han. Paul
KrekorianHan. Richard Alarcon Han. Bernard C. ParksHon. Joe
Buscaino Han. Jan PerryHan. Jose Cardenas Hon. Bill RosendahlHan.
Mitchell Englander Han. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spririg StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT&T from putting a cell phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful blutls.
A T&T has applied to the California Coastal Commission to
put a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt. Holyoke(Applicationnumber:5-12-146.)
Please vote to amend the regulations so that we can keep the cell
tower out of the park wheremany of our children play and all of us
enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific Ocean
-
P!acing an industria! commercial wireless telecommunications
facility at: 302 Mount Holyoke Ave., PacificPalisades is completely
incompatible with the use and purpose 01 the family homes in our R1
zonedneighborhood, Further, this cell tower is right beside a park
where children play. It would create an aestheticblight since it
would be located next to Palisades Park (a public park) and in a
coastal zone, It would bedetrimental to the health of our families,
the value of our property, the reputation of our local public
schools, andthe character of our neighborhoods.
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemption (BIG!)Expansion of the notice
provisions (to be determined, but currently limited to
"adjoining/abutting/across thestreet" property
owners/occupants)Enhancement of the aesthetic provisions (to be
determined, but certainly any enhancement would be animprovement
since there are virtually no such provisions related to towers in
the current ordinance!)Imposition of permit duration limits (again
to be determined; currently there are none)Expansion 01 the right
of appeal to "all aggrieved persons" (Le" consistent with appeal
rights under L,A. ZoningCode for CUPs/private property
installations: currently, appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only
afforded tothe limited number of owners/occupants who received
notice -- a highly restrictive provision which stands aloneamong
California cities).Requirement for the applicant to map all
existing wireless facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs
in the area or community served by the proposed facility.Provision
for public comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for
all proposed installations in residentialzones (currently no such
hearings are provided for),Requirement lor the applicant to provide
an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification of compliance with
FCCrequirements (again, no such provision in current
ordinance),Requirement for the applicant to map all existing
wireless facilities and to project anticipated future needs in
thecommunity served by the proposed facility (same),Provide a
temporary moratorium on PROW installations (not onprivate property
installations) while the Ordinance is being draftedRequirement for
the applicant to bear the expense of an independent expert to
assist the City, asneeded, with analysis of technical issues such
as coverage gap claims, RF emissions andalternative location
feasibility.
Sincerely,
because I am a resident and it is unnecessary, hazardous to our
livlihood and peace of mind. Enough is enough!
erin jonssonPACIFIC PALISADES, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Chanqe.orq, viewable at
http://www.change.org/petitions/los-angeies-city-council-lJote-lor-regulaUon-ot-wtf-s.
To respond, click here
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:40 PM
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: avalon barrie Date:
Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 6:28 PMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance
CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To: june,lagmay@!acHy.org
-
Greetings,
! just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT&T lrom putting a 45 foot tower cell
phone tower on one 01 our mostbeautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Hon. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Hon. Eric GarcettiHon. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Han. Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Hon. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Han. Paul
KrekorianHen. Richard Alarcon Hon. Bernard C. ParksHon. Joe
Buscaino Hon. Jan PerryHan. Jose Cardenas Hon. Bill RosendahlHan.
Mitchell Englander Hon. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645!Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Counci!members,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT&T from putting a cel! phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful bluffs.
AT&T has applied to the Calilornia Coastal Commission to put
a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt. Holyoke( Applicationnumber:5-12-146.)
Please vote to amend the regulations so that we can keep the cell
tower out of the park wheremany of our children play and all of us
enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific Ocean
Placing an industrial commercial wireless telecommunications
facility at: 302 Mount Holyoke Ave., PacificPalisades is completely
incompatible with the use and purpose of the family homes in our R1
zonedneighborhood. Further, this cell tower is right beside a park
where children play. It would create an aestheticblight since it
would be located next to Palisades Park (a public park) and in a
coastal zone. It would bedetrimental to the health of our families,
the value of our property, the reputation of our local public
schools, andthe character of our neighborhoods.
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemption (BIG!)Expansion of the notice
provisions (to be determined, but currently limited to
"adjoining/abutting/across thestreet" property
owners!occupants)Enhancement of the aesthetic provisions (to be
determined, but certainly any enhancement would be animprovement
since there are virtually no such provisions related to towers in
the current ordinance!)Imposition of permit duration limits (again
to be determined; currently there are none)Expansion ot the right
of appeal to "all aggrieved persons" (i.e., consistent with appeal
rights under L.A. ZoningCode for CUPs/private property
installations; currently, appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only
afforded tothe limited number of owners/occupants who received
notice -- a highly restrictive provision which stands aloneamong
California cities).Requirement ior the applicant to map all
existing wireless facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs
in the area or community served by the proposed facility.Provision
for public comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for
all proposed installations in residential
-
zones (currently no such hearings are provided for),Requirement
for the applicant to provide an RF emissions analysis and/or a
certification of compliance with FCCrequirements (again, no such
precision in current ordinance),Requirement for the applicant to
map all existing wireless facilities and to project anticipated
future needs in thecommunity served by the proposed facility
(same).Provide a temporary moratorium on PROW installations (not
onprivate property installations) while the Ordinance is being
draftedRequirement for the applicant to bear the expense of an
independent expert to assist the City, asneeded, with analysis of
technical issues such as coverage gap claims, RF emissions
andalternative location feasibility.
Sincerely,
avalon barriepacific palisades, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at
http://www.change.org/petitions/los-angeles"clty-council-vote-for-regulation-of-wtf-s.
To respond, click here
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:40 PM
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Ellen Greenhut
Date: Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:08 PMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF
Ordinance CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To:
[email protected]
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63,03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9111/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT&T from putting a 45 foot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful blufts at 302 Mt. Ho!yoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Hon. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Hon. Jose HuizarHon. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Hon. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Hon. Paul
KrekorianHen. Richard Alarcon Hon. Bernard C. ParksHan. Joe
Buscaino Han. Jan PerryHan. Jose Cardenas Han. Bill RosendahlHan.
Mitchel! Englander Hon. Dennis P. Zine
-
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No, 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT& T from putting a cell phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful bluffs,
AT &T has applied to the California Coastal Commission to
put a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt Holyoke( Applicationnumber:5-12-146,)
Please vote to amend the regulations so that we can keep the cell
tower out of the park wheremany of our children play and all of us
enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific Ocean
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:
Elimination of the utility pole exemptionExpansion of the notice
provisionsEnhancement 01 the aesthetic provisionsImposition of
permit duration limitsExpansion of the right of appeal to "all
aggrieved persons" (i,e" consistent with appeal rights under L.A.
ZoningCode for CUPs/private property installations; currently,
appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only afforded tothe limited
number of owners/occupants who received notice -- a highly
restrictive provision Which stands aloneamong California
cities).Requirement for the applicant to map all existing wireless
facilities and to project anticlpatedfuture needs in the area or
community served by the proposed facility.Provision for public
comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, lor all proposed
installations in residentialzonesRequirement for the applicant to
provide an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification 01
compliance with FCCrequirementsRequirement for the applicant to map
all existing wireless facilities and to project anticipated future
needs in thecommunity served by the proposed facility
(same),Provide a temporary moratorium on PROW installations while
the Ordinance is being draftedRequirement tor the applicant to bear
the expense of an independent expert to assist the City, asneeded,
with analysis of technical issues such as coverage gap claims, RF
emissions andalternative location feasibility.
Sincerely,
I have children and grandchildren I don't want this near them or
their schools.
Ellen GreenhutPacific palisades, California
.Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at http://www,change.orgipetitions/los-anqeles
..city ..council ..vote ..for-requlation-oi-wtt-s. To respond,
click here
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:40 PM
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: kirsten lando
-
Date: Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 7:56 PMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF
Ordinance CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To:
june.lagmay@!acity.org
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMe Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop A T&T from putting a 45 foot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Hon. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Han. Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Hon. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Hon. Paul
KrekorianHon. Richard Alarcon Han. Bernard C. ParksHan. Joe
Buscaino Han. Jan PerryHon. Jose Cardenas Hon. Bill RosendahlHan.
Mitchell Englander Han. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles I CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please vote to 'amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT&T from putting a cell phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful bluffs.
AT& T has applied to the California Coastal Commission to
put a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Applicationnumber:5-12-146.) Please vote to amend the regulations
so that we can keep the cell tower out 01 the park wheremany of our
children play and all of us enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific
Ocean
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemptionExpansion of the notice
provisionsEnhancement of the aesthetic provisionsImposition 01
permit duration limitsExpansion of the right of appeal to "all
aggrieved persons" (l.e., consistent with appeal rights under L.A.
ZoningCode for CUPs/prIvate property installations; currently I
appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only afforded tothe limited
number of owners/occupants who received notice -- a highly
restrictive provision which stands aloneamong California
cities).Requirement for the applicant to map all existing wireless
facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs in the area or
community served by the proposed facility.Provision for public
comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for all proposed
installations in residentialzonesRequirement for the applicant to
provide an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification of
compliance with FCCrequirementsRequirement for the applicant to map
all existing wireless facilities and to project anticipated future
needs in thecommunity served by the proposed facility (same).
-
Provide a temporary moratorium on PROW installations while the
Ordinance is being draftedRequirement for the applicant to bear the
expense of an independent expert to assist the City, asneeded, with
analysis of technical issues such as coverage gap claims, RF
emissions andalternative location feasibility.
Sincerely,
I have children and love my bluffs. Don't compromise our health
with this cell tower!! .
kirsten landopacific Palisades, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at
http://www.change,org/petitions/los··angeles-city~council'"'vote-tor-reguI8tion-of-wtf··s.
To respond, click here
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters , [email protected]
Man, Sep 10,2012 at 12:41 PM
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Bryce Ozur Date:
Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 9:07 PMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance
CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To: [email protected]
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 }we may
not be able to stop AT&T from putting a 45 foot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Han. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han. Eric GarcettiHon. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Han. Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Han. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Han. Paul
KrekorianHan. Richard Alarcon Han. Bernard C. ParksHon. Joe
Buscaino Han, Jan PerryHan. Jose Cardenas Han. Bill RosendahlHan.
Mitchell Englander Han. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012
-
Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments to "Above
Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT&T from putting a cell phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful bluffs.
AT&T has applied to the Cal ifornia Coastal Com miss ion to
put a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Applicationnumber:5-12-146.) Please vote to amend the regulatrons
so that we can keep the cell tower out of the park wheremany of our
children play and all of us enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific
Ocean
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemptionExpansion of the notice
provisionsEnhancement of the aesthetic provisionsImposition 01
permit duration limitsExpansion of the right of appeal to "all
aggrieved persons" (Le., consistent with appeal rights under L.A
ZoningCode for CUPs/pri\iate property installations; currently,
appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only afforded tothe limited
number 01 owners/occupants who received notice -- a highly
restrictive provision which stands aloneamong California
cities).Requirement for the applicant to map all existing wireless
facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs in the area or
community served by the proposed facility.Provision for public
comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for all proposed
installations in residentialzonesRequirement for the applicant to
provide an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification of
compliance with FCCrequirementsRequirement for the applicant to map
all existing wireless facilities and to project anticipated future
needs in thecommunity served by the proposed facility
(same).Provide a temporary moratorium on PROW installations while
the Ordinance is being draftedRequirement for the applicant to bear
the expense of an independent expert to assist the City, asneeded,
with analysis of technical issues such as coverage gap claims, RF
emissions andalternative location feasibility.
Sincerely,
Bryce OzurLos Angeles, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, \iiewable at
http://www.change,org!petltions/los-angeles"city"council-\.oote-for-·regulation-of-wireless-telecommunications-facilities.
To respond, clickhere
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:41 PM
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: patrick hildebrand
Date: Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 9:07 PMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF
Ordinance CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63,03.2To:
june.lagmay@lacity,org
-
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT&T from putting a 45 foot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Ho!yoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Han. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Hen. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Han. Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Han. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Han. Paul
KrekorianHan. Richard Alarcon Han. Bernard C. ParksHan. Joe
Buscaino Han. Jan PerryHan. Jose Cardenas Han. Bill RosendahlHan.
Mitchell Englander Han. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT&T from putting a cell phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful bluffs.
AT&T has applied to the California Coastal Commiss ion to
put a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Applicationnumber:5-12-146.) Please vote to amend the regulations
so that we can keep the cell tower out 01 the park wheremany of our
children play and all of us enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific
Ocean
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemptionExpansion of the notice
provisionsEnhancement of the aesthetic provisionsImposition of
permit duration limitsExpansion of the right of appeal to "all
aggrieved persons" (i.e., consistent with appeal rights under L.A.
ZoningCode for CUPs/private property installations; currently,
appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only afforded tothe limited
number of owners/occupants who received notice -- a highly
restrictive provision which stands aloneamong California
cities).Requirement for the applicant to map all existing wireless
facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs in the area or
community served by the proposed facility.Provision for public
comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for all proposed
installations in residentialzonesRequirement for the applicant to
provide an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification 01
compliance with FCCrequirementsRequirement for the applicant to map
all existing wireless facilities and to project anticipated future
needs in thecommunity served by the proposed facility
(same).Provide a temporary moratorium on PROW installations while
the Ordinance is being draftedRequirement for the applicant to bear
the expense of an independent expert to assist the City, asneeded,
with analysis of technical issues such as coverage gap claims, RF
emissions andalternative location feasibility.
-
Sincerely.
patrick hildebrandPacific Palisades, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at
http://www.change.org!petitions!los-angeles-ciiy-council-vote··for-regulation-of-wireless-telecommunications-facilities.
To respond, clickhere
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Man, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:41 PM
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Cindy Hoffman Date:
Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 9:42 PMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance
CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To: [email protected]
Greetings,
! just signed the iollowing petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMe Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles Cay Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT& T from putting a 45 foot tower cel!
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Appl ication number: 5-12-146.)
Sept 7, 2012,
Hon. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Han. Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Han. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Han. Paul
KrekorianHan. Richard Alarcon Hon. Bernard C. ParksHan. Joe
Buscaino Han. Jan PerryHan. Jose Cardenas Han. BlI! RosendahlHan.
Mitchell Englander Han. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT& T from putting a cell phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful bluffs.
-
AT& T has applied to the California Coastal Commission to
put a 45 loot tower at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Applicationnumber:5-12-146.) Please vote to amend the regulations
so that we can keep the cell tower out 01 the park wheremany of our
children play and all 01 us enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific
Ocean
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemptionExpansion of the notice
provisionsEnhancement of the aesthetic provisionsImposition of
permit duration limitsExpansion of the right of appeal to "all
aggrieved persons" (i.e., consistent with appeal rights under L.A
ZoningCode for CUPs/private property installations; currently,
appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only aftorded tothe limited
number of owners/occupants who received notice -- a highly
restrictive provision which stands aloneamong California
cities).Requirement for the applicant to map all existing wireless
facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs in the area or
community served by the proposed facility.Provision for public
comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for all proposed
installations in residentialzonesRequirement for the applicant to
provide an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification 01
compliance with FCCrequirementsRequirement lor the applicant to map
all existing wireless facilities and to project anticipated future
needs in thecommunity served by the proposed facility
(same).Provide a temporary moratorium on PROW installations While
the Ordinance is being drattedRequirement for the applicant to bear
the expense of an independent expert to assist the City, asneeded,
with analysis of technical issues such as coverage gap claims, RF
emissions andalternative location feasibility.
Sincerely,
Cell towers and or antennas should never be allowed in
residenta! areas. These devices produce high levels of RFradiation
24/7. Research shows that people who live/work close to cell towers
have increased cancer rates. Voteagainst this. YOU WOULD NOT WANT
THIS IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD!!
Cindy HoffmanOrange, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at http://www.change.org/petitions/los
"angeles"·city-cQuncii-vote"for-regulatioll"
of-wireless-telecorr'imunications··jacilities. To respond,
clickhere
June Lagmay Mon, Sep 10,2012 at 12:41 PMTo: Brian Walters
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Carlos Loaiza Date:
Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 10:23 PMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance
CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To: [email protected]
Greetings,
-
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT& T from putting a 45 foot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful blul1s at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Han. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han, Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Han. Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Han. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Hon. Paul
KrekorianHon. Richard Alarcon Han. Bernard C. ParksHan. Joe
Buscaino Han. Jan PerryHan. Jose Cardenas Han. Bill RosendahlHan.
Mitchell Englander Hon. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No, 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT& T from putting a cell phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful bluffs.
AT& T has applied to the California Coastal Cornmiss ion to
put a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Applicationnumber:5-12-146.) Please vote to amend the regulations
so that we can keep the cell tower out of the park wheremany of our
chlldren play and all of us enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific
Ocean
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemptionExpansion of the notice
provisionsEnhancement of the aesthetic provisionsImposition of
permit duration limitsExpansion of the right of appeal to "all
aggrieved persons" (i.e., consistent with appeal rights under L.A.
ZoningCode for CUPs/private property installations; currently,
appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only afforded tothe limited
number of owners/occupants who received notice -- a highly
restrictive provision which stands aloneamong California cities).
-Requirement for the applicant to map all existing wireless
facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs in the area or
community served by the proposed facility.Provision for public
comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for all proposed
installations in residentialzonesRequirement for the applicant to
provide an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification of
compliance with FCCrequirementsRequirement for the applicant to map
all existing wireless facilities and to project anticipated future
needs in thecommunity served by the proposed facility
(same),Provide a temporary moratorium on PROW installations while
the Ordinance is being draftedRequirement for the applicant to bear
the expense of an independent expert to assist the City, asneeded,
with analysis of technical issues such as coverage gap claims, RF
emissions andalternative location feasibility,
Sincerely,
Cell tower planning must consider the impact on the aesthetics
of the surrounding environment.
-
Carlos LoaizaOrange, California
Note: this email was sent as part 01 a petition started on
Chanqe.orq, viewable at
http://www,change,orgipetitionsl!os-angeles-city-council-vote-ior-regulation-of-wireless-telecommunications-facilities,
To respond, clickhere
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Man, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:42 PM
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Kenneth Lee Date:
Man, Sep 10,2012 at 12:24 AMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance
CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To: [email protected]
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT&T from putting a 45 foot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146,)
Sept. 7> 2012.
Han. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Han, Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Han. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Han. Paul
KrekorianHan. Richard Alarcon Hon. Bernard C. ParksHan, Joe
Buscaino Han. Jan PerryHan, Jose Cardenas Han, Bill RosendahlHan,
Mitchell Englander Han. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please 1J0teto amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT& T from putting a cell phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful bluffs.
AT &T has applied to the California Coastal Commission to
put a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt. Holyoke( Applicationnumber:
5-12-146.) Please 'vote to amend the regulations so that we can
keep the cell tower out 01 the park wheremany of our children play
and all of us enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific Ocean
-
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemptionExpansion of the notice
provisionsEnhancement of the aesthetic provisionsImposition of
permit duration limitsExpansion of the right of appeal to "all
aggrieved persons" (Le., consistent with appeal rights under L.A
ZoningCode for CUPs/private property installations; currently,
appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only aiforded tothe limited
number of owners/occupants who received notice -- a highly
restrictive provision which stands aloneamong California
cities).Requirement lor the applicant to map all existing wireless
facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs in the area or
community served by the proposed facility.Provision for public
comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for all proposed
installations in residentialzonesRequirement for the applicant to
provide an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification of
compliance with FCCreq uirementsRequirement for the applicant to
map all existing wireless facilities and to project anticipated
future needs in thecommunity served by the proposed facility
(same).Provide a temporary moratorium on PROW installations while
the Ordinance is being draftedRequirement for the applicant to bear
the expense 01 an independent expert to assist the City, asneeded,
with analysis 01 technical issues such as coverage gap claims, RF
emissions andalternative location feasi bility.
Sincerely,
Kenneth LeeOrange, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at
http://www.change.erg/petitions/los-angeles-city--council-vote-for-regulation-ol-wireless-telecommunications-facil
ities. To respond, clickhere
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Man, Sep 10,2012 at 12:42 PM
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Jerry Krikhell
Date: Man, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:16 AMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF
Ordinance CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec, 63.03.2To:
june.lagmay@!acity.org
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT& T from putting a 45 loot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
-
Sept. 7,2012.
Hon. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han. Eric GarcettiHon. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Hon. Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Han. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Han. Paul
KrekorianHan. Richard Alarcon Hon. Bernard C. ParksHen. Joe
Buscaino Hon. Jan PerryHon. Jose Cardenas Hon. Bill RosendahlHan.
Mitchell Englander Han. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645!Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop A T&T from putting a cell phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful bluffs.
AT &T has applied to the California Coastal Commission to
put a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Applicationnumber:5-12-146.) Please vote to amend the regulations
so that we can' keep the cell tower out 01 the park wheremany of
our children play and all 01 us enjoy a spectacular view 01the
Pacific Ocean
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
of the utility pole exemptionExpansion of the notice
prosisionsEnhancement of the aesthetic provisionsImposition of
permit duration limitsExpansion 01 the right of appeal to "all
aggrieved persons" (I.e., consistent with appeal fights under L.A.
ZoningCode for CUPs/private property installations; currently,
appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only afforded tothe limited
number of owners/occupants who received notice -- a highly
restrictive provision which stands aloneamong California
cities).Requirement for the applicant to map all existing wireless
facilities and to project anticipatedfuture needs in the area or
community served by the proposed facility.Provision for public
comment and/or a hearing prior to permit issuance, for all proposed
installations in residentialzonesRequirement for the applicant to
provide an RF emissions analysis and/or a certification of
compliance with FCCrequirementsRequirement for the applicant to map
all existing wireless facilities and to project anticipated future
needs in thecommunity served by the proposed facility
(same).Provide a temporary moratorium on PROW installations while
the Ordinance is being draftedRequirement for the applicant to bear
the expense of an independent expert to assist the City, asneeded,
with analysis of technical issues such as coverage gap claims, RF
emissions andalternative location feasibility.
Sincerely,
Jerry Krikhelipacific palisades, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at
http://www.change.org!petitions!los-angeles-city-council-vote-for-regulation-of-wireless-teiecommunications-i8cilities.
To respond, clickhere
-
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Man, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:42 PM
--------- Forwarded message ----------From: Lauren Brenner Date:
Man, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:29 AMSubject: Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance
CF09-2645/AGF, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2To: [email protected]
Greetings,
I just signed the following petition addressed to: Los Angeles
City Council.
Vote to Amend AGF Ordinance, LAMC Sec. 63.03.2
Without amendments to the AGF ordinance CF09-2645 ( on the
agenda @ the Los Angeles City Council meetingon 9/11/2012 )we may
not be able to stop AT&T from putting a 45 foot tower cell
phone tower on one of our mostbeautiful bluffs at 302 Mt. Holyoke(
Application number: 5-12-146.)
Sept. 7, 2012.
Hon. Herb J. Wesson, Jr., President Han. Eric GarcettiHan. Ed P.
Reyes, President Pro Tempore Han. Jose HuizarHan. Tom LaBonge,
Assistant President Han. Paul KoretzPro Tempore Han. Paul
KrekorianHan. Richard Alarcon Han. Bernard C. ParksHan. Joe
Buscaino Hon. Jan PerryHan. Jose Cardenas Han. Bill RosendahlHon.
Mitchell Englander Han. Dennis P. Zine
Los Angeles City CouncilCity Hall200 North Spring StreetLos
Angeles, CA 90012Re: Council File No. 09-2645/Proposed Amendments
to "Above Ground
Dear Honorable Councilmembers,Please vote to amend the AGF
ordinance so that we can stop AT&T from putting a cell phone
tower on one of ourmost beautiful bluffs.
AT&T has applied to the Catitornia Coastal Commission to put
a 45 foot tower at 302 Mt. Holyoke( Applicationnumber:5-12-146,)
Please vote to amend the regulations so that we can keep the cell
tower out of the park wheremany of our children play and all of us
enjoy a spectacular view of the Pacific Ocean
Please vote to provide regulation for the following:Elimination
01the utility pole exemptionExpansion of the notice
provisionsEnhancement of the aesthetic provisionsImposition of
permit duration limitsExpansion of the right of appeal to "all
aggrieved persons" (i.e., consistent with appeal rights under L.A
ZoningCode for CUPs/private property installations; currently,
appeal of AGF permits in the PROW is only a1fordedtothe limited
number of owners/occupants who received notice -- a highly
restrlctive provision which stands alone
-
among California cities).Requirement 10r the applicant to map
all existing wireless iacilities and to project anticipatedfuture
needs in the area or community served by the proposed
facility.Provision for public comment and/or a hearing prior to
permit issuance, for all proposed installations in
residentialzonesRequirement for the applicant to provide an RF
emissions analysis and/or a certification of compliance with
FCCrequirementsRequirement for the applicant to map all existing
wireless facilities and to project anticipated future needs in
thecommunity served by the proposed facility (same).Provide a
temporary moratorium on PROW installations while the Ordinance is
being draftedRequirement for the applicant to bear the expense of
an independent expert to assist the City, asneeded, with analysis
of technical issues such as coverage gap claims, RF emissions
andalternative location feasibility.
Sincerely,
Lauren BrennerPacific Palisades, California
Note: this email was sent as part of a petition started on
Change.org, viewable at
11ttp:/lwww.chl.Jrlge.orglpetitions/los"angeles-·city-council-vote-for-regulation-ot-wire!ess-telecommunications-facilities.
To respond, clickhere
-
Fwd: CF 09-2645 City Attorney Final Report on Placement of Cell
Towers andRelated Equipment
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Mon, Sep 10,2012 at 12:14 PM
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Sheri A Saperstein
Date: Fri, Sep 7,2012 at 12:18 PMSubject: Re: CF 09-2645 City
Attorney Final Report on Placement of Cell Towers and Related
EquipmentTo: [email protected]:
[email protected]
Dear Council member Wesson,
I urge City Council to swiftly enact the City Attorney's
recommended "Above Ground Facility Ordinance," andalso to place a
temporary moratorium on all cell phone tower-related placement
activity until the new ordinance isin effect.
Specifically and in addition, I urge:
.. expansion of the notice requirement* enhancement of the
aesthetic provisions* elimination of the utility pole exemption..
Imposition of permit duration limits
Although my wording is bollerplate, please understand that this
issue of great importance to me. I haveconsidered each word, and it
is important to me that each action mentioned be taken.
Our civic landscape is too important a shared resource to be
damaged by unnecessarily irresponsiblecommercial activity. I use a
cell phone, and do want cell phone towers to exist. But they don't
need to degradeour landscape.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Sheri A. Saperstein500 So. Barrington Ave., #6Los Angeles, CA
90049
-
Fwd: AGF Ordinance ~Council File No. 09~2645
June Lagmay To: Brian Walters
Mon, Sep 10,2012 at 12:01 PM
---------- Forwarded message --"-"-""--From: Regina Clark Date:
Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:08 AMSubject: AGF Ordinance - Council File
No. 09-2645To: councnmernber. feyes@lacity .orq,
c()uncilmemb8r.engl
-
Thank you.
Regina Clark
Tujunga Resident
-
~Residellts' GrQUpP.O. Box 34055Granada HiHs, CA 9134'1
September 3, 2012 RE: CF # 09-2645Support Legislation Regulating
Cell Towers,Above Ground Facilities
Honorable Council member Englander:
For several years, wireless telecommunications providers have
been taking advantage of deficienciesin the LAMC in order to place
unsightly cell towers (AKA Wireless Telecommunication Facilitiesor
WTFs) in close proximity to residences and along scenic routes,
These companies have utilizedexemptions granted to public utilities
in order to place facilities within the public right of way(PROW)
in areas where they would otherwise not be allowed; In 2009, the
City Council directedthe City Attorney to report on mechanisms
available to regulate the placement of these WTFs,Subsequently, the
City Attorney provided the requested report along with the
followingrecommendations:
• Elimination of the utility pole exemption• EXpansion of the
notice provisions• Enhancement-of the aesthetic provisions•
Imposition of permit duration limits '
Numerous California municipalities have included several of the
below listed provisions regulatingPROW install