Page 1
Title The Identity of the Turkish Rulers to the South of Hindukushfrom the 7th to the 9th Centuries A.D.
Author(s) INABA, Minoru
Citation ZINBUN (2006), 38: 1-19
Issue Date 2006-03
URL https://doi.org/10.14989/48824
Right © Copyright March 2006, Institute for Research in HumanitiesKyoto University.
Type Departmental Bulletin Paper
Textversion publisher
Kyoto University
Page 2
ZINBUN2005No.38
TheIdentityoftheTurkishRulerstotheSouthofHindukushfromthe7thtothe9thCenturiesA.D.*
MinoruINABA
1. TheTurkishRulersofEasternAfghanistan
Atthebeginningofthe1990 う民 many Bactriandocumentswerediscovered
inthenorthernareaofAfghanistanwhichwasstillinthemiddleofacivil
war.Thereisnodoubtthatthosedocumentswill ラtogether withtheBactrian
inscriptionfromRabataknear8urkhKotalandBuddhistdocumentsfromthe
cavesnorthofBamiyan , helpustoimproveourunderstandingofthehistory う
religionandthesocietyofancientAfghanistan.AnumberofthoseBactrian
documentshavebeenintroducedbyN.8ims-Williamswithtransliterations
andtranslations うwhich willsurelystimulatefurtherresearch(β倒S臼imsト-Will iam
2000)Justbeforethatdiscovery ぅbeing inspiredby8h.Kuwayamaうs workonthe
historyofK 瓦pi 釘and theGandh 瓦ra areapriortotheIslamicperiod(Kuwayama
1990) う I publishedapaperonthehistoryofeasternAfghanistan , speciallyfoュ
cusi 時on Ghazni/Z 瓦bulistan fromthe7thtothe8thcenturyA.D・ ぅscrutiniz
ingmaterialsavailableatthattilne(Inaba1991).Aframeworkofthehistory
ofthatareaduringtheperiodinquestionwasdeducedasfollows:
Inthelatterhalfofthe6thcentury , theHephtaliteempireinTokh 瓦rist 瓦n
collapsedduetoTurkishattackうi.e. WesternTuJue. Gandh 瓦ra , whichhad
alsobeenunderthecontroloftheHephtalites うand K瓦pi 釘which wasadjacenttoGandh 瓦ra , weregreatlyaffectedbythatevent. Thedynastylabeledthe
Khi 時alides byKuwayama(orNezakidesbysomescholarsbωed ontheleg-
*IwouldliketoexpressmygratitudetoProf. Y.YoshidaandDr. A.Palumbo , whoprovidedmewithinvaluableinstructionandsuggestions ぅand ぅas always , toDr. 8h.
Kuwayamawhohasneverfailedtokindlyandwithgreatgenerousitydiscusswithme
atgreatlength. AndIamalsogratefultoMr. AnthonyR.Blackforimprovingmy
English.
1
Page 3
MINORDINABA
endofthecoins)hadbeenestablishedinK瓦pisl andwasexertingitsruleover
theK瓦bul valleyasfarasGandhara.Wheninthefirsthalfofthe7thcentury
Xuanzangvisitedthere うthe kingofK瓦pisl wasofthislineage.Inthe650 うh
ArabMuslimsreachedasfarasSlstanandintendedtomaketheirwayfurther
north うwhich resultedinconsiderablestrategicimportancebeingplacedonthe
southernborderoftheK瓦pisl kingdom うnamely K瓦bu l. Atthattime , K瓦bul
wasundertheruleoftheTurkswhohadbeenreportedbyXuanzangtohave
livedinthemountainareabetweenZ瓦bulist 瓦nand K瓦pi 釘うthat is ヲFulishisa
tangna 弗栗侍薩慎那 . Graduallyhavingextendedtheirpower ぅthey cameto
beindependentand うeventually うdepri vedtheKhingalideKingofalmostthe
wholeofhisterritory.ItwastheywhowerereferredtoastheTurkSahinthe
Islamicsources.
Inthe680 うs , aprincefromK瓦bul fledsouthwarddowntoZ瓦bulistan , probュ
ablyduetotheconflictsurroundingsuccessiontothethrone うand established
hisindependencethere(Cf.Kuwayama1999).Thenewr叫ers ofZabulist 瓦n
weredenotedintherecordsofArabandPersianhistoriansbythename ふん
rtbyl.Ithasbeenmaintainedthatthistitleshouldberead ムヂo znbylwhichmighthavesomerelationwiththecultsurroundingtheGodZhun(如 nii of
Xua 四ang). ConsideringtheTurkishsituationmentionedabove , howeverぅthistitleshouldbeunderstoodasacorruptedformoftheTurkishtitleiltiibiir.1
Thusうthe twokingdomsofKabulandZ瓦bulist 瓦n wereofthesameTurkish
originandbothactedasanimpregnablerampartagainsttheMuslimsfor
almosttwocenturiesfollowing.
Nevertheless うthere remainseveralproblemsunsolvedandunmentioned う
oneofwhichistheoriginofthoseTurks.TheBactriandocumentsmentioned
aboveandsomearchaeologicalfindingsoftheareainquestionfromthelastcenturyseemtoindicatetheTurkishtribenamedtheKhalajasapossible
candidatefortheoriginofthoseTurks.2 Theprimarypurposeofthispaperis
toverifythisidentification.
Asamatteroffact , theideaofidentifyingtheTurksinquestionwith
theKhalajtribeisnotveryrecent.L.Petech(1964)alreadysuggestedthis
identificationandreferredtotheexpressions“He-da-Iuo-zhi 詞達羅支" and“Geda-Iuo-zhi 葛達羅支Jうwhich appearedinChinesesources.A.Rehman(1988)
alsoconnectedtheTurksofK瓦bul andZabulist 瓦n withtheKhalajutilizingthe
materialscitedbyJ.Marquart(1
1 Cf.Bombaci1970:59;Rehman1988:180;Inaba1991:53-55;Sims-Williams2002:235.
2 Cf.Lee&Sims-Williams2003;Verardi&Paparatti2004;Inaba2004.
2
Page 4
THEIDENTITYOFTHETURKISHRULERS
scholarsmaybe , theyseemnottohavesucceededinexaminingitsu 白ciently う
asPetechneverproducedacomprehensivecomparisonofinformationfromthe
ChinesesourcesandthatoftheArabicandPersiansources うnor didRehman
bringmaterialintheChinesesourcestolight. However ぅY. Yoshida(2000
[2003])recentlyhassuggestedtheassumptionthattheChineseHedaluozhiandGedaluozhicanbeconnectedwiththeword“kharalaじがう which appears
onthelegendsoftheNezakS瓦h coins うconsidering thelattertobesomekind
ofIndianizedformoftheword “Khalaj ." Iwilltakethissuggestionasmystartingpoint.
2. Hedaluozhi
Tobeginwith うlet usconsidertheChineseexpressionsHedaluozhiand
Gedaluozhi.However , sinceeachhasvariants うit isfirstnecessarytoexaminetheexpressionsthemselvestodecidewhichshouldbetakenasthecorrectform
orwhethertherearemultiplecorrectforms.
Tostartwith うlet usproceedwithapassagefromX·初 旬ngshu Vol.221b:
“Xieyu 謝周目 li es southwestofTokh 瓦ristan. ItwasformerlycalledCaojuzha 漕矩陀
orCaoju 漕矩but renamedHedaluozhiintheXianqingperiod.EmpressWuagain
changedthenametothepresentone.About400litoitseastliesJibin 厨賓and
toitsnortheastliesBamiyanatalmostthesamedistance.Indialiestothesouth う
PersialiestothewestandGuzganliesnorthwards.ThekingresidesinHexina
(鶴悉那 *yak-sit-na) whichis7ぅ000 liwide.Thekingalsosometimesresidesinthe
Aponi(阿婆体九 -bua-nia ) castle.Thelandproducesplentyofsaffronandwater
springsir 向ate thefields.PeoplefromTuJue , JibinandTokh 瓦rist 加 (吐火羅)
livethere.Jibinisrecruitingyoungsoldiersfromthiscountrytoprotectagainst
theArabs.Theysentanenvoyandpresentsinthe1styearoftheJingyunera
(710A.D.)andlatersubjugatedthemselvestoJibin.Inthe8thyearofKaiyuan(720) うthe EmperormandatedGedalωzhi xielifaShiquerandmadehimtheking
TheyhavesentseveralenvoysuntiltheTianbaoera. 門
HerethreenamesforZabulistanintheTangperiodarementioned , i.e. う
Caojuzha , Hedaluozhi(Gedaluozhi)andXieyu. TheChinesenamesapplied
toZ瓦bulist 瓦n havebeenanalyzedbyYoshida(Kuwayama1992:135-139) ぅac
cordingtowhomCaojuzhaandXieyu , aswellasCaoli(Xugαoseng zhu αηう
Vol.4) ぅ Xieyue (Huilinyinyi う Vol. 100)andZhewutl 刷tana (Xuany 仇yinyi う
Vol.18)aretranscriptionsfor*dz 瓦ul くZ 瓦b 叫-istan) うwhile Hedaluozhiand
Gedaluozhi(andGelωdazhi intheJiutαngshu ; seebelow)musthavebeen
3
Page 5
MINORDINABA
transcriptionsforawordcompletelydi 百erent from*dz 瓦ul くZ 瓦bu l. Asforthe
lattertranscriptions ,E.Chavannes(1969:160 うn. 4)presumesthatHedaluozhicouldbeanerroneoustranscriptionforDaluohezhi 達羅詞支which mightcorュ
respondtoal-Rukhudh くal- RukhkhajappearinginIslamicsources ,especiallyingeographicalworkswrittenduringthe9thandthe10thcenturies うas aplace
nameofsouthernAfghanistanaroundthepresentQandahar.Asmentioned
above うPetech suggestedconnectingtheformtoKhalaj. WhileKuwayama
(1990:253-54) , distinguishingHedaluozhifromGedaluozhi うsupposes theforュ
mertobeaplacenameandthelattertobeakindofTurkish0日cial title ,the*Qarata 己i.
HedaluozhialsoappearsintheZizhitongjia 凡 Vol. 200:
“On thedayguiweiofthe6thmonth[of661]う eight dudufuandseventy-sixzhou 州
hadbeenplacedinthesixteencountries ぅ i.e. Tl 山lOluo (Tok 瓦ra) うYanda (Hephtal) ヲ
Jibin ぅBosi (Persia)etc. 門
ThisaccountconcernsthereorganizationofAnxiduhufuandsixteencounュ
triesintheWestinthe1styearofLongshuo(661) ラwhich isdiscussedbelow.
TheT:αng huiy αo Vol.73alsomakesreferencetothesameevent:
“Zhaozhi 僚枝 dudufu hasbeenplacedintheFubaoshidien 伏賓悲顛castle うthe
capitalofthekingofHedaluozhi. 刊
Thesamesourceliststhenamesofzhouandvillagesputunderthecontrol
ofthisdudufu. OnecanfindalmostthesameaccountintheXintαngshu
Vol.43 うas well.ItisobviousfromtheseaccountsthatHedaluozhiwasthenameappliedto
Z瓦bulist 瓦n duringtheXianqingera ,andaZhaozhidudufuwasstationedatthecastleofthekingofHedaluozhiwhensixteenwesterndudufuwerepositioned
inthe1styearofLo 時shuo (661)Recently ぅA. Palumbo(2001:122-24)hasdrawnattentiontothefactthat
HedaluozhiappearsintheDunhuangmanuscriptoftheLαozi hu αhujing 老
子化胡経 (British LibraryOr.8210/s.1857).Thename"d αoshi SuoDaoxuan道士索洞玄" iswrittenattheendofthismanuscript. ThisSuoDaoxuanis
knowntohavecopiedtwootherscriptures うone ofwhichisanon-titledDaoist
sutra(BritishLibraryOr.8210/s.2999)andtheotherthesecondvolumeoftheTaixu αηzhengyi benjijing 太玄真一本際経 (Brit ish LibraryOr.8210/s.3563).
Thedatethesetwodocumentswerecopiedisthe“25t h ofthe11thmonthin
the2吋year ofKaiyuan(5th うJanuary of715) ぺfrom whichonecaninferthatthemanuscriptoftheHuahujingalsobelongstothesameperiod.
4
Page 6
THEIDENTITYOFTHETURKISHRULERS
3. Gedaluozhi , GeluodazhiandGeluozhi
TheformGedaluozhi うwhich isnearlyidenticaltoHedaluozhiexcluding
theinitialcharacter うappears intheCefuyu αηgui Vol.964aswellastheXin
tα ngshu. TheCefuyu αngui has:
“In the9thmonth[inthe8thyearofKaiyuan(720)], anenvoywassenttoapprove
theenthronementofGedaluozhixielifi α Shiquer 葛達羅支韻利護誓屈爾 as theking
ofXieyuandthatoftheGedaluozhitegin 特勤 as thekingofJibin."
However うthe Jiutαngshu Vol.198 うwhich containsalmostthesamecontent
thoughslightlyabridged うreads:
“[J ib in has]sentanenvoytoChinainthe7thyearofKa剖iYl
onescrollofastronomicalt舵ext 臼Sうa bookofsecretandforeignme吋dici 加ロ問e伺s. [The
Emperor]issuedanorderofi町estiture うsending anenvoyinreturntoapprove
theking[ofJibin]tobetheGeluodazhi 葛羅達支 tegin. 刊
Here うwe findtheform“G elu o d a zh i" . WhilethesimilaraccountintheTtαng
huiy αo Val. 99(Wudedi αn version)providestheform “Geluozhi 葛羅支Jう the
Sikuqu αnshu versionofthesamesourcehas“G elu o d a zh i ," whichmaymean
thatthecharacter “da 達" wasjustdroppedfrom “Geluodazhi円 to become
“Geluozhiうう in theWudedi αn version.3
3 Itshouldbenotedthatthereisanothervariantforthisword.TheSikuqu αnshu versionof1lαng huiy αo Vol.73has:
“T he ZhaozhidudufuhasbeenplacedintheFubaoshidiencastle うthe capitalofthekingofAluoluozhi 阿落羅支. 円
Muchisobscureconcerningtheformationofthepresenttextofthe1lαng huiy αo . T.F旧uhata (1989;1998)pointsoutthatthemanuscriptswhichwereusedasthebaseforconstructingtheSikuqu αnshu versioncouldpreserveanolderform.Furuhatamentionsthreemanuscriptsbelongingtothislineage ぅtwo ofwhicharenowintheNationalCentralLibraryofChineseTaipeiandtheotherbeingintheSeikadoBunkoLibrary ヲJapan. Inthesethreemanuscripts うthe wordinquestioniswrittenAluoluozhi. AllthreecouldbedatedtotheQingperiod , whileうaccording toFuruhata , thislineageofmanuscriptscoulddatebacktotheSouthernSongdynasty.Ifthatisthecase , theformAluoluozhicouldalsobefairlyold. Comparingwithotherforms ぅthe firstcharacter 阿could beinterpretedasanerrorfor 詞(or うpossibly 阿which hasthesamesoundas 詞) . Thoughthesecondcharacter 落is completelydi 旺'erent fromotherforms ぅit ispossiblethatthischaracterreflectstheexistenceof1-/r-asasecondconsonantintheoriginalword うwhich
isquiteinteresting(Seebelow).YetthisformisfoundonlyintheSikuq切附hu versionofthe 1lαng huiy αo andisnotveryeasytoconnectwithotherformsviaasatisfyingexplanation.Thatiswhyitisomittedfromthediscussionhere.
5
Page 7
MINORDINABA
Table1.iltiibiirinvariouslanguages
Language Source
本 ilt ii b ii r Turkic
韻利設 xiel iflα Chinese Jiutαηgshu うXin tαngshu etc.
υL 入L てo~Y] po Bactrian BactrianDocuments
hitivin α MiddleIndic(7) NezakS瓦h Coins
ふん Arabic/Persian Baladhurl,Tabarletc.
Fromthesourcescitedabove うit isobviousthatGedaluozhiandGeluodazhi
aretranscriptionsofthesameword.Ontheotherhand うcom paringGedaluozhi(whoseMiddleChinesesoundis*kat-dat-Ia-t~re) withHedaluozhi(whoseMC
soundis> 出a-dat-Ia- 印刷ぅonly theinitialsoundisdifferent.Asdiscussedbelow う
thedifferencecanbeexplainedbythedifferenceinthedateoftranscription
andhowtheinformationwastransmitted.Therefore ウit iswarrantedthatwe
tentativelytakethesetwoformstobeslightlydifferenttranscriptionsofthe
sameword.
4. hitiviTI α kharal忌.ca
Asarest此ofthediscussionabove ぅHedalωzhi/Gedaluozhi aretho 時ht to
bethemostappropriateforms.Nextletusconsiderwhatwordthesetermsmusthavetranscibed. Thereisaclueintheso-callednyckyMLK タ=Nezak
S瓦h coinsfou 日d chieflytothesouthofHindukush.Thecoinswhichbearthe
PahlavilegendnyckyMLK'havebeenscrutinizedbyR.GobI(1967).Among
them ぅone groupofcoins ぅcategorized byhimasEmission208(referredasNumH208hereafter) うhas aBrahmilegendassociatedwithitasfollows:
“srThitivirakharal 瓦yap 瓦ramesvara srTvahitiginadevak 瓦rita rp. " (G 凸bl 1 967- i : 142
145)
Thesecondwordhitivirais ぅaccording toH.Humbach(1966:60) ぅthe Midュ
dIeIndicformoftheTurkishtitleiltiibiir ・ This seemstobehighlyprobabletakingintoaccountthatSims 羽Tilliams (2000:254)identifiesthewordυ山ー
てO~Tj PO hilitberappearingintheBactriandocumentswithiltiibiir.4
AccordingtoM.Mori(1967:427) う ilt ii bii r wasthetitlegiventothechiefs
ofclansotherthantheAshinainEasternTuJue.AsforWesternTuJu札the
4 Asfortheformhilitber ,seeSims-Williams2002:235.
6
Page 8
THEIDENTITYOFTHETURKISHRULERS
Jiutαngshu Vol.194reads:
“Tong YabguQaganwasbraveandsmart ぅvery goodatwarfare.Inthenorth うhe
conqueredTieLu 鉄勤うin thewest うhe repelledthePersians ぅand inthesouth うhis
territorystretchedasfarastheborderofJibin.Allofthesecountriessubmitted
tohim.Hepossessedhundredsofthousandsofarchers うbeing dominantoverthe
WesternRegions 西域 . First うhe residedattheoldhomeofWuSun 烏孫うthen
movedhispalacetoQianQuannorthofShiguo(C 託) . Hegavethetitlexielif α to
allthekingsofWesternRegionsandalsodispatchedatutuη 吐屯 to eachofthese
regionstocollecttaxesandtributes.HeheldunparalleledpowerintheWest. 門
ThisrecordinformsusthatnotonlyweretheTurkishchiefsbutalsothe
r叫ers ofthecity-statesinTransoxianaandBactriagiventhistitle(Cf.Kuwayama
1990:234).ThelocalrulerofthecityofRob(kl
thetitleυ仏L1" O~Y] PO inthreeoftheBactriandocumentsdatedtothe7thcenュ
tury(Doc.N うDoc.P andDoc.QofSims-Williams2000). Accordingtothe
Xintαngshu Vol.221andtheCefuyu αngui Vol.964quotedabove うthe King
ofXieyu=Z 瓦bulist 瓦n wasgiventhetitlexielij α. Assumingthatthisxielij α is
identicalwithiltiibiir(Cf.Mori1967) うalong with叫Lてo~Y] po andhitivi 同 we
canconsiderthistitletobethe“ iltiibiir ofGedaluozhi. 刊
Ontheotherhand うon thewords “hitivira kharal瓦va" appearingonthe
legendofNumH208うthere seemstobenodiscussionoftheword“kharal瓦va"
besidesthatofHumbach(1996[1998]:251)whosuggeststhepossibilityof
thiswordbeingakindoferroneoustranscriptionforthenameofsometribe う
possiblytheKharlukh=Qarluq. However ぅthe firsthalfofthe8thcenturyto
whichthesecoinshavebeenattributedis うto thebestofourknowledge うtoo
earlytobethedateofQarluq うs appearanceeventothesouthofAmuDarya.5
Moreoverうno informationぅprior orsubsequent うhas surfacedimplyingtheir
5 V.Minorsky(1982:287-88)saysthatagroupofQarl 問were reportedbyal-TabarltobelocatedtothesouthofAmuDarya.Whatismeanthereisthe“Jabguyaうう who helpedSuluQaghanofTiirgi 話who werefightingwiththeArabsinTokh 瓦rist 瓦n inthe730 冶
(Cf.Tabarl-ii:1547 う1590-91 う1604 ぅ1609). MinorskythoughtthatthisJabguyawasaYabguoftheQarluq うwhich leadhimtoassumethatinthebeginningofthe8thcentury う
therealreadywasagroupofQarluqleadbytheirYabgulivinginTokharist 瓦n. Actually う
al-Taba r! うmentions thisYabguas “Jabghuyaal-Kharlukhl刊on oneoccasion.However う
asinotherinstances うsince heonlyusedtheterm"Jabghuya"or“Jabghuya al-Tukh 瓦rl , "
itseemsnottobeafirmenoughbasistoinfertheexistenceofQarluqsinTokharistanatsuchanearlydate.O.Pritsak(1951:274& n.2う275) criticizesthissuppositionandpointsoutthatitwasafter766thattheQarluqbecameanheirofWesternTuJue.
7
Page 9
MINORDINABA
Table2.Khalajinvariouslanguages
Language Source
Khalac ?
詞達羅支/葛達羅支 Chinese Jiutαηgshuう Xin tαngshu etc.
xα 入ασo Bactrian BactrianDocuments
Kharal 託a MiddleIndic(7) NezakS瓦h Coins
εi ム Arabic/Persian I~takhrl , Mas'lidletc.
activitytothesouthofHindukush.
Thereisadifferentviewonthereadingofthefinalconsonantofthis
word.Thecharacterstranscribingthesoundv-andc-areverysimilarinthe
Brahmiscriptandsometimesnoteasytodiscern.Thecoinsofthistypewere
alreadyreportedinthe19thcenturyandA.Cunningham う J . PrincepandE.
Thomashaveshowntheirreadings(Cunningham1962:269) ぅwhich are “Ai 廿re1加n
cha払?" “Ain1n cha"and“Kharala cha"respectively.Allofthemreadthefinal
consonantasch-=c-.Recently ヲ J . Harrr 凶ta (1996:378-9)6andYoshida(seeabove)alsoagreeintheirreading“kharaHica ."
KhalajiswritteninArabicscriptas 九i ムAs isknown ぅ r intheArabicscripttranscribesthesoundj-andc-.IntneBactriandocuments うthe nameis
writtenasXαλασO ぅthe Bactrianσtranscribing thesounds-andc-.Withthis
inmindonecansafelyassumetheoriginalnameofKhalajasKhalac.This
tribewaslivinginthesouthwesternregionofAfghanistaninthe10thcentury
(Cf.Minorsky1940). MeanwhileotherpassagesintheBactriandocuments
indicatetheexistenceofthattribeinthenorthernskirtofHindukushinthe7thandthe8thcenturies(Sims-Williams2000:82 ヲ98-104; Cf.Sims ・机Tilliams
2002:234). Therefore ぅif "kharal 瓦va/kharalaca" ofNumH208istakenasthenameofsometribe ぅKhalaj isamoreappropriatecandidatethanQarluq.
Theseconsiderationslendsupporttothereading“hitivira kharal泌がうfrom
thelegendofNumH208asthe"iltiibiirofKhalaj
5. KhalajandtheTang
Ofthetwophrasesdiscussedabove , i.e. “Gedaluozhixielifiα竹 and “hitiviγα
kharal従ピ う xielijαand hitiviraaredifferenttranscriptionsofthesameword.
6However, Harmattaidentifiesthiswith 本Qarg i1a c"i 昌撤支which isthenameofthekingofK 瓦pi 釘mentioned intheJiuTIαngshu andtakesitasanamefortheroyalfamily.
8
Page 10
THEIDENTITYOFTHETURKISHRULERS
Hereafter うthe plausibilityofidentifyingGedaluozhi うwhich maybeidentical
withHedaluozhi うwith kharal 必a shouldbediscussed.Forthatpurpose ,takingalookatthepoliticalanddiplomaticrelationsbetweentheTangandTuJue
wouldbeuseful うas itisimportanttoconsiderunderwhatcircumstancetheseChinesetranscriptionsappearedinthesources.
AfterthebreakupofEasternTuJuebytheTang , thelattergradually
expandedtheirinfluencefurtherwest うwhile WesternTuJuereestablisheditspowerunderTongYabguQaganatthebeginningofthe7thcentury.Afterthe
deathofTongYabgu ぅYipi DuoluQagan 乙毘日出陸可汗established hisruleover
theWesternTuJue. However , in642 うthe TangbroughtYipiShekuiQagan
乙毘射置可汗 into powerandcrushedDuoluQagan. AshinaHeluhadbeen
ayαbgu forDuoluQaganbutsurrenderedtotheTangafterDuoluQagan 冶
defeat. Nevertheless うHelu rebelledafterthedeathofEmperorTaiZong 太
宗. HeinvadedtheterritoryofShekuiQaganandtriedtoconquerGaochang
高昌 and Tingzhou 庭州(650-651). TheTangdispatchedarmiesunderthe
commandofSuDingfang 蘇定方ヲAshina Mishe 阿史那禰射and AshinaBuzhen
阿史那歩真. In657 うSu DingfangwonasweepingvictoryoverHeluatSuy 瓦b.
ThelatterfledtothewestbuteventuallywascapturedatCaebyXiaoSiye着嗣業.
SubjugatingHelu うs rebellion うthe Tangimmediatelysetintopostwarmanュ
agement うincluding therelocationoftheAnxiduhufutoKueaandtherearュ
rangementofHell どs formerterritoryunderthenewduhufu.TheX'初 旬ngshu
Vol.215breads:
“After Heluうs downfallうhis formerterritorywasdividedintosomezhouandxu αη
勝、 to whichmanyclansweremadetoimmigrate. TheMukun 木昆clan wasrefashionedintotheFuyan 旬延 dudufu, alongwiththeTuqishiSllogemohe 突騎施
索葛莫賀 clan beingrefashionedintotheWalu 日毘鹿 dudufuうthe TuqishiAlishi 突
騎施阿利施 clan beingrefashionedintotheJieshan 繋山 dudufuうthe HuluwuQue胡株屋闘 cl an beingrefashionedintotheYanbo 盤泊 dudufuうthe SheshetiTun 揖
舎提轍 cl an beingrefashionedintotheShuanghe 讐河 dudufuうand theShunishiChuban 鼠尼施慮半clan beingrefashionedintotheYingsuo 鷹裟 dudufu. Then う
thetwoduhufu う Kunli ng 昆陵 and Mengchi 蒙池うwere placedincontrolofthese
dudufus.Ineverycountry ぅwhich wassubjugatedbytheTang うa zhouwassetup ぅ
beingputunderthecontroloftheAnxiduhufuuptotheborderofPersiaintheWest. 門
ThereorganizingprojectofWesternRegionsbeganintheyearfollowing
Helu'ssubjugation うi.e. 658andwasbroughtaboutinthe1styearofLongshuo
9
Page 11
MINORDINABA
(661)accordingtotheT:αng h'l均αo Vol.73:
“On the2凶day ofthe5thmonthinthe3rdyear[ofXianqing](7t h う June of658) う
theAI 凶 d'l山ifu wasmovedtoKuca.TheformerAnxi[dudu]wastransformed
intotheXizhou 西川 dudu, towhichQuZhizhan 麹智湛wasappointedtogovernthe
oldplaceofGaochang.AsWesternRegionswerebeingsubjugated うenvoys were
dispatchedtoSama 訂rqa 凶(Ka 時gω) andTokh 瓦訂ris 抗t 瓦加n (Tl 山
thes討it印ua抗ti ぬon凡うthe productsofthosec∞oun 凶ltrie 白s (訪其地風俗物産) ,う and thehistory
Oぱf thecreationandabolition0ぱf zhωau orxu αη there aswell. Theysubmitted
drawingsandplatesasreportsoftheirmissions うwhich wereutilizedbythe0血cers
tocompilethesixtyvolumesoftheXiyutuzhi 西域圃志 "
"Onthe17thdayofthe6thmonthinthe1styearofLongshuo(7t h う July of
661) ぅ 幼au andxu αn wereplacedinTokharist 加. TheenvoyWangMi 時yuan 王
名遠 submitted theXiyutuji 西域園記 . Herequestedplacingdudufuinthesixteen
countrieswestofKhotanandeastofPersia うlaying 80zhau う 1 10 xu αη and 126
militarystations 軍府 . HealsoerectedastonemonumentinTokh 瓦ristan torecord
theEmperor うs achievementsandvirtues. 門
ThemissionofWangMingyuanwasalsorecordedintheXin tαngshu
Vol.58:
"Xiyutuzhi う sixty volumes. Gaozong 高宗dispatched envoystoSamarqandand
Tokh 瓦ristan toinvestigatethesituationandtheproductsofthosecountries うafter
whichheordereddrawingstobesubmitted.TheEmperoralsoorderedthe0伍cers
tocompile[thebookonWesternRegions].XuJingzong 許敬宗received thisorder
andcompleteditinthe3rdyearofXianqing."
Likewise うthe T:αng huiy αo Vol.36reads:
“On the9thdayofthe5thmonthinthe3rdyearofXianqi 時(14th うJune of658) ,asWesternRegionswerebeingsubjugated うenvoys weresenttoSamarqandand
Tokh 瓦rist 瓦n toinvestigatethesituation うproducts andthehistoryofcreationand
abolitionofzhauorxu αn there.Asaresultぅmaps anddrawingsweresubmitted う
whichwereutilizedbythe0白cers incompilingthesixtyvolumesoftheXiyu
tuzhiunderthedirectionofXuJingzong.Whenthebookwascompleted , allthe
scholarshighlyadmireditsextensiveness."
AccordingtotheJiutαngshu Vol.198 うWang Mingyuanhadbeenagoverュ
norofNanyouxu αn 南由牒 う Longzhou 臨州 . HewasdispatchedtoTokh 瓦rist 瓦n
atthecommencementofthereorganizationprojectin658andreturnedto
10
Page 12
THEIDENTITYOFTHETURKISHRULERS
Chinain661submittingtheXiyutujiasareportofhismission.7
TheXiyutuzhicompiledbyXuJingzongandotherofficerswasalsoreferred
toastheXiguozhi 西園志 . Itwascompletedassixtyvolumes ぅwhich later ,withtheadditionoffortyvolumesofplatesanddrawings うwas enlargedtoonehundredvolumesin666(the3計rd yl戸ea訂r ofLi加nde 二the Is剖t Y戸ea紅r 0ぱf Ganfl 島engω )(F1αe仰η Zh'l凶T匂uli
AccordingtotheXi仇7ηl t的α7η19ρ8hz 仏1" う the edicttocompilethebookwaωs issuedin
the3r吋dy戸ea訂r ofXi同anqing andthesixty-volumeversionwascompletedwithin
thatveryyear うwhich maymeanthatthe 五rst versionoftheXiyutuzhiwas
theverbatimcompilationofthevarioussourcesconcerningtotheWestern
Regions。百 ered toandaccumulatedbytheCentralGovernment(Cf.Uchida1965:143).TheF1αe印η zhz川uli
theXi旬νt匂1, t加uz}幼hi waωs compiledbasedonthetravelr問epo ぽrt 臼s ofXua 佃nzang うWan
Xuansuo 壬玄策and others.Togetherwiththeseworks ぅprior workslikePei
Ju'sXiyutuji8 andthebiographicaldatafromtheGαoseng zhu αη might also
havebeenutilized , withinformationpassedbetweentheembassiesandthe
Tang. Thepassage “Whenthebookwascompleted , allthescholarshighlyadmireditsextensiveness ううin theX如 何ηgshu seemstoindicatethat うunder
thedirectionofXuJingzongwhohadmuchexperienceinthecompilationof
theHistorieslikeSuishu , Jinshuandetc. うthis bookwascompiledfromvarious
sourcesavailableatthattime.TheXiyutujisubmittedbyWangMingyuanmusthavebeenapartof
theforty-volumesupplement.ThisreportbyWangMingyuan ぅthough titled
tuji う had tocontainnotonlyplatesanddrawingsbutalsootherinformation
collectedduringhisthreeyearmission.Forinstance ぅthe Jiutαng8hu Vol.198
reads:
“In the3rdyearofXianqing うwhen investigatingthesituationofthatcountry
(=Jibin) うthey notethatthefounderoftheroyalfamilywasXinnie 馨草ぅand
thatdowntothepresentkingHejiezhi 昌顕支うthe thronewaspassedfromfather
tosonfortwelvegenerations."
TheoriginalChineseofthesentenceunderlinedis 訪其園俗うwhich cor-
7 G.UchidathinksthatWangMingyuanwassenttoTokh 瓦rist 瓦n twice,i.e.inthe3rdyearofXianqi 時and the1styearofLo 時shuo (Uchida1965:142).Nevertheless うconsidering
thepurposeandresultsofhismission うit ismoreappropriatetothinkofitashavingbeencarriedoutforthreeyears.
8 PeiJu うsX 句u tujiissupposedtohavebeenreferencedinthedescriptionoftheWesterncountriesintheSuishu.Thebookwascompletedby606(Kuwayama1990:125-126).
11
Page 13
MINORDINABA
rectlycorrespondstowhatismentionedintheXintαngshu Vol.5andthe
Tα ng huiy αo Vol.73 うnamely ヲthat theenvoysdispatchedtoSamarqandand
Tokh 瓦ristan intheXianqingera “investigatedthesituationandtheproducts
ofthosecountries(訪其地風俗物産) ." Therefore ぅthe informationconcerning
JibinintheJiutαηgshu isthoughttobederivedfromWangMingyuan 冶re
port.Moreover , fromtheaccountoftheTIαng huiy α0 , itcanbededucedthatthereportprovidedinvaluabledataforrefashioningthesixteendudufuinthe
WesternRegions.
TheaccountfoundintheXintαngshu Vol.221bonZ瓦buli stan saysthatthe
nameHedaluozhiappearedintheXianqingera.Consideringtheaboveleads
ustoassumethatthealternatenamewastheresultofWangMingyuan 冶
missioninTokh 瓦ristan. Unfortunately ぅno informationrevealshowhisinvesュ
tigationwascarriedout.Itisalsounknownwhetherhehimselfexploredfrom
Tokh 瓦rist 瓦n tothesouthofHindukushorhecollectedthedatathroughinforュ
mants. Nevertheless , itisclearthathismissionwasalmostconcurrentwith
theemergenceoftheKhalajpowertothesouthofHindukushandherecorded
thenameasHedaluozhi.
6. HedaluDzhi/Gedaluozhi , kharal託a andKhalaj
Thoughitisnotevidentwhythenamewasrecordedinthe ぅso tospeak う
IndianizedformHedaluozhi うthere aretwopossibilities.ThefirstisthatWangMingyuanorhisinformantrecordedthenameintheIndianizedform. The
secondisthattheKhalaj=Khalacthemselvesreferredtotheirownnamein
Indianizedform.ThelattermayberatherprobableastheKhalajthemselves
usedtheIndianizedform"kharal 説ゲ intheirowncoinsaboutahalfcenturylater.
StillitmustnotbeforgottenthatHedaluozhiandGedaluozhiarenotexact
transcriptionsfor“kharal託a. ' う The secondcharacter 達usually transcribesthe
sounddiir-(Cf. 達磨くdharma) andisnotexpectedtoappearhere.Thoughthe
detailedlinguisticcircumstancetothesouthofHindukushduringthisperiod
isstillambiguous うit maysafelybesupposedthatMiddleIndicandBactrian
werethetwomainlanguagesthere うbecause theyaretwoofthethreelanguagesusedintheNezakSahcoins うlegends (thethirdbeingPahlavi).Accordingto
Sims-Williams(1997:23) うwhen anl-andanr-comeintodirectcontact うthe lュ
tendstochangetod-intheBactriandocumentsbelongingtothe7thcentury
andlater.Inferringfromthis うit canbeassumedthatwhenthenameKhalac
wasIndianizedto"kharal 託a" ,ortoaformsimilartoit うand wastransmitted
12
Page 14
THEIDENTITYOFTHETURKISHRULERS
toWangMingyuan , therebybeingaffectedbytheBactrianpronunciation ,thesecondconsonantwasheardasd-. Ontheotherhand ヲconcerning the
ChinesetranscriptionofMiddlelndic うwe findinstanceswhereMiddlelndic
d-istranscribedbyMiddleChinesel-/r-andMiddlelndicl-istranscribed
byMiddleChinesed-.AccordingtoS.Karashima(1994:19 う27 , 67) うthis may
reflectthefactthatintheMiddlelndicofnorthwesternIndia ,pronunciationof
d-andl-hadmovedcloser.ThecaseofHedaluozhi うGedaluozhi andkharal 説a
couldbeexplainedinthiswayaswell.
Nevertheless うas noticedinbothoftheexplanations うit isnotatallaneasytasktoascertaininwhichstageofcommunicationthesoundd-orthe
correspondingChinesecharacter 達appeared うas thislargelydependsonthe
conditionofactualcommunicationorconversations.9
ConcerningthereasonwhythenameofKhalajwaslndianized うwe may
recallthepredominanceofIndiancultureintheareastretchingovertheHinュdukushduringthisperiod. AbouthalfoftheNezakS瓦h coins うlegends are
writteninlndicwithBrahmiscript.lO BesidesうIndian culturespreadevento
BactriaandSogdianaintheprecedingperiod , i.e. うthe KidariteandHephュ
thaliteperiod. Thisphenomenawas ぅaccording toKuwayama(2002:154) , aconsequenceofthedispersalofmerchantsawayfromGandh 瓦ra tothoseareas
afterthefalloftheHephthalites. Ontheotherhand , F.Grenet(2002:213)regardsthistobeduetothecloserelationshipofBactriaandSogdianawith
NorthwesternIndiaundertheruleoftheKidaritesandHephthalites. Harュ
matta(1996:370)referstothecoinsissuedinKhuttalaroundthisperiodonwhichthenamesoftherulers(Hephthaliteprinces , accordingtoHarmatta)
arescribedinlndianizedforms.lndianizationofthenameofKhalajmaywell
9 Marq凶rt (Marquart& deGroot1915:258 ぅn.1) andPetech(1964:294)referstothe
word 丸山> whichappearsintheitineraryofAbuDulafMis'arb.Muhalhil , quotedby
al-Ya 伊t inhisMu 'j・αm al-Buldiin(iii:443). Thisiscalled “the FirstLetter"ofAbu
DulafandthewordinquestionappearsalongwiththeQarluqinthedescriptionofthe
peoplewholivedalongtheroadfromWesternTurkestantothewesternpartofChina.
Marquartsuggeststhepossibleconnectionbetweentheletter..kwith 達supposing that
r.and んare confusedhere. However うthe “F irst Letter"ofAb 己Dulaf isthoughtto
oebaseaonhearsaycollectedinBukhara(Minorsky1955:11-18)andtheform がムふ
hasnotprovedtobefoundanywherebuthere. Therefore ぅthough thewordwhiChto
someextentresemblesHedaluozhi/GedaluozhiandappearstogetherwiththeQarluqis
interesting , itisnotpossibletomakeanykindofconclusiveargumentb邸付on this
word.
lO Gるbl hasclassifiedtheNezakS忌h coinsintoabouteightygroups ぅmore thanahalfof
whichutilizeBrahmiinscriptionsorletters(Cf.GぬI 1967-i:132-186).
13
Page 15
MINORDINABA
followthesametendency. Theymighthavethoughttheirnameshouldbe
IndianizedinordertoberecognizedasoneoftherulersoftheIndianworld.
Thiscouldbereflectedinthefactthatinthe8thyearofKaiyuan うabout sevュ
entyyearsaftertheXianqingera うKhalaj sentenvoystotheTangcourtwho
referredtothemselvesasGedaluozhi. Forthem うreferring tothemselvesby
suchanamewasprobablyproperandbefittingarulerwhocouldsendenvoys
tothegreatTangdynasty.
Itisnotclear うhowever , whythistimeadifferentうthough slight ,transcripュtionwasadopted. Toascribethischangetothedifferenceinperiodorthe
whimofatranscriberisasimpleremedy. Still うthe factthatsomeArabic
andPersiansourcesapplytheformQalajinsteadofKhalajshouldbenoted.
D~ ωan Lugat αt-Turk う a Turkishdictionaryofthe11thcenturybyMaqm 己d
al-K 説garI explainstheetymologyofthenameKhalajthroughtheTurkishwords “qal aどうIn Jami(al-Ttαωarikhう a worldhistoryofthe14thcentury
compiledbyRa 訂d aI-DIn ぅthe tribeiscalled“Qalaj ." Thefactthatsources
writtentothewestofPamirdi 旺'er intheirtranscriptionsofthefirstconsonant
seemstocorrespondtothedualChinesetranscriptions.Maqmudal-K 説garI
alsostates:
“The OyuzandQif ,ぬq sometimeschangeqiijtokhii'.TheyareasectionoftheKhalaj.Theysay:KhIYZIMkhlzim'Mydaughter(bint!) うwhile theTurkssay:
QYZIMqlzim. 刊(Dankoff &Kelly1982-ii:263)
Meanwhile うin theMiddleChinesetranscription , 言IT and 葛usually tranュ
scribethesoundkhaandqα respectively. Therefore うit mightbeassumed
thatHedaluozhirecordedintheXianqingeratranscribedthenameKhal 泌
whichisattestedintheBactrian うArabic andPersiansources うwhile Gedaluoュzhirecordedinthe8thyearofKaiyuantranscribedthenameQalacwhichis
witnessedintheworksofMahmudal-K 泌さarI andRa 訂d aI-DIn.Itmayalso
besupposedthattheoriginalnameofthetribewasQala 己うwhich theKhalaj
peoplethemselvespronouncedKhalacbychangingqajtokha'(Cf.Doerfer
1971:173)
Bethatasitrna ぁmy conjecturehereconcerningtheexistenceoftwoChinesetranscriptionsisthattheymightbepartlycausedbythedifferencein
thetimeoftranscription.ThosewhoactedasintermediatersbetweenKhalaj
andtheTangeachtimemusthavebeendi 旺'erent aswell うwhich mayimply
thatthepronunciationofthosemediatorscouldhavedi 旺'ered slightly.
Itisnowappropriatetosumupthediscussion:
First うfrom thevariantsinChinesetranscription , HedaluozhiandGedalu-
14
Page 16
THEIDENTITYOFTHETURKISHRULERS
ozhishouldbetakenasthecorrectforms うboth ofwhichweretranscriptions
ofthesameword.
Second うthere aretwowordswhichseemtobeindicativeofthetitleofsomeruler. OneisGedaluozhixielif α recorded intheChinesesourcesand
theotheris“hitivira kharal瓦とがうwhich appearedonthelegendsoftheNezak
Sahcoins ウboth ofwhichareconcernedwithalmostthesameperiodandarea.
Byassumingthetitle“khalac iltiibiir, ' う it becomespossibletoidentifybothas
beingdifferenttranscriptionsofthesametitleusingdifferentlanguagesand
scripts.
Third う if theseweretranscriptionsoftheIndianizedformofKhalaj うthe
ChineseHedaluozhiandGedaluozhicanbeunderstoodtocorrespondtothe
phonicvariantsoftheoriginaltribename うi.e. KhalacandQala じ .
Thetitlementionedabovewa剖s bornbytherulerswhomweknowfrom
theIslamicsωour 陀ce侃s tωo havebeen
Khala 吋j i詰s themostc∞on凶siおstωen 凶t hypothesistoexplainthepoliticalsituationof
theareasouth0ぱf Hi加nduku 凶1凶sh aroundthattime.
7. KhalajinCentralAsia
AsforthequestionofwhenandfromwheretheseKhalajcametoAfghanistan う
regrettablywedonothavesu 茄cient information.StillMinorsky'spioneerwork
(1940)andotherindirectinformationleadustothefollowingdescription.
It hω been pointedoutthattheoriginoftheKhalajmightbeassociュ
atedwiththeHephthalites.Thisassumptionisbasedontheaccountinthe
Mα !ii tz!:tα l- ' Ulii m (119-120)byal-Khwarizmlwhichsays"TheKhalajandKanjlnaTurksaretheremnantsoftheHephthalites. 竹It willnot うhowever うbe
verypromisingtoexpectexactinformationconcerningethnicityinthisstateュ
mentbecausethisworklumpstheKhalajandtheKanjlna(=Kumedh)inthe
samecategory(Cf.Clauson&Bosworth1965:8-9).Ontheotherhand ぅcon
sideringthatthesourcesbelongingtotheIslamicperiodgenerallydistinguish
theKhalajfromotherTurksorTurkmans ぅand Huicao(Kuwayama1992:38 う
122-123)alsodistinguishesTurksinKめul andZabulistanfromtheTurksto
thenorthofHindukush うit isnotveryprobabletothinkoftheKhalajasa
partofWesternTuJue.IwillconfinemyselfheretosaythattheHephthaliteempiremightwellhavebeenanamalgamofvariousnomadicandnon-nomadic
people11andthattheKhalajpeople うwho livedsomewhereinCentralAsia ,had
11 Cf.Maroth1990;Clauson&Bosworth1965 ぅloco sit.
15
Page 17
MINORDINABA
beeninvolvedin(ortookpartin)therapidexpansionoftheempire ぅmeaning
onesectionofthemmovedintoAfghanistan.AsMinorskypointedout , IbnKhudadhbih(α l-MIα s ii likωαα al-M,αmaωli批t依k : 28 う
31)r陀epoωrt 臼s thatagroup0ぱf Khala 吋j andQa紅r It叫waωs livingtotheeast0ぱf Sy戸r
Darya.Othersourcescanbecitedaswell.TheXintαngshu Vol.217mentions
atribecalledtheBoma 駁馬adj acenttoJiegu 結骨(=Kirgiz).Theformerwas
alsoreferredtoastheElazhi 遁刺支 (υαγ. Helazhi 昌刺支) orBila 弊刺 . The
Tongdi αn Vol.200callsthesametribeHela 局刺(Cf. Shiratori1970:615~620).
Moreover ぅal-Id6sI (OpusGeographicum:714~715) describesthataboutacouュ
pIeofdayseastofTar 瓦z residedthewinterquarteroftheQarluqandthe
winterquarteroftheKhalajadjacenttoit. Thegeographerfurtherrecords
thatonthewayfromTaraztotheterritoryofKIm 瓦k therewasacastlecalled
xyxmwhichwastheresidenceoftheKhalajking.AlthoughtheexactlocationoftheKIm 瓦k territoryishardtospecify うal- IdrIslandotherArabandPersian
geographerstendtoconnectittotheIrtishbasin.T.Moriyasu(1977:28-30&
ns.113-115)suggeststhepossibilitythatthetribementionedintheChinese
sourcesmightbethesameastheKhalajbasedonthearrangementofthegeoュ
graphicallocations.Asamatteroffact うIslamic sourcesdescribetheKIm 瓦k as
awesternornorthernneighborofKi 培iz (Cf.Minorsky1982:305).Thelatter
was ぅaccording totheXintαTゅhuぅ the neighboroftheBoma/Elazhi/Helazhi.Thisevidenceseemstoindicatethat うfrom the9thtothe10thcenturies う
asectionoftheKhalajstilllivedtotheeastofT紅白and westoftheIrtish
basin ぅpossibly aroundIssik-Kulandeastward.TheJαhiin-n iim仏 a 13thcenュ
turyPersianmanualofgeographybyMul}.ammadNajIbBakran ,saysthatthe
“Khalaj areakindofTurkswho , inancienttimes うhad cometoZ瓦bulistan
fromtheterritoryofQarl 問・刊 ( Jα hii n-n ii mα: 73). ThisalsorevealsthattheoriginalhomeoftheKhalajwasinthatarea.
Unfortunately うno informationisavailableconcerningthelaterhistoryof
theCentralAsianKhalaj.Fromthe10thcenturyon , theKhalajweremenュ
tionedintheareasouthofAmuDarya うespecially innorthernIndiaandthe
easternsectionoftheIranianplateau うwhich hasalreadybeendescribedby
Minorsky(1940)
16
Page 18
THEIDENTITYOFTHETURKISHRULERS
Bibliography
Bombaci うA. (1970)OntheAncientTurkicTitleEltabar.In:ProceedingsoftheIXth
MeetingofthePerm αnent Intern αtion αl AltaisticConference , Naplesぅpp.1-66.
Cunni時ha瓜A. (1962)LaterIndo-Scythians.(reprint) ぅDelhi.
Cα}
Ta剖ipe i.
Clauson ぅG. & C.E.Bosworth(1965) ヲAI-Xw 訂izml onthePeopleofCe 山古I Asia.
JRAS1965 ぅ pp . 2-1 2 .
Da 此off うR. &J.Kelly(tr.)(1982)CompendiumoftheTl 川ic Dialects.3Vols ぅH紅白
vardUniversityPrinting0血ce o
Doerfer うG. (1971)Khal α'J Materials.IndianaUniversity.
Furuhata うT. (1989)OnthevariousversionsoftheT' αng hui-y αo . Ti5hi5gaku78 ぅ pp . 82
95.(Japanese)
Furul 同九T. (1998)AStudyonCirculationoftheTtαng hui-y αo . TheTi5yi5shi-Kenkyu
57(1) , pp.96-124.(Japanese)
G凸bl ぅR. (1967)DokumentezurGeschichtederiranischenHunneninBαkt 巾n und
Indien.4Vals. うWiesbaden.
GrenetぅF. (2002)RegionalInteractioninCentralAsiaandNorthwestIndiainthe
KidariteandHephthalitePeriod.In:Sims-Williams うN. (ed.)Indo-IranianL仰
gu αges αnd Peoples.Oxford うpp.203-224.
Harn 凶ta ぅJ. (1996)TokharistanandGandh 瓦ra underWesternTurkRule(650-750).
In:Litvinsky ぅB.A. うZha 時Guang-da &R.Sh.Samghabadi(eds.)Histo γνof Oi り
iliz αtions ofCent γαl Asi α II I. Paris うpp.367-383.
Humbach うH. (1966)BaetrischeSpracl 時nkmiiler I.Wiesbaden.
Humbach うH. (1996[1998])Pangul ぅa Turco-BactrianRuler.BulletinoftheAsi αInsti
tute10 う pp . 247-25 1.
IbnKhurd 瓦dhbih ,α l-Mα salikωαα l-Mα malik. ed.deGoeje ,M. ょうLeiden う1967.
al-Idrlsl う Opus Geogn αphicum (KitabNuzhatal-MustaqfiIkhtiriiqal-Afaq').ed.Cerulli う
E. うA. Bombacietal. うNaples &Romeう1982-1984.
Inaba , M.(1991)ThreeKingsofZabulisUininthe7th-8thCenturies.Sein αηAzi α
Kenky 匂 35 ぅ pp . 39-60 . (Japanese)
17
Page 19
MINORDINABA
Inaba うM. (2004)N瓦y Qal'a , Wujlrist瓦n andtheKhalaj.AnAppendixforVerardi&
Paparatti2004.
Karashima ぅS. (1994)ChouAgonKyonoGengonoKer 向u. Tokyo.(Japanese)
al-Khwaxizmi うMα fati:!}α l- 'Ulum.ed.vanVloten , G. うLeidenう1968.
KuwayamaぅSh. (1990)Kapis i:-G αndhara ShiKenkyu.InstituteforResearchinHuュ
manities うKyoto University.(Japanese)
Kuwayama うSh. (ed.)(1992)Hi 仰の Wαng Wu-Tianzhuguoz}川町Record ofTravels
inFiveIndicRegio ηs , Translation αηd Comment α旬. InstituteforResearchin
Humanities , KyotoUniversity.(Japanese)
Kuwayama うSh. (1999)HistoricalNotesonK瓦pisi andKめul intheSixth-Eighth
Centuries.Zinbun34 う pp . 25-77 .
Kuwayama うSh. (2002)AcrosstheHindukushofth εFirst Millennium.Institl 府for
ResearchinHumanities うKyoto University.
Lee うJ. &N.Sims-Williams(2003)TheAntiquitiesandInscriptionofTang-eSafedak.
SilkRo αdArt αnd Archaeology9 ぅ pp . 159-184.
Mar6th うM. (1990)DiepolitischeGeographieAfgl 間山tans im7.-8.Jahrhundert.In:
Har 江川ta , J.(ed.)FromAlexar 時r theGreattoKillTegin ぅ B吋apest ぅ pp . 1 33-137 .
Marquart うJ. (1901)Erans αhr nachderGeogn αphie desPs.MosesXorenac'i.Berlin.
Marquart うJ. &M.J.deGroot(1915)DasReichZabulundderGotZunvom6.-9.
Jahrhundert.In:Weil うG. (ed.)Festschr ザt 印刷 γd Sαch肌 Berli nぅ pp . 248-292 .
Minorsky ぅV. (1940)TheTurkishDialectoftheKhalaj.BSOS10(2) ぅ pp . 4 1 7-437 .
Minorsky ぅV. (tr.)(1955)AbuDulafMis'aribnMuhalhil'sTrl αvels inIran(ci 陀αA.D.
950).Cairo.
Minorsky ぅV. (tr.)(1982)Ifududal-'Alam:TheRegionsoftheWo 似. (2nded.) うCam
bridge.
Mori うM. (1967)HistoricalStudiesoftheAncientT1川ic People1.Tokyo.(Japanese)
Moriyasu ぅT. (1977)Aproposdestribusdel'AsieCentralequisetrouventdansles
sourcestibetaines:DRU-GUetHOR.Journ αl ofAsi αn αnd Afric αn Studies14 う
pp.1-48.(Japanese)
Muhammadb.NajibBakr 瓦n , Jαhan-nam α. ed.Riyahi ラM.A. うTehran ぅ1963.
Palumbo , A.(2001)LaォScritturadiLaozicheconverteibarbariサ.Sincretismoe
conflittoideoligicoinunciclodiletteraturareligiosadellaCinamedievale.Ph.D.
18
Page 20
THEIDENTITYOFTHETURKISHRULERS
Dissertation(IstitutoUniversitarioOrientale うNapoli).
Petech うL. (1964)NotessuK瓦pisi eZ瓦bul. Rivistαdegli Studi0巾T山li 39(4) ヲpp.287-
294.
Pritsak うO. (1951)VondenKarlukzudenKarachaniden.ZDMG101 ぅ pp . 270~300.
Rehma 凡A. (1988)TheLαst TwoDyn αsti ωof theSiihis.(reprint) ぅNew Delhi.
Shiratori うK. (1970)ShinaHondoShuuiShominzoku.ShiratoriKurakichiZensl 凶 4 う
Tokyo ぅpp.549-739. (Japanese)
Sims-Williams ぅN. (1997)NωLight onAncientAfghanistan.SchoolofOrientaland
AfricanStudies うLondon University.
Sims-Williams ぅN. (2000)BactrianDocumentsfromNorthernAfghanistan1.Oxford.
Sims-Williams ヲN. (2002)AncientAfghanistanandItsInvaders:LinguisticEvidence
fromtheBactrianDocumentsandInscriptions.In:Sim トWilliams うN. (ed.)Indoュ
In αηtαη Lαngu αges αnd Peoples う Oxford ぅ pp . 225-242 .
al-Tabarl うTα 'rzkhα l-Rusulωαα l-Muluk. ed.deGoeje , M.J. うLeiden ぅ1879-190 1.
Uchida , G.(1965)TouKousouChokusenSaiikishiKouroku.Kenkyu(KobeDα句αku
Bung αkukai) 35 ぅpp.140-149. (Japanese)
Verardi うG. &E.Paparatti(2004)BuddhistCω es ofJiighurz αηdQ αrabiigh-e Gh αzn i,
Afgh αnist αn. IsIAO-Rome.
al-Y 瓦qut う Mu 'jαmα l-Buldii n. 5Vols. うBeirutう1984.
Yoshida , Y.(2000[2003])Review:NICHOLASSIMS-WILLIAMS.Bαctrian Docuュ
mentsfromNorthernAfgh αnist αη I : LegalandEconomicDocument.Studiesin
theKhaliliCollection うVo l. 3.CIlr.Pt.2 う Inscriptions oftheSeleucid αηdP αrthian
Periods αηd ofE αstern In αη αnd CentralAsi α. Vol.4うBactrian. BulletinoftheAsia
Institute14 ヲpp. 154~ 159.
19