Title of Paper: Multiculturalism: Enriching Cultural Enterprises for National Development Authors name: Osedebamen David Oamen, PhD. Address: 117 Igun Street, P. O. Box 4906, Benin City, Nigeria Telephone No: 234-8027311048 234-7065246454 Email Address: [email protected]Institutional Affiliation: Department of Theatre and Media Arts, Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Edo State, Nigeria. ABSTRACT This paper strives to discuss multiculturalism which often resulted from the concentration of people of different cultures initiated by geo-political actions of the people or colonialism and it is common in nations and continents. The paper stressed the process through which multiculturalism enriches cultural enterprises for national development as well as took a swirl on each constituent of culture and its economic embodiment that swells national development. It x-rayed the collective strength of multiculturalism and the bountiful enterprises bequeathed on the people of any nation that is multiculturalised. It further substantiated the need for nations to take advantage of enterprise potentials of multiculturalism for national development. It posit that, rather than mirror multiculturalism as differences and allow it inform negative political views, its enterprise
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Title of Paper:Multiculturalism: Enriching Cultural Enterprises for
Institutional Affiliation:Department of Theatre and Media Arts,
Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Edo State, Nigeria.
ABSTRACT This paper strives to discuss multiculturalism whichoften resulted from the concentration of people ofdifferent cultures initiated by geo-political actions ofthe people or colonialism and it is common in nations andcontinents. The paper stressed the process through whichmulticulturalism enriches cultural enterprises fornational development as well as took a swirl on eachconstituent of culture and its economic embodiment thatswells national development. It x-rayed the collectivestrength of multiculturalism and the bountifulenterprises bequeathed on the people of any nation thatis multiculturalised. It further substantiated the needfor nations to take advantage of enterprise potentials ofmulticulturalism for national development. It posit that,rather than mirror multiculturalism as differences andallow it inform negative political views, its enterprise
advantages should be exploited. This is because it iscapable of creating employment as well as enhanceschoices of cultural products and services. It furtherheld that multiculturally influenced enterprisesculminate into multi-economic values for a nation.Therefore, it suggested the exploitation of multiculturalenterprises benefits which enriches national development.The paper concluded that the benefits of multiculturalismshould be of utmost consideration rather than thedifferences within the component cultures. It however,insisted on the political management of multiculturalismthrough a cultural policy mechanism that provides forequality to avoid violence which often stems fromviolation of cultural rights. It added thatmulticulturalism goes with multicultural alternatives inresolving cultural conflicts in the event of mutual co-existence.
cultural plurality, multiracial etcetera, in attempt to
manage its implication. It was used in Canada in attempt
to manage their multicultural societies which evolved as
a result of migration of people from different countries.
Consequently, multiculturalism has been popularized and
publicized in different ways and concerted to mean the
convergence of cultures in one society. Indicatively,
multiculturalism is centered on tolerance and
accommodation of other ethic cultures rather than the
dominant culture.
The birth of the concept of multiculturalism can be
traced to the writings of Horace Kallen, who advocated a
policy of “cultural pluralism.” He was a German born
Jewish America philosopher, who first published his ideas
in 1915… the term “multiculturalism” was coined in Canada
in the 1960s, and was used in the Trudeau Government in
attempt to promote harmony between the predominant French
Canadian and British Canadian cultures as well as with
the various minority cultures (Kallen, 2). The Canadian
measure was political, and it was geared towards
inclusive citizenship which creates opportunity for other
cultures to flourish. It ensures that all citizens keep
their identities, take pride in their ancestry and have a
sense of belonging. This was meant to enhance security,
self-confidence and make citizens of a particular culture
receptive to other cultures. This experience encourages
racial and ethnic harmony and cross cultural
understanding, thereby stimulating them to take active
part in social, cultural, economic and political affairs
(Kallen, 1). This will further encourage them to bequeath
their cultural enterprises on their new culture. Atkinson
disagreed totally with the concept of multiculturalism,
especially as it concerns Canadian view. He is of the
opinion that multiculturalism is a derail of the simple
truth that cultures clash. The proponents of
multiculturalism attack this truth by claiming that: All
the different cultures can live one big family as soon as
we get rid of the bad people…which means that to uphold
law and order the values of other cultures must be denied
(Atkinson, 1). This is not true considering the fact that
Canadian multicultural Act has taken caution against such
denial. In its preamble the Act states:
WHEREAS the constitution of Canadaprovides that every individual is equalbefore and under the law and has the rightto the equal protection and benefit of thelaw without discrimination and thateveryone has the freedom of conscience,religion, thought, belief, opinion,expression, peaceful assembly andassociation and guarantees those rights andfreedoms equally to male and female person… (Canadian Govt., 1) This constitutional position gave birth to the
multiculturalism policy of Canadian which states in item
(f) Encourage and assist the social, cultural, economic
and political institutions of Canada to be both
respectful and inclusive of Canada’s multicultural
character…
(h) Foster the recognition and appreciation of the
diverse cultures of Canada society and promote the
reflection and the evolving expressions of those
cultures (Canadian Govt., 3).
This study is poised to discuss multiculturalism on
the dimension of how it enriches cultural enterprises for
national development. Multicultural societies are
expected to have enriched cultural enterprise based on
the multiplicity of their culture. Ethnic uniqueness,
character and other traits or influences differentiate
one culture from another. These characteristics distanced
each culture from another as well as inform its
enterprise. Furthermore, a distinct ethnic culture is one
of the cultures in a multicultural nation and that
bequeath its cultural enterprises on its nation, thereby
enriching it.
MULTICULTURALISM AND CULTURAL ENTERPRISES
Multiculturalism gave birth to multicultural
enterprises with its attendant uniqueness. This means, in
a multicultural setting, there are different cultural
enterprises. In essence, if there are twenty different
cultures, each of them will have different strands of
cultural enterprises. For instance, in a multicultural
setting, if there are twenty strands of music, dance,
artifacts et cetera, it depicts the multiplicity of
cultural enterprises. The difference originates from the
varied cultural background. However, that does not
indicate that there will be no similarities. This may be
closely or distance related. No matter how related they
may be each stands out. This is because the civilization
of a people depends on the uniqueness of their culture;
this is sustained all through their existence.
Consequently, man is the highest of all existing values.
His world view as it concerns his dignity, honour,
rights, thoughts and the realization of all his abilities
are enshrined in his culture. These are projected in
every of his cultural enterprises.
Every cultural enterprise is a representation of the
ethnic culture that gave birth to it within a
multicultural nation. Therefore, a multicultural society
produces multicultural enterprises that are vibrant and
productive because each of the ethnic group that holds on
to each of the strand that constitutes the nation’s
multicultural setting agitate for superiority towards
effective management of their culture – that is ensuring
its developmental strength is utilized. In doing this,
the various cultural enterprises are developed and
charged towards sustenance as well as sustain
practitioners.
Canadian example of multicultural management
indicates that there is more to gain if multiculturalism
is properly managed. More so, of concern to this study is
the nation’s desire to encourage and assist the social,
cultural, economic and political institutions of Canada
to be both respectful and inclusive of Canada’s
multicultural character. Most related to this study is
economic aspect which informs multicultural enterprises
and national development. Obviously, Canadian approach
was political; apart from creating a healthy political
atmosphere it also evolve an environment that strengthens
the enrichment of cultural enterprises towards nation
building.
Scully argued along the line of Atkinson. He had the
view that when societies are multicultural, the
ethnocentric differences of race, religion, ethnicity and
languages often lead to enmity. Even if different groups
live together peacefully, the lack of a common language
norm reduces cooperation and increases the cost of
transecting. However, he submitted that: But this is
dangerous because emphasizing our cultural differences
may exacerbate inter group enmity and lead to social
breakdown (Scully, 13).
The cause of the social breakdown is sometime, due
to ethnic competition for superiority, bearing in mind
that ethnicity holds the total value of multiculturalism.
The agitation that leads to social break down is
political, this seem to attract more of multiculturalism.
Meanwhile, the opposite of this agitation and its vital
constituent are cultural enterprises. Multiculturalism
gave birth to cultural enterprises which can also be
referred to as ethnic enterprises. It was observed that
The term “ethnic enterprises” carries withit considerable academic and analyticalcache. It does so because racial/ethnicbackground and affiliation really matter inbusiness education and management practice.It matters in term of history and theexperiences of individuals and ethnicgroups based on social customs, attitudesand economic practices. Various processesare in place to limit the availability andgrowth of ethnic enterprises (4)… At leastin academic circles the ideas ofmulticultural education, multiculturalcommunication and other fields as well makeit seem appropriate that the termmulticultural also applies to businessenterprises (Spratlen, 5).The cultural industries are publishing, music,
cinema, craft and design. Each of these industries
constitutes cultural enterprises. Multiculturalism
informs multicultural enterprises. Most countries of the
world are multiculturalised, and this has impacted
economically, politically and socially on the nation.
Nigeria is a good example of a country with an
exemplified multicultural experience of cultural
enterprises.
MULTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES: THE NIGERIA EXPERIENCE
Nigeria was amalgamated in 1914 for the purpose of
administrative convenience by colonial administration.
Prior to amalgamation, cultural practices strengthened
each ethnic and interethnic relation rather than weaken
it. This is because every ethnic group struggles for
survival and recognition within the large pool of culture
brought together by amalgamation. The survival and
recognition instinct of the various cultures turned
Nigeria into a multicultural nation. … the area now
designated as Nigeria was occupied by numerous
independent ethnic nationalities each with its own unique
culture and social system. It is estimated that Nigeria
has over four hundred cultures (Adelakun, 68). Each of
these culture is valid and active, that means the people
of that culture still actively practice it, and it
implies that each of the cultural enterprises of these
cultures are alive and practiced. Hence it was asserted
that,
Not all countries are linguistically or,culturally homogeneous but many, to takeexample of… Nigeria, comprise a fewhundred subcultures each proud of theirtribal or caste allegiance and each withtheir own language or dialect butcommunicating at national level only bymeans of English… (Palineoda, 59)
The multicultural manifestations of Nigeria, as a
nation inspired the federal government to draw a cultural
policy influenced by internal and external influences for
the management of her varied cultures. The national
cultural policy which, was adopted in 1988 states in
paragraph 2.2
A cultural policy is imperative in order toincorporate such an essential part of ourhistory into our general national developmentprocess, because, culture as a force has bothits own economic and political consequences inthe life of any nation (Nigerian Govt., 333).The economic aspect of it consists of the cultural
enterprises that are embedded in the various ethnic
cultures that constitute Nigeria. These cultural
enterprises, span across the various cultural industries:
publishing, music, cinema, craft and design (Nigerian
Govt., 1) in Nigeria.
In essence, each strand of culture in Nigeria is a
cultural enterprise with one of the cultural industries.
For instance, we have over four hundred ethnic groups in
Nigeria as estimated. If these groups decide to collect
their dominant folktales and put them in a book, that
would amount to four hundred books. It could also be
imagined, if other strands of these cultural values are
improved upon or advanced through creativity, it will
have huge impact on other industries. Let’s examine the
cultural enterprises in publishing for example, they are
literature et cetera. These multicultural choices are
bequeathed by each of the ethnic group in Nigeria.
However, multiculturalism is not void of problems;
Nigeria’s has been enriched multiculturally than
experience problems.
MULTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES AND NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Multicultural enterprises are instruments of
national development. The process through which,
multicultural enterprises impact on national development
begins with the individuals who engages in the
enterprise… capitalizing on the diverse range of skills
and expertise that cultural diversity brings. “This will
result in multiple economic and social benefits to the
participating individuals and their families…”
(Kamara,1). The individual who engages in a cultural
enterprise does so with the intention to earn a living
depending on his cultural background which informed his
enterprise. In consideration
From the definition of cultural industries, acultural enterprise can be defined as acommercial venture, within one of the above –stipulated a sector that connects creators andartists to markets and consumers, providing theformer with recognition and a source of income.Cultural enterprises may be strongly motivatedby profits or they may be non-profitorganizations and public institutions… culturalenterprises generate value and in the optimalcase, income too, for a range of actors acrossthe value chain production (Kamara, 9).Cultural enterprises have a value chain of
production which begins with artists or cultural
entrepreneurs who engage in creativity. They are artists,
performers, etcetera these work for producers. These
producers are publishers, music and film producers, sound
technicians, managers. After production, these products
are circulated by distributors. They include promoters,
agents, retailers, festivals and fair organizers,
marketers, curators, etcetera. The value chain of
cultural enterprises indicates its economic viability. It
was further observed that
Cultural enterprises are the base businessneeding to attain a certain economicviability that permits them to becomesustainable and provide the actors acrosstheir value chain with a decent standardof living. In this sense, general businessdevelopment strategies should also applyto cultural enterprises. However, thecultural sector shows many particularitiesthat mean that conventional economictheory does not always apply well to thesector. Cultural enterprises deal in symbolic goodsand services, which communicate meaning andvalues. They are not conventionalcommercial ventures in the sense that theymix up making money and making meaning. Thesymbolic content of a cultural good orservice is usually of greater importancethan the functional and material content.The base of this symbolic content oftenlies on intellectual property, which isalso often the most important, if not theonly, asset that a cultural enterpriseholds. (Kamara, 11)
Most cultural enterprises are ethnotised – tied to
a particular ethic group. This places such cultural
enterprises on the high side of demand, especially if
such cultural enterprise is of high value. In a
multicultural nation, if each cultural enterprise is tied
to an ethnic group, it gives rise to the number of
cultural enterprises in that country. As each of the
cultural enterprises of each ethnic group is engaged in
by creative artist, who create for all cultural
enterprise producers, while cultural enterprise producers
produce for cultural commodity distributors. The
exploitation of each cultural enterprise in a
multicultural nation multiplies cultural enterprise
businesses down the value chain. The various cultural
enterprise businesses, creation, production and
distribution create jobs in multiple forms similar to the
variegated nature of the culture so exploited. As the
cultures of the various ethnic groups influence creation
production and the distribution of cultural goods and
services at ethnic level it enriches cultural enterprises
business at the national level, thereby providing
multiple choices for cultural goods and services. The
creation, production and distribution process engages
labour – a source of employment which impacts on gross
domestic product, which strengthens national development.
That means, capitalizing on the diverse range of skills
and expertise that cultural diversity brings “…result in
multiple economic and social benefits to the
participating individuals and their families” (1), the
nation and the entire world.
RECOMMENDATION
The potentials of multiculturalism and its process
of enriching cultural enterprises for national
development have been vigorously argued. The following
recommendations are necessary to enhance the process.
First the term multicultural enterprises and its positive
impact should be accepted as a factor in national
development. At least in academic circles the ideas of
multicultural education, multicultural communication and
other fields as well make it seem appropriate that the
term multicultural also applies to business enterprise.
This authenticates the need for acceptability of
multiculturalism and how it strengthens cultural
enterprises. Cultural enterprises in a multicultural
nation should be positively exploited as a means of
national development through employment creation for
young people. This will not only create jobs but promote
culture. It becomes more important to exploit cultural
enterprise potentials in the area of employment which has
posed serious challenge to government.
It must be acknowledged that the factstill remains that the aspirations forjob employment by young people,illiterate or literate, throughout thedeveloping countries and developedcountries cannot be met practically fora very long time. Realizing this factmost countries have been exploring andexperimenting with different strategies
to solve such gigantic problems… (Osei-Hwedia et al, 161).
The cultural enterprise opportunities that abound in
multicultural nations are capable of reducing the problem
of unemployment in multicultural nations. That is if
government takes the initiative to;
(a) Encourage entrepreneurs in the areas of cultural
enterprise.
(b) Encourage cultural skills and talents dominant in
each ethnic group.
(c) Provide project management expertise to aspiring
and existing cultural enterprise entrepreneurs.
(d) Support entrepreneurship through the building of
networks, providing training, information and
mentoring
(e) Linking cultural enterprise entrepreneur with
internal and external support services.
(f) Intending and existing cultural enterprise
entrepreneur should be given access to business
training, modulated guidance in business planning,
assistance in accessing startup funds, marketing
support and development.
(g) Partnership with higher institutions of higher
learning to provide short and long term training
for entrepreneurs
(h) Encourage research and use of modern technological
equipment.
Through concerted planning and implementation,
government can bring to fruition the economic benefits
that flows from multiculturalism into cultural
enterprise, which if properly managed can enhance
national development.
CONCLUSION
Though multiculturalism may have its negative
implications, this should not be allowed to swallow the
enriching and developmental potentials of its impact on
cultural enterprises. Rather, now that it is certain that
multiculturalism enriches cultural enterprises for
national development, developing nations can now see
these manifestations as positive advantages which should
be exploited.
In spite of the problems that bedevil
multiculturalism, its enrichment potential of cultural
enterprises equals it. Government of multicultural
nation, especially developing nations can take its
potential as an option in defense of multicultural as
well as its development capacity.
REFEREES
Artists in Development: UNESCO Culture Sector. Retrieved from
http://portal
unesco.org/culture / en/ev.php… on 24/5/2012.
Anele, D. I. O. “Black African Culture and Aesthetics.”
Eds. Obafemi, O. and B.
Ayakoroma, Perspective on Cultural Administration in Nigeria.
Ibadan: Kraft
Books Ltd. 2010. P.111-127
Adelakun, O. “Cultural Documentation and Structural
Analysis.” Eds. Obafemi,
O. and B. Ayakorom. Perspectives on Cultural
Administration in Nigeria.
Ibadan; Kraft Books Ltd. 2010. P. P. 64 –
74.
Atkinson P. Multiculturalism: Its Real Nature and Origin. Retrieved
from
htt://www.our civilization.com/m/tul+.htm on
24/5/2012.
Creative Industries: UNESCO Culture. Retrieved from