Top Banner
Oregon Department of Education October, 2012 1
13

Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

Jan 13, 2016

Download

Documents

vern

Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status. Oregon Department of Education October, 2012. ESEA Title III: Sec 3122. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

Oregon Department of EducationOctober, 2012

1

Page 2: Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

ESEA Title III: Sec 3122(2) IMPROVEMENT PLAN- If a State educational

agency determines, based on the annual measurable achievement objectives described in subsection (a), that an eligible entity has failed to make progress toward meeting such objectives for 2 consecutive years, the agency shall require the entity to develop an improvement plan that will ensure that the entity meets such objectives. The improvement plan shall specifically address the factors that prevented the entity from achieving such objectives.

2

Page 3: Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

An improvement plan should focus only on those things that we intend to improve or refine, not everything that we are already doing.

3

Page 4: Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

TO INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT THUS FACILITATING MEETING THE AMAOs

MAIN PURPOSE OF IPs

4

Page 5: Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

IMPROVEMENT PLANS

Include the following:1.Identification of factors that prevent

districts/schools from meeting the AMAOs2.Data Analysis3.Goals4.Follow-up/Monitoring implementation of the

plan

5

Page 6: Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

1. Identification of factors that prevent districts/schools from meeting the

AMAOsOR,WHAT BARRIERS ARE IN PLACE THAT MAY

NOT ALLOW ELLs TO MEET AMAOs.

6

Page 7: Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

2. Data Analysis

INQUIRY

INQUIRY

7

Page 8: Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

3. Goals

Goals are directly related to the AMAOs district/schools need to improve and are written in terms of student achievement. For example:

At the end of SY 2012-13, Rose Grove Elementary School will show an increase in ELs moving up one proficiency level up from 54% to 64%, and increase of 10%, as measured by the ELPA.

8

Page 9: Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

4. Implementation of the plan

IMPLEMENTATION

ACTIVITIES SUPPORTING A GOAL

RESEARCH SUPPORTING THE ACTIVITY

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IMPLICATIONS

9

Page 10: Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

MonitoringPERIODICALLY CHECK ON HOW ACTIONS/ACTIVITIES ARE BEING

IMPLEMENTED BY COLLECTNG DATA ON THEIR IMPLEMENTATION.

10

Page 11: Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

MONITORING

PERSON(S) RESPONSIBLE

EVALUATION STRATEGY

TIMELINE

PERFORMANCE RESULTS11

Page 12: Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

EVALUATION OF PREVIOUS PLAN

GOAL 1 HOW DID EACH SUPPORTING

ACTIVITY WORK? WHY OR WHY NOT

GOAL 2 HOW DID EACH SUPPORTING

ACTIVITY WORK? WHY OR WHY NOT

GOAL 3 HOW DID EACH SUPPORTING

ACTIVITY WORK? WHY OR WHY NOT

EVALUATION OF IPs

12

Page 13: Title III Improvement Plans 2-Year status

13