1 TABLE OF ACTIVITY – GROUP SCHEDULE DATE MATTER MEMBER INVOLVING ( %) 20/3/2011 Make a discussion how to handle the project 100 24/3/2011 Visit the experiment area 100 2/4/2011 ------ 11/4/2011 Doing the analysis and soil sample Determination of organic matter content Determination of the texture of soil Determination of water content Determination of air content of soil Determination of soil PH 100 15/4/2011 -------- 17/4/2011 Collect data to determination plant density species in experiment area using systematic sampling technique and line transect 100 19/4/2011 Send the report to the 100
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
1
TABLE OF ACTIVITY – GROUP SCHEDULE
DATE MATTER MEMBER
INVOLVING ( %)
20/3/2011 Make a discussion how to handle the
project
100
24/3/2011 Visit the experiment area 100
2/4/2011 ------ 11/4/2011 Doing the analysis and soil sample
Determination of organic
matter content
Determination of the texture
of soil
Determination of water
content
Determination of air content
of soil
Determination of soil PH
100
15/4/2011 -------- 17/4/2011 Collect data to determination plant
density species in experiment area
using systematic sampling technique
and line transect
100
19/4/2011 Send the report to the teacher 100
2
SOIL ANALYSIS
3
Title : Soil sampling technique
Pupose : Using the right technique to take the soil sampling
Apparatus : Metal cylinder and piston (to dig out soil)
Procedure
1) The metal cylinder are press into the soil
2) The soil sample from the cylinder remove by using the piston
Result
4
The sample for the soil like sand, loam and clay will get with the soil when press into
the soil
Discussion
The metal cylinder and piston are ensure in the vertically with the soil when press
into soil
Conclusion
For the effective technique to get the soil structure in natural, used the digger.
5
Title : determination of the tenture of the soil
Purpose : to determine the tenture of soil
Apparatus : 500 cm3 measuring cylinder, 100 cm3 soil sample and 300 cm water.
Procedure :
1) The soil sample is added into the measuring cylinder and with water
2) The content shake vigorously
3) Leave the mixture for 48 hour to allows mixture settle out according to density and
surface area of particles.
4) Then the volume of various traction of soil sample are measured.
6
Matter Soil sample (g)
Weight of soil sample 100
Weight of small stone 24
Weight of loam 40
Weight of clay 14
Weight of water 132
Weight of humus 100
Weight of soil sand 12
We assume that 1 cm3 equal 1g from the table percentage of the small stone, loam,
clay, humus and sand can be calculated by using this formula.
% soil component = weight of sand
__________________ x 100
Weight of soil sample
1) % of small atone component = weight of sand
__________________ x 100
Weight of soil sample
= 24
___ X 100
100
= 24%
7
2) % of loam component = weight of loam
___________________ x 100
Weight of soil sample
= 40
___ X 100
100
= 40%
3) % of clay component = Weight of clay
___________________ x 100
Weight of soil sample
= 14
___ X 100
100
= 14%
4) % of humus component = Weight of sand
___________________ x 100
Weight of soil sample
= 10
____ X 100
100
= 10%
5) % of sand component = Weight of sand
___________________ x 100
Weight of soil sample
= 12
____ X 100
8
100
=12%
Discussion
The soil sample in a measuring cylinder has for approximately 48 hours for the soil
sample partides to settle.
Conclusion
From the experiment, we get the texture of the soil contents small stone 24% , loam 40%, clay 14%,
humus 10%, and sand 12%.
9
Title : Determination of water content of soil
Purpose : To determine the water content of soil
Apparatus : Aluminium foil pie dish
Material : 80 gm soil
Procedure :
1) Firstly empty aluminium toil pie dish was weight. Then the mass is recorded (a)
2) A broken up soil sample is added to the pie dish and weight. The mass is recorded (B)
3) The pie dish containing the soil sample was placed into the oven at 110 °c 24 hours.
4) The sample from the oven is remove and cook in dessiccator
5) When the sample is cold, remove and weight it. The mass is recored.
6) The sample then return into the oven at 110 °c for further 24 hours.
7) Stages 4 and 5 repated until consistent weighing are recorded. Received the mass
(c).
8) The percentage of water can be calculate as follow
10
B – C
_____ x 100
B – A
The soil sample in dessicator is retain for experiment 4
Result :-
Matter Mass (g)
Mass of the empty aluminium foil pie dish 107.9
Mass of soil sample + aluminium foil pie dish 187.9
Mass of sample after coll + aluminium foil
pie dish
Reading 1 181.33
Reading 2 182.04
Reading 3 181.50
Average 181.62
% water contain of soil = Weight of sand
___________________ x 100
Weight of soil sample
By using the formula = B – C
____________ x 100
B – A
= 187.9 – 181.62
______________ x 100
187.9 – 107.9
11
% water content of soil = 7.85 %
Discussion
Soil sample is heated to eliminate the water to avoid the masss of water counted in
this experiment.
Soil sample is heated until the constant weight is apply. The soil colour is change
from dark to light colour. The soil also become more sand sandy.
Conclusion
The value obtained in the experiment, is the percentage total water present. The
amount will depend upon content include field capacity and available water.
12
Title : Determination of organic matter content
Propose : To determine the content of an organic (humus) in a soil.
Apparatus : Desiccators and lid
Ttripod
Bunson burner
Asbestos mat
Fireclay triangle tongs
Material : Dried soil sample
Sand soil, loam soil, orchard soil
13
Procedure :
1) Using Bunsen flame the available and lid are strongly heated to remove all traces of
moisture. Cool it by placing in the desiccators. Then weight and mass (a) are
recorded.
2) The dried soil sample (from the previous experiment) are added in the desiccators and
weight. Mass (b) are recorded.
3) To burn off all the organic matter the soil sample in the unable that corered with the
lid are red heated for 1 hour. Then cool it for 10 minutes and remove it from
desiccators.
4) When cool the emcible and sample are weigh.
5) Procedure from 1 – 4 are repeated with constant mass is recorded.
6) Percentage of organic content is calculated a follow.
7) Experiment are repeated using soil sample taken from different areas.
14
Result :-
No Matter Area
Field Orshard Beach
1 Crucible + cover (a) 28.3 28.3 28.3
2 Crucible + cover + soil
before heating
108.3 108.3 108.3
3 Soil sample used (b - a) 80.0 80.0 80.0
4 Crucible + cover + soil
after heating (c)
Reading 1 98.0 96.00 100.37
Reading 2 97.37 95.39 99.87
Reading 3 97.37 95.39 99.87
Average 97.58 95.55 100.03
5 Organic metter (b – c)
Reading 1 10.3 12.3 7.43
Reading 2 10.9 12.91 8.43
Reading 3 10.9 12.91 8.43
Average 10.7 12.7 8.0
6 Percentage
(b – c)
_______ x 100
(b – a)
13.37% 15.87% 10%
Discussion :-
15
1) Soil sample from different areas are used to demosstrafe the variation on organic
content
2) The soil sample is heated repeatly at 11. Then is was cooled in desiceator until
consistent reading were obtamed.
Conclusion :-
The soil sample which contained the most organic matter is arehard with and followed
by field 13.37% and 10% beach respectively 15,87%.
16
Title : Determination of air content of soil.
Propose : To investigation the air content of a soil.
Apparatus : The can of volume 200 cm, 500 cm beaker, metal seeker
Material : Water
Procedure :-
1) Place into the 500 cm3 beaker with empty can open uppermost and fill the beaker
with above the level of the can. The water level in the beaker is wanted.
2) The can containing water is remove and using measuring cylinder the volume of
water is measure. Volume (a) recorded.
3) By using a drill the base of the can is perforate about right small holes.
4) The open of the can is push into the soil which the surface vegetation has been
removed until soil begins to come through the perforation. The can is dry out and
standardrize the soil level with the top of can.
5) The can of soil is placed into the beaker with open end uppermost. Used seeker to
loosen soil and allow air to escape.
6) The level of water in the beaker will be lower than the original level because the water
replaced the air which was present in the soil.
17
7) Water from a full 100cm measuring cylinder is added into the beaker until the original
level ia restorest. Volume of water added (b) is recorded.
8) The percentage air content of the soil sample can be determine as follows
b _ X 100
a 9) The experiment is repeated using soil sample from different areas.
18
Results = Percentages volume of air in the soil sample is edculated
Formula =
Volume of water added
X 100
Initial volume of water in can
= b
X 100
a
Table =
Soil
sample
Initial volume of
water in can
(a) cm
Volume of water
added
(b) cm
% air in the soil
b X 100
aOrchard
Field
Beach
250
250
250
200
80
230
80%
32%
92%
19
Discussion:
Soil from different areas have differentair contain
Soil sample from beach has the higher air content of all (95%) and followed by
the archard (second higher) (85%) and the soil sample from the field is the third
(31%)
Using a correct technique will taking the reading the volume of the water will
help in approximate results.
Conclusion:
Beach soil is not suitable for vegetation because it has higher air content and this
meant that it could nit trap water because of it tiny and smaller sand structure.
The suitable soil for vegetation is the orchard soil because its closed and small
structure.
20
Title : Determination of soil pH
Purpose : To determine the pH of soil
Apparatus : Long test tube, test tube rack, spatula, 10cm pipette
Material : Universial indicator
Procedure :
1) 1 cm of soil and barium sulphat is added in the test tube. Barium sulphat is used to
ensure flocculation of colloidal day.
2) 10 cm of water distilled water and 5 cm of BDH universial indicator solution is
added. Used bung to seal the test tube. Then shake it vigorously and leave it 5
minutes to allow content to settle.
3) The colour of liquid in the test tube is compared with the colours on the BDH
reference colour chart the corresponding pH are read of.
4) Using soil sample from different areas the experiment are repeated.
Result :
Area pH value
Field 6
Orchard 10
Beach 4
21
Discussion :
pH is one the most useful measurement that can be made on soil. Because it determine
the nutrients contents at the soil and which vegetation is suitable to be plant on it.
Conclusion :
Generally loam soil have many humus and it is an acidic soil because of the percentage
of organic acids.
22
TYPE OF SOIL SAMPLE
Beach soil
Orchard soil
Padi field
23
DETERMINATION OF THE OF SOIL ORGANISMS.
Title : land organism
Purpose : To determine the types of organism in soil
Apparatus : Tullgren furnel, retort stand, beakers, hand lens
Material : 4% formalin solution, soil sample
Procedure :
1) Apparatus is prepared as show in the diagram above.
24
2) Soil sample is put on the filter. The bigger organism which cannot get through the filter
are separated by using forcep and inserted into the beaker which contain 4% formalin
solution.
Determination Of The Types Of Soil
Organism
25
3) The beaker contain 4% formalin solution is putted under the surface of tullgram funnel
so that the smallest organism will fall into the formalin solution.
4) The lamp is switched on and the apparatus is leaved for afew days.
5) After a few days, the beaker contain 4% formalin solution is exquliued. Organism in
the soil is examinated by using hand lens to identified them.
6) Types of organism which are found are then identified their order and common name.
The diagram of the organism are draw.
Result :
Bil Phylum organism Common name Shape
1 Artropoda-insecta Larva
2 Artropoda-insecta Ants
3 Artropoda-archnida Spider
4 Annelid Earthworm
5 Artropoda-insecta Termite
26
Discussion :
1) The soil sample is that is used first, place on the net under the lamp which has switched
on. After one or two days, the beakers contain formalin that is placed under the
tullgram tunnel is examined and then identifield.
2) This technique is based on the negative responces organism toward bright light, high
temperature and low moisture.
3)The bright light forces the organism download and then eventually falls into the beaker
containing formalin solution.
Conclusion :
This technique can isolated the terresfrial mesofauna live, larva, ants, spider,
earthworm, and fermite.
Title : Aquatic Organism
Propose : To investigate the types of organism in aguatic environments
Frequency : Number of quadrat containing the species
___________________________________ X 100
Total number of quadrat
Relative Frequency : Frequency of value the species
____________________________ X 100
Total frequency values of all species
35
No Species of plant in quadrat Total
species
for the
quadrat.
Percentage
of
frequency.
(%)
Percentage of
relative
frequency (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 9/25 3.6 15.06
2 3/10 3.0 12.55
3 30/100 3.3 15.81
4 1/4 2.5 10.41
5 7/100 0.7 2.93
6 11/100 1.1 4.60
7 37/100 3.7 15.48
36
8 17/100 1.7 7.11
9 3/100 0.6 2.51
10 37/100 3.7 15.48
Total 24.1 100.00
Formula
Percentage coverage : total base or area coverage of all quadrat X 100
Total number of quadrat sampled X quadrat area
Relative coverage : coverage by species X 100
Total coverage by all species
MAPING AREA EXPERIMENT OF RANDOM QUADRATS
37
Guideline
b) Random sampling quadrats.
Result
Student’name : 1) Muhammad Al Afiq bin Kasri
2) Muhammad Al Hilmi bin Hasan
3) Muhammad Hilmi Amir bin Mat Nawi
4) Muhammad Faizmuhaizihan bin Abdul Rasyid
Habitat : Orchard
Location : Taman Tengku Anis
Type of plant : Terrestrial plant
Quadrat size : 1M X 1M
38
Date : 16 APRIL 2011
Table of data for the measurement of each species of plant in the random sampling.
No Species of plant in quadrat Total species
for the 10
quadrat.
Frequency Relative frequency
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 / / / 3 30 5.66
2 / / / / / / / 7 70 13.21
3 / / / 3 30 5.66
4 / / / / / / / / 8 80 15.09
5 / / / / 4 40 7.55
6 / / / / / / 6 60 11.32
7 / / 2 20 3.77
39
8 / / / / 4 40 7.85
9 / / / / / / / / / / 10 100 18.87
10 / / / / / / 6 60 11.32
Total 53 530 100.00
Table 2.1 species of plant in the random sampling quadrat
Formula :
Frequancy : Number of quadrat containing the species X 100
Total number of quadrat
Relative frequency : Frequency value of the species X 100
Total frequency value of all species
No Species of plant in quadrat Total number
of quadrat x
area of each
quadrat
Density Relative density (%)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
0
1 8 7 2 10 1.7 9.49
2 2 6 4 3 1 2 5 10 2.3 18.24
3 5 6 1 10 1.2 6.70
4 2 3 1 3 4 4 3 9 10 2.9 16.20
5 3 2 5 6 10 1.5 8.38
6 4 3 1 2 2 1 10 1.3 7.26
7 7 3 10 1.0 5.59
8 5 4 2 2 10 1.3 7.26
9 2 3 4 1 1 1 3 2 6 7 10 3.0 9.49
10 2 5 1 2 4 3 10 1.7 9.49
40
Total 17.9 100.00
Table 2.2 : total species plant place in the random sampling quadrat
Formula :
Density : total number of individual of a species in all quadrat X 100
Total number of quadrat X area of each quadrat
Relative density : density of a species X 100
Total density of by all species
No Species cover (base) in quadrat Total
species
cover for
ten
quadrat
Percentage
of
coverrage
(%)
Percentage
of
relative
coverrage
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 11/50 2.3 2.65
2 46/50 18.4 21.20
3 22/50 8.2 9.45
4 129/50 6.4 7.58
5 33/50 3.3 3.58
6 193/50 7.1 3.80
7 1/50 0.2 8.18
8 9/50 1.8 0.24
9 179/50 35.8 41.24
41
10 13/40 3.3 3.80
Total 86.8 100.00
Table 2.3 total of datafor the measurement of each species cover in quadrat
Formula
Percentage coverage : Total base or area coverage of all quadrat X 100
____________________________________
Total coverage by all species.
Relative coverage : Coverage by species
__________________ x 100
Total coverage by all species
MAPING AREA EXPERIMENT OF LINE TRANSECTS
42
Guideline
Title : Sampling technique using line transect
43
Purpose : To determine frequency coverage percentage and density of plant
Species in the habitat.
Apparatus : rope (15.30meters)
Procedure :
1) One base line along the border of the are under investigation is determine.2) One series of point along the base line is chosen either randomly is
systematically. 3) The plant that touch and cross under transects line are record.4) Place 10 – 20 line randomly in the area to provide enough sample to
investigate.
Formula:
Frequency : Total number of intervals where the species are found
___________________________________________ X 100
Total number of interval of transects
% species cover : Total cross sectional length of a species
_________________________________ X 100
Total length of transects
Relative cover species : Total cross sectional length of species
_______________________________ X 100
Total cross sectional length of all species
Result :-
44
Student’s name :
1) MUHAMMAD AL AFIQ BIN KASRI2) MUHAMMAD AL HILMI BIN HASAN3) MUHAMMAD HILMI AMIR BIN MAT NAWI4) MUHAMMAD FAIZMUHAIZIHAN BIN ABDUL RASHID
Habitat : Orchard
Location/place : kg, Padang Lembik
Type of plant : Terestrial Plant
Distance of each intervals : 1.0 meter
Total number of interval : 10
Total length of interval : 15.30 meter
Date : 17 APRIL 2011
Table of data for the measurement of each species of plant in the sampling technique using linhe transects
45
No Individual in distance of each intervals
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 9 4 3
2 18 3 10 2 8 2 12 10 2 6
3 3 2 8 2
4 1
5 16 6
6 2 1
7 5 2
8 1
9 5
10 3
Table 3.1 Total of species of plant in the length of transect interval.
No Total length Percentage cover (a/b) X 100
Total cross all sectional
Relative cover.
Total cross sectional (a)
Transect (b)
46
1 16 1530 1.05 145 11.03
2 73 1530 4.77 145 50.34
3 15 1530 0.98 145 10.34
4 1 1530 0.07 145 0.69
5 22 1530 1.44 145 15.17
6 3 1530 0.20 145 2.07
7 7 1530 0.46 145 4.83
8 1 1530 0.07 145 0.69
9 3 1530 o.20 145 2.07
10 4 1530 0.26 145 2.76
Total 15301530 9.5 145 100
Table 3.2 percentage of cover and relative cover in other species of palnt in the transect.
No No of intervals where species are recorded
Total no of interval transect
frequency Total of all frequency
Relative frequency
47
1 3 15.30 19 180 10.55
2 10 15.30 65 180 36.40
3 4 15.30 26 180 14.44
4 1 15.30 6 180 3.33
5 2 15.30 13 180 7.22
6 2 15.30 13 180 7.22
7 2 15.30 13 180 7.22
8 1 15.30 6 180 3.33
9 1 15.30 6 180 3.33
10 2 15.30 13 180 7.22
100.00
Table 3.3 Frequency and relative frequency in other species of plant in the transect.
Discussion : The relative density, relative cover, relative frequency and so on of each plant species in a habitat can be determine by using the quadrat sampling. Technique such as systematic and random sampling procedure. It also can be determined by using the sampling technique line transect.
Conclusion : From the experiment we can observed the dominant species of plant in this habitat is kemucup.