Utilizing Operating Systems to Effectively Manage Completions and Production Chemicals January 2013 Todd Wauters Global Business and Development Manager Becky Ogden Technical Training Manager
Utilizing Operating Systems to Effectively
Manage Completions and Production
Chemicals
January 2013
Todd Wauters
Global Business and Development Manager
Becky Ogden
Technical Training Manager
2 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Safety Moment
Emergency exits and evacuation discussion
3 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Overview
Introductions
MVP 2.0
– System Description
– Key Differentiators
Case Histories
– West Texas
– Rocky Mountains
– East Texas
– Northeast
Conclusion
Q & A
4 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 System Description
Multi-Value Plus
– Chemical reporting system designed and maintained internally by Multi-Chem
– Combines the customer data with analysis and production data which is exportable into multiple formats
– Examples
• Treatment Program Information
• FRAC Reporting
• Customer Cost and Usage Reports
• Observations
• Field Analyses
• Failure Analyses
• Customer Well/Production Information
• Lab Analysis and Data
5 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Key Differentiators
Accessible via Internet, 24-7
Real time, trending data linked to actual locations/injection
points
Key Performance Indicators- aka KPI’s
Monitoring reports (field tests as well as laboratory tests)
MSDS/PDB’s
Reporting speed & efficiency
Tool for system reviews/DOT Audits
Combines multiple reports to provide complete location
histories without further research
Automatic backup of data each night
6 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Key Differentiators
Linked with laboratory systems to provide actual lab reports
uploaded daily, accessible for a registered user from any
computer with internet access
Complete application and monitoring analysis: (Drill down to
a specific Location)
Financial Reports: Executive Summary (50,000’ overview)
down to location specific
Can be drilled down to the specific well/location to bring all
database/analytical/usage reports into one consolidated
report
Recommendations can be uploaded and viewed by locations
with the history stored within the system
7 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Examples
8 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Examples
9 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Examples
10 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Examples
11 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Examples
12 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Examples
13 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
MVP 2.0 Examples
14 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – West Texas
Customer A-
– Iron Sulfide (FeS) was causing rod parting and rod cutting of the tubulars which resulted in a high frequency of failures (reducing production and increasing costs)
– MVP 2.0 was utilized to monitor various chemical treatments which were not bringing down the FeS levels (Initial well bore grindouts indicated a 30% interface with 4% water wet solids)
– Change to AcroClear treatment program was monitored by tracking grindouts and failures by location
Program results-
– Clean grindouts and elimination of FeS
– Significant failure reduction
– Production increase of 4 bbls/day
15 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – West Texas
29
11
4
8
5
37
16
10 12
22
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Bb
ls O
il
Well Name/Number
Customer A- Tracking Production Data
BBls Oil Pre-AcroClear BBls Oil Post AcroClear
Well A Well B Well C Well D Well E
16 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – West Texas
6
9
6
9
4
7
0
1
0 0 0 0 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Bb
ls O
il
Well Name/Number
Customer A- Tracking Failure Reduction
Failures/year Pre-AcroClear Failures Post-AcroClear
Well 1 Well 2 Well 3 Well 4 Well 5 Well 6
17 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – West Texas
Customer B-
– Injection well was not taking water due to high amounts of
FeS
– MVP 2.0 analysis tracking and trending tools were used to
monitor millipore filtration in conjunction with an AcroClear
treatment program
Results-
– The well which was not previously taking water started
taking water at 250 bbls/day at 1750 PSI
18 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – West Texas
Customer B- Tracking Lab and Field Analysis
19 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – West Texas
Customer C-
– Pipeline customer with severe corrosion rates
– MVP 2.0 coupon monitoring and failure reporting
were used to trend corrosion rates in MPY’s
– Effective biocide program was developed as a direct
result of coupon corrosion rate trending within the
system
Results-
– Corrosion rate reduction of 2.02 mpy to 0.25 mpy
– BS&W reduced from 1.5% to 0.1%
20 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – West Texas
Customer C- Tracking Corrosion Rates and Failures
21 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – Rocky Mountains
Customer D-
– Water disposal well was not taking water due to high levels of FeS and safety concerns were high due to increasing H2S levels
– A chemical program consisting of 3 combined chemicals was tracked in MVP 2.0 and shown to be ineffective at reducing FeS and H2S
– In addition, this customer was replacing a minimum of 16 filters per day due to clogging, and incurring significant costs from filter replacements, labor, and heightened safety hazards from potential H2S exposure
– The customer and operators were able to utilize MVP 2.0 combined with an AcroClear treatment program to monitor failure rates and program costs
Results-
– Initial chemical program cost was $89,000 per year combined with $16,934 in filter replacements, labor, hazard removal and safety concerns
– Chemical program after utilizing MVP 2.0 and AcroClear- $31,000 per year, no filter replacements at the 26 day point, and FeS and H2S elimination
22 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – Rocky Mountains
Customer D- Tracking Water Injection Quality
23 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – East Texas
Customer E-
– Overall operations cost reduction was identified as the primary focus for the customer
– The Multi-Chem team identified pump optimization as the leading contributor to cost reduction
– MVP 2.0 was used to trend the effects that modified pump rates and custom chemicals were having on production rates
Results-
– Reduced costs in all measured categories
– Cost related to production reduced as well ($/mcf, $/bbl)
– Chemical usage reduced by 36%
– Wells unloaded more water by 38%
24 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – East Texas
Customer E- Reducing Cost Through Pump Optimization
25 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Case Histories – East Texas
Customer E- Reducing Cost Through Pump Optimization
26 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Conclusion
Summary-
Q & A-
27 © 2011 HALLIBURTON. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
“SERVICE IS WHAT GOT US HERE AND SERVICE IS WHAT WILL KEEP US HERE.” JAMES B. ARCHER – 1993