4aA11SW8239 2 .7155 T ISDALE 010 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY on the TISDALE #1 GROUP Tisdale Township Hollinger Argus Limited Timmins, Ontario August 15, 1984 D. R. Alexander
4aA11SW8239 2 .7155 T ISDALE 010
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
on the
TISDALE #1 GROUP
Tisdale Township
Hollinger Argus Limited
Timmins, Ontario August 15, 1984
D. R. Alexander
42A115*8239 S.7155 T ISDALE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
010C
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
CLAIM MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l
PREVIOUS WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
GENERAL GEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
TABLE OF FORMATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
DESCRIPTION OF UNITS. . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . 8
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
FIGURES
Figure l - Geological sketch map of theTimmins area . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Figure 2 - Distribution of stratigraphicunits in the Timmins area. . . . . 4
MAPS
Geological Survey - Tisdale Groups IB and 2Tisdale Township; Scale 1:2500 . . . . . (in pocket)
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author would like to gratefully
acknowledge the able assistance provided by
Messrs. Larry Ferguson and Roy Shegelski of
Esso Minerals Canada - Mr. Ferguson for the
reconnaissance workup, and Dr. Shegelski for
his aid in interpretation.
- 11 -CLAIM MAP
9^^ p — H ighway. 655 W"-- ,- l// . '-. . ? 9? ?,. ^\ M urphy Twp. r~^ \,
I" ,,•TV*;-. ; ~L ' \
~.f
Jt**
A
122*8 r^ •hi ll'!
-i J '*.fi- y//"03*Y /so,•J/'/F---JtrP
.I/it 9 949
A* * .*"
#x'' f.
P . ^ 98S4 ,*h A x* V*-s
^'^m ——Wt~-^fa* 'ATe 5 29975 fi? ^ -
rf. ^•f
xS
i* /e''-.v 59r04B\
fx VX ' V '
p ^ "^561049 ,3
x9 S -4j
1H^
. ^
^•~ \ y -"^t c - -^^- -
p591050 ^
r-/I2ZM 2927^/
oA/p
i I32C* '^P 594782 ^'^-P/
1 ^, * ^.
j. 1 xP^^ f 1325*'
r 94 ''P 594TJ/W
V S& '•t 1H
^ \f ' '
^ xi
P ?" r y •9833
i- *'~1^- - -r'
T V ^ ^ ^J "
139i7. . ..9
(@ x y•s.
1391ft, i f'••C
P * ^ 1229^ 30*/•'/' ;
* J
13256 f ' f 5 947By
so i ft y-y/^ i
L M.V. "-1"X? 30,IO65I '/' *
^/p 9951
*
LOT 8
p13916
\e*p13912
'0
^^Vr-,Charltboit
L o t*~JJoc x'* Lo ^— ^
^ ^^^3j^ j' \ - ,
< P r pDJ59ID47 IJ9HD" ^
* eV ^^v # -
^ ^' . ^
9
- ' ^^,: l - ^---.^P A, ^P \3??4 '^ IS9I5
,'-* /. ~——J
l
t 1
'
P 1 P /^ 14774 . 5834
J
9l J?*
--^4r-
tj07\ :- ;*
^! -
( 91Js.e
P [6335 V2
X -^
X.
s *ffe— "6341^ ^ '^
0J'9
5892 / X
i /*Kx-7 ———— f- S
p59479J '
r " O
P i394792' B 4fcZ ; ~D
?9t594784.ZSe
epss^ys5* 6
ft1
,P LO594785 /- ^L v.
00 [
P? .5M7B8 '
t9lD
i,k ;T~S
p594791
ft
- '
•P 15021
P ft ™594790
f.~
o— •c~^v, Vp r— x12961 — V.
9
^* TISDALE #1?9S
?9P
A
Cp\ ^ p ^ N 'iSL4.VBS ' 59*7^7 l )
,: ^TLOT 7 I LOT 7-^1 J.QT 6 .. . ^ON-VJ;
p , 30'27O66
0
'0,1
P 27067
9
p pBI06P i9576Be
595767 l
ft^(^ 306 5
^p8105 P 595769^!
O
3?C*2
P595770
ft t
P - P i
8(07 {5562
* "1^*,^ 1 ^
!^^- 7-K 1 14" * -- ! ii!'i
] ,-r——— 4'S^ _ J. —-^.- ' P 5?J I13200 ]1
' * !i 'L
P '- . . 1 t 5OTJ4I3
1 S ^e :1 f
Pj\, ' "~
BtdoP 595967
'i ^ \
P254
• •'.'
^ *,
?,o,CON V ,P 595968e
p255
0
^, fP 252
*
___ __ -*^
P13605
t' P253
. */"1
—— - -—— -^1
PJ444 J
i P 33075O
dale Twp11324
9
^ \ ^A798 \ \
P 633T
Vp 76338 lr
6339 634O
9 "
P c? 626*
9 i
-p14644P 595969- a 5 C
j13540
9
^ t~ p
6267
9•c?
p13538
' * ,P13537
*/^ sot
sp ^- — — ''1*373
309 9
P
I36S4
13732 P 595970
P1318*
P 53.0751 ' P 5307559 !
^^^ SCALE 1:20 000'' S - .
P i ^530746 5t0749
1 \. \
•^^ \-- jN 'S- — --4^-^-- -p / ^
530747 ^^- 530748 X- J
P ' P13667 13688P 530752 l P 53O754
ft
P 5JO753
~"^ /
.0, ep13052r~~^
f 5 0P V. eT-al. * .; ^
IP x'J2995' ,
^-
I?7137 OO P 532H3
e^ r,
]
' \
P 12994
- v^0
p13053
91
p\T.*6433
^ ^^ -
6336 -* j9 — -
iS4 ^
^^^s1*^ /t^
-p . _ ^-- ^ ^; 6982 " 1
*
y---
p 12969
O-
'0
. . ,,J
ifM' N J(3Sf.
- l -
INTRODUCTION:
During the fall of 1981, and over the summer of 1982,
a collection of Tisdale Township properties (groups l through 6)
were mapped on a reconnaissance scale by Larry Ferguson of
Esso Minerals Canada - Esso Minerals are joint venture partners
with Hollinger Argus on the Tisdale properties. Subsequently,
in the latter part of June and early July, 1984, the recon
naissance data on the Tisdale #1 Group were 'tightened up' with
check mapping and topographic work by the author.
The ten claims covered by the geological survey {listed
in the accompanying Technical Data Statement) occupy parts of
lots 6, 7 and 8, Concession VI, Tisdale Township.
The claim group lies approximately five kilometers
north of the City of Timmins proper, and is conveniently accessible
via Highway 655 and a combination of gravel roads extending through
the original Hollinger gravel claims.
Topographic variations across the property (excluding
artificial workings within the gravel pits) are in the order of
15-20 meters, with expectations of bedrock depths from 0-30 meters
(average 25-30m). The west part of the property is covered with
sand and gravel deposits of the Tisdale esker complex, while the
east part of the group (essentially east of the lot 7-8 line) is
covered with clays and silts sands of glaciolacustrine origin.
The drier, and topographically higher, esker complex
is characterized by jackpine vegetation with lesser stands of
poplar and birch, while the east part of the property is largely
a wet, spruce, spruce-alder swamp, occasionally mixed with fir,
larch, poplar and birch vegetation.
- 2 -
PREVIOUS WORK:
Until recent years, most of the land in the north
part of Tisdale Township has been patented, with little or no
work having been recorded.
One particular group of consequence, in the south
half of lot 7, Concession VI, was staked by Keevil in 1965,
based on the results of an airborne survey. Follow-up ground
magnetics and horizontal loop E.M. better defined an anomaly
which had been previously drilled by Canico.
The Canico drill hole is reported (by Keevil) to
contain a section of barren graphitic slates/interflow sediments
within mafic flows, although none of the Canico data were filed
for assessment.
The Hollinger-Esso claims were staked in December 1980,
with magnetic (G-816, proton) and electromagnetic (VLF) surveys
having been previously filed on the property. The results of
those surveys are integrated into the geological background of
this report.
GENERAL GEOLOGY:
The regional picture of the Timmins geology is
articulated well by Pyke (1982) who subdivides the rocks into
a lower Komatiitic - mafic calc-alkaline - felsic calc-alkaline
with iron formation sequence designated as the Deloro Group, and
and upper Komatiitic - Mg-tholeiite - Fe-tholeiite - felsic
calc-alkaline sequence called the Tisdale Group {see Figures l
and 2).
A more local terminology, utilized by the mines of the
area and described by Ferguson (1968), subdivides the Upper
(Tisdale) Group into the Northern, Mcintyre, Central and Vipond
Series overlain by the felsic, calc-alkaline Krist fragmental.
A sequence of previously designated ultramafic intrusives, the
t t t t ri ri/f ^ t t t * t f tt t t t ^4 t tv t t t t t t tttttttAttttttt
LEGEND
MIDDLE PRECAMBRIAN
L^.g Cobalt Formationgreywacke. arkose, argillite. conglomerate
unconformity
EARLY PRECAMBRIAN
\ssBaS\ D iabase *Intrusive Contact
l/./J Granitic intrusive rocks. Intrusive Contact
QVyj Ultramafic intrusive rocks f—-- I ntrusive Contact [ '.' '. j Sediments (domtnantly lurbidites)
]f ^ Iron formation
fcvvj Felsic to intermediate volcanics
l j Mafic volcanics
|| Ultramafic volcanics
* Some diabase dikes are Middle to Late Precambrian age
* Location of gold mines (present and past producers)
^ Fault
Anticlinal axis
Synclinal axis
l
LO
l
Figure f Geological sketch map of the Timmins area.
...after Pyke (1981) pg.2
' x^.-^^^^fpf' v'-' b 'riA^^^^lJ^Tlli.-vttfe^nv' ' 'j
VII
VI
V
IV
III
II
LEGEND
Porcupine group
a U pperformat ions
b Lowe Tformations
Tisdale group
Upper meCavolcanlc format Ion
Middle metavolcanic formation
Lower metavolcanic formation
Deloro group
Upper metavolcanic formation
Middle metavolcanic formation
Lower metavolcanic format ion
8TMBOL8
Geological boundary
Fault
Anticlinal axil
Synclinal axis
Figure 2—Distribution of stratigraphic units in the Timmins area.
...after Pyke (1981) pg-3
- 5 -
Northern Series, and part of the Mcintyre Series (the 95 Flow
portion) define the predominately Komatiitic base of the
Tisdale Group, followed by magnesian tholeiitic rocks of the
upper Mcintyre Series (55 Flow) and the Central Series. The
99 Flow at the base of the Vipond Series marks the onset of
iron tholeiitic rocks.
The northern ten claims of the Tisdale #1 property
span the upper part of the Komatiitic sequence and most of the
magnesian tholeiitic rocks of the Tisdale Group.
Regionally, the Tisdale #1 property is located in a
structurally complex area between two distant domal features -
the Pamour Dome to the north and the Shaw Dome to the south.
The westward extension of a major synformal axis, outlined by
the Blake River volcanics in the Kirkland Lake Area, plots north
of the Tisdale property, although its precise location is
unknown.
Of more local focus, the Tisdale #1 property lies on
the north limb of the isoclinal, North Tisdale Anticline. Units
on the property dip in a southerly direction and top north.
Fault structures present in the North Tisdale area
appear to mainly reflect the north-northwesterly and northwesterly
style Burrows-Benedict and Montreal River Systems, although no
specific offsets can be delimited on the property.
Economically, the Tisdale #1 property covers a portion
of the stratigraphy similar to the settings for most of the major
deposits in South Tisdale Township. A lack of exposure, however,
in combination with stratigraphic elements not easily detected by
geophysical means (i.e. presence of porphyry, folding, dilation),
hampers evaluation of the claims. Further, the ability to establish
targets via overburden drilling is restricted by the presence of
esker and glaciolacustrine deposits.
TABLE OF FORMATIONS:
An abbreviated stratigraphic succession covering the
Deloro and Tisdale Group rocks follows, with aside references to
the local mine terminology.
- 6 -
TABLE OF FORMATIONS
PLEISTOCENE and RECENT - esker and glaciolacustrinedeposits of the Tisdale esker complex and the (Lake) Barlow-Ojibway formation
--- great unconformity-
PRECAMBRIAN
ARCHEAN
- faulting and diabase intrusion - (may locally be synchronous)
- folding, carbonitization, porphyry intrusion - (precise and sometimes relative timing unknown, although certain carbonate units appear crudely stratabound)
Tisdale Group
Calc-alkaline felsic volcanics
Fe-tholeiite suite
Mg-tholeiite suite
Slr-j
Komatiitic volcanicsen ci• 5 8 ^i a
•H ffi-P T3
ft
Krist fragmental
Vipond Series
Central Series C16 Flow CIS Flow C14 Flow
Mcintyre Series 55 Flow
Mcintyre Series 95 Flow
Northern Series N63 pillow lava N63 Dacite
Deloro Group
Felsic calc-alkaline volcanicswith oxide iron formation (older) andsulphide iron formation (younger) near top of sequence
Mafic calc-alkaline volcanics
Komatiitic volcanics
- 7 -
DESCRIPTION OF UNITS:
The only bedrock exposed on the property occurs on
Claim 594789 circa line 19E at 10+OOm North. The exposure
is low-lying in the spruce, spruce-alder swamp, and is interpreted
to be part of the 55 Flow system (i.e. Mg-tholeiite).
Most of the outcrop is medium grained, moderately soft,
grey green in colour, and weathers pale buff to brownish. The
rock is essentially composed of plagioclase, tremolite/actinolite,
hornblende and chlorite, with minor accessory quartz in l-2mm
grains. The rock exhibits a fine felted texture (locally appears
finely sheared) from the presence of tremolite/actinolite, and
contains assorted coarser grains of plagioclase and dark green
hornblende. Near the eastern end of the outcrop there are
scattered, tiny, sometimes rusted vesicles, along with trace
amounts of pyrite.
The southeast margin of the outcrop is cut by a partially
exposed flow-top breccia that is a rather homogenous mixture of
mafic fragments, with rare siliceous fragments and small bun-
shaped pillows. The contact of the breccia zone, although
irregular, averages 60O - the zone dips south, but tops north.
It is not expected that the flow-top breccia represents the top
of the adjacent and stratigraphically lower 95 Flow system.
The majority of the outcrop is also fractured in two
directions (Azimuths 15O and 75O ), such that the exposure is
blocky in appearance.
By integrating the geophysical results with the outcrop
exposures, drill-hole geology available, and the stratigraphic
thicknesses proposed by Ferguson (1968)
: geophysical anomaly A appears to represent the
carbonaceous tuff/argillite at the 95 Flow-Northern Series contact;
: anomaly B is suggested to follow the carbonaceous tuffs
along the upper part of the 55 Flow, and
: anomaly C is interpreted to outline the top of the
Central Series, pillowed Mg-tholeiites.
- 8 -
Considering that most of the stratigraphic sections
presented by Ferguson (1968) indicate that the 95 and 55 Flows
are of near equal thickness, the contact between the two systems
is arbitrarily placed midway between the two electromagnetic
anomalies {A and B) with only minor input from the total field
magnetics.
Thus, the claims are interpreted to be underlain by
mainly pillowed, amygdaloidal Mg-tholeiites of the Central Series,
Mg-tholeiites and carbonaceous tuffs of the 55 Flow system, and
Komatiitic volcanics with carbonaceous horizons of the 95 Flow-
Northern Series rocks.
Of note is the location of the Canico drill hole
proposed by Keevil (assessment files, Resident Geologist's Office),
which does not appear to have tested any of the geophysical
anomalies outlined.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Tisdale #1 property is underlain by an important
sequence of rocks which, at this point, yield little information
towards defining a target that has not previously been tested.
To that end, an induced polarization survey will be undertaken
shortly.
Dale R. Alexander
- 9 -
SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ferguson, 1968
S.A.Geology and Ore Deposits of Tisdale Township, District of Cochrane; Ontario Department of Mines Geological Report 58, 177p. Accompanied by Map 2075, Scale I'^IOOO', 12 Charts.
Lee, Hulbert A.1979: Northern Ontario Engineering Geology Terrain
Study, Data Base Map, Pamour. Ontario Geological Survey, Map 5026, Scale 1:100 000.
Pyke, D.R. 1981:
1982
Relationship of Gold Mineralization to Stratigraphy and Structure in Timmins and Surrounding Area; P.1-15 in Genesis of Archean, Volcanic-Hosted Gold Deposits, Symposium Held at the University of Waterloo, March 7, 1980, O.G.S. MP97, 175p.
Geology of the Timmins Area, District of Cochrane; Ontario Geological Survey Report 219, 141p. Accompanied by Map 2455, Scale 1:50 000, 3 Charts, and l Sheet Microfiche.
Assessment files, Resident Geologist's Office,
In-house files, Hollinger Argus Limited.
42A11SW0239 2.7155 TISDALE S(Z)(Z)
Mining Lands Section
Control Sheet
File No J?. 7/S5
TYPE OF SURVEY
MINING LANDS COMMENTS:
GEOPHYSICAL
GEOLOGICAL
GEOCHEMICAL
EXPENDITURE
Signature of Assessor
Date
Report of Work
Ontar s
al, Geological, Geochemxal and Exosnditures)
4-
The Mining Act
Instructions: — Please type or print.— l* number of mining claims traversed
exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: — Only days credits calculated in the
"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.
— Do not use shaded areas below.IT vi.- o-
Geological ^^ ^
Hollinger Argus Limited
[Township or Area
_____Tisdale Township!ProsDECtor's Licence No.
A-20822
P.O. Box 320, TIMMINS, Ontario P4N 7E2
Hollinger Argus Limited•;rov; of Author (of Geo Technical report)
^Date of Survey (from &1 to) !Total Miles of line Cut07 10 81 !03 07 84 i 16.033 kmsDay ! Mo. ! -r r. i Day l Mo. l Yr. | J-u . u J J jvuio
Dale R. Alexander, c/o Hollinger Argus Limited•-...i * j H-.'i.iiJt's;;;i) Der Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
i Geophysical i ^ ^Claim
r o* i ;r~\ s urvey: | c ,
irc'UOes line cutting) . Magnetometer
- - ^M-nic^onr, ^vey: . " *",c
- Other LI:!.: : "'U ruys Hoi t a chl
oeo.oo.c,, /fL-26-
\ G eochemicai
• :;: ' ^ r'"- - ' - : Days pe-
C'v-"' ••'ir 1 'evi:se S'CJP - E lectromagnet c..-,, -'r- -r ;otat(s) nere
- Magnetometer
' - Ra a ,omev,c ;
: - Otner1i l Geological jj ;\ 1 Geochemical
•\'f.--oi '.-.r: C .'t'aits i Days pei ; Claim
Note: Soi;Ciai DroviSions ElectromagneticCT-MitS do nOl apply J —————————;j Airborne Surveys. Magnetometer
1 Radiometric
~. v:^r..huire* (excludes Dower stripping}Vi.; '--c* in or*. ri'MormeJ
" ' -- ' " : ' 1 ' ; :' - ' L"' ' :fr ' r
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits Total
^otal Expenditures Days Credits
i 3 -r- 15 =
: . ns*- j ? - 'Or u ; TO:;I; O3vr. Credits mav DB apportioned at the claim hoider's
"••o'CL, 5 f ter number ot oays credits per claim selected .-. cu'j- ir.', Jt rirint.
CJate Recorded Hofaer or Agent (Signature)
j Aug. 15, 1984 U ^ . ('
Mining ClaimPrefix ! Number
P 594781
. 594782
594783
594784
594785
594789
594790
594791
594792
594793
i!
i-i r. C 1 1 V E D
"i ; ': ' ! r) 1984
,.^ ii.....-.-. :,..uiiji,
Expend. Days Cr.
-?e26-
23-
2^2^-
2-9-
-20-
20-
-20-
2-0-
i
-ieci
B)rat. M
3
For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr.lDate Recorded Recorded *"? 1
l/ f.^f\ \~^4sL*/ /x 1 f 0*7li f) U Date Approved as Recorded l jf*"' J-~ ^^ —\— t S*v XT f ' *^ i ff f ^ _
Mining ClaimPrefix Numoer
i (j^ ajfcii L ±t
E C (p R D E D! AMOO-i 1DQ/IHUD 6 OOH
iptNo. ^ CV.
i
PORCUPINE MINIMS OIViaoH
i 5 -k i i*' k riE
P. M9|lp|l!jI2| Ij2!3jf jrnC.
j
Expend. Days Cr.
JLJL
1;J—
Total number of mining claims covered by this -i r\report of worK.
^^ fMining R eaGr ae f /y /f .
JP?M f/ rf/^~^ faffs^J&for
^t-^^pU^y-^ ^-~^T^"CsrtificaTior, ^' -if^nn Report of V.ork ^ ( S ( f
i no-,,.-, ,-pr- :. tn-" l r.av-- 3 r-"-.nn-i .T -i ^r'n"^!p K-iowiedfiP o* tn--' tacts set forth m tne Reoort of Work annexWfTereto. navinq Bii/forrped trie work
Dale R. Alexander,/ c/o Hollinger Argus Limited, _______Date Certified Ce/Sjfied oy t&iflnaXTraP.O.Box 320, Timmins, Ont. ' A "Aug.15,1984
Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
FUe.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Sui
Township o
Claim Hold
Survey Con Author of 1 Address of Covering D(
Total Miles
SPECIAL
•vey(s)r Area
er(s)Box
ipany
leport
GeologicalTisdale Township
Hollinger Argus Limited320, Timmins, Ontario P4N 7E2Hollinger Argus LimitedDale R. Alexander
Author c /o Hollinger Argus Limited
ites of Surv
of Line Cut
. PROVISICCREDITS REQUEST
Py Oct. 7, 1981 - July 3, 1984(linecutting to office)
16.033 kms.
|NS. fED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
AIRBORNE CREDITSMagnetome
nATR- At
Res. Geol.
ter
ig.l5 P 19
DAYS Geophysical
—Rlertrnmagnptir
—Maprnprnrrvt/T
—p-jHmmptrir
-Oth^r
^l-l 20fienlngiral
n^nrhprniral
(Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
ilectromagt(enter t
84 fUCMA
ictir RaHjr.pnefi'-ays per claim)
.TTTRF- <HL^JJL K. . (JUJtfnAuthor of Report or Agent
rfi
Oualifirations N <
Previous SurveysFile No. Type Date Claim Holder
[MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED
List numerically
(prefix) (number)
P. 594781
594782
594783
594784
594785
594789
594790
594791
594792
594793
^r""
"" ^/V?n.......................................................t-.j^..
S':p y -
TOTAITTA?MS 10
837 (5/79)
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations ———————————————————————————Number of Readings —
Station interval ^—.^^^—^^————————————^^———-—Line spacing.———.—
Profile scale—^^—^^—————————^—-————^—-——-—-.^^-————^^——^—
Contour interval.
Instrument —
W ZG
u
Accuracy — Scale constant.
Diurnal correction method.
Base Station check-in interval (hours).
Base Station location and value ^—^—
Instrument
Coil configuration^-4
liH U WJ
Coil separation ——^—^—————^^^-———^^—-—————————.——————^^^—^^^——.^———.——
Accuracy —^.^———————————^—^--—.-———^^^^^^-—^^——.^^——-—————.^^.^^^^....^.^^—^
Method: Q Fixed transmitter O Shoot back d In line CD Parallel line
Frequency—————^—————————^—(specify V.L.F. station)
Parameters measured.
Instrument
Scale constant
Corrections made. >
O
H <N5 ^ocuQ u;U
a Z
Base station value and location
Elevation accuracy.
Instrument ,.^-^—^^—^—..^^^—^^^—————.^——-—.^———^^^^^^—-.^^^—— Method D Time Domain D Frequency Domain
Parameters - On time ___________________________ Frequency ____
— Off time ___________________________ Range ————————
— Delay time.
Integration time.
Power.
Electrode array —
Electrode spacing .
: of electrode
1984 09 17 Your File: 334 Our File: 2.7155
Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTloBTins, OntarioP4N 2S7
Dear Sir:
Me have received reports and naps for a Geological Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) oi Mining CIalas P 594781 et al 1n the Township of Tisdale.
This Material trill be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.
Yours sincerely*
S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: (416)965-6918
A.Barr:sc
cc: Hollinger Argus P.O. Box 320 Timmins, Ontario P4N 7E2 Attn: Dale R. Alexander.
HOLLINGER MINES LIMITEDTIMMINS ONTARIO-TELEPHONE: { 7O5) 264-1313P4N 7E2
August 15, 1984.
Mr. Bruce Hanley,Mining Recorder, Porcupine Division,Ministry of Natural Resources,60 Wilson Avenue,TIMMINS, Ontario.P4N 2S7
Dear Bruce:
Attached is a 'Report of Work' for a geological survey covering ten claims in Tisdale Township.
Hollinger Argus Limited would like to transfer the linecutting credit {previously filed with the geophysical surveys) to the geological survey currently being filed. This would facilitate filing induced polarization and resistivity surveys on the claim group.
shortly.The geophysical surveys will get under way
The claims are on extension until the end of August, 1984.
I trust that all is in order, and I thank you for your co-operation.
Sincerely,
Dale R. Alexander, Exploration Geologist.
Encl.PORCUPINE M:N:;;C
P i S S IAU6 2 l fcS*
HOLLINGER ARGUS LIMITED p Q BOX 32o JELEPHONE: ^ 264. ]3 , 3TIMMINS. ONTARIO P4N 7E2
September 6, 1984.
Mr. E.F. Anderson,Director, Lands Administration Branch,Ministry of Natural Resources,Whitney Block, Room 6450,Queen's Park,TORONTO, Ontario.M7A 1W3
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Re: 10 claims - Tisdale Township, P.594781-785, P.594789-793
Enclosed you will find duplicate copies of a report
of a Geological Survey for our Tisdale #1 group which is in
Tisdale Township. Also enclosed is a copy of the Report of
Work which was filed with the Mining Recorder of the Porcupine
Mining Division in Timmins.
Sincerely,
!' ; : C : : l V ; " r) LU^
: P^J W. H. King,Records Officer
1 - J i'!
Encls.
V7T-
\\
\
(T(T
crr•TcT
V\
soo r
O3CX)
.O
0"
l i
MU
RP
HY
TW
PTI
SD
ALE
Jac
kpin
e,
Po
pla
rre
fore
sted
with
Ja
ckpi
ne
594
792
5 9
4 7
9 \
3
part
ly
cle
are
d
ara
v e
lS
pru
ceJa
ckp
ine
,
Popla
r.Dr
i l
Hole
T
IS.-
2-I
-84
L.
12
3m.
, 0V
24
m. :
. G
ale
- al
kalin
e fe
lsic
vo
ican
ics
Sp
ra
ce
, A
Id e
r s
Inte
rflo
w
tuffs/
sedim
ents
schi
stos
ity
dire
ctio
n
of
top
ri s^
topo
gra
phic
fe
atur
e
drill
hol
e- p
roje
cted
up
dip
ov
er
are
a
HULL
ING
EB A
RGUS
LIM
IIED
TI
MM
INS
l CO
N.
CON.
Vi
CON.
V
42A11SW0239 2.7155 TISDALE
20
13
o c
~ ;e