Top Banner
Angler Heterogeneity and Species-Specific Demand for Recreational Fishing in the Southeast United States* Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary) Kurt Schnier (University of Rhode Island) John Whitehead (Appalachian State University) AFS Annual Meeting, Lake Placid, NY, Sept. 10-14, 2006 *MARFIN #NA06NMF4330055
24

Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Jan 02, 2016

Download

Documents

Joseph Garrison

Angler Heterogeneity and Species-Specific Demand for Recreational Fishing in the Southeast United States*. Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary) Kurt Schnier (University of Rhode Island) John Whitehead (Appalachian State University). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Angler Heterogeneity and Species-Specific Demand for Recreational Fishing in the Southeast United States*

Tim Haab (Ohio State University)Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)Kurt Schnier (University of Rhode Island)John Whitehead (Appalachian State University)

AFS Annual Meeting, Lake Placid, NY, Sept. 10-14, 2006

*MARFIN #NA06NMF4330055

Page 2: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Targeting behavior Compare various

angler targeting models

• single-species• aggregates of related

species• all species combined

Our research will consider:

Page 3: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Our research will consider:

Species substitutionEstimate angler willingness to

substitute to other species or species groups when fishing quality or fishing management changes

Page 4: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Our research will:

Estimate how willingness to substitute species might differ by angler typesocioeconomic factorspreferencesgear type (i.e., mode)

Page 5: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Our research will:

Provide species-specific estimates of economic value for: changes in fishing

quality management (e.g.,

size limits, bag limits)

Page 6: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

To date:

We have identified the feasibility of demand modeling at the species level

Estimated a prototype single species demand model

Page 7: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

MRFSS 2000

LA to NC n = 70,781

Southeast 2000 (Limited Valuation Round) n = 42,079

Hook and line trips only (99%), day trips only (67%), delete missing values on key variables n = 18,709

Targets a species n=11,257

Page 8: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Fishing mode

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Shore

Party/Charter

Private/Rental

Page 9: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

State of intercept

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

LA

MS

AL

FL (G)

FL (SA)

GA

SC

NC

Page 10: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Species

425 unique species caught by recreational anglers sampled by the MRFSS

15 species account for 82% of the targeting activity and 38% of the (type 1) catch

Page 11: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Top 5 target species of interest

Spotted seatrout 23%

Red drum 20%

Dolphin 6%

King mackerel 6%

Spanish mackerel 4%

Page 12: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Species groups

Big game 4%

Bottom fish 4%

Flat fish 5%

Small game 11%

Snapper - grouper 15%

Page 13: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Target BehaviorAny Species Dolphin

sign p-value sign p-value

Intercept + p < .01 - p < .01

Years fished + p < .01 - p < .01

Boat owner + p < .01 +

Shore mode - p < .01

Charter mode - p < .01 + p < .01

Days fished + p < .01 - p < .01

Wave 4 - - p < .01

Wave 5 + p < .01 - p < .01

Wave 6 + p < .01 - p < .01

Gulf - p < .01 - p < .01

Page 14: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Random Utility Models

Conditional LogitU = X’β + e

Mixed LogitU = X’δ + ε + e

Page 15: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Dependent variables

Travel cost [party/charter] TC = charter fee + driving

costs + time costs [private/rental] TC = driving costs + time

costs Predicted (type 1) catch rate

Depends on 5-year historic (type 1) catch rate

Big (20” or greater) Small (less than 20”)

Historic big game catch rate Number of MRFSS interview sites in the

county

Page 16: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Conditional/Mixed Logit

Party/charter boatEight counties

Private/rental boat Ten counties

Page 17: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Conditional Logit Results

Coeff t-stat

Travel cost -0.054 -25.13

Dolphin catch > 20" 11.37 9.87

Dolphin catch < 20" 1.15 9.11

Big game catch 13.30 14.38

Log(number of sites) 0.10 1.67

Number of observations = 685Number of alternatives = 18Number of cases = 12330

Page 18: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Mixed Logit Results

Number of observations = 685Number of alternatives = 18Number of cases = 12330

Coeff t-stat

Travel cost -0.080 -16.45

Stand. Dev. of TC 0.035 6.33

Dolphin catch > 20" 8.91 5.15

Dolphin catch < 20" 1.21 5.09

Big game catch 9.00 12.49

Log(number of sites) 0.036 0.47

Page 19: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Economic value of one fish per trip

Conditional Mixed

Big (> 20”) 209.78 110.82

Big + 1 sd 194.54

Big - 1 sd 77.48

Small (< 20”) 21.22 15.05

Small + 1 sd 26.42

Small - 1 sd 10.52

Page 20: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Policy analysis

About 1.3 million dolphin trips in east coast of FloridaThe welfare loss of new 20” size limit

is about:• $15/fish/trip • x 1.3 million trips• = $19.5m (+/- 1 sd: $33.8m, $14.3m)

These costs could be compared to the benefits …

Page 21: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Future work

Incorporate 1997 data Consider species substitution models for:

Dolphin King mackerel Red drum Spanish mackerel Red snapper Aggregate species groups

Policy analysis: size limits, bag limits

Page 22: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Contact

John Whitehead

Department of Economics

Appalachian State University

Boone, NC 28608

[email protected]

http://www.appstate.edu/~whiteheadjc

Page 23: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Nested Logit

Party/charter Private/rental

Eight counties Ten counties

Page 24: Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College of William and Mary)

Nested Logit Results

Number of observations = 685Number of alternatives = 18Number of cases = 12330

Result

Travel cost OK

Dolphin catch > 20" Not stat. sig.

Dolphin catch < 20" OK

Big game catch Not stat. sig.

Log(number of sites) OK