TIK 4001 – Module 1 The emergence of a knowledge society (Olav Wicken) Learning outcomes: - Introduction to the field - The concepts of learning and knowledge as social processes and products o Learning as experience and interaction o Various forms of knowledge: useful knowledge, tacit knowledge, scietific knowledge - The role of history and space in analysis of contemporary society - Knowledge and learning in First and Second Industrial Revolution o Learning in organisations o Organising science/research – Science/ research organisations - Historical determinism, paths, trajectories Week 34: Entering the field Mond 18.8 10.15-12 Introduction – understanding knowledge in the modern society Olav Wicken Hand out of case study: environment/climate resources biotechnology 12-13 Lunch 13-14 Introduction Studieadmin Tue 19.8 09.15-11 Studies of creation and use of knowledge: a multi-disciplinary field Olav Wicken/ Kristin Asdal ? Wed 20.8 Reading day Thu 21.8 09.15-11 A cultural approach: “Useful knowledge” Olav Wicken Mokyr 1994 O‟Brian Bruland og Berg 1998 Landes 1998 Fri 22.8 09.15-11 Workshop: many forms of useful learning & knowledge Olav Wicken Presentation of case study Week 35: Learning processes Mond 25.8 09.15-11 Learning as a social or interactive process (networks) Olav Wicken Bruland Mokyr
18
Embed
TIK 4001 Module 1 The emergence of a knowledge society ... · The emergence of a knowledge society (Olav Wicken) Learning outcomes: ... The Gifts of Athena. Historical Origins of
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
TIK 4001 – Module 1
The emergence of a knowledge society
(Olav Wicken)
Learning outcomes:
- Introduction to the field
- The concepts of learning and knowledge as social processes and products
o Learning as experience and interaction
o Various forms of knowledge: useful knowledge, tacit knowledge, scietific
knowledge
- The role of history and space in analysis of contemporary society
- Knowledge and learning in First and Second Industrial Revolution
o Learning in organisations
o Organising science/research – Science/ research organisations
- Historical determinism, paths, trajectories
Week 34: Entering the field
Mond 18.8 10.15-12 Introduction –
understanding knowledge
in the modern society
Olav Wicken
Hand out of case
study:
environment/climate
resources
biotechnology
12-13 Lunch
13-14 Introduction
Studieadmin
Tue 19.8 09.15-11 Studies of creation and
use of knowledge: a
multi-disciplinary field
Olav Wicken/
Kristin Asdal
?
Wed 20.8 Reading day
Thu 21.8 09.15-11 A cultural approach:
“Useful knowledge”
Olav Wicken Mokyr 1994
O‟Brian
Bruland og Berg
1998
Landes 1998
Fri 22.8 09.15-11 Workshop: many forms of
useful learning &
knowledge
Olav Wicken Presentation of case
study
Week 35: Learning processes
Mond 25.8 09.15-11 Learning as a social or
interactive process
(networks)
Olav Wicken Bruland
Mokyr
Tue 26.8 09.15-11 Methodology:
Sources,data collection,
theory and historical
narratives (How to study
knowledge and in history
Olav Wicken
12-14 VISIT TO LIBRARY
Olav Wicken SEARCH FOR
LITERATURE
Wed 27.8 Reading day
Thu 28.8 09.15-11 Learning as experience:
Tacit knowledge
Olav Wicken Mokyr
Bruland og Berg
Wicken 1984
Fri 29.8 Transfer of technology
and knowledge
Technological dynamics
of industrialisation:
Europa, Scandinavia,
Norway
Olav Wicken Mokyr
Bruland
Polany
Week 36: Scientific knowledge
Mond 1.9 The scientific revolution:
new methods in creation
of knowledge
& scientific organsiations
Large Technological
HughesSystems
Olav Wicken Shafin
Shafin & Shaeffer
Mokyr 1994
Hughes 1987
Tue 2.9 Methodology: Using data
and theory to construct a
text
(Kristine
Bruland)
Wed 3.9 Reading day
Thu 4.9 Co-ordination of
knowledge – “Big
Science, Small Science”
Olav Wicken De Solla Prize
Fri 5.9 Workshop: Does history
matter? Determinism,
paths and trajectories
Olav Wicken Marx & Smith 1998
Mokyr 1994
Hughes 1987
Literature:
ESST Core literature
Marx, Leo & Merrit Roe Smith (1998). Introduction. In Merrit Roe Smith & Leo Marx
(Eds.), Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism.
Cambridge, Mass./London: The MIT Press, pp. ix-xv.
Mokyr, Joel (1994). The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, chapters 5 and 6, pp. 81-148.
Hughes, Thomas (1987). The evolution of Large Technological Systems. In: Bijker, W.E.,
Hughes T.P. & Pinch, T. (Eds.) (1987). The Social Construction of Technological Systems.
New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge MA.: MIT Press,
pp. 51-82
(Ca. 100 sider)
Other literature
Bruland, Kristine (1998), Scandianvian Industrialisation, ch.9 in M. Berg and K. Bruland,
Technological Revolutions in Europe, pp.
Bruland, Kristine (1989), British technology and European Industrialization, Cambridge
university press, ch.8, pp.108-136
Berg & Bruland (1998)
De Solla prize
Landes, David S (1998), Ch. 13: The Nature of Industrial Revolution in The Wealth and
Poverty of Nations. Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor, pp.186 – 199
Mokyr, Joel (2002), The Gifts of Athena. Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy,
Princeton University Press, ch. 1, 3, 7
Chandler Alfred D. (1990), Scale and Scope. The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, pp. 3-
13, (14-47)
Hughes T., (1984), Large technological systems, in Bijker et al (eds.) The Social construction
of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology , pp. 51 –
82
Mowery, David C.,& Rosenberg, Nathan; Ch. 2: The Growing Role of Science in the
Innovation Process in Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth 198, pp. 21 – 34
Shafin
Shafin & Shaeffer
Vincenti, Walter G (1990), “Engineering as Knowledge”, in W.G. Vincenti, What engineers
know – and how they know it, pp 3-15
Methodology
Kjeldstadli, Knut (1998), Forf Kap. 12: Kildegransking i Fortida er ikke hva den en gang
var. En innføring i historiefaget, pp.161 – 173
Path dependency
David, Paul A. (1985), Clio and the Economics of QWERTY, American Economic Review
(Papers and Proceedings) 75: 332-37
Fagerberg, Jan (2005), ch. 1 in Oxford Handbook of Innovation Studies
Ulrich Beck talks about the place of science in a risk society. You’ll also hear from another equally influential European thinker, Bruno Latour, the author of "We
Have Never Been Modern." He will argue that our very future depends on overcoming a false dichotomy between nature and culture.
Ian Hacking & Andrew Pickering
Philosophers of science tended, until quite recently, to treat science as a mainly theoretical activity. Experiment - science’s actual, often messy encounter with
the world - was viewed as something secondary, a mere hand-servant to theory. In this episode we hear from two of the scholars who’ve been influential in advancing this changed view: first Ian Hacking, Canada’s pre-eminent
philosopher of science, and later in the hour Andrew Pickering, author of The Mangle of Practice.
Simon Schaffer
How to Think About Science begins with a conversation with Simon Schaffer, co-author of Leviathan and the Air Pump, subtitled Hobbes, Boyle and the
Experimental Life. A book that changed the way people thought about the history of science.
Brian Wynne
Science and technology lie almost completely outside the realm of political decision. Our civilization, consequently, is caught in a profound paradox: we glorify freedom and choice, but submit to the transformation of our culture by
technoscience as a virtual fate. Our guest is Brian Wynne of the University of Lancaster. He’s the associate director of an institute that studies the social and
Shrolec and Verspagen (2008) The Voyage of the Beagle in Innovation Systems Land. Explorations on Sectors, Innovation, Heterogeneity and Selection, No 20080220, Working Papers on Innovation Studies from Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo, http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/tikinowpp/20080220.htm
Steinmueller (2004) The European software sectoral innovation system, in Malerba, F. (2004)
Sectoral Systems of Innovation, Cambridge University Press (C)
Henderson, Orsenigo and Pisano (1999) The Pharmaceutical Industry and the Revolution in
Molecular Biology: Interactions Among Scientific, Institutional and Organizational Change,
in Mowery and Nelson (eds) “Sources of Industrial Leadership, Studies of Seven Industries”,
Cambridge University Press. (C)
Callon (1998) The Laws of the Market, Blackwells, London,
IPP BOK 2008: Wicken
Chapters in Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson (2005) Handbook of Innovation (B)
Fagerberg (2005) Innovation: A guide to the literature, Chapter 1
Lam (2005) Organizational Innovation, Chapter 5
Smith (2005)Measuring innovation, chapter 6
Edquist, C. (2005)Systems of Innovation: Perspectives and Challenges, Chapter 7
Asheim, B. T. and Gertler, M. (2005). The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems, Chapter 11
Malerba (2005) Sectoral systems: how and why innovation differs across sectors, chapter 14
Von Tunzelmann and Acha (2005) Innovation in ”Low-Tech” Industries, Chapter 15
Hall (2005) Innovation and Diffusion, chapter 17
Verspagen (2005) Innovation and Growth, chapter 18
Fagerberg and Godinho (2005) Innovation and Catching up, chapter 19
Borras and Lundvall (2005) Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, chapter 22
Cusumano, M., Mylonadis, Y., & Rosenbloom, R. (1992). Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-
Market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta. The Business History Review., 51-94
(44p)
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/3117053.pdf
Chesbrough, H.W. (2003) The Era of Open Innovation, MIT Sloan management Review,
Spring 2003 (C)
Grant, R. (1998). Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management
Journal, 17 (Special Issue: Knowledge and the Firm ), 109-122. (13p) (C)
Hanseth, O. & Lyytinen, K. (2004). “Theorizing about the Design of Information
Infrastructures: Design Kernel Theories and Principles”. In Sprouts: Working Papers on
Information Environments, Systems and Organizations, Volume 4, Issue 4. Pp. 207-241. http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~oleha/Publications/ISRinfrastructurefinal05-12-05.pdf
Hanseth, O. and Monteiro, E. (1997): “Inscribing behavior in information infrastructure
standards”. Accounting, Management & Information Technology. Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 183-211. http://heim.ifi.uio.no/~oleha/Publications/siste.enkel.doc.html
Jeppesen, L. B. & Molin, M. (2003). Consumers as Co-developers: Learning and Innovation
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1991). The Knowledge Creation Company. Harvard Business
Review, 69(November-December), 96-104. (8p) (C)
Pidgeon, N. and O'Leary, M. (2000) Man-Made Disasters: Why Technology And Organizations (Sometimes) Fail , Safety Science, 34, 1-3, pp. 15-30 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VF9-40BGF24-2&_user=674998&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000036598&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=674998&md5=02656df87e207fa691308d2f33f8df6c
Vaughan, D. (2002) Signals And Interpretive Work: The Role Of Culture In A Theory Of
Practical Action In Karen A. Cerulo (ed.) Culture in Mind: Toward a Sociology of Culture
and Cognition. New York: Routledge. 2002: 28-54. (C)
Nævestad, T.O. (2008) Reducing ignorance to signals of danger through cultural redundancy? Forthcoming
Schilling, M. A. (2008). Strategic management of technological innovation. Boston:
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapters 1-4 +6 + 8+10 (B)
Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. (1999). The art of standards wars. California Management Review,
41(2), 9-32. (23p) (C)
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.
Von Hippel, E. (2005) Democratizing Innovation, Chapters 1-3. (44p) http://web.mit.edu/evhippel/www/democ1.htm
Vohora, A. , Wright, M. , and Lockett, A. (2005) Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies, Research Policy, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp.147-17 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V77-49DN89M-
Modul 5 : Politics of knowledge (Linda Madsen) Learning outcomes:
- Increased awareness of the inter-relationship between knowledge and policy. - Recognizing the complex interplay of the social, scientific and technological in current public
debate, research and development programs and social policy formation. - Analyzing the political issues involved in a current social/scientific/technological controversy.
Week 48 Conceptualization, standardization and classification
Mon 24/11 Lecture: The politics of artefacts The politics of classification
Göran Sundqvist Winner Star
Tue 25/11 Lecture, Method: Textual analysis
Kristin Asdal Asdal et. al forthcoming
Punch
Wed 26/11 Reading day
Thu 27/11 Lecure: Feminist perspectives on politics of knowledge
Linda Madsen Haraway Harding
Fri
28/11
Excursion: Teknisk museum
Linda Madsen Barry Oudshoorn & Pinch
Week 49 The role of science and policy in the governance of global risks
Mon
1/12
Lecture: Risk Society, Risk Theory, and Governmentality,
Göran Sundqvist Beck (1992) Latour
Tue
2/12
Lecture/Seminar: Linda Madsen Mythen Lidskog and Sundqvist
Wed
3/12
Reading day
Thu
4/12
Method seminar Göran Sundqvist Lidskog and Sundqvist
Fri
5/12
Seminar: Definition struggles and policy
Linda Madsen Hinchliffe David Miller,
Week 50 Public participation and deliberative democracy
Mon
8/12
Lecture: Forms of knowledge; the challenge of flexibility, credibility, and reflexivity
Göran Sundqvist Wynne Ellis Waterton
Tue
9/12
Lecture: Political technologies
Kristin Asdal Asdal Bruun Jensen
Wed
10/12
Reading day
Thu
11/12
Seminar: Users and democratization of technology
Linda Madsen Ingunn Moser Sally Wyatt
Fri
12/12
Reflections on the term
Linda Madsen
Essay 1: Week 40 (29.9-3.10) – module 1 & 2
Essay 2: Week 47 (17.11-21.11) – module 3 & 4
Essay 3: Week 51 (15.12-19.12) – course
17
Litterature
Asdal, Kristin, Ingunn Brita Moser and Brita Brenna eds. (2007) Technoscience the politics of interventions, Oslo Academic Press, Unipub AS Norway
Asdal, Kristin (2008): “On Politics and the little Tools of Democracy: A Down to Earth Approach”, Distinction No. 16, pp11-26 (16p)
Asdal, Kristin (forthcoming): ”Saken” i Asdal, Kristin, Kjell Lars Berge ,Karen Gammelgaard, Helge Jordheim, ,Tore Rem, Trygve Riiser-Gundersen og Johan L.Tønnesen (Forthcoming): Tekst og historie. Å lese tekster historisk, Universitetsforlaget
Barry, Andrew (2001): ”Interactivitet: Konsumenter, borgere og kultur” in Asdal, Kristin, Brita Brenna og Ingunn Moser (2001):Teknovitenskaplige kulturer, Spartacus Forlag AS
Beck, Ulrich (1992). “The Politics of knowledge in Risk Society” Chapter 2 in: Ulrich Beck, Risk
Society. Towards a new Modernity. London: Sage Publications,
Ellis, Rebecca, Claire Waterton (2005): “Caught between the cartographic and the ethnographic imagination: the whereabouts of amateurs, professionals, and nature in knowing biodiversity”, in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, volume 23, pp673 – 693 (20p), http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=d353t
Haraway, Donna (1984): “Primatology is Politics by Other Means”, PSA: Proceedings of the
Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1984, Volume Two:
Symposia and Invited Papers, (1984), pp. 489-524 Published by: The University of
Chicago Press on behalf of the Philosophy
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/192523.pdf
Harding, Sandra: “After the Commom Era” Signs, Vol. 25 No. 4 Feminisms at a Millenium
Hinchliffe, Steve (2001): “Indeterminacy in-decisions: science, policy and politics in the BSE crisis”, in Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 26, pp. 182-204 (22p). http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/tran/26/2
Jensen, Casper Bruun (2005): Citizen projects and consensus building at the Danish Board of Technology: on experiments in demovraccy” in Acta Sociologica Vol 48:221-235. http://asj.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/48/3/221
Latour, Bruno (1988), The Pasteurization of France, Harvard University Press, Cambridge,
MA, (translation by Sheridan, A. and Law, J.)
Lidskog, Rolf and Göran Sundqvist (2002): “The Role of Science in Environmental Regimes: The
Case of LRTAP”, European Journal of International Relations, SAGE Publications and
Moser, Ingunn and John Law (2007): “Good Passages, Bad Passages” in Technoscience the politics of interventions, Oslo Academic Press, Unipub AS Norway
Miller, David (1999): “Risk, science and policy: definitional struggles, information management, the media and BSE”, Social Science Medicine Vol. 49 pp1239-1255 (16p) http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleListURL&_method=list&_ArticleListID=739042313&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000036598&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=674998&md5=5cc050a7efdf8edc8008a9cfd66ac2c7
Mythen, Gabe (2008): “Sociology and the Art of Risk”, Sociology Compass Vol. 2 No 1, pp 299-316, Blackwell Publishing Ltd (15p) http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/[email protected]
Oudshoorn, Nelly & Pinch, Trevor (2003). Introduction. In Oudshoorn, Nelly & Pinch, Trevor (Eds.). How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, pp. 1-28 (27p)
Star, S. L. (1991): “Power, Technologies and the Phenomenology of Conventions: on being allergic to onions” in ) in Technoscience the politics of interventions, Oslo Academic Press, Unipub AS Norwayn
Winner, L. 1980. Do Artifacts have Politics? Daedaleus, 108, pp. 121-136 (15p)
Wyatt, Sally (2003). Non-Users also Matter: The Construction of Users and Non-users of
the Internet. In Oudshoorn, Nelly & Pinch, Trevor, How Users Matter: The Co-
Wynne , Brian (1992): “Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science”, Public Understanding of Science: An International Journal of Research in the PublicDimentions of Science and Technology , Institute of Physics Publishing in association with the Science Museum Vol . 1, pp. 281-304 ISBN: ISSN: 0963-6625 (23p)