THREE-GENERATION MODELS FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF CREDENTIALS IN THE NETHERLANDS, 1940-1984 WOUT ULTEE MAARTEN WOLBERS JOCHEM TOLSMA RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN, THE NETHERLANDS PRESENTATION AT THE RC28 SPRING MEETING AT THE CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG MAY 10-12, 2012
30
Embed
THREE-GENERATION MODELS FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF CREDENTIALS IN THE NETHERLANDS, 1940-1984 WOUT ULTEE MAARTEN WOLBERS JOCHEM TOLSMA RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN,
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
THREE-GENERATION MODELS FOR
THE TRANSMISSION OF CREDENTIALS IN THE NETHERLANDS, 1940-1984
WOUT ULTEE
MAARTEN WOLBERS
JOCHEM TOLSMA
RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN, THE NETHERLANDS
PRESENTATION AT THE RC28 SPRING MEETING AT
THE CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG
MAY 10-12, 2012
FIRSTGENERATION
SECOND GENERATION
THIRD GENERATION
1946 - ?? 1976
1907 - 1979 1910 - 1983
1937
1862 – 1950 1947
1880 - 1960 1955
1980: GOLDTHORPE
CLASS STRUCTURE AND SOCIAL MOBILITY IN
BRITAIN
1980: COLLINS
THE CREDENTIAL SOCIETY
1979: BOURDIEU
LA DISTINCTION
GOIN’ BACK QUESTION:
IS BRITAIN STILL A CLASS SOCIETY?
WHAT’S IT GONNA BE QUESTION:
WILL CREDENTIALS BECOME MORE AND MORE IMPORTANT IN TECHNOLOGICALLY HIGHLY
DEVELOPED SOCIETIES LIKE THE USA?
SHIFTING MECHANISMS QUESTION:
LESS REPRODUCTION OF INEQUALITY BY THE TRANSMISSION OF MATERIAL RESOURCES?
MORE REPRODUCTION OF INEQUALITY THROUGH THE TRANSMISSION OF CULTURAL RESOURCES?
AND MORE RECONSTITUTION OF INEQUALITY THROUGH AN INCREASE IN EDUCATIONAL
HOMOGAMY?
IF TECHNOLOGICALLY HIGHLY DEVELOPED SOCIETIES,
AS INDICATED BY FATHER-SON INTERGENERATIONAL MOBILITY,
ARE LESS AND LESS CLASS SOCIETIES
AND MORE AND MORE CREDENTIAL SOCIETIES
THEN
THE QUESTION OF CREDENTIAL MOBILITY GAINS THE UPPERHAND OVER THE
QUESTION OF CLASS MOBILITY
BREAKING DOWN THE QUESTION OF INTERGENERATIONAL CLASS MOBILITY
INTO THE QUESTION OF THE EFFECT OF CLASS ORIGINGS ON EDUCATION
AND THE QUESTION OF THE EFFECT OF EDUCATION ON CLASS DESTINATION
DOES NOT GO FAR ENOUGH:
INTERGENERATIONAL CREDENTIAL MOBILITY IS INTERESTING IN ITSELF
MULTIVARIATE MODELS HIGHLIGHT DIRECT (NET) EFFECTS, WHEREAS TOTAL EFFECTS ARE MORE
IMPORTANT
AND SINCE MODELS OFTEN ARE NOT RECURSIVE, INDIRECT EFFECTS REMAIN UNDERSTUDIED
THE TWO SMALLER QUESTIONS ARE QUITE DIFFERENT:
WHEREAS THE QUESTION OF SOCIAL ORIGIN AND EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT
IS ABOUT FAMILIES AND STATES
THE QUESTION ABOUT EDUCATION AND DESTINATION
IS ABOUT THE SHORT-TERM EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN THE BUSINESS CYCLE
AND ABOUT LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF TECHNOLOGICALLY DRIVEN CHANGES IN OCCUPATIONAL STRUCTURES
BY DONATING AND BEQUESTING WEALTH TO THEIR CHILDREN, PARENTS ONCE REPRODUCED CLASS INEQUALITY
BY SPENDING TIME AND DOING THINGS WITH THEIR CHILDREN, PARENTS NOWADAYS REPRODUCE CREDENTIAL INEQUALITY
SINCE PARENTS NOWADAYS LIVE LONGER, THE TRANSMISSION OF MATERIAL RESOURCES IS
DELAYED
WHEREAS MORE CULTURAL RESOURCES ARE BEING TRANSMITTED
OUR OWN HYPOTHESIS:
THE INCREASE IN LONGEVITY IS SO STRONG
THAT NOT ONLY THE LIFE SPAN OF PARENTS AND CHILDREN OVERLAP MORE
THE LIFE SPAN OF THESE CHILDREN AND THE LIFE SPAN OF THEIR GRANDPARENTS
ALSO OVERLAP MORE
IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETIES THERE WILL BE A STRONGER DIRECT EFFECT OF THE EDUCATION OF GRANDPARENTS (FIRST
GENERATION) ON EDUCATION IN THE THIRD GENERATION (CHILDREN)
FOR CHILDREN TO BE BORN, A MOTHER AND A FATHER ARE NECESSARY
THEREFORE INTERGENERATIONAL QUESTIONS AS FATHER-SON QUESTIONS
MAY BE OFF THE MARK
CREDENTIALS IN THE THIRD GENERATION DEPEND UPON CREDENTIALS OF MOTHERS
AND FATHERS IN THE SECOND GENERATION
THE HIGHER THE CREDENTIALS OF A SECOND GENERATION HUSBAND, THE
HIGHER THE CREDENTIALS OF HIS WIFE
NET OF THIS, THE CREDENTIALS OF HIS WIFE ALSO MAY BE HIGHER IF HIS FATHER
(FIRST GENERATION) HAS HIGHER CREDENTIALS TOO
FIRST
SECOND
THIRD
SPOUSE SECOND
???
???
SO, THE TOTAL EFFECT OF CREDENTIALS IN THE FIRST
GENERATION ON THE CREDENTIALS OF THE THIRD GENERATION MAY
CONSIST OF
1) A DIRECT EFFECT PLUS
2) AN INDIRECT EFFECT BY WAY OF THE SECOND GENERATION PLUS
3) AN INDIRECT EFFECT BY WAY OF THE SECOND GENERATION SPOUSE
IF NO DIRECT EFFECT OF THE FIRST ON THE THIRD GENERATION IS
FOUND,
THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT THERE IS NO TOTAL EFFECT OF THE FIRST
ON THE THIRD GENERATION
THE SECOND ??? IS A !!!FOR THE NETHERLANDS WE HAVE INDEED
FOUND THAT A MAN (WOMAN) HAS A SPOUSE WITH A HIGHER LEVEL OF
EDUCATION
IF THAT PERSON HAS A HIGHER LEVEL OF EDUCATION
AND, INDEPENDENT OF THIS, IF THE FATHER OF THIS PERSON HAS A HIGHER
LEVEL OF EDUCATION
SEE DE GRAAF, SMEENK, ULTEE & TIMM, THE WHEN AND WHOM OF FIRST MARRIAGE IN THE NETHERLANDS
IN (EDITORS) BLOSSFELD & TIMM, WHO MARRIES WHOM?, 2003
THE FINDINGS WERE MADE BY COMBINING TWO SURVEYS CONDUCTED IN THE NETHERLANDS, IN 1992
AND 1998
WARREN & HAUSER 1997 DID NOT FIND A DIRECT EFFECT OF THE FIRST GENERATION
ON THE THIRD GENERATION FOR WISCONSIN, USA
EROLA & MOISIO 2007 FOUND ALMOST NO DIRECT OF GRANDPARENTS’ CLASS ON
CHILDREN’S CLASS FOR FINLAND 1950-2000
CHANG IN 2011 AT SPRING MEETING OF RC28 IN ESSEX
PRESENTED FINDINGS ON THE UNITED KINGDOM SHOWING THAT
FIRST GENERATION CLASS HAS A DIRECT EFFECT ON THIRD GENERATION CLASS, NET
OF SECOND GENERATION CLASS AND EDUCATION
(IN SAMPLES OF SOME 2,000, 6,000 AND 4,000 THIRD GENERATION PERSONS)
AT THE SUMMER 2011 MEETING OF RC28 IN IOWA CITY, USA
MARE PLEADED IN FAVOR OF THREE-GENERATION QUESTIONS
MARE ACCEPTED THAT IN TECHNOLOGICALLY HIGHLY DEVELOPED SOCIETIES
THE THIRD GENERATION HAS NO DIRECT EFFECT IN THE BROAD MIDDLE OF THE SOCIAL SCALE,
BUT DOES HAVE EFFECTS AT THE TOP AND BOTTOM
THESE EFFECTS ARE INTERACTIONS, THE FIRST AND SECOND GENERATION DO MORE IN COMBINATION
THAN EACH GENERATION DOES ON ITS OWN
MARE ALSO WANTS TO STUDY THE SIZE OF THE EFFECT OF THE FIRST GENERATION ON THE THIRD GENERATION IN CHINA, BEFORE THE ADVENT OF
INDUSTRIALISM THE MOST DEVELOPED AGRARIAN SOCIETY THE WORLD EVER KNEW
MY HYPOTHESIS HERE IS THAT IN THE CONTEMPORARY NETHERLANDS,
BECAUSE OF THE GENERAL INCREASE IN LONGEVITY,
THE TOTAL EFFECT OF FIRST GENERATION EDUCATION ON THIRD
EDUCATION IS GROWING
OUR DATA PERTAIN TO THE NETHERLANDS
AND WERE COLLECTED IN FIVE SIMILAR SURVEYS CALLED THE
FAMILY SURVEY DUTCH
POPULATION
ABBREVIATED IN DUTCH FNBIN SOUTH AFRICA THIS IS A BANK
YEARS OF SURVEY:
1992
1998
2000
2003
2009
IN EACH SURVEY YEAR ABOUT 1,000 PRIMARY RESPONDENTS
WERE INTERVIEWED
IF THEY WERE OFFICIALLY MARRIED OR LIVING IN A
COMMON-LAW MARRIAGE, THEIR PARTNERS WERE
INTERVIEWED TOO
IF A PARENT WAS STILL ALIVE, THAT PARENT RECEIVED A MAIL
QUESTIONNAIRE
IF A CHILD WAS 25 YEARS OR OLDER, THAT CHILD RECEIVED
A MAIL QUESTIONNAIRE
ALL PRIMARY RESPONDENTS (SECOND GENERATION) WERE ASKED AFTER THE
EDUCATION OF THEIR FATHER AND MOTHER (FIRST GENERATION)
THE PRESENT SPOUSE OF EACH PRIMARY RESPONDENT WAS ASKED AFTER THE EDUCATION
OF HER OR HIS FATHER AND MOTHER
ALL PRIMARY RESPONDENTS WERE ASKED AFTER THE EDUCATION OF ALL THE CHILDREN (THIRD
GENERATION) THEY HAVE WITH THEIR PRESENT SPOUSE
IN THE MAIL QUESTIONNAIRE CHILDREN (THIRD GENERATION) AND PARENTS (FIRST GENERATION)
WERE ASKED AFTER THEIR EDUCATION
SO, WE HAVE TWO MEASURES FOR THIRD GENERATION AND FIRST GENERATION EDUCATION
WE WILL ASSUME IN LATER RESEARCH THAT
PROXY MEASURES ARE LESS ACCURATE THAN
FIRSTHAND MEASURES
WE WILL NOT ESTIMATE FIRSTHAND STATISTICAL MODELS HERE
AT LEAST IN OUR FIRST SURVEY YEAR WE - UNDERSTANDABLY - DID NOT YET HAVE ENOUGH
SECOND GENERATION CASES
WITH DOUBLE MEASURES FOR THE FIRST GENERATION AND FOR THE THIRD GENERATION
FROM OUR FIVE SURVEYS, WITH SOME 5,000 PRIMARY RESPONDENTS
WE EXTRACTED 2,400 CHILDREN 25 YEARS OR OLDER
SOMETIMES MORE THAN ONE CHILD PER PARENT, (WE APPLIED A CLUSTER CORRECTION TO THE
STANDARD ERRORS)
FOR THESE PERSONS WE HAVE VALID SCORES FOR
OWN EDUCATION,
FATHER’S EDUCATION,
MOTHER’S EDUCATION,
EDUCATION OF FATHER’S FATHER,
EDUCATION OF FATHER’S MOTHER,
EDUCATION OF MOTHER’S FATHER, AND
EDUCATION OF MOTHER’S MOTHER
FIRST A TABULAR ANALYSIS SEE ON THE HANDOUT
TABLES 2A, 2B, 2C EN 3
THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT TOTAL EFFECT OF GRANDFATHER’S EDUCATION ON
CHILD’S EDUCATION
WHEN HOLDING CONSTANT FOR FATHER’S EDUCATION, FOR THOSE WITH A HIGHLY EDUCATED FATHER, THERE IS
NO EFFECT OF GRANDFATHER’S EDUCATION ON CHILD’S EDUCATION
FOR THOSE WITH A LOWLY EDUCATED FATHER, THERE IS A POSITIVE EFFECT OF GRANDFATHER’S EDUCATION ON CHILD’S
EDUCATION
SO, THERE IS AN INTERACTION EFFECT, BUT NOT THE ONE PREDICTED BY MARE
THEN WE ESTIMATED LINEAR REGRESSION MODELS
WE RECODED LEVELS OF EDUCATION ACCORDING THE NUMBER OF YEARS PEOPLE MINIMALLY STUDY FOR A
CREDENTIAL
WE PLAYED AROUND BY ESTIMATING TWELVE MODELS
SEE TABLE 4 IN THE HANDOUT
WHEN CONSIDERING ALL CHILDREN, THERE IS A EFFECT OF FATHER’S FATHER’S EDUCATION, NET OF FATHER’S
EDUCATION
BUT IT BECOMES INDIRECT UPON THE INTRODUCTION OF MOTHER’S EDUCATION
THIS FINDING REPEATS ITSELF FOR WOMEN, BUT NOT FOR MEN
IN THE SEPERATE COHORTS NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ARE FOUND OF FATHER’S FATHER’S EDUCATION NET OF
FATHER’S EDUCATION
FINALLY WE ESTIMATED LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELS WITH THE ODDS OF TERTIARY CREDENTIALS VERSUS
LOWER CREDENTIALS AS THE PHENOMENON TO BE PREDICTED
WE PLAYED ONCE MORE AROUND WITH MODELS, AND TABLE 5 ONCE MORE PRESENTS TWELVE OF THEM
FOR ALL THIRD GENERATION PERSONS, THERE IS NO DIRECT EFFECT OF FATHER’S FATHER’S
EDUCATION ON CHILD’S EDUCATION,
THAT DIRECT EFFECT IS NOT THERE EITHER FOR MALE CHILDREN OR FEMALE CHILDREN SEPERATELY
WHEN CONSIDERING THE EARLIER GENERATION, THERE IS AN INSIGNIFICANT
TOTAL EFFECT OF FATHER’S FATHER’S EDUCATION
IN THE LATER GENERATION THERE IS A SIGNIFICANT TOTAL EFFECT OF FATHER’S
FATHER’S EDUCATION
AND A DIRECT EFFECT OF FATHER’S FATHER’S EDUCATION, NET OF FATHER’S
EDUCATION
WHEN BRINGING IN MOTHER’S EDUCATION, THE EFFECT OF FATHER’S
FATHER’S EDUCATION BECOMES ALMOST FULLY INDIRECT
THIS TELLS ABOUT INDIRECT EFFECTS OF FIRST GENERATION EDUCATION BY WAY
OF THE EDUCATION OF THE SECOND GENERATION SPOUSE, AS ALLUDED TO
EARLIER
THIS PRESENTATION OBVIOUSLY IS A REPORT ON WORK IN PROGRESS
WE WANT TO ESTIMATE RECURSIVE MODELS
WE HAVE TO DEVISE A BETTER TEST OF CHANGES IN THE COURSE OF TIME BY
RECODING YEAR OF BIRTH
NOT INTO TWO CATEGORIES,
BUT BY TAKING IT IS A METRIC (PERHAPS ACCORDING TO SOME MEASURE FOR LIFE
EXPECTANCY)
WE STILL HAVE TO APPLY CORRECTIONS BY REPLACING PROXY MEASURES FOR THE FIRST
AND THIRD GENERATION BY FIRSTHAND MEASURES (BUT WE DO NOT HAVE THEM FOR
EVERYONE IN OUR SAMPLE)
AS YET, I DO NOT FEEL HOPELESS ABOUT MY
BOURDIEU HYPOTHESES
THIS POWERPOINT IS POSTED ON MY WEBSITE
TYPE IN GOOGLE
WOUT ULTEE
CLICK THE FIRST HIT,
GO ON THE LEFT TO PRESENTATIONS, THEN TO FOREIGN PRESENTATIONS
THERE YOU WILL FIND THE POWERPOINT, THE TABLES AND THE TEXT SO FAR