THOR End-User Workshop – October 2012 Stephen Dye, THOR End-User Workshop London, October 2012 MCCIP Secretariat Cefas Marine Climate Change Centre (MC 3 ) Transferring science to Policy Makers & Potential uses of 1 Year to Decadal Predictions
Dec 25, 2015
THOR End-User Workshop – October 2012
Stephen Dye, THOR End-User Workshop
London, October 2012
MCCIP Secretariat
Cefas Marine Climate Change Centre (MC3)
Transferring science to Policy Makers&
Potential uses of 1 Year to Decadal Predictions
UK Govt needs marine climate evidence
THOR End-User Workshop – October 2012
There are many key policy drivers which call for evidence and advice:
1. The UK Climate Change Act 2008 extends throughout the whole of the UK Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). The Act will require the Government, to assess the risks to the UK from the impact of Climate Change and report to Parliament (every 5 years).
2. The Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 includes commitments to “look ahead at the predicted impacts of climate change on the marine environment, how marine activities contribute towards it, and also how they are affected by it”.
3. The 2009 Green Paper on ‘Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy’ recognizes that “The new policy has to play a role in facilitating climate change adaptation efforts. Climate change is an added stress on marine ecosystems which makes a reduction of fishing pressure to sustainable level even more urgent”.
4. The EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive which recognizes that “given the impact of climate change, it is essential to recognise that the determination of good environmental status may have to be adapted over time.”
ScientistsEvidence
Builders and Holders
Government &
ManagersDecision Makers
Network of wider stakeholders(opinions, priorities, policy, impacts)
Steering Group
Expert advice
MCCIPsecretariat
Multiple end-users
THOR End-User Workshop – October 2012
Annual Report Card
THOR End-User Workshop – November 2012
And creating a ‘trusted’ scientific community view for them • A comprehensive scientific community viewWe have over 100 scientists from 40 institutes contributing on 30 topics, peer reviewed by topic specialists A science summary – not policy statements!
• Make sure the summary is a summary! 12 page-summary card with headline messages.
• What do we really know... Communicating uncertainty on each topic
• Make it relevant: We highlighting changes based around UK vision of clean, safe, healthy and biologically diverse seas Answer the ‘so what’ question!
• Keep it up to date!Next ‘full’ MCCIP report published mid-2013
Complex information?
THOR End-User Workshop – October 2012
Keep messages targeted and simple without mis-representing the science
Complex information?
THOR End-User Workshop – October 2012
Especially where the source material is quite technical in nature
Headlines
THOR End-User Workshop – October 2012
Clear messages up front, which for the latest special topic are about...
• Fish distributions: Changes in depth / spatial
distribution / migration / spawning
• Management: Technologies make cultivated species robust and protected areas could help against CC impacts.
• Socio-economics: Potential importance of positive impacts on recreational fishing (e.g. Seabass).
• Wider implications: Shifting distributions have led to international disagreements which CC could exacerbate.
Marine scenarios behind atmospheric
THOR End-User Workshop – October 2012
‘Land’ atmosphere25km grid3 Emissions Scenarios7 time slices (2020s-2080s)
‘True’ marine variables(SST, salinity etc..)12km grid1 Emissions Scenario1 time slices (2080s)
Stakeholder message:Quantification of uncertainty in present assessments and future projections. Lead times of 5, 10, 20 years
CCRA needed:3 Emissions Scenarios3 time slices (2020s- 2050s-2080s)
Prediction or Projection?
THOR End-User Workshop – October 2012
Marine Strategy Framework Directive• The MSFD establishes a framework within which Member States shall take the
necessary measures to achieve or maintain good environmental status in the marine environment by the year 2020 at the latest.
• Good Environmental Status: Characterise -> assess -> strategy [7 year review cycle ]
• Initial assessment requires characterisation of the seas (T, S, circulation) and assessment of past and future trends.
• National waters should be considered in the context of the regional and subregional systems.
NationalRegional
THOR End-User Workshop – October 2012
Fish-Climate relationships
Cod and decadal variability
1) Cod spawn younger with higher temperature (Brander)
2) Cod grow faster with warmer temperature (Brander)
3) Cod recruitment has an optimum temperature (Planque) ~Northern and Southern boundary
Møre
Lofoten
Troms
Finnmark In the 20th C Arcto-Norwegian cod stock
made delicate adjustments in its spawning location, moving N into Troms and
Finnmark and out of More, and then back
0
50
100
150
200
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Year
Ro
e in
dex
, Fn
Sundby and Nakken
0
50
100
150
200
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Year
Ro
e in
dex
, Fn
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 20002 .5
3
3 .5
4
4 .5
5
Tem
pe
ratu
re [
C]
o
Finnmark
Troms
Møre2004/05:
Recovery of East
Finmark spawning
areas after 40 years of
absence
PINRO - Barents Sea Temperature
Marine variability as context
THOR End-User Workshop – October 2012
For the past... But what could predictabiltiy on 1-30year do?
Conclusions. Where next?
THOR End-User Workshop – October 2012
Communicating to stakeholders
• Non technical summaries should be exactly that and this does take time (and lots of painful discussion) you have to make time to do it properly.
• The ‘so what’ question can often be the hardest to answer but if you ignore it your work could well be ignored, especially by the policy community.
• Don't shy away from uncertainty and differences in opinion, it’s the first thing we get asked about!
• What we don’t know or can’t do is really important to explain.
Seasonal Decadal Predictions
• Marine stakeholders are varied but often treated as one sector.
• UKCP09 projections were limited for Marine, but a big step forward. But the next 5 or 30 years is closer to the useful timescale for many (not all) applications.
• Maybe marine is the first place that subdecadal predictions/forecasts will be available.
• Users are realistic- maybe predictions are not available yet but assessment of predictability would be really useful.
THOR End-User Workshop – October 2012
SST predictability?
Too Parochial?
Ho et al., Clim Dyn, 2012
Some extras on marine ecosystems
THOR End-User Workshop – November 2012
Sundby 2011 – WK AMO
Decadal variability + Global warming?
Beaugrand et al