Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF at SIPCOT, Thoothukudi by IWMA 1 Ramky Enviro Engineers Limited Contents 1.0. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 3 1.1. About Thoothukudi ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2. Location of the Project ................................................................................................... 4 1.3. Major Industries located in SIPCOT ............................................................................. 6 2.0. INTRODUCTION OF THE PROJECT/BACKGROUND INFORMATION .............. 6 2.1. Identification of the project and Project Proponent ....................................................... 7 2.3. Need for the Project and its Importance to the Country and or Region ......................... 8 3.0. PROJECT DESCRIPTION WITH PROCESS DETAILS ............................................ 9 3.1. Type of the Project ......................................................................................................... 9 3.2. Need for the Project ....................................................................................................... 9 3.3. Justification of Project ................................................................................................... 9 3.4. Location of the Project ................................................................................................. 10 3.5. Land Area Breakup ...................................................................................................... 10 3.6. Required Manpower .................................................................................................... 11 3.7. Water Requirement & Waste Water Generation ......................................................... 11 3.8. Power and Fuel Requirement ....................................................................................... 11 3.9. Project Cost .................................................................................................................. 12 3.10. Project Description ...................................................................................................... 12 3.11. Alternate Fuel & Raw Material Facility (AFRF) ......................................................... 25 4.0. SITE ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 37 4.1. Site Connectivity ......................................................................................................... 37 4.2. Physiography ............................................................................................................... 37 4.3. Geology........................................................................................................................ 38 4.4. Soil classification ......................................................................................................... 39 4.5. Meteorological information ......................................................................................... 39 5.0. PLANNING BRIEF..................................................................................................... 40 6.0. PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................. 42 7.0. REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT (R&R PLAN) ................................... 43 8.0. PROJECT SCHEDULE AND COST ESTIMATES ................................................... 43 9.0. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL (FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS) ............................. 43
49
Embed
Thoothukudi Draft TSDF PFR - 17.6.15 R3environmentclearance.nic.in/writereaddata/Online/... · Thoothukudi. The facility is located strategically at SIPCOT, Thoothukudi, which is
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF at SIPCOT, Thoothukudi by IWMA
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
14RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
High Volume Low Hazard Wastes Drilling muds
Mine tailings
Metaliferous slags
Others The other hazardous wastes generated in the project area are expected to comprise of the following groups:
Discarded containers used for chemicals and hazardous substances
Date expired / off specific /discarded chemicals and products
Miscellaneous waste like used cotton, gloves, gum boots
Contaminated filter / filter bags
Contaminate centrifuge bags
Spent activated carbon and any other waste
Spent catalysts
Process dust
Dust / particulate from exhaust / flue gas treatment
Sulphur sludge
Sludge from solar ponds
Alkaline and acidic and paint sludges
Floor sweeping waste from industries
Spent resins from DM plant
Distillation residue / Tarry Waste
Cooling water sludge
Drum sludge, etc
3.10.3 Waste Disposal Pathways
Based on the above compiled information wastes have been classified by their pathway of
disposal.
Wastes going to direct landfill Wastes that require stabilization prior to landfill Wastes requiring pre-treatment for co-incineration (Alternative Fuel and Raw Material
Facility, AFRF)
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
15RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
Figure 3: Flow Pathway of Wastes
The pathways of the waste at the site is as follows
Comprehensive analysis of the wastes – Laboratory facilities
Decision of waste pathway of treatment/ storage/ disposal
Waste acceptance criteria
Collection and Transportation of wastes.
Waste received at site.
Weighing and recording of waste receipt.
Sample collection (representative)
Storage at the temporary storage area.
Analysis (finger printing)
Waste confirmation
Waste Treatment/ storage/ disposal
AFRF
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
16RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
3.10.4 Laboratory Facilities
A well advanced laboratory shall be established to carry out comprehensive analysis of
hazardous wastes, finger print analysis and Treatability studies to decide on the disposal path
way as per the waste acceptance criteria. Analytical equipment required for comprehensive
analysis of the waste to be performed prior to acceptance of the waste from the generator and
fingerprinting analysis to be performed to confirm the waste will be made available at the
project site.
3.10.5 Collection and Transportation
For collection and Transportation appropriate vehicles as per demand will be provided. Type
of vehicles used will be of relevant capacity (Crane mounted containerized collection and
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
20RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
3.10.7.2Guidelines adopted for TSDF Operations
Based on the quantities available the following general information could be inferred:
The following general guidelines shall relate to daily activities associated with the operations
of TSDF:
The facility shall operate only during day light hours throughout the year.
The landfill will be staged in cells so that the minimum practical area of waste is
exposed and maximum practical area of waste has the final cap in place i.e.,
progressive filling and capping of the landfill ensuring minimization of infiltration of
wastes.
The Weigh Bridge at the main entrance will record all movements and weights and
receive waste tracking receipt as required by the waste manifest system.
The standpipe forming part of the leachate collection system shall be checked
regularly for the presence of leachate. Once leachate is detected it shall be regularly
pumped out and transferred to the leachate treatment facility on-site. The level of
leachate in the standpipe shall not be allowed to rise above the level of the leachate
collection system.
Materials Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for every chemical used or handled at the
landfill shall be provided on the premises.
Monitoring and auditing of the facility shall be performed on a periodic basic.
Met-station shall be installed with continuous recording system.
A security system shall be maintained to avoid trespassing & hazard to public.
Once a waste is received at the TSDF, a sample of waste shall be collected, at the
sampling bay/temporary storage facility and shall undergo laboratory analysis based
on which its pathway of treatment/ disposal shall be determined.
A waste manifest system shall be developed in accordance with the requirement of the
regulatory agencies to cover the transportation of the waste to TSDF and to provide
for record of waste manifestation. The manifest system shall include details of the
waste generator, waste transporter, quantity of waste, characteristics of waste,
description, consistency of waste in terms of physical state and waste category
number as per HW (M&H) Rules, 2003.
Each load of waste arriving at the facility shall be located properly and logged to
identify its pathway of treatment/ storage/ disposal.
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
21RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
An inventory shall be maintained at the arrival and departure dates of waste loads in
and out of the intractable waste storage area.
3.10.7.3 Landfill Design
The landfill will be designed and constructed as a secure facility to contain the waste material
and any leachate, which is formed by the entrapped moisture or by infiltration of rainfall. To
meet these requirements the base of the landfill has been designed as an engineered liner
constructed prior to the placement of waste and also an engineered capping over the surface
after completion of filling to minimize the infiltration of rainfall. The cross section of the
landfill meeting MOEF Guidelines is given in Figure 4.
The base liner of the landfill containment system is proposed to be a double composite liner
with synthetic geo-membrane plus clay. Adequate leachate collection system shall be
incorporated at the base to collect and remove the leachate. These shall incorporate HDPE
pipes embedded in drainage layers of sand/ gravel and /or geonet/ geotextile. The composite
liner (Secondary liner) shall comprise of a 0.45 mm thick clay compacted to a permeability
less than 10 –9 m/s and above this shall be a HDPE liner with permeability less than 10 –14 m/s
above which a complete drainage system shall be placed. Above the secondary base liner
shall be placed a primary liner comprising of primarily clay layer and HDPE membrane
which will prevent infiltration into the secondary layer. A leachate collection and removal
system shall also be placed over the primary liner to collect and remove any leachate
generated by infiltration of precipitation or by the moisture entrapped in the waste. This
makes the secondary system to serve as a leak detection system and an early warning of
potential future liabilities to necessitate action for remediation. Above the drainage system of
the primary liner shall be placed a geo-textile filter to act as a filter/ barrier between the waste
and the drainage system. This entire system would make the base liner a double composite
liner meeting the national laws.
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
22RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
Figure 4: Landfill Cross Section
Clay Liner consists of a varying proportions of hydrated aluminum silicates (e.g. kaolnite,
bentonite, illite and montmorillonite) which, when properly compacted, form a soil mass with
a very low hydraulic conductivity. The clay material for use as the liner at this landfill shall
be analyzed and permeability testing shall be carried out to ascertain its low permeability.
Design permeability of the clay liner has been fixed at 10 –09 m/s and with availability of clay
liner; we will be able to achieve better results than the design values. Placement of clay liner
shall be most critical in terms of its efficiency of functioning. Clay should be placed in layers
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
23RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
not exceeding 200-mm and shall be compacted to attain the required permeability. The clay
layer after attaining the 0.45m thickness should be then checked for its permeability. Further
to this, clay shall be kept moist to ensure that it does not dry up and cause cracks to the lining
system. To ensure this we intend to keep the clay for the purpose at +4% wet of optimum
moisture content.
Synthetic Liners consists of various synthetic flexible membrane liners have been
considered for use as the primary liner at the proposed landfill. Both Poly-Vinyl Chloride
(PVC) and High – Density Polyethylene (HDPE) liners are generally suitable for this landfill.
Tensile strength is a fundamental design consideration in order to assess the ability of the
liner to resist uniaxial and biaxial strains, which occurs in the landfill. Another stress strain
consideration is the coefficient of thermal expansion.
Considering various membrane properties it is decided to use HDPE liner with appropriate
thickness as primary liner for the base of the landfill. HDPE was selected for the following
reasons:
Adequate strength to withstand mechanical strength during construction, placement
and operations.
Acceptable weathering performance.
Superior physical properties under chemical and environmental exposure to wastes
Capability to withstand the seaming process.
The hydraulic conductivity of HDPE is of the order of 0.5 * 10 –16 m/sec, which is effectively
impermeable. Construction of the seam welding process shall be subjected to strict QA/QC
measures to ensure the integrity of the liner.
Secure Landfill is the final placement area for land fillable hazardous wastes which are
treated or wastes does not require treatment. Waste directly or after treatment will be
disposed in the landfill as per the laboratory advice. Waste will be spread in the landfill using
heavy earth machinery and then compacted using vibro compactor. At the end of the landfill
operations 10 – 15 cm soil cover is placed as a daily cover.
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
24RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
During rainy season a flexible HDPE sheet cover shall be placed over the uncapped area of
the landfill minimize infiltration of rainfall into the landfill; the rain water shall be diverted to
join the surface water drains. At the end of the total landfill operations the final capping shall
be done using composite liner with clay and synthetic geo-membrane, with vegetative soil
cover grass cover.
3.10.7.4 Leachate Collection/Treatment and Disposal
Leachate collection and removal shall be provided above the geo-membrane in two layers
viz., the primary and the secondary liners. The primary liner shall serve as leachate collection
and removal system, while the secondary liner shall serve as leak detection system and a
signal of potential liabilities in terms of environmental pollution. Leachate shall be collected
by a network of lateral and header pipes embedded in a drainage layer, all of which shall
eventually drain into a leachate collection sump. The collected leachate shall be transferred to
a leachate treatment system.
The leachate collection system in an engineered landfill takes the form of an under-drain
beneath the waste material it is required to ensure there is no more than a limited head of
pressure above the base liner to cause leakage of liquid from the base of the landfill. The
design maximum pressure head in the proposed landfill shall be limited to 300mm.
Drainage is affected by a layer of about 300mm thick of graded sand/gravel having a high
permeability. Within this layer a network of HDPE pipes are placed to collect leachate and
conduct it quickly to the collection sump for removal from landfill. The pipes are typically
perforated only over the upper half to allow the leachate to enter the pipe and thereafter to be
contained within the pipe network system. The layout of the pipe network generally includes
sufficient redundancy to ensure that if a blockage occurs somewhere in the network the
leachate simply backs-up a little then flows into the system a little further up-gradient. Two
layers of the leachate collection system shall be provided one over the other. Slotting area of
the pipe shall be done only on the top 120o portion of the pipe and to an extent of 100 cm2 per
running meter of the pipe.
The key design features of the leachate collection system to be installed at the proposed
landfill comprise the following:
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
25RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
A network of semi perforated HDPE pipes laid out directly over the primary and
secondary liners and graded towards the collection sump at no less that 2% slope,
with a slotting area of 100 cm2 per running meter of the pipe.
A drainage layer 300mm thick of graded sand/gravel placed over the entire base of the
landfill, covering the pipe network.
A geo-textile placed over the primary liner serving the purpose of filter/ barrier
between the waste and the drainage media.
The pipe shall have sufficient strength to withstand the load imposed by the overlying
waste and the earth moving activities associated with the placement and the
compaction of the waste (Min 6 Kg/ Sq.cm).
3.10.7.5 Drainage of Surface Runoff
Network of open channels shall be designed and constructed around the landfill to intercept
surface runoff of rainwater and divert it around the facility and collect it for the use at the
facility or for disposal. Storm water collected on the landfill site will be directed to a first
flush retention pond which shall be designed for a sufficient capacity to cover a 1 in 100
years 10 minutes storm event. In particular the storm water system will be designed and
implemented to prevent surface runoff entering the landfill and thus minimizing the leachate.
3.10.7.6 Wastewater Treatment
Leachate collected from Secured Landfill will be treated in a solar evaporation pond/forced
evaporation. The dry residue from the solar evaporation pond/forced evaporation will be
handled as a solid waste and will be disposed in the landfill. The domestic sewage will be
treated in a septic tank/ soak pit arrangement.
3.11. Alternate Fuel & Raw Material Facility (AFRF)
The disposal of hazardous waste creates major economic and environmental problems. The ideal way of handling and disposal of hazardous waste is to look for options such as reuse, recycle and / or recovery. In line with this concept utilization of hazardous waste as a fuel or raw material in the manufacture of cement is one of the best options. Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) in the year 2010, issued “Guidelines on Co processing in Cement/Power/Steel Industry” to encourage utilization of selected hazardous waste in cement
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
26RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
kilns as a fuel or raw material while protecting the environment from the control of emissions and without impacting the quality of cement.
3.11.1. Wastes Handling in AFRF
Despite co-processing having inherent advantages, a careful approach is desired in view of
the hazardous nature of the substances that are handled in the process from the point of
i. Selection of right materials
ii. Transportation of waste
iii. On-site storage
iv. Handling & Disposal
v. Emission control
vi. Compliance, Health & Safety management
The hazardous wastes for co-processing need to be handled in an environmentally sound
manner avoiding the possibilities of contaminating the nearby environment and eliminate the
chances of accidents. CPCB has identified and prescribed suitable wastes for co-processing in
cement kilns.
3.11.2. Categories of Wastes Handled
The following are the categories of hazardous wastes / substances for which regular
permission has been granted by CPCB for co-processing in cement industries,
1. Hazardous Wastes
a. Paint sludge from automobile sector
b. Petroleum refining sludge
c. TDI tar waste
d. ETP sludge from M/s BASF India Ltd.
2. Other Wastes
a. Plastic wastes
b. Tyre chips
The hazardous wastes other than which are listed in the above mentioned not recommended
list, should possess the following characteristics as a minimum for co-processing in the
cement kilns.
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
27RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
The hazardous wastes other than which are listed in the above mentioned not recommended
list, should possess the following characteristics as a minimum for co processing in the
cement kilns. Specifications of hazardous waste for use as Alternative Raw Material
I. Specifications of hazardous waste for use as Alternative Raw Material Parameter Limit
II. Specifications of hazardous waste for use Energy Recovery
Parameter Limit Calorific value as received basis > 2500 K Cal /Kg Ash - Liquid < 5% - Solid < 20 % Chloride < 1.5% Sulphur < 1.5% PCB/PCT < 5 ppm Hg < 10 ppm < 50 ppm Cd + Tl + Hg < 100 ppm As + Co + Ni + Se + Te + Sb + Cr + Sn + Pb + V
< 2500 ppm
pH 4 to 12 Viscosity for liquid < 100 cSt Flash point for liquid > 60°C
Certain wastes cannot be processed in cement kilns keeping in the environment, health, safety and operational issues. The wastes listed below are not recommended for co-processing in cement kilns
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
28RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
• Explosives • Corrosives • Mineral acid wastes • Radioactive wastes • Unsorted municipal garbage
In view of the above potential for reuse of hazardous waste in the cement industry, IWMA envisages to set up Alternate Fuel and Raw Material Facilities (AFRF) at SIPCOT, Thoothukudi.
3.11.3. Methodology of waste handling
The principle concept of AFRF is to pre-process the waste at TSDF to make it directly suitable to utilize in cement kilns either as raw material or fuel. The pre-processing like blending / mixing / calorific value enriching etc., will homogenize the wastes received from different industries and bring the pre-processed waste characteristics in line with concentration limits as prescribed by CPCB. AFR Facility at TSDF shall help the hazardous waste generator in providing one stop solution for all the hazardous wastes generated at their end and at the same time help cement industry in eliminating the transport, pre-processing and other associated activities at their and facilitate both of them to concentrate in their core business of manufacturing activity. The methodology of operations is as follows:
1. Waste Characterization: 2. Waste Transport from HW generator 3. Pre-processing at – AFR Facility 4. Waste Transport to Cement Industry
3.11.3.1 Waste Characterization:
The waste received from the generator shall be subjected to comprehensive analysis as per the Hazardous Waste (Handling, Management &Transboundary) Rules, 2008. The disposal pathway of the waste shall be first looked for the possibility of converting the same to be useful for co-processing otherwise it shall be opted to dispose by means of secured landfill or incineration. The protocol for the comprehensive analysis is presented in the Annexure – II. The following laboratory infrastructure required for the AFR Facility
S.No Parameters Instruments Required for Testing 1 pH pH meter 2 VOC PCB/PCT Gas Chromatograph 3 TOC TOC Analyser 4 CaO, SiO2,Al2O3, Fe2O3, SO3 Inductive Couple Plasma
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
29RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
(in Ash) &Heavy Metals Spectrophotometer / Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer
5 Cl& S CHNS & Cl Analyser / Bomb Calorimeter 6 F UV Visible Spectrophotometer 8 CV Bomb calorimeter 9 Ash Muffle furnace, hot air oven 10 Viscosity Viscometer 11 Flash Point Flash Point Analyser
3.11.3.2 Waste Transport from the Generator
The waste shall be collected from the generator (industry) in closed and spillage proof
containers. A label as per the HW Rules (enclosed as Annexure -III) shall be affixed on the
container and transported in the dedicated trucks duly following the 6-copymanifest system
(Manifest form is enclosed as Annexure – IV). The driver also carries the TREM card
(enclosed as Annexure – V) and hands over to the TSD Facility at the time of waste
reception.
Covered, pneumatically operated and dedicated vehicles are used for the transportationof
waste from the generator to TSDF as well as pre-processed waste to cementindustries for co-
processing. Drums are handled using forklift.
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
30RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
3.11.3.3 Finger Print Analysis
The waste suitable for co-processing shall be directed to AFR facility for pre-processing.
Strong oxidizers generally are considered to be incompatible with many organic substances
because of the potential for dangerous reactions. Chlorates, per chlorates and other strong
oxidizers are potentially incompatible with alcohols, halogenated hydrocarbons, other
reactive organic compounds and solvents, and other flammable and combustible wastes. The
potential consequences of mixing such incompatible materials are fire, explosion, or violent
reaction. Compatibility Criteria shall be followed at all stages of operations.
3.11.3.4 Pre Processing of Wastes
The waste shall be received at TSDF and verified for the necessary documents and then the
same shall be weighed at the TSDF and shall be subjected to a quick verification testing
called finger print analysis as per HW Rules. The protocol for the finger analysis is presented
in the Annexure – VI. The waste suitable for co processing shall be directed to AFR facility
for preprocessing.
Strong oxidizers generally are considered to be incompatible with many organic substances
because of the potential for dangerous reactions. Chlorates, perchlorates, and other strong
oxidizers are potentially incompatible with alcohols, halogenated hydrocarbons, other
reactive organic compounds and solvents, and other flammable and combustible wastes. The
potential consequences of mixing such incompatible materials are fire, explosion, or violent
reaction. Compatibility Criteria shall be followed at all stages of operations.
The following chart helps in understanding compatibility between various hazardous
chemicals and compounds
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
31RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
The waste having rich mineral content as per CPCB guidelines with special reference to lime,
silica and alumina shall be checked for other parameters and they will be adjusted to desired
levels as per the possibility and sent to cement industry as an alternative raw material.
The wastes which are principally candidates for incineration shall be checked for calorific
value, halogens, sulphur and other heavy metal content. These wastes are fit for converting
them as alternative energy material for cement industry/other suitable industry. The calorific
value shall be enriched using rice husk /high calorific wastes or lowered by mixing neutral /
low calorific waste materials to make it optimum around 4000 K Cal/ Kg.
There are three types of wastes that are to be processed
i. Solid wastes
ii. Semi-Solid/ Tarry wastes
iii. Liquid wastes
i. Solid Wastes
Based on the characteristics of the potential solid wastes that can be converted as alternate
fuels suitable for co-processing in cement plants are taken into a mixer / blender. A solid
blend is prepared by adding some additives to adjust all relevant parameters.
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
32RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
The first step of preparing solid blend is selection of wastes suitable for mixing / blending.
The segregation of waste according to their pH & calorific value helps in it. Source materials
for solid substitute fuel include Paint Sludge, Oily Filter Cake, Spent Carbon, Organic waste,
Tarry waste, Biomass, Resin, Distillation Residues, Grease etc. Assortment of waste is done
according compatibility criteria. A general waste selection criteria for high calorific value
fuel is Low moisture content, high LOI & TOC, high calorific value, good compressibility,
less ash content, nontoxic, less pollutant, sustainable combustion.
After selection the waste is mixed with binders. Some common binders which can be used for
blending are rice husk, press mud, bagasse, saw dust, scrape of coconut, coal dust, lime,
silicates, epoxy resins, fly ash etc. Binders should have following properties are Easily
available, Cheap in cost, Produce strong final agglomerates, permanently bond particles,
withstand the rigors of storage, handling, packaging & shipping.
The addition of strength increasing additives such as latex, pulp from the pulp & paper
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
42RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
6.0. PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE
Infrastructure and Capex for Setting up AFRF
The following are the infrastructure required for setting up the AFRF facility.
S. No Infrastructure details Units / Area 1. Waste transport equipment PLT 10 / PLT 15 – hook loaders 2 Nos. Body vehicles for drum loading 2 Nos Tanker – 5 Kl capacity 1 No.
4. Laboratory Equipment List as above Sampling equipment Lab equipment for CA and FPA Equipment to carry out trials for arriving
appropriate recipe for preparing
Infrastructure details 1. Blender with Cart Dumper 1 No. 2. Reaction Vessel with limpet coil, agitator and
cooling system 1 No
3. Liquid Storage Tanks – 20 Kl 2 Nos 4. Liquid Storage Tanks – 50 Kl 1 No 5. Motors and Transfer pumps 4 + 4 6. Other equipment – cables, piping, panels Lot 7. Civil works, Erection & Commissioning Lot 8. Shed for Process equipment and reagent stores 250 sq.m
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
43RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
7.0. REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT (R&R PLAN)
No Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R Plan) is required because the proposed site is
located inside the notified SIPCOT industrial area.
8.0. PROJECT SCHEDULE AND COST ESTIMATES
Financial projections for the proposed project intended by the Company have been worked
out and given below.
Cost Estimates of the project
S.No Description Amount in Lakhs 1 Land cost 150 2 Land development cost 100 3 TSDF components
(SLF, Stabilization unit, Temp. store, Intractable waste store, Incinerable waste store, AFRF facility, Tyre wash)
2500
4 Transport, Earthmoving and other machinery 250 5 Lab and admin. bldg., Security, weigh bridge,
sampling bay, Roads drains, Green Belt and others etc.
1000
6 Preoperative expenses 100 Total 4100
9.0. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL (FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS)
The land area of 20 acres for the proposed project is adequate exclusively for the waste
generated in and around the project area. The location of the project is within the SIPCOT
industrial area and complying to the CPCB site selection criteria for developing CHWTSDF,
hence will not pose any social or other issues.
The Project is also envisaged to set up AFR Facility so that the incinerable waste can be
preprocessed and sent to cement plants for co-incineration. The project is economically and
technically viable because this project helps the industrial waste generators in and around
Thoothukudi in reducing their waste transportation cost. At the same time the Project also
envisages the subsidies from the Central and State Government for developing common
TSDFs.
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
44RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
Project Benefits
From the proposed project the major benefits, include improving the degraded environment by establishing an Integrated Common Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
The proposed project facilitates better management of the industrial wastes. It will be the showcase for other states for management of hazardous waste with
additional benefit of green and clean Environment. It minimizes the pollution load on environment from industrial hazardous waste Compliance with prescribed regulatory norms which in turn avert the risk of closure
on account of violation of rules It reduces the number of hazardous waste dump sites in the area and also eliminates
the pollution potential The management of wastes is relatively easier & economically viable at common
facility. Cost of environmental monitoring is less at common facility Reduced environmental liability due to captive storage of hazardous waste in the
premises of industries Better occupational health and safety at individual industry level Prevention of natural resource contamination thereby improving overall
environmental status of the region
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
45RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
Annexure - 2
WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
USEPA; SW-846; Vol. 1A, 1B, 1C and Vol. 2 Concentration of In-organics [as per Schedule 2 of HW (M&H) Rules, 1989, as amended].
Organic Parameters Analysis Oil & Grease
Extractable Organic (in special cases only)
% Carbon
% Nitrogen
% Sulphur
% Hydrogen
USEPA; SW-846; Vol. 1A, 1B, 1C and Vol. 2 Concentration of individual organics [as per Schedule 2 of HW (M&H) Rules, 1989, as amended]
USEPA; SW-846; Method 1311, 1330 Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure (For the parameters identified in Section 2, Annexure -III and the listed parameters as presented in Method 1311 of SW 846; USEPA)
Pre Feasibility Report for the Proposed CHWTSDF in SIPCOT Thoothukudi by IWMA
49RamkyEnviroEngineersLimited
Annexure - 4
FINGERPRINT ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES - TSDF
Method of Analysis Fingerprint Analysis by the Operators of TSD Facilities
Physical Analysis Physical State of the waste (liquid/slurry/sludge/semi-solid/solid: inorganic/organic/metallic)
Identification of different phases of the wastes (in cases of solid wastes contained in aqueous/non-aqueous liquids/solutions for slurries and sludge)
Colour & Textures
Whether the waste is multi-layered (yes/no)? If yes, quantify each layer
Specific Gravity
Viscosity
USEPA, SW-846; Method 1010 and 1020 Flash Point
Loss on ignition at 105˚ C
Loss on ignition at 650˚ C
USEPA, SW-846; Method 9095 Paint Filter Liquid Test (PFLT)
USEPA, SW-846; Method 9096 Liquid Release Test (LRT)
Chemical Analysis
USEPA, SW-846; Method 9040, 9041 and 9045 pH
USEPA, SW-846; Vol. 1C Part II; Test Method to determine HCN released from Wastes
Reactive Cyanide (ppm)
USEPA, SW-846; Vol. 1C Part II; Test Method to determine H2S released from Wastes