COACHING FOR RESILIENCE - LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT UTILIZING CONCEPTS OF MEANING AND MOTIVATION Abstract: Resilience is the ability to bounce back after a critical blow or crisis. It includes the motivation to rise from the ashes and to (re-)engage in meaningful living. Hence, developing resilience is crucial for both individuals and organizations. In this presentation, I will demonstrate how understanding human motivation in general and the Reiss Motivation Profile in particular can be utilized to coach for more resourceful resilience in leadership development. Summary: Resilience is the ability to bounce back after a critical blow or crisis. It includes the motivation to rise from the ashes (Masten, 2009). Motivation addresses the initiation, intensity, and persistence of human behavior (Geen, 1995). Understanding and being able to influence the factors that initiate, sustain, and change human behavior, are crucial to understanding and building resilience in particular as well as to leadership development in general. Developing resilience is crucial for both individuals and organizations. Interestingly, Maslow’s (1943) theory of motivation, although based on the often disputed psychodynamics introduced by Freud and Adler, still has a strong influence on leadership and leadership development (Shriberg, Shriberg, & Kumari, 2005). Surprisingly, the importance of Frankl’s (1959) research on “Man’s search for meaning”, and of Reiss’ (2000) presentation of “The 16 basic desires that motivate our actions” has not yet been fully recognized (Mengel, 2008). Frankl’s and Reiss’ work lead beyond Freud’s and Adler’s emphasis on pleasure and power and they set a new scholarly milestone based on scientific study rather than on an intuitive understanding and development of concepts of motivation. The human “Will to meaning”, the centerpiece of Frankl's (1988) motivational theory, and its application within Frankl's Existential Analysis, can serve as one significant component of building resilience and developing leadership. In particular, based on Frankl’s work Gary T. Reker (1996) has developed a scientific instrument – Sources of Meaning Profile (SOMP) – which allows individuals to identify and prioritize the following areas of meaningful engagement and value actualization: Leisure activities Meeting basic needs Creative activities Personal relationships Personal achievement Personal growth
18
Embed
Thomas mengel coaching for resilience - leadership development utilizing concepts of meaning and motivation
Presentation "COACHING FOR RESILIENCE - LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT UTILIZING CONCEPTS OF MEANING AND MOTIVATION" on November 1, 2013 at the International Leadership Association Global Conference, Montreal, Canada.
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
COACHING FOR RESILIENCE - LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT UTILIZING CONCEPTS OF MEANING AND
MOTIVATION
Abstract:
Resilience is the ability to bounce back after a critical blow or crisis. It includes the motivation to rise
from the ashes and to (re-)engage in meaningful living. Hence, developing resilience is crucial for both
individuals and organizations. In this presentation, I will demonstrate how understanding human
motivation in general and the Reiss Motivation Profile in particular can be utilized to coach for more
resourceful resilience in leadership development.
Summary:
Resilience is the ability to bounce back after a critical blow or crisis. It includes the motivation to rise
from the ashes (Masten, 2009). Motivation addresses the initiation, intensity, and persistence of human
behavior (Geen, 1995). Understanding and being able to influence the factors that initiate, sustain, and
change human behavior, are crucial to understanding and building resilience in particular as well as to
leadership development in general. Developing resilience is crucial for both individuals and
organizations.
Interestingly, Maslow’s (1943) theory of motivation, although based on the often disputed
psychodynamics introduced by Freud and Adler, still has a strong influence on leadership and leadership
development (Shriberg, Shriberg, & Kumari, 2005). Surprisingly, the importance of Frankl’s (1959)
research on “Man’s search for meaning”, and of Reiss’ (2000) presentation of “The 16 basic desires that
motivate our actions” has not yet been fully recognized (Mengel, 2008). Frankl’s and Reiss’ work lead
beyond Freud’s and Adler’s emphasis on pleasure and power and they set a new scholarly milestone
based on scientific study rather than on an intuitive understanding and development of concepts of
motivation. The human “Will to meaning”, the centerpiece of Frankl's (1988) motivational theory, and
its application within Frankl's Existential Analysis, can serve as one significant component of building
resilience and developing leadership.
In particular, based on Frankl’s work Gary T. Reker (1996) has developed a scientific instrument –
Sources of Meaning Profile (SOMP) – which allows individuals to identify and prioritize the following
areas of meaningful engagement and value actualization:
Leisure activities Meeting basic needs
Creative activities
Personal relationships Personal achievement
Personal growth
Religious activities
Social causes Altruism
Enduring values/ideals
Traditions & Culture Legacy
Financial security
Humanistic concerns Hedonistic activities
Material possessions
Relationship with nature
Similarly, Reiss' (2000, 2008) model of 16 basic desires is only slowly finding its way into motivational
theory in general and into leadership and leadership development in particular. The 16 motivators, goals
and values include:
Acceptance (the desire to avoid criticism and rejection), Beauty (the desire for beauty and aesthetic appeal),
Curiosity (the desire for truth and knowledge),
Eating (the desire for a variety of food), Family (the desire to raise children and to nurture),
Expedience (the desire for purposefulness),
Idealism (the desire for social justice), Interdependence (the desire for interdependence),
Order (the desire for structure),
Physical Exercise (the desire to move one’s muscles), Power (the desire for influence of will,
Saving (the desire to collect),
Social Contact (the desire for friendship),
Status (the desire for prestige), Tranquility (the desire for inner peace), and
Vengeance (the desire to get even). Given that the resulting Reiss Motivational Profile is a scientifically based profile of human desires and
strivings, this approach can effectively complement Frankl's existential approach in the context of
building resilience and of leadership development.
This presentation will first introduce these two approaches to motivation and discuss how they may
serve as a basis for meaningful leadership practice and development. In particular, it will show how the
Sources of Meaning Profile (SOMP; Reker, 1996), a scientifically developed instrument based on Frankl's
work, allows individuals to identify and prioritize areas of meaningful engagement and value
actualization. Furthermore, the presentation will demonstrate how the Reiss Motivational Profile (RMP)
and the respective strivings and values of an individual may allow for a 'balanced' evaluation of
capacities for resilience and leadership. Both, the SOMP and the RMP-strivings and values, are
integrated into a coherent leadership development and coaching process based on an Existential and
Motivation Analysis. Finally, the application of the Existential and Motivation Analysis will be described
presenting the case of the coaching client Sam Someone.
References:
Frankl, V. E. (1959). Man’s search for meaning: An introduction to logotherapy . Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Frankl, V. E. (1969). The will to meaning: Foundations and applications of logotherapy . New York, NY: The World
Publishing Company. Geen, R. G. (1995). Human motivation: A social psychological approach . Belmont, CA: Cole.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, pp. 370-396.
Masten, A. S. (2009). Ordinary Magic: Lessons from research on resil ience in human development. Education Canada. Canadian Education Association, 49 (3): 28–32.
Mengel, T. (2008). Motivation. in: Gosling, J. and Martura no, A. (eds.) (2008). Key Concepts in Leadership Studies.
Milton Park, Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge. pp. 111-114. Reiss, S. (2000). Who am I? -The 16 basic desires that motivate our behavior and define our
personality. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam. Reiss, S. (2008). The normal personality - A new way of thinking about people. Cambridge; New York:
Cambridge University Press. Reker, G. T. (1996). Manual – Sources of Meaning Profile Revised. Peterborough, Ontario, Canada:
Student Psychologists Press. Shriberg, A., Shriberg, D. L., & Kumari, R. (2005). Practicing leadership. Principles and applications (3rd
ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
ILA Conference 2013 1
Thomas Mengel, PhD Professor of Leadership Studies, University of New Brunswick;
Gary T. Reker (1996): Sources of Meaning Profile (SOMP)
to identify and prioritize the following areas of meaningful engagement and value actualization: 1 Leisure activities 2 Meeting basic needs 3 Creative activities 4 Personal relationships 5 Personal achievement 6 Personal growth 7 Religious activities 8 Social causes 9 Altruism
Frankl, V. (1985). Man’s Search for Meaning. Pocket Books, New York Mengel, T. (2012). ‘High Potential’ can be deceiving – Utilizing the Reiss Motivational Profile® in HR and Leadership Development. FMI Journal June 2012. Mengel, T. (2012). Leading with ‘emotional’ intelligence – Existential and Motivational Analysis in leadership and leadership development. Journal on Educational Psychology 5(4):24-31. Reiss, S. (2008). The Normal Personality. A New Way of Thinking About People. Cambridge University Press, New York. Reiss, S. (2000). Who am I? The 16 Basic Desires That Motivate Our Actions and Define Our Personality. Berkley Books, New York. Reker, G. T. (1996). Manual-Sources of Meaning Profile-Revised. Student Psychologists Press, Peterborough.