Thomas E. SpinkThomas E. Spink Licensing Project Manager Nuclear Generation Development 1101 Market Street, LP 5A Chattanooga, TN 37402 423-751-7062 Fax: (423)-751-6509 …

1

PMBelCOL PEmails

From: Spink, Thomas E [[email protected]]Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 2:12 PMTo: Mallecia HoodCc: Neil Haggerty; Sterdis, Andrea LynnSubject: LTR 22 - Correct AttachmenrtAttachments: ER Ltr 22 - consolidated Attachments.pdf

Mallecia, Please find attached the PDF with all the attachments included. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. Thomas E. Spink Licensing Project Manager Nuclear Generation Development 1101 Market Street, LP 5A Chattanooga, TN 37402 423-751-7062 Fax: (423)-751-6509

Hearing Identifier: Bellefonte_COL_Public_EX Email Number: 497 Mail Envelope Properties (B648F67990B15146B8646584D20B8DD104E9FF1B) Subject: LTR 22 - Correct Attachmenrt Sent Date: 8/20/2008 2:12:28 PM Received Date: 8/20/2008 2:16:00 PM From: Spink, Thomas E Created By: [email protected] Recipients: "Neil Haggerty" <[email protected]> Tracking Status: None "Sterdis, Andrea Lynn" <[email protected]> Tracking Status: None "Mallecia Hood" <[email protected]> Tracking Status: None Post Office: TVACOCXVS2.main.tva.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 322 8/20/2008 2:16:00 PM ER Ltr 22 - consolidated Attachments.pdf 3206298 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)A TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

FLOW FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE FOR FLOW PAST THE BLN

Tennessee Valley Authority

Flow Frequency Percentagefor Flow Past the BLN

(1 page)

Attachment 5.3-3(1)AFlow Frequency Percentage for Flow Past the BLN

93.4% 93.3% 92.7%

89.7%

84.9%

19.2%

3.5%

0.9% 0.2%1.2%3.5%

5.9%6.5%6.6%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

> 0 > 100 > 1000 > 5000 > 10,000 > 50,000 > 100,000 > 150,000 > 200,000

Flow Rate (cfs)

Perc

ent o

f Tim

e A

bove

Lis

ted

Flow

Normal FlowReverse Flow

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)A

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)B TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

TYPICAL BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE DURING REVERSAL


Typical BLN Flow Rate Response During Reversal

(1 page)

Attachment 5.3-3(1)BTypical BLN Flow Rate Response During Reversal

-20,000

-10,000

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Hours

Flow

Rat

e (c

fs)

>0/<2 hrs>1/<3 hrs>2/<4 hrs>3/<5 hrs>4/<6 hrs

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)B

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)C TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

REVERSE FLOW OCCURRENCE AND DURATION AT THE BLN (1978 – 2007)


Reverse Flow Occurrence and Duration at the BLN (1978 - 2007)

(1 page)

Attachment 5.3-3(1)CReverse Flow Occurrence and Duration

at the BLN (1978-2007)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

>0/<2 hrs >1/<3 hrs >2/<4 hrs >3/<5 hrs >4/<6 hrs

Duration of Occurrence

Num

ber o

f Occ

urre

nces

(197

8 - 2

007)

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)C

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)D TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

TYPICAL BLN LOW FLOW RATE RESPONSE DURING REVERSAL


Typical BLN Low Flow Rate Response During Reversal

(1 page)

Attachment 5.3-3(1)DTypical BLN Low Flow Rate Response During Reversal

-1,000

-800

-600

-400

-200

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Hours

Flow

Rat

e (c

fs)

>0/<2 hrs>1/<3 hrs>2/<4 hrs>3/<5 hrs>4/<6 hrs

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)D

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)E TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE (JUNE 29 – 30, 2002),COMPARED TO GUNTERSVILLE AND NICKAJACK DAM RELEASES


BLN Flow Rate Response (June 29 - 30, 2002) Compared to

Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases(1 page)

Attachment 5.3-3(1)EBLN Flow Rate Response (June 29-30, 2002)

Compared to Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases

-20,000

-10,000

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

179.0

4

179.1

2

179.2

1

179.2

9

179.3

7

179.4

6

179.5

4

179.6

2

179.7

1

179.7

9

179.8

7

179.9

6

180.0

4

180.1

2

180.2

1

180.2

9

180.3

7

180.4

6

180.5

4

180.6

2

180.7

1

180.7

9

180.8

7

180.9

6

Julian Day, 2002

Flow

Rat

e (c

fs)

Flow Past BLNNickajack ReleasesGuntersville Releases

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)E

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)F TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE (MAY 2 – 3, 1983), COMPARED TO GUNTERSVILLE AND NICKAJACK DAM RELEASES


BLN Flow Rate Response (May 2 - 3, 1983) Compared to

Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases (1 page)

Attachment 5.3-3(1)FBLN Flow Rate Response (May 2-3, 1983)


0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

123.8

8

123.9

6

124.0

4

124.1

3

124.2

1

124.2

9

124.3

8

124.4

6

124.5

4

124.6

3

124.7

1

124.7

9

124.8

8

124.9

6

125.0

4

125.1

3

125.2

1

125.2

9

125.3

8

125.4

6

125.5

4

125.6

3

125.7

1

125.7

9

Julian Day, 1983

Flow

Rat

e (c

fs)


ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)F

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)G TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE (AUGUST 16 – 17, 1988),COMPARED TO GUNTERSVILLE AND NICKAJACK DAM RELEASES


BLN Flow Rate Response (August 16 - 17, 1988) Compared to


Attachment 5.3-3(1)GBLN Flow Rate Response (August 16-17, 1988)


-30,000

-20,000

-10,000

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

228.0

0

228.0

8

228.1

7

228.2

5

228.3

3

228.4

2

228.5

0

228.5

8

228.6

7

228.7

5

228.8

3

228.9

2

229.0

0

229.0

8

229.1

7

229.2

5

229.3

3

229.4

2

229.5

0

229.5

8

229.6

7

229.7

5

229.8

3

229.9

2

Julian Day, 1988

Flow

Rat

e (c

fs)


ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)G

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)H TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE (SEPTEMBER 3 – 4, 1998),COMPARED TO GUNTERSVILLE AND NICKAJACK DAM RELEASES


BLN Flow Rate Response (September 3 - 4, 1998) Compared to


Attachment 5.3-3(1)HBLN Flow Rate Response (September 3-4, 1998)


-20,000

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

245.0

0

245.0

8

245.1

7

245.2

5

245.3

3

245.4

2

245.5

0

245.5

8

245.6

7

245.7

5

245.8

3

245.9

2

246.0

0

246.0

8

246.1

7

246.2

5

246.3

3

246.4

2

246.5

0

246.5

8

246.6

7

246.7

5

246.8

3

246.9

2

Julian Day, 1998

Flow

Rat

e (c

fs)


ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)H

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)I TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY





Attachment 5.3-3(1)IBLN Flow Rate Response (June 20-21, 2006)


-20,000

-10,000

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

170.0

0

170.0

8

170.1

7

170.2

5

170.3

3

170.4

2

170.5

0

170.5

8

170.6

7

170.7

5

170.8

3

170.9

2

171.0

0

171.0

8

171.1

7

171.2

5

171.3

3

171.4

2

171.5

0

171.5

8

171.6

7

171.7

5

171.8

3

171.9

2

Julian Day, 2006

Flow

Rat

e (c

fs)


ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)I

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)J TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE (JANUARY 2 - 3, 2007), COMPARED TO GUNTERSVILLE AND NICKAJACK DAM RELEASES


BLN Flow Rate Response (January 2 - 3, 2007) Compared to


Attachment 5.3-3(1)JBLN Flow Rate Response (January 2-3, 2007)


-10,000

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

2.00

2.08

2.17

2.25

2.33

2.42

2.50

2.58

2.67

2.75

2.83

2.92

3.00

3.08

3.17

3.25

3.33

3.42

3.50

3.58

3.67

3.75

3.83

3.92

Julian Day, 2007

Flow

Rat

e (c

fs)


ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)J

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)K TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY





Attachment 5.3-3(1)KBLN Flow Rate Response (June 25-26, 2007)


-20,000

-10,000

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

175.8

3

175.9

2

176.0

0

176.0

8

176.1

7

176.2

5

176.3

3

176.4

2

176.5

0

176.5

8

176.6

7

176.7

5

176.8

3

176.9

2

177.0

0

177.0

8

177.1

7

177.2

5

177.3

3

177.4

2

177.5

0

177.5

8

177.6

7

177.7

5

Julian Day, 2007

Flow

Rat

e (c

fs)


ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)K

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)L TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE (OCTOBER 25 – 26, 2007),COMPARED TO GUNTERSVILLE AND NICKAJACK DAM RELEASES


BLN Flow Rate Response (October 25 - 26, 2007) Compared to


Attachment 5.3-3(1)LBLN Flow Rate Response (October 25-26, 2007)


-15,000

-10,000

-5,000

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

298.0

0

298.0

8

298.1

7

298.2

5

298.3

3

298.4

2

298.5

0

298.5

8

298.6

7

298.7

5

298.8

3

298.9

2

299.0

0

299.0

8

299.1

7

299.2

5

299.3

3

299.4

2

299.5

0

299.5

8

299.6

7

299.7

5

299.8

3

299.9

2

Julian Day, 2007

Flow

Rat

e (c

fs)


ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)L

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)M TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

BLN ER FIGURE 2.3-5 FLOW FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE FOR FLOW PAST THE BLN

REV. 1


BLN ER Figure 2.3-5 Flow Frequency Percentage

for Flow past the BLN (1 page)

Rev. 1

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)M

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)N TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

BLN ER FIGURE 2.3-6 REVERSE FLOW OCCURRENCE AND DURATION AT THE BLN (1978 – 2007)

REV. 1


BLN ER Figure 2.3-6 Reverse Flow Occurrence and Duration at

the BLN (1978 - 2007) (1 page)

Rev. 1

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)N

ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(3) TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

CORMIX INPUT FILES (CD-ROM, RUN DATE 08-01-2008)


CORMIX Input Files (CD-ROM, run date 08-01-2008)

ATTACHMENT 5.3-5A TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

ER FIGURE 5.3-3 100 % EFFLUENT FLOW THROUGH BOTH DIFFUSERS – 7Q10 RIVER FLOW (39.2ºF)

REV. 1


ER Figure 5.3-3 100% Effluent Flow through Both Diffusers

7Q10 River Flow (39.2ºF) (1 page)

Rev. 1

ATTACHMENT 5.3-5A

ATTACHMENT 5.3-5B TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

ER FIGURE 5.3-4 100 % EFFLUENT FLOW THROUGH BOTH DIFFUSERS – 7Q10 RIVER FLOW (90ºF)

REV. 1



7Q10 River Flow (90ºF) (1 page)

Rev. 1

ATTACHMENT 5.3-5B

ATTACHMENT 5.3-5C TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

ER FIGURE 5.3-5 100 % EFFLUENT FLOW THROUGH BOTH DIFFUSERS –

MAXIMUM REVERSE RIVER FLOW (39.2ºF) REV. 1



Maximum Reverse River Flow (39.2ºF) (1 page)

Rev. 1

ATTACHMENT 5.3-5C

Thomas E. SpinkThomas E. Spink Licensing Project Manager Nuclear Generation Development 1101 Market Street, LP 5A Chattanooga, TN 37402 423-751-7062 Fax: (423)-751-6509 …

Documents