Top Banner
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2015 www.PosterPresentations.com For the past decade, research on modeling of tsunami inundation has mostly focused on modeling tsunami run up on 2D slope or 3D topography with complex shoreline. But few of them simulate flows overland especially flows around the macro-roughness onshore like groups of buildings near shoreline. In this study, two different numerical approaches were used to model community-scale tsunami inundation: a high-fidelity 3D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) approach and a 2D approach based on depth-averaged shallow water equations. The numerical models were first validated against existing experimental data of a 1:50 idealized model of the town Seaside, Oregon. For the 3D approach, the experimental basin was modeled using 4 separate subsections due to limited computational resources. The 2D approach was able to model the entire basin in a single simulation with much more efficiency. INTRODUCTION In this study, two different numerical approaches were used to model the inundation. 2D Simulations: Depth-averaged shallow water equations solved using open-source package GeoClaw with high-resolution finite volume methods and Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) techniques. Typical computation time: 5-6 hours with 1 computer core 3D Simulations: CFD models developed using open-source CFD package OpenFOAM Typical computation time: 8-10 days with 128 computer cores in parallel Domain subdivided into four sections to improve computational efficient Allows for direct computation of forces and moments on structures SIMULATION METHODOLOGY FREE SURFACE ELEVATION, VELOCITY AND MOMENTUM FLUX Wave generation The figure at right shows time history of wave height at two wave gauges offshore. Good correlation between the measured and predicted results the tsunami waves generated in the numerical model were slightly underestimated and had slightly slower propagating speed. SAMPLE FORCES ON BUILDINGS Xinsheng Qin, Michael R. Motley, Randall J. LeVeque, Frank I. Gonzalez University of Washington Tsunami inundation and forces on coastal communities An experiment on tsunami inundation through an urban water front was conducted at Oregon State University. A 1:50 scale model of part of the town of Seaside, Oregon, located on the U.S. Pacific Northwest coastline and adjacent to the Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ), was constructed and a series of experiments were conducted to measure flow velocities and water levels at 31 locations within the model-scale community (Park et al., 2013). The rectangular basin is equipped with a segmented, piston-type wave maker to simulate tsunami inundation. The figure below on the left shows top view and side view of the basin superimposed with the experimental setup and an image of the town of Seaside. In the front of the town, there was seawall with a height of 0.04 m (model scale). The figure below on the right shows the locations of the 31 gauges where water level and flow velocity were measured in the experiment, numbered A1-A9 (Line A), B1-B9 (Line B), C1-C9 (Line C), and D1-D4 (Line D), and 4 different subsections modeled in 3D simulation. FLOW THROUGH A COMMUNITY Free surface elevation, velocity and momentum flux Subsection A The figure above shows snapshots of the inundation process at 3 different moments (Top: GeoClaw. Bottom: OpenFoam, subsection A). With the 3D approach, tsunami forces and overturning moment on buildings can also be predicted Forces (on building in green circle) Peak = 450 N (model scale) = 12500 kips (prototype) Seismic design load for this building = 6500 kips Overturning moments (on building in red circle) Peak = 35 (model scale) = 218000 (prototype) Minimum moment required to overturn the building (estimated based on its weight) = 158000 REFERENCES 1. Clawpack Development Team. (2015). Clawpack software, Version 5.3.0. http://www.clawpack.org. 2. www.openfoam.org 3. Cox, D., Tomita, T., Lynett, P., & Holman, R. (2008). Tsunami inundation with macroroughness in the constructed environment. In Proc. 31st International Conference on Coastal Engineering, ASCE (pp. 1421-1432). 4. Park, H., Cox, D. T., Lynett, P. J., Wiebe, D. M., \& Shin, S. (2013). Tsunami inundation modeling in constructed environments: a physical and numerical comparison of free-surface elevation, velocity, and momentum flux. Coastal Engineering, 79, 9-21. 5. Rueben, M., Holman, R., Cox, D., Shin, S., Killian, J., & Stanley, J. (2011). Optical measurements of tsunami inundation through an urban waterfront modeled in a large-scale laboratory basin. Coastal Engineering, 58(3), 229-238. Free surface elevation, h, cross-shore component of velocity, u, and momentum, 2 , at selected gauges onshore are shown below (Black and red: measurement. Green: OpenFOAM. Gold: GeoClaw.). Prediction and measurement agreed well, except for that velocities and momentum flux showed large discrepancies around the peak. Overestimation of peak value in velocity Experiment: Direct measurement failed, as acoustic doppler velocimeters failed to record velocity Optical methods were used to estimate velocity, for example 2.2 m/s (gauge A3) Peak value of velocity history was computed by analyzing trajectory of leading edge of the bore from image data (Rueben et al., 2011). Then the red solid line in velocity history was obtained by fitting a second order polynomial curve from peak value to later time histories. OpenFOAM: Direct measurement showed 2.85 m/s at gauge A3, shown with green solid line) As shown in the contours above, maximum velocity does not occur at the front edge of the incoming bore Simulating the optimal method, the fluid velocity is approximately 2.2 m/s at gauge A3, matching experimental results Conclusion: Using optical methods to obtain peak and/or missing data in velocity may be problematic and can underestimate velocity peaks. This becomes critical for force prediction, as forces are proportional to the square of the velocity. Figures adapted and modified from Park et al. ,2013
1

THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT Tsunami inundation and …depts.washington.edu/clawpack/posters/AGU_2015/AGU2015_QinMotleyEtAl.pdfpresentation poster. You can use it to create your research

Jul 12, 2020

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT Tsunami inundation and …depts.washington.edu/clawpack/posters/AGU_2015/AGU2015_QinMotleyEtAl.pdfpresentation poster. You can use it to create your research

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2015

www.PosterPresentations.com

(—THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—)

D E S I G N G U I D E

This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 48”x72”

presentation poster. You can use it to create your research

poster and save valuable time placing titles, subtitles, text,

and graphics.

We provide a series of online answer your poster production

questions. To view our template tutorials, go online to

PosterPresentations.com and click on HELP DESK.

When you are ready to print your poster, go online to

PosterPresentations.com

Need assistance? Call us at 1.510.649.3001

Q U I C K S TA R T

Zoom in and out As you work on your poster zoom in and out to the level

that is more comfortable to you. Go to VIEW > ZOOM.

Title, Authors, and Affiliations Start designing your poster by adding the title, the names of the

authors, and the affiliated institutions. You can type or paste text

into the provided boxes. The template will automatically adjust the

size of your text to fit the title box. You can manually override this

feature and change the size of your text.

T I P : The font size of your title should be bigger than your name(s)

and institution name(s).

Adding Logos / Seals Most often, logos are added on each side of the title. You can insert

a logo by dragging and dropping it from your desktop, copy and

paste or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Logos taken from web sites

are likely to be low quality when printed. Zoom it at 100% to see

what the logo will look like on the final poster and make any

necessary adjustments.

T I P : See if your company’s logo is available on our free poster

templates page.

Photographs / Graphics You can add images by dragging and dropping from your desktop,

copy and paste, or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Resize images

proportionally by holding down the SHIFT key and dragging one of

the corner handles. For a professional-looking poster, do not distort

your images by enlarging them disproportionally.

Image Quality Check Zoom in and look at your images at 100% magnification. If they look

good they will print well.

ORIGINAL DISTORTED

Corner handles

Go

od

pri

nti

ng

qu

alit

y

Bad

pri

nti

ng

qu

alit

y

Q U I C K S TA RT ( c o n t . )

How to change the template color theme You can easily change the color theme of your poster by going to

the DESIGN menu, click on COLORS, and choose the color theme

of your choice. You can also create your own color theme.

You can also manually change the color of your background by

going to VIEW > SLIDE MASTER. After you finish working on the

master be sure to go to VIEW > NORMAL to continue working on

your poster.

How to add Text The template comes with a number of pre-

formatted placeholders for headers and text

blocks. You can add more blocks by copying

and pasting the existing ones or by adding a

text box from the HOME menu.

Text size Adjust the size of your text based on how much content you

have to present. The default template text offers a good

starting point. Follow the conference requirements.

How to add Tables To add a table from scratch go to the INSERT menu

and click on TABLE. A drop-down box will help you

select rows and columns.

You can also copy and a paste a table from Word or another

PowerPoint document. A pasted table may need to be re-

formatted by RIGHT-CLICK > FORMAT SHAPE, TEXT BOX, Margins.

Graphs / Charts You can simply copy and paste charts and graphs from Excel or

Word. Some reformatting may be required depending on how

the original document has been created.

How to change the column configuration RIGHT-CLICK on the poster background and select LAYOUT to see

the column options available for this template. The poster

columns can also be customized on the Master. VIEW > MASTER.

How to remove the info bars If you are working in PowerPoint for Windows and have finished

your poster, save as PDF and the bars will not be included. You

can also delete them by going to VIEW > MASTER. On the Mac

adjust the Page-Setup to match the Page-Setup in PowerPoint

before you create a PDF. You can also delete them from the Slide

Master.

Save your work Save your template as a PowerPoint document. For printing,

save as PowerPoint or “Print-quality” PDF.

Student discounts are available on our Facebook page.

Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.

© 2015 PosterPresentations.com 2117 Fourth Street , Unit C Berkeley CA 94710 [email protected]

For the past decade, research on modeling of tsunami

inundation has mostly focused on modeling tsunami run

up on 2D slope or 3D topography with complex

shoreline. But few of them simulate flows overland

especially flows around the macro-roughness onshore

like groups of buildings near shoreline. In this study,

two different numerical approaches were used to model

community-scale tsunami inundation: a high-fidelity 3D

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) approach and

a 2D approach based on depth-averaged shallow water

equations. The numerical models were first validated

against existing experimental data of a 1:50 idealized

model of the town Seaside, Oregon. For the 3D

approach, the experimental basin was modeled using 4

separate subsections due to limited computational

resources. The 2D approach was able to model the entire

basin in a single simulation with much more efficiency.

INTRODUCTION

In this study, two different numerical approaches were used to model the inundation.

• 2D Simulations:

– Depth-averaged shallow water equations solved using open-source package

GeoClaw with high-resolution finite volume methods and Adaptive Mesh

Refinement (AMR) techniques.

– Typical computation time: 5-6 hours with 1 computer core

• 3D Simulations:

– CFD models developed using open-source CFD package OpenFOAM

– Typical computation time: 8-10 days with 128 computer cores in parallel

– Domain subdivided into four sections to improve computational efficient

– Allows for direct computation of forces and moments on structures

SIMULATION METHODOLOGY

FREE SURFACE ELEVATION, VELOCITY

AND MOMENTUM FLUX

• Wave generation

The figure at right shows time history of wave

height at two wave gauges offshore.

– Good correlation between the measured

and predicted results

– the tsunami waves generated in the numerical model were slightly

underestimated and had slightly slower

propagating speed.

SAMPLE FORCES ON BUILDINGS

Xinsheng Qin, Michael R. Motley, Randall J. LeVeque, Frank I. Gonzalez

University of Washington

Tsunami inundation and forces on coastal communities

An experiment on tsunami inundation through an urban water front was conducted at

Oregon State University. A 1:50 scale model of part of the town of Seaside, Oregon,

located on the U.S. Pacific Northwest coastline and adjacent to the Cascadia

Subduction Zone (CSZ), was constructed and a series of experiments were conducted

to measure flow velocities and water levels at 31 locations within the model-scale

community (Park et al., 2013). The rectangular basin is equipped with a segmented,

piston-type wave maker to simulate tsunami inundation. The figure below on the left

shows top view and side view of the basin superimposed with the experimental setup

and an image of the town of Seaside. In the front of the town, there was seawall with a

height of 0.04 m (model scale). The figure below on the right shows the locations of

the 31 gauges where water level and flow velocity were measured in the experiment,

numbered A1-A9 (Line A), B1-B9 (Line B), C1-C9 (Line C), and D1-D4 (Line D),

and 4 different subsections modeled in 3D simulation.

FLOW THROUGH A COMMUNITY

• Free surface elevation, velocity and momentum flux

Subsection A

The figure above shows snapshots of the inundation process at 3 different moments

(Top: GeoClaw. Bottom: OpenFoam, subsection A).

With the 3D approach, tsunami forces and overturning

moment on buildings can also be predicted

• Forces (on building in green circle)

– Peak = 450 N (model scale) = 12500 kips

(prototype)

– Seismic design load for this building = 6500 kips

• Overturning moments (on building in red

circle)

– Peak = 35 𝑁 ∙ 𝑚 (model scale) = 218000 𝑘𝑁 ∙ 𝑚

(prototype)

– Minimum moment required to overturn the

building (estimated based on its weight) =

158000 𝑘𝑁 ∙ 𝑚

REFERENCES 1. Clawpack Development Team. (2015). Clawpack software, Version 5.3.0. http://www.clawpack.org.

2. www.openfoam.org

3. Cox, D., Tomita, T., Lynett, P., & Holman, R. (2008). Tsunami inundation with macroroughness in the constructed

environment. In Proc. 31st International Conference on Coastal Engineering, ASCE (pp. 1421-1432).

4. Park, H., Cox, D. T., Lynett, P. J., Wiebe, D. M., \& Shin, S. (2013). Tsunami inundation modeling in constructed

environments: a physical and numerical comparison of free-surface elevation, velocity, and momentum flux. Coastal

Engineering, 79, 9-21.

5. Rueben, M., Holman, R., Cox, D., Shin, S., Killian, J., & Stanley, J. (2011). Optical measurements of tsunami inundation

through an urban waterfront modeled in a large-scale laboratory basin. Coastal Engineering, 58(3), 229-238.

Free surface elevation, h, cross-shore component of velocity, u, and momentum, ℎ𝑢2,

at selected gauges onshore are shown below (Black and red: measurement. Green:

OpenFOAM. Gold: GeoClaw.). Prediction and measurement agreed well, except for

that velocities and momentum flux showed large discrepancies around the peak.

• Overestimation of peak value in velocity

Experiment:

Direct measurement failed, as acoustic doppler velocimeters failed to record velocity

Optical methods were used to estimate velocity, for example 2.2 m/s (gauge A3)

Peak value of velocity history was computed by analyzing trajectory of

leading edge of the bore from image data (Rueben et al., 2011).

Then the red solid line in velocity history was obtained by fitting a second

order polynomial curve from peak value to later time histories.

OpenFOAM:

Direct measurement showed 2.85 m/s at gauge A3, shown with green solid line)

As shown in the contours above, maximum velocity does not occur at the front edge

of the incoming bore

Simulating the optimal method, the fluid velocity is approximately 2.2 m/s at gauge

A3, matching experimental results

Conclusion: Using optical methods to obtain peak and/or missing data in velocity may

be problematic and can underestimate velocity peaks. This becomes critical for force

prediction, as forces are proportional to the square of the velocity.

Figures adapted and modified from Park et al. ,2013