Top Banner
LO NG -TER M CARE Objectives U nderstand the role and scope ofservicesincluded in LTC A ppreciate w ho usesLTC and underw hat circumstances A ssesshow LTC isorganized, integrated, evaluated and reim bursed Be aw are ofinnovative approachesto organizing LTC U nderstand nationalpolicy issuesrelating to LTC.
43

This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

Dec 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Mae Garrison
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

LONG-TERM CARE

Objectives

Understand the role and scope of services includedin LTC

Appreciate who uses LTC and under whatcircumstances

Assess how LTC is organized, integrated,evaluated and reimbursed

Be aware of innovative approaches to organizingLTC

Understand national policy issues relating to LTC.

Page 2: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics.

For more information visit the Forum’s web site at www.agingstats.gov or call 301-458-4460

Page 3: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 4: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 5: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 6: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 7: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 8: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 9: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 10: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 11: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 12: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 13: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 14: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 15: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 16: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 17: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 18: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 19: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 20: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 21: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 22: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 23: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 24: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .
Page 25: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

Definitions

range of health and social services needed tocompensate

for permanent or temporary functional disabilities, provided over an extended period of time (at least three

months), goal is increasing independence, includes social, medical and custodial services includes diagnostic, preventive, therapeutic,

rehabilitative, supportive and maintenance services(“continuum” of care)

mix depends on client needs and changes over time

Page 26: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

chronic disease vs disability vs functional ability vshealth

ADLs- eat, dress, personal care and grooming, transferfrom bed to chair, bathe, walk, maintain bowel andbladder continence

IADLs – handle money, telephone, grocery shopping,housekeeping, chores, arranging for transportation

Health – complete physical, mental and social well-being

Page 27: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

Trends

14 % of population will be over 65 in 2010 Oldest old is fastest growing group Family and friends do most care – ‘informal’ 50% of those who live past 65 will be in a nursing

home at some time Five percent of elderly live in nursing homes Many equally dependent people live at home Home care is increasing Prevalence of Alzheimer’s Disease is increasing ALOS in nursing home is two years but some

move in and out quickly

Page 28: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

Nursing Homes - history Scandals (fraud, abuse, neglect, poor physical plant) Began as county poor houses Shortage of good nursing home beds Weak regulation Difficult to make a profit when income is from

welfare patients

Some discrimination against public pay patients

Page 29: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

Nursing Home Characteristics Mostly proprietary

50% SNF and 50% ICF

1.6 million beds in US

53/1000 population over 65

95% occupancy

ALOS 2 yrs

Some hospitals have SNF beds, some swing beds

Page 30: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

Nursing Home Financing Consumes about 10% of personal health

expenditures Medicaid 45% Medicare 5% Private pay 45% Private insurance 1%

4% other

Page 31: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

Nursing Home Patients Elderly, female, no relatives, 60% have mental disorder Highly dependent Most people dread nursing home admission

Page 32: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

MODELING THE OUTCOMES OF NURSING HOME CARE

Rohrer and Hogan, Soc Sci Med 24(3) 1987

290 VA NH pts - 243 remaining

Are the number of minutes of nursing care associated with outcomes when case mix is controlled?

Page 33: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

Results of Regression Analysis of Outcome RUG (R -square=.71, N=234)

LPN/Aides -.005

Psychosocial -.002

Basic .005

MD notes -.159

RN .013

Initial RUG .475

Rehab n.s.

Page 34: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

CONCLUSIONS

•The amount of nursing care is associated with outcome functional status.

Non-RN time is associated with better outcomes

•RN time is associated with worse outcomes (ameliorative)

•Rehab service was not associated with outcomes (constrained range?)

Page 35: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

ORGANIZATIONAL PREDICTORS OF OUTCOMES OF LONG-STAY NURSING HOME RESIDENTS

Rohrer et al, Soc Sci Med, 1993

10 nursing homes, 32 units, 872 cases

Measures•job assignment vs flexible duties•hierarchy (number of levels of supervision)•closeness of supervision (RNs/nonRNS)•pace (discharges/beds)•workload (percent heavy care residents)•initial and outcome functioning

Page 36: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

REGRESSION RESULTS (R-Square=.74)

•Job assignment 0.068

•Hierarchy 0.153

•Closeness of supervision n.s.

•Pct heavy care 0.207

•Pace 1.044

•Hierarchy x pace -1.074

•Initial functioning 0.743

Page 37: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

CONCLUSIONS

Residents get worse:under strict job assignmenttall hierarchies / large organizationswhere workload is heavywhen pace is fast

Residents get better:in large organizations when pace is fast

Contingency theory applies - optimal structure depends on circumstances

Page 38: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

Community-Based Care home care adult day care assisted living hospice continuing care communities case management S/HMO PACE

Page 39: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

Substitution-what percent of nursing pts couldbe at home?

Channelling experiment did not save money Admissions were not reduced Health status was not improved Need targeted programs Case mgt may complement informal caregiving Not cost effective, but still considered ‘the right thing

to do’

Page 40: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

Long Term Care Reform -Problems

financing fragmentation access quality consumer rights

workforce

Page 41: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

Financing Reform expand Medicare private nursing home insurance blend public and private

capitation (e.g., SHMOs)

Page 42: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

Integrative mechanisms for continuum ofcare

Inter-entity planning and management

Care coordination

case mgt,

single point of access,

teams

MIS

Page 43: This report was produced by the Federal Interagency Forum on Aging Related Statistics. For more information visit the Forum’s web site at .

Organizational Reforms Reduce shortage of nursing home beds Increase training of staff Establish standard of minimal supervision (24 hour

nursing) Increase support for informal care (watch out for

woodwork effect) Increase education and salaries in LTC

Integrate acute care, LTC and social services