Top Banner
This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7 th February 2007
23

This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Jan 17, 2016

Download

Documents

lowri

This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors. Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7 th February 2007. The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (as amended). Catherine Casserley, Barrister-at-law Senior Legislation Adviser. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Working with HIV/ AIDS

Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 2: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (as amended)

Catherine Casserley,

Barrister-at-law

Senior Legislation Adviser

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 3: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

The Disability Discrimination Act 1995

- Amended by :

- Special Educational Needs and Disability Act 2001

- The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (Amendment ) Regulations 2003 SI 2003/1673

- The Disability Discrimination Act 2005

- See also the statutory codes of practice at the DRC website

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 4: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Disabled person – defined in s.1 and Schedule 1 of the Act

- Schedule 1 as amended: ) … a person who has cancer, HIV infection or multiple sclerosis is to be deemed to have a disability, and hence to be a disabled person

- In this Schedule, “HIV infection” means infection by a virus capable of causing the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Only disabled persons are covered by the Act (though see Attridge Law v Coleman Times, January 12, 2007)

Page 5: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Employment – What is Unlawful?

Recruitment: s.4(1)

To discriminate against a disabled person

(a) in the arrangements made for determining to whom employment is offered (i.e. application and interview process)- Murray v Newham CAB EAT/1096/99 6 July 2000 (1st hearing)

(b) in the terms in which employment are offered

(c ) by refusing to offer or deliberately not offering employment

Page 6: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

What is Unlawful?When in Employment :s.4(2)

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

To discriminate against a disabled employee

(a) in the terms of employment

(b) in the opportunities afforded for promotion, a transfer, training or receiving any other benefit, or by refusing such opportunity

(c ) by dismissing him or subjecting him to any other detriment (Jenkins v Legoland Windsor EAT/1155/02 3 July 2003)

Page 7: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

What is Unlawful?Harassment :s.4(3)

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

It is also unlawful to subject a disabled person, either an applicant or employee, to harassment

Harassment: where for a reason related to disability, there is unwanted conduct which has the purpose or effect of violating the disabled person’s dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading humiliating or offensive environment for him

Page 8: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Forms of Discrimination (s.3A)

• direct discrimination (s.3A(5))

• failure to make a reasonable adjustment – the cornerstone of the Act (s.3A(2))

• disability related discrimination (s.3A(1))

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 9: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Direct Discrimination

Treating a disabled person, on the grounds of disability, less favourably than you treat or would treat a person not having that particular disability whose relevant circumstances, including his abilities, are the same as or not materially different from, those of the disabled person

No justification possible

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 10: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

In Practice

• treatment based on prejudice

• “blanket” bans

• e.g. Leon worked as a hairdresser in an exclusive hair salon in a large city. He disclosed his HIV status to his employers as he felt he might have to take time off work. He was then dismissed from his job as his manager felt that customers and staff would feel uncomfortable with him working in the salon. This would be unlawful direct discrimination

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 11: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

“Disability Related” Discrimination

• where, for a reason relating to the disabled person’s disability, you treat him less favourably than you would treat others to whom that reason does not or would not apply

• broader than “direct” discrimination

• effectively, treatment which relates to disability but does not fall within “direct discrimination” e.g. dismissal because of sickness absence

• Clarke V TDG Ltd t/a Novacold [1999] IRLR 318 CA

• Murphy v Slough Borough Council and Governing Body of Langley Wood School EAT/1157/02

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 12: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

“Disability Related” Discrimination - Example

• a person who takes six months sick leave due to a disability is sacked

• not direct discrimination - anyone in the same circumstances would have been treated in this way

• less favourable treatment for a reason relating to their disability - but for the disability, they would not have had the six months off, and so would not have faced the sack

• subject to justification “material and substantial reason”

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 13: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Duty to Make Reasonable Adjustments s.4A, 18B

where a

• provision, criterion or practice applied by or on behalf of an employer, or

• any physical feature of premises occupied by the employer

• places the disabled person concerned at a substantial disadvantage in comparison with persons who are not disabled, it is the duty of the employer to take such steps as it is reasonable in all the circumstances of the case for him to have to take in order to prevent the physical feature or provision criterion or practice from having that effect.

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 14: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Duty to Make Reasonable Adjustments

“provision criterion or practice” includes arrangements

• examples of adjustments (18B) are:

• making adjustments to premises

• allocating some of the disabled person’s duties to another person

• transferring him to fill an existing vacancy

• altering his hours of working or training

• assigning him to a different place of work or training

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 15: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Duty to Make Reasonable Adjustments 2

allowing him to be absent during work or training hours for rehabilitation, assessment or treatment

• giving or arranging for training or mentoring (whether for the disabled person or any other person) – to capture the DRTF recommendation of disability awareness training as an adjustment

• acquiring or modifying equipment

• modifying instructions or reference manuals

• modifying procedures for testing or assessment

• providing a reader, interpreter, supervision or other support

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 16: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Factors to be taken into account in Determining what is Reasonable (18B)

• the extent to which taking the step would prevent the effect in relation to which the duty is imposed

• the extent to which it is practicable

• the financial and other costs incurred in taking the step and the extent to which taking it would disrupt any of his activities

• the extent of his financial and other resources

• the availability of financial or other assistance

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 17: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Factors to be taken into account in Determining what is Reasonable

• the nature of his activities and the size of his undertaking

• where the step would be taken in relation to a private household, the extent to which taking it would:

• (a) disrupt that household or

• (b) disturb any person residing there

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 18: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

A Failure to Make a Reasonable Adjustment Cannot be Justified

Either it is reasonable, in which case there is a breach of the duty, or it is not, in which case there is no breach

For the duty to apply, the employer must know or be reasonably expected to know, that the person has a disability and is likely to be affected by the provision/physical feature

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 19: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Justification

• Justification is only applicable to disability related discrimination, not to direct or failure to make reasonable adjustments

• “material and substantial” (3A(3))– relatively low threshold (Jones v Post Office [2001] IRLR 384

• BUT cannot justify if there has been a failure to make adjustments which would have made a difference to the reason for treatment (s.3A(6)) - this is key to the DDA now

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 20: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Key Cases

• Archibald v Fife Council [2004] IRLR 197

• Notts County Council v Meikle [2004] IRLR 703

• High Quality Lifestyles Ltd v Watts [2006] IRLR 850

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 21: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Key Issues Relating to HIV in the Workplace and the DDA

• Disclosure

• Sickness absence

• Health and safety

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 22: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Disability Equality Duty – the Public Sector and HIV

• All public authorities bound by the general duty to promote disability equality

• Key public authorities also have to produce a disability equality scheme, which will include arrangements for monitoring disability

• Must take a proactive approach to disability equality – in the employment context, means taking an anticipatory approach e.g. impact assessing relevant employment policies etc

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007

Page 23: This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors

Contact us

• www.drc-gb.org

• Helpline: 08457622633

Institute of Employment Rights Working with HIV/ AIDS Wednesday 7th February 2007