Top Banner
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gebrosky B, Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Cooper R, Kelleher A. Evaluation of lightweight wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA testing standards. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(10):1373–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2012.08.0155 Slideshow Project DOI:10.1682/ JRRD.2012.08.0155JSP Evaluation of lightweight wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA testing standards Benjamin Gebrosky, BS; Jonathan Pearlman, PhD; Rory A. Cooper, PhD; Rosemarie Cooper, MPT, ATP; Annmarie Kelleher, MS, OTR/L, ATP
5

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gebrosky B, Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Cooper R, Kelleher A. Evaluation of lightweight.

Dec 13, 2015

Download

Documents

Clyde Ward
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gebrosky B, Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Cooper R, Kelleher A. Evaluation of lightweight.

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gebrosky B, Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Cooper R, Kelleher A. Evaluation of lightweight wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA testing standards. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(10):1373–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2012.08.0155

Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2012.08.0155JSP

Evaluation of lightweight wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA testing

standards

Benjamin Gebrosky, BS; Jonathan Pearlman, PhD; Rory A. Cooper, PhD; Rosemarie Cooper, MPT, ATP;

Annmarie Kelleher, MS, OTR/L, ATP

Page 2: This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gebrosky B, Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Cooper R, Kelleher A. Evaluation of lightweight.

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gebrosky B, Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Cooper R, Kelleher A. Evaluation of lightweight wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA testing standards. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(10):1373–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2012.08.0155

Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2012.08.0155JSP

• Aim– Evaluate folding lightweight wheelchair models using

American National Standards Institute/Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America (ANSI/RESNA) standards.

• Relevance– While design and manufacturing advances plus consistent

ANSI/RESNA standards should have led to higher quality, better durability, and cost-benefit, wheelchair failures have been increasingly reported over last 15 yr.

Page 3: This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gebrosky B, Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Cooper R, Kelleher A. Evaluation of lightweight.

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gebrosky B, Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Cooper R, Kelleher A. Evaluation of lightweight wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA testing standards. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(10):1373–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2012.08.0155

Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2012.08.0155JSP

Method• Tested 3 lightweight wheelchairs:– (a) Sunrise Medical Breezy 600.– (b) Invacare 9000XT.– (c) Invacare Patriot Plus.

• Performed 6 ANSI/RESNA Tests:– Static stability.– Effectiveness of brakes.– Dimensions, mass, and maneuvering space.– Measurement of seating and wheel dimensions.– Static, impact, and fatigue strengths.– Information disclosure, documentation, labeling.

Page 4: This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gebrosky B, Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Cooper R, Kelleher A. Evaluation of lightweight.

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gebrosky B, Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Cooper R, Kelleher A. Evaluation of lightweight wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA testing standards. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(10):1373–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2012.08.0155

Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2012.08.0155JSP

Results• We hypothesized that quality of lightweight

wheelchairs had declined. – 7 of 9 wheelchairs tested failed multidrum test

durability requirements.– Average of 194,502 equivalent cycles was

completed.• Similar to previous test results.• Far below 400,000 minimum ANSI/RESNA requirement. • Significantly worse than test results for aluminum

ultralight folding wheelchairs.

Page 5: This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gebrosky B, Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Cooper R, Kelleher A. Evaluation of lightweight.

This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Gebrosky B, Pearlman J, Cooper RA, Cooper R, Kelleher A. Evaluation of lightweight wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA testing standards. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(10):1373–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2012.08.0155

Slideshow ProjectDOI:10.1682/JRRD.2012.08.0155JSP

Conclusion• Results uncovered some disturbing issues with

lightweight wheelchairs.• Recommendations to improve durability:– Require wheelchairs to be tested by independent

and certified test laboratories.– Implement wheelchair rating system based on

National Highway Transportation Safety Administration 5-star vehicle crash ratings.• Would help clinicians and end users compare durability of

different wheelchairs.