Building Guided Pathways to Success for States and Students Third Annual Convening
Feb 15, 2016
Building Guided Pathways to Success for States and Students
Third Annual Convening
Data-Driven Change: Metrics
27 states and 743 institutions
Hawai‘i Graduation InitiativeCampus Completion Scorecards
Dr. Pearl Imada Iboshi, DirectorUniversity of Hawai‘i System
Institutional Research and Analysis OfficeOffice of the Executive Vice President/Provost
Scorecard Context
UH has well-established system/campus strategic outcomes and performance measures through 2015
Total degrees and certificates earned: Total, STEM and Native Hawaiians
Going rates of public and private high schools
Disbursement of Pell
Campuses are meeting their goals, yet graduation rates have not improved
Scorecard Goal
Improve Graduation rates and facilitate data-driven change by:
Focusing on graduation rates in major categories, including on-time rate
Identifying factors that affect timely graduation
Highlighting progress measures leading to completion
Working with campuses to initiate strategies based on metrics
Strategy for Scorecard Development
Do analysis to show that metrics selected affect completion
Keep the data simple and easily accessible through an “at a glance” sheet
Get campus buy-in to metrics used Establish a baseline for future performance
Fall first-time, full-time freshmenwith 6+ credits at entry
Fall 07 Cohort
Credits at Entry % of cohort
0 1,178 68.10 < x < 6 275 15.96+ Credits at Entry 278 16.1TOTAL 1,731 100.0
Graduate in 4 Years Graduates Grad Rate(%)
0 170 14.40 < x < 6 51 18.56+ Credits at Entry 96 34.5TOTAL 317 18.3
Metrics UsedGraduation rates, retention rates, time and credits to
degreeMeasures known to affect completion for first-time
students: 6 or more credits at entry Taking math and English in first year Taking 30 or more credits in first year Declaring major by start of second year
Measures showing on going-progress and measures of time and credits to degree for all students
Distance learning and summer credits to total credits % of students taking 15 credits % students with more than 120 credits
Scorecard Value and Buy-In
Met with and received approval from all campus Chancellors and Vice Chancellors
Armed campuses with knowledge on key data points in preparation for HGI Summit II (CCA academy) Oct. 2012
Next Steps: Establish Routines to Promote Data-Driven Change
Plan an annual roll out, beginning Winter 2013 with measures updated to AY2011-2012
Establish new targets on completion and consider targets for progress metrics for inclusion in Scorecard version 2.0
Schedule regular discussions on systemwide student and academic affairs committees on progress and completion issues
Continue to offer campuses system support
Highlight campus successes on HGI website
Value-Added Funding at a Glance
Displayed another way, value-added funding looks like this:Basic Structure Optional Enhancements Community College Options
Freshman 1.0 Closing attainment gaps + .2(Pell students) Gateway course completion + .2
Sophomore/AA or AS graduate 1.2 STEM, nurses + .2 Technical certificate completion = 1.2
Junior 1.4 Flagship Options Transfers with 30 credits = 1.2
Senior 1.6 Master’s, doctoral graduates + .2 Associate degree graduates = 1.4
BA or BS graduate 1.8 On time BS or BA + .2 Part-Time StudentsValue proportionally (full-time equivalency of 30 credit hours per year)Receive the same value-added weighting as full-time students