Top Banner
Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology http://www.core. kochi -tech.ac. jp /hunter/ lawriehunter at yahoo dot c om
49

Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology lawriehunter at.

Dec 28, 2015

Download

Documents

Shona Park
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Thinking in English:Foundation Critical Thinking

Lawrie HunterKochi University of Technology

http://www.core.kochi-tech.ac.jp/hunter/lawriehunter at yahoo dot com

Page 2: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking

This is not a commercial presentation.

1. Outline: the major variations of the CT theme

2. Hunter's task-based approach

3. Hands-on: let's build a CT unit: tasks and processing

Page 3: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Critical thinking as a curriculum area 

1.1 Issues-based, adversarial critical thinking (including debate)

1.2 de Bono type thinking

1.3 Critical thinking = formal logic

1.4 Critical thinking = careful reading/listening + articulate speaking

/writing

Page 4: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

1.1 Issues-based, adversarial critical thinking

(including debate)

Focused on the word "critical" in the sense of finding weaknesses in arguments,

Page 5: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

1.1 Issues-based, adversarial critical thinking

(including debate)

Focused on the word "critical" in the sense of finding weaknesses in arguments,

Adversarial critical thinking (very American) is based on polar opposites (e.g. right and wrong).

Page 6: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

1.1 Issues-based, adversarial critical thinking

(including debate)

Focused on the word "critical" in the sense of finding weaknesses in arguments,

Adversarial critical thinking (very American) is based on polar opposites (e.g. right and wrong).

For Japanese learners of Western languages, adversarial critical thinking is both culturally distant and linguistically challenging.

Page 7: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

1.2 de Bono type thinkinghttp:www.sixhats.com

The de Bono system is a proven method of teaching issues-based (and non-adversarial) thinking skills.

Page 8: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

1.2 de Bono type thinkinghttp:www.sixhats.com

The de Bono system is a proven method of teaching issues-based (and non-adversarial) thinking skills.

However, the de Bono system has not been successful in Japan.

Page 9: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

1.2 de Bono type thinkinghttp:www.sixhats.com

The de Bono system is a proven method of teaching issues-based (and non-adversarial) thinking skills.

However, the de Bono system has not been successful in Japan.

This is probably because most Japanese learners (a) do not have the foundation language skills for discussion (b) are not comfortable offering points of view

Page 10: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

1.3 Critical thinking = formal logic

As an L2 inroad to thinking skills, formal logic has two weaknesses:

Page 11: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

1.3 Critical thinking = formal logic

As an L2 inroad to thinking skills, formal logic has two weaknesses:

It has little value for everyday issues thinking.

It is complex and abstract (no-no's for L2 learning).

Page 12: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

1.4 Critical thinking =

careful reading/listening +

articulate speaking/writing  

Page 13: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

1.4 Critical thinking =

careful reading/listening +

articulate speaking/writing  

This view of critical thinking focuses on foundation literacy skills.

Page 14: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

1.4 Critical thinking =

careful reading/listening +

articulate speaking/writing  

This view of critical thinking focuses on foundation literacy skills.

Without these skills, the L2 learner cannot proceed to discussion or

debate.

Page 15: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Critical thinking as an EFL content area  

Page 16: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Critical thinking as an EFL content area  

1. Issues-based critical thinking is values-loaded.Some say that EFL critical thinking is English cultural imperialism.

Page 17: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Critical thinking as an EFL content area  

1. Issues-based critical thinking is values-loaded.Some say that EFL critical thinking is English cultural imperialism.

2. Logic as EFL content is high cognitive load.Logic is not what we need for everyday problems.

Page 18: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Critical thinking as an EFL content area  

1. Issues-based critical thinking is values-loaded.Some say that EFL critical thinking is English cultural imperialism.

2. Logic as EFL content is high cognitive load.Logic is not what we need for everyday problems.

3. de Bono's lateral thinking is very useful.However, it's also language heavy. 

Page 19: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Critical thinking as an EFL content area  

1. Issues-based critical thinking is values-loaded.Some say that EFL critical thinking is English cultural imperialism.

2. Logic as EFL content is high cognitive load.Logic is not what we need for everyday problems.

3. de Bono's lateral thinking is very useful.However, it's also language heavy. 

4. Most Japanese students don't have the basic patterns of accurate communication.

Start there.

Page 20: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

PRINCIPLE: Learners need to have a clear situating of what they are doing.

Page 21: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

PRINCIPLE: Learners need to have a clear situating of what they are doing.

This calls for a simple, structured characterization

of language and communication.

Page 22: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

A simple, structured characterization of language and communication:

We need to separate

information

from

persuasive/poetic rhetoric

Page 23: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

hunter’stools

GENRES REGISTERS MOVES

Page 24: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Genresallow us to talk about

the type of information conveyed in any given utterance.

This is the starting point for the L2 learner.

hunter’stools

GENRES REGISTERS MOVES

Page 25: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Systemic Functional LinguisticsSFL talks about these genres:

• Narrative: construct a pattern of events• Procedure: tell how to do something• Information report: present information• Explanation: tell how and why things occur• Exposition: argue a case• Discussion: look at sides of an issue

hunter’stools

GENRES REGISTERS MOVES

Read this on Hunter's website.

Page 26: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Mohan's (1986) knowledge structures

Classification Principle Evaluation

Description Process Choice

Page 27: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

KUT’s genres

... reflect information types (Mohan's (1986) knowledge structures)

rather than speech act types such as SFL's text types.

Classification Principle Evaluation

Description Process Choice

hunter’stools

GENRES REGISTERS MOVES

Page 28: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

hunter’stools

GENRES REGISTERS MOVES

KUT’s genres

At KUT, we have built our curriculumaround these genres:

DescriptionClassificationComparisonSequenceCause-effect + inferencePro-con -a composite genre

Page 29: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

KUT’s genres

Critical ThinkingAsahi Press 20012nd year textbook6 units (6 genres)

in 2 quarters

At KUT, we have built our curriculumaround these genres:

DescriptionClassificationComparisonSequenceCause-effect + inferencePro-con -a composite genre

hunter’stools

GENRES REGISTERS MOVES

Page 30: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

KUT’s genres

Critical ThinkingAsahi Press 20012nd year textbook6 units (6 genres)

in 2 quarters

The learning process used in this bookEach of the 6 units in this book follows the same teaching/learning pattern:

hunter’stools

GENRES REGISTERS MOVES

INPUT

USAGE PRACTICE

AUTHENTIC TASK

EXPRESSION

Page 31: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

KUT’s genres

Critical ThinkingAsahi Press 20012nd year textbook6 units (6 genres)

in 2 quarters

The learning process used in this book

Each of the 6 units in this book follows the same teaching/learning pattern:

INPUT: the learners are exposed to the target vocabulary and phrases required for expression of the ideas which are basic to the genre in the unit. For input, the learners listen to explanations of the genre by the teacher, practice speaking and listening to sentences from the genre, and read various explanations of the genres language and language structure

USAGE PRACTICE: in each unit there are a succession of activities and tasks which allow the learner to practice using the language required for the genre. It is important to emphasize to the learners that the activities and exercises are necessary to prepare the students for the final large task at the end of each unit. The activities and tasks may be performed in several different modes: for example, as in-class activities (individual or group) or as written homework. This flexibility is important for the teacher, allowing for a variety of timings and paces.

AUTHENTIC TASK: the tasks at the end of the units are designed to be non-linguistic tasks, based in the real world. In some chapters the learners are asked to arrange information in certain structures; in other chapters the learners are asked to solve real-world type problems. These tasks may be done individually or in groups of 2, 3 or 4 learners.

EXPRESSION: the language aspect of the authentic tasks lies in the expression of the product of the task. In this book the tasks are written tasks, but they may also be done as pair or group presentations. The presentation approach is explained in detail in the teacher's guide.

hunter’stools

GENRES REGISTERS MOVES

Page 32: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

KUT’s genres

Critical ThinkingAsahi Press 20012nd year textbook6 units (6 genres)

in 2 quarters

hunter’stools

GENRES REGISTERS MOVES

Thinking in EnglishKUT Press 2004

A mapping workbook,companion to CT6 units (6 genres)

Extends CT to 4 quarters

Page 33: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Hands-on: let's build a unit: cause and effect

INPUT

USAGE PRACTICE

AUTHENTIC TASK

EXPRESSION

Hunter's genres:DescriptionClassificationComparisonSequenceCause-effect InferencePro-con

Page 34: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Hands-on: Example: sequence

INPUT

USAGE PRACTICE

AUTHENTIC TASK

EXPRESSION

Hunter's genres:DescriptionClassificationComparisonSequenceCause-effect InferencePro-con

Page 35: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Hands-on: example: sequence•Unit 2: Sequence

• Input: listening and speaking: Giving directions and telling a story

• Input: instructions and narration: Giving directions and telling a story

•Usage practice: sequencing: The steps for making an omelette

• Usage practice: giving instructions: Telling how to _______

• Input: narration: Mr. Nakamura’s Day: Dictation

• Usage practice: writing: Mr. Nakamura's Sunday

• Authentic task: narration: Putting a story in order

• Usage practice: sequence words: Making a story better

• Input: comparing instructions and narration: finding verbs and signal words

• Authentic task: Get the gold!

• Expression: Unit 2 final report: how Kenji and Junichi Got the Gold

Page 36: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Example: sequenceInput

Usage practiceAuthentic task

Expression

InputDecide sequence structure signals

FirstTo begin

ThenNextAfter that

Finally At lastIn the end

While + clause A, clause BAfter + clause A, clause BAs + clause A, clause BWhen + clause A, clause BIf + clause A, clause B

Page 37: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Example: sequenceInput

Usage practiceAuthentic task

Expression

InputSequence structure signalsProcessing input containing signals

1. First I got up and then I went to the bathroom

and had a shower.After that I got dressed

and went to the kitchen.

2. First I took the milkout of the fridge.

Then I went to the cupboardand got a glass.

Finally I poured myself a glass of milkand drank it.

Page 38: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

InputUsage practiceAuthentic task

ExpressionSequence structure signals

Page 39: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Example : sequence Input

Usage practiceAuthentic task

Expression

Usage practiceGraphics from sentences

Page 40: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Example : sequence Input

Usage practiceAuthentic task

Expression

Usage practiceSentencesfrom graphics

Page 41: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

InputUsage practiceAuthentic task

Expression

Sentences from graphics

Page 42: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Example : sequence Input

Usage practiceAuthentic task

Expression

Usage practiceOrderinginformation

Page 43: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Example : sequence Input

Usage practiceAuthentic task

Expression

Usage practiceCombiningsentences

Page 44: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Example : sequence Input

Usage practiceAuthentic task

Expression

InputFindingstructure signalsand otherlexicalitems

Page 45: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Example : sequence Input

Usage practiceAuthentic task

Expression

Authentic taskReal-world problem

Page 46: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Example : sequence Input

Usage practiceAuthentic task

Expression

Expression

Report/

drama/

video/

interview/

graphic

Page 47: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Hands-on: let's build a unit: cause and effect

INPUT

USAGE PRACTICE

AUTHENTIC TASK

EXPRESSION

Hunter's genres:DescriptionClassificationComparisonSequenceCause-effect InferencePro-con

Page 48: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Unit: cause and effectInput

Usage practiceAuthentic task

Expression

InputC-E structure signalsProcessing input containing signals

Usage practiceGraphics from sentencesSentences from graphicsCombining sentences

Authentic taskReal-world problem

ExpressionReport/drama/video/interview

Page 49: Thinking in English: Foundation Critical Thinking Lawrie Hunter Kochi University of Technology  lawriehunter at.

Don’t hesitate to write to me.

Lawrie HunterKochi University of Technology

http://www.core.kochi-tech.ac.jp/hunter/lawriehunter at yahoo dot com