LECTURE #1 THE SUBJECT OF THEORETICAL GRAMMAR
The phonological system is the subfoundation of language; it
determines the material (phonological) appearance of its
significant units. The lexical system is the whole set of naming
means of language, i.e. words'n'word groups.
The grammatical system is the whole set of regularities
determining the combination of naming means of the formation in of
utterances.
Traditionally grammar is determined as the system of rules of
changing of the words'n'the rules of regulations of their combining
in the sentence. That is why it is divided into 2 parts:
morphology'n'syntax.
A practical description is aimed at providing the student with a
manual of using the language in a proper way without making
mistakes in oral'n'written speech. The aim of theoretical grammar
of a language is to present a theoretical description of its
grammatical system, i.e. to scientifically analyze'n'define its
grammatical categories 'n' study the mechanisms of grammatical
formation of utterances of words in the process of speech
making.
The plane of content comprise the purely semantic elements
contained in language where the plane of expression comprises the
material (formal) units of language taken by themselves apart from
the materials rendered by them (form).
These 2 planes are inseparable connected so that no meaning can
be realised without some material means of expression. Grammatical
elements present a unity of content'n'expression.
On the other hand, the corresp of two planes is very complex 'n'
this complesity can be illustrated by means of polysemy, homonymy,
synonymy.
In cases of polysemy'n'homonymy two or more units of the plane
of content correspond to one unit of the plane of expression.
Synonymy
Two or more units of the plane of expression correspond to one
unit of the plane of content(Will you come to the party? - Will you
be coming? - Are you coming?).
Taking into consideration the discrimination between the two
planes we may say that the purpose of grammar as a linguistic
discipline is to disclose and formulate the regularities of the
correspondence between the plane of conent'n'the plane of
expression in the formation of utterances.
Lingual units stand to one another in two fundamental types of
relations: syntagmatic and paradigmatic.
Syntagmatic relation are immediate their relations between units
in a segmental sequence. My friend has come. In this sentence
syntagmatically connected are the words'n'word groups my friend,
has come, friend has come. The combination of two words or word
groups one of which is modified by the other is called a syntactic
syntagma.
There are four main types of notional syntagmas:
- predicative (subj + predicate)
- objective (verb + objective)
- attributive (noun + attributive)
- adverbial (modified notional word: v, adj, adv + adv
modifier).
Since syntagmatic relations are actually observed in utterances,
they are described by the Latin formula as relations in presentia
(in the present), 'cause we can observe them in the phrase,
sentence etc.
The other type of relations opposed to syntagmatic is called
paradigmatic. They exist between elements of the system outside the
forings where they occur unlike syntagmatic relations p r cannot be
directly observed in utterances, that is why they are refered to as
relations in absentia (in the absence).
Grammatical paradigms express various grammatical categories.
The minim paradigm consist of two form-stages, e.g. boy-boys. A
more complex paradigm can be divided into paradigmatic series
(subparadigms) e.g. the system of the finite verbs. Any grammatical
paradigm should consist of weak'n'strong members.
Units of language are divided into segmental'n'suprasegmental.
Segmental units consist of phonemes, syllables, morphemes, words
etc.
suprasegmental units do not exist by themselves; they are
realisedd together with segmental units and express different
modificational meanings (functional). To the suprasegmantal units
belong intonation, accent and patterns of word order. The segmental
units form a hierarhy of levels. Lingual hierarhy The lower level
is phonemic: it is form by phonemes which have no meaning.
The level located above the phonemic one is the morphemic level.
The morpheme is the elementary meaningful part of the word.
The third level in the segmental lingual hierarhy is the level
of words, or lexemic level.
The next higher level is the level of phrases (word groups) or
phrasemic. To this level belong combinations of two or more
notional words. The level of sentence or proposemic level.
Supraproposemic level which is formed by a supra-phrasal
construction (supra-phrasal unit).
In the printed text the supra-phrasal construction very
coincides with the paragraph.
- The next level level of the text, which of consists of group
of supra-phrasal constructions. Although, it can consist of one
supra-phrasal unity.
And the higher level of this hierarhy is the level of
discourse.Discourse is interpreted as difficult communicative
phenomenon, which includes in itself social content, and apart the
participants of communication knowledge, of process production of
perception of texts. Discourse after T. van Dijk is a different
communication. Event of socio-cultural co-operation, characteristic
lines of which are interests, aims'n'styles.
B. Johnstone determines discourse as combining text in an
aggregate with extra-linguistic socio-cultural, pragmatic,
psychological factors. Discourse is a communication, which
submerged in life. Grammatical structure of the english languageThe
chief features characterizing an analytical language are the
following:
1. A lot of analitical forms. An analytical form consists of one
or more functional words which have no lexical meaning and only
express one or more of the grammatical categories of person,
number, tense, aspect, voice, mood, etc and one notional word.
Tense and Aspect verb forms (the continuals forms: I'm writing;
the perfect form: I have written; Perf Cont : I have been writing;
Fut Simple: I shall write; all the other forms of the Future also
the interrogative and the negative forms of the Present and Past
Simple: does he sing?- He doesn't sing).
The Passive Voice: I was invited to the theatre.
Subjunctive mood: I should go there if I had time.
With some adj: the category of degrees of comparison: more
beautiful, the most beautiful.
2. Comparatively few grammatical inflections
Endings:
s in the 3rd person sg. In the Present simple: speaks.
s in the plural of nouns: tables. en: children, oxen.
s in the posessive case: my mother's book
ed, -d in the Past Simple of regular v: smoked, jumped
ing in the Present part and gerund: smiling
en in past particle of some irregular verbs: broken
er, -est in comparative and superlative degrees of comparison of
some adj and adv: sooner-soonest.
3 A rare use of sound alteration to denote grammar forms: speak
spoke, mouse mice, man - men.
4 A rare us eof suppletive forms; be-am-is-are, go-went,
good-better.
5 A wide use of prepositions to denote relations between objects
and to connect words in the sentence: the roof of the house.
6 Prominent us eof word order to denote grammatical relations: a
more or less word order which acquires extreme importance: The
fisherman caught a fish.
7 Extensive use of substitutes. Word substitutes saves
repetition of a word in certain conditions. LECTURE #2 MORPHOLOGY.
PARTS OF SPEECHMorphology is the part of grammar which studies the
forms of words. The morpheme is the smallest meaningful unit into
which a word form may be divided, e.g. writers can be divided into
three morphemes:
1) write-, expressing the basic lexical meaning of the word,
2) -er-, expressing the idea of agent performing the action
indicating by the root of the verb,
3) -s, indicating number, that is, showing that more than one
person of the type indicated is meant.
Two remarks are necessary here:
1. Two or more morphemes may sound the same but be basically
diffirent, e.g.
-er indicating the doer of an action as in writer
-er denoting the comparative degree of adjectives and adverbs,
as in longer.
2. There may be zero morphemes, that is the absence of morpheme
may indicate a certain meaning. Thus books is characterized by the
-s- morpheme as being a plural form, book is is characterized by
the zero morpheme as being a singular form.
Allomorphs
- The student comes
- The students come
- The ox comes
- The oxen come
- the change of student to students is paralleled by the change
of ox to oxen.- That is, the meaning and function of the -en in
oxen is the same as the meaning and function of the -s in students.
-s and the -en represent the same morpheme: each of them is a morph
representing the same morpheme, and they are termed allomorphs of
the same morpheme.
Parts of speech
The words of language, depending on various formal and semantic
features, are divided into grammatically relevant classes of words.
The traditional grammatical classes of words are called parts of
speech. The term part of speech is purely traditional and
conventional and was introduced in Ancient Greek.
In modern linguistics, parts of speech are classified on the
basis of three criteria: meaning, form and function. According to
Vinogradov parts of speech are divided into notional and
functional, which reflects their division in the earlier
grammatical tradition into changeable and unchangeable. The
notional parts of speech of the English language are the noun, the
adjective, the numeral, the pronoun, the verb, the adverb.
The features of the noun:
1. The categorial meaning of substance (thingness).
2. The specific suffixal forms of derivation; categories:
number, case and gender.3. The functions in the sentence: subject,
object, attribute, predicative, adverbial modifier.
The features of the adjective: 1. The categorial meaning of
property (qualitative and relative);
2. The specific suffixal forms of derivation; categories:
degrees of comparison (for qualitative adjectives);3. The functions
in the sentence: subject, attribute, predicative.
The features of the nummeral:
1. The categorial meaning of number (cardinal and ordinal).
2. The narrow set of simple numerals; the specific forms of
composition for compound numerals; the specific suffixal forms of
derivation for ordinal numerals; no categories.3. The functions in
the sentence: subject, attribute.
The features of the pronoun:
1. The categorial meaning of indication (deixis).
2. The narrow sets of various status with the corresponding
formal properties of categorial changeability and word-building;
categories: number, case, gender.3. The functions in the sentence:
subject, object, attribute, predicative, adverbial modifier.
The features of the verb:
1. The categorial meaning of process.
2. The specific suffixal forms of derivation; the opposition of
the finite and non-finite forms;categories: person, number, tense,
time correlation, aspect, voice, mood. 3. Functions in the
sentence: predicate for the finite verb, the mixed (verbal and
other than verbal) functions for the non-finite verb.
The features of the adverb:
1. The categorial meaning of the secondary property, i.e. the
property of process or another property.
2. The specific suffixal forms of derivation; categories: forms
of the degrees of comparison for qualitative adverbs.
3. The functions in the sentence: adverbial modifier.
To the functional parts of speech (unchangeable words) belong
the article, the preposition, the conjunction, the particle, the
modal word, the interjection.
The article expresses the specific limitation of the substantive
functions.
The preposition expresses the dependencies and interdependencies
of substantive referents.
The conjunction expresses connections of phenomena.
The particle unites the functional words of specifying and
limiting meaning.
The modal word expresses the attitude of the speaker to the
reflected situation and its parts.
The interjection is a signal of emotions.
Henry Sweet (15 September 1845 30 April 1912) is an English
philologist, phonetician and grammarian. According to H. Sweet (A
New English Grammar) the parts of speech in inflectional languages
are divided into two main groups, declinable, that is, capable of
inflection, and indeclinable, that is, incapable of inflection.
Criteria for classifying are: meaning, form, and function.
The declinable parts of speech fall under the three main
divisions: nouns, adjectives, and verbs. Noun-word: noun proper,
noun-pronoun, noun-numeral, infinitive and gerund. Adjective-word:
adjective proper, adjective-pronoun, adjective-numeral, participle.
Verb: finite verb and verbals (infinitive, gerund, participle).
Indeclinable words or particles comprise arverbs, prepositions,
conjunctions, and interjections.
Otto Jespersen (16 July 1860 30 April 1943) is a Danish linguist
who specialized in the grammar of the English language. He helped
to revoutionize language teaching in Europe, contributed greatly to
the advancement of phonetics, linguistic tjeory, and thr history of
English, and originated an international language, Novial.
Acoording to Jespersen (meaning, form, function)
parts of speech are cassified into: (The philosophy of
grammar)
-substantives (including proper named)
-adjectives
-pronouns (incuding numeral and pronominal adverbs)
-verbs
-particles: adverbs, prepositions, conjunctions, and
interjections.
Ch. Fries presents his scheme of English word-classes. In his
book The structure of English Fries gives a classification of Parts
of speech which entirely depends on the distribution of the word.
The materias that furnished the evidence on which Fries' analysis
is based, were somefifty hours of tape-recorded conversations by
some three hundred different speakers, with the participants
entirely unaware that their speech was being recorded. To study the
word he introduced the term frames. A frame is a formula of a
typica constuction which is typical of this particular word as
belonging to a certain class.
Frame A. The concert was good (always)
Frame B. The clerk remembered the tak (suddenly)
Frame C. The team was there.
He proved the liabiity of his theory by the operation of
substitution. Through this operation he gets four casses, he cals
them by numbers:
class one (nouns)
class two (verbs)
class three (adjectives)
class four (adverbs)
He also distinguished 15 functional classes or functional words,
designated by letters. Functional words are exposed in the process
of testing as being unable to fill in the positions of the frames
without destroying their structure. The group of functional words
can be distributed among the three main sets. The words of the
first set are used as specifiers of notional words. Here belong
determiners of nouns, modal verbs serving as specifiers of notional
verbs, functional modifiers and intersifiers of adjectives and
adverbs.
The words of second set play the role of interpositional
elements, determining the relations of notional words to one
another. Here belong prepositions and conjunctions.
The words of thir set refers to the sentence as a whole. Such
are question-words (what, how, etc), inducement-words (let's,
please. Etc), attention-getting words. Words of affirmation and
negation, sentence introducers (it, there) and some others.
J. Nesfield's classification of parts of speech
Words are classified according to the purpose that they are used
for, and every such class is called a Part of Speech. The parts of
speech can be thus defined:
- a noun is a word used for naming some persons or things.
- a pronoun is a word used instead of a noun or
noun-equivalent
- an adjective is a word used to qualify a noun
- a verb is a word used for saying somethinf about some person
or thing
- a preposition is a word placed before a noun or
noun-equivalent to show in what relation the person or thing
denoted by the noun stands to something else
- a conjunction is a word used to join words or phrases
together, or one clause to another clause
- an adverb is a word used to qualify any part of speech except
a noun or pronoun
- an interjection is a word or sound thrown into sentence to
express some feeling of the mind.
Note. observe that the part of speech to which a word belongs
depends on the purpose that the word is used for in that particular
context, and that the same word may be of a different part of
speech in a different context. Thus man is a noun in The man has
come, but a verb in Man the lifeboat.
LECTURE #3 THE NOUN
The noun as a part of speech has the categorial meaning of
substance or thingness. It follows from this that the noun is the
main nominative part of speech and the central nominative lexemic
unit of language.
The categorical functional properties of the noun are determined
by its semantic properties.
The most characteristic substantive function of the noun is that
of the subject in the sentence. The function of the object is also
typical of the noun as the substance word. Other syntactic
functions are attribute, adverbial modifier and even
predicative.
Apart from these functions, the noun is characterized by some
special types of combinability.
In particular, typical of the noun is the prepositional
combinability with another noun, a verb, an adjective, an adverb,
e.g. an entrance to the house, to turn round the corner, red in the
face, far from its destination.
The possessive combinability characterizes the noun alongside
its prepositional combinability with another noun, e.g. the
Presidents speech, the books cover.
English nouns can also easily combine with one another by sheer
contact, e.g. a sport event, film festival. In the contact group
the noun in pre-position plays the role of a semantic qualifier to
the noun in post-position.
The noun is generally associated with the article. Because of
the comparative scarcity of morphological distinctions in English
in some cases only articles show that the word is a noun.
As a part of speech, the noun is also characterized by a set of
formal features determining its specific status in the paradigm of
nomination. It has its word-building distinctions, including
typical suffixes, compound stem models, conversion patterns.
According to their morphological composition we distinguish
simple, derivative and compound nouns.
Simple nouns are nouns which have neither prefixes nor suffixes:
chair, table, room, fish, map, work.
Derivative nouns are nouns which have derivative elements
(prefixes or suffixes or both): reader, sailor, childhood,
misconduct, inexperience.
Productive noun-forming suffixes are:-er reader, -ist dramatist,
-ess actress, -ness madness, -ism nationalism.
Unproductive suffixes are: -hood childhood, -dom freedom, -ship
friendship, -ment development, -ance importance, -ence dependence,
-ty cruelty, -ity generosity.
Compound nouns are nouns built from two or more stems:
appletree, snowball, blueball, reading-hall, dining-room.
Lexico-grammatical classification of nouns
The most general subclasses of nouns are grouped into five
oppositional pairs.
The first nounal subclass opposition differentiates proper and
common nouns. The basis of this division is type of nomination.
Proper nouns are always written with a capital letter, since the
noun represents the name of a specific person, place or thing. The
names of days of the week, months, historical documents,
institutions, organizations, religions, holy texts are proper
nouns.
Many people hate Monday mornings.
Common nouns are nouns referring to a person, place or thing in
a general sense.
According to the sign, the nearest town is 60 miles away.
The second subclass opposition differentiates animate and
inanimate nouns on the basis of form of existence. The third
subclass opposition differentiates human and non-human nouns on the
basis of personal quality. The fourth opposition is countable,
uncountable and collective nouns on the basis of quantitative
structure.
A countable noun (or count noun) is a noun with both a singular
and a plural form, and it names anything (or anyone) that you can
count. Countable nouns are the opposition of non-countable nouns
and collective nouns (table, chair, room).
A non-countable noun (or mass noun) is a noun which does not
have a plural form, and which refers to something that you could
not usually count. A non-countable noun always takes a singular
verb in a sentence (oxygen, tea, coffee).
A collective noun is a noun naming a group of things, animals,
or persons. You could count the individual members of the group,
but you usually think of the group as a whole, as one unit.
The committee meets every Wednesday afternoon.
Other examples are the jury, the police, crowd, fleet, family,
cattle, machinery, foliage.
Somewhat less explicitly distinguished is the division of
English nouns into concrete and abstract.
A concrete noun is a noun which names anything (or anyone) that
you can perceive through your physical senses: touch, sight, taste,
hearing, or smell.
The judge handed the files to the clerk.
An abstract noun is a noun which names anything which you can
not perceive through your five physical senses (justice,
afterthought, childhood, schizophrenia).Categories of nouns
The category of number
Modern English, as most other languages, distinguishes between
two numbers, singular and plural.
The grammatical category of number defines a set of word forms
which has one common categorical function, that of the
singular/plural distinction. Semantically, number expresses the
propositional content and actualizes nouns in communication by
providing a qualification book: books, difficulty: difficulties.The
strong member of this binary opposition is the plural, its
productive formal mark being the suffix -(e)s [-z, -s, -iz] as
presented in the forms dog-dogs, clock-clocks, box-boxes.
The other, non-productive ways of expressing the number
opposition are vowel interchange in several relict forms (man -
men, woman-women, tooth-teeth, etc.), the archaic suffix -(e)n
supported by phonemic interchange in a couple of other relict forms
(ox-oxen, child-children, cow-kine, brother-brethren), the
correlation of individual singular and plural suffixes in a limited
number of borrowed nouns (formula - formulae, phenomenon -
phenomena, alumnus-alumni, etc.). In some cases the plural form of
the noun is homonymous with the singular form (sheep, deer, fish,
etc.).
The essential meaning of singular and plural seems clear enough:
the singular number shows that one object is meant, and the plural
shows that more than one object is meant. However, language facts
are not always so simple as that. The category of number in English
nouns gives rise to several problems which claim special
attention.
First of all, it is to be noted that there is some difference
between, say, three houses and three hours. Whereas three houses
are three separate objects existing side by side, three hours are a
continuous period of time measured by a certain unit of
duration.
If we take such plurals as waters (e.g. the waters of the
Atlantic), or snows (e.g. A Daughter of the snows), we shall see
that we are drifting further away from the original meaning of the
plural number. In the first place no numeral could be used with
nouns of this kind. We could not possibly say three waters, or
three snows. We cannot say how many waters we mean when we use this
noun in the plural number. What is the real difference in meaning
between water and waters, snow and snows? Its obvious that the
plural form in every case serves to denote a vast stretch of water
(e.g. an ocean), or of snow, or rather of ground covered by snow
(e.g. in the arctic regions of Canada). In the case of water and
waters we can state that the water of the Atlantic refers to its
physical or chemical properties, whereas the waters of the Atlantic
refers to a geographical idea: it denotes a seascape. So we see
that between the singular and the plural an additional difference
of meaning has developed.
The difference between two numbers may increase to such a
degree, that the plural form develops a completely new meaning
which the singular has not got at all. Thus, for example, the
plural form colours has the meaning banner which is restricted to
the plural (e.g. to serve under the colours of liberty.). It is
natural to say that the plural form has been lexicalized.
In comparison with many other languages, including German and
Russian, the expression of number as singular and plural by mean of
variant components is simple in English. As a rule, the singular is
unmarked (zero). Out of five possible ways to denote plural in Old
English only one (-as) has survived to be the general plural
morpheme in Modern English (-(e)s) and there are only few nouns
which, also for historical reasons, have other means of plural
formation.
We must also consider here two types of nouns differing from all
others in the way of number: they have not got the usual two number
forms, but only one form. The nouns which have only a plural and no
singular are usually termed pluralia tantum (which is the Latin for
plural only) and those which have only a singular and no plural are
termed singularia tantum (the Latin for singular only).
Among the pluralia tantum are nouns trousers, scissors, pincers,
breeches, environs, outskirts, dregs. As it is obvious from these
examples, they include nouns of two types. On the one hand, there
are the nouns which denote material objects consisting of two
halves (trousers, scissors, etc); on the other, there are those
which denote a more or less indefinite plurality (e.g. environs,
dregs, supplies, outskirts earnings, politics, police). If we
compare the English pluralia tantum with the Russian, well see that
in some cases they correspond to each other (e.g. trousers ,
scissors , environs ), while in others they do not (-money).
Close to this group pluralia tantum nouns are also some names of
sciences, e.g. mathematics, phonetics, also politics, and some name
of diseases, e.g. measles, mumps, rickets, creeps (), hysterics.
The reason for this seems to be that, for example, mathematics
embrace a whole series of various scientific disciplines, and
measles are accompanied by the appearance of a number of separate
inflamed spots on the skin. It is typical for English that some of
this pluralia tantum may be accompanied by the indefinite article,
and if they are the subject of a sentence the predicate verb may
stand in the singular, which would be unthinkable in Russia.
The direct opposite of pluralia tantum are the singularia
tantum, i.e. nouns which have no plural form. Among these we must
first of all note some nouns denoting material substance, such as
milk, butter, and some abstract notions peace, usefulness. Nouns of
this kind express notions which are, strictly speaking, outside the
sphere of number. But in the morphological and syntactical system
of the English language a noun cannot stand outside the category of
number. If the noun is the subject of a sentence, the predicate
verb will have to be either singular or plural. With the nouns just
mentioned the predicate verb is always singular.
Some nouns denoting substance, or material, may have a plural
form, if they are used to denote either an object made of the
material or a special kind of substance, or an object exhibiting
the quality denoted by the noun. Thus the noun wine, as well as the
noun milk, denotes a certain substance, but it has a plural form
wines used to denote several special kinds of wine.
Certain nouns denoting groups of human beings (family,
government, party, etc) and also animals (cattle, poultry, etc)
regarded as a single unit are termed collective nouns.
Collective nouns fall under the following groups:
a) nouns used only in the singular and denoting a number of
things collected together and regarded as a single object: foliage,
machinery.
b) nouns which are singular in form though plural in meaning:
police, poultry, cattle, people, gentry.
c) nouns that may be both singular and plural: family, crowd,
fleet, nation.The category of case
Case is the morphological category of a noun manifested in the
forms of noun declension and showing the relations of the nounal
referent to other objects or phenomena.
The category is expressed by the opposition of the uninflected
form called the nominative case (weak member) and the inflected
form s called the possessive case (strong member of the
opposition).
Four special views advanced at various times by different
scholars should be considered as successive stages in the analysis
of the problem.
The first view is called the the theory of positional cases
(J.C. Nesfield, M. Deutschbein, M. Bryant). This theory is directly
connected with the old grammatical tradition.
According to this theory, the unchangeable forms of the noun are
differentiated as different cases by virtue of the functional
position occupied by the noun in the sentence thus the English noun
would distinguish nominative, genitive, vocative, dative and
accusative, and only the genitive case is an inflexional one.
The Nominative case (subject to a verb). Rain falls.
The Vocative case (address). Are you coming, my friend?The
Dative case (indirect object to a verb). I gave John a penny.
The accusative case (direct object, and also object to a
preposition). The man killed a rat.
The second view is called theory of prepositional cases (G.
Curme).
Here we should distinguish two cases: dative case (to + noun,
for + noun) and genitive case (of + noun). These prepositions,
according to Curme are inflexional prepositions, i.e. grammatical
elements equivalent to case-forms.
The third view of the English noun case recognizes a limited
case theory (H. Sweet, O. Jespersen, A.I. Smirnitsky, S.G.
Barkhudarov). The limited case theory is based on the opposition of
nominative case (weak member) and possessive (strong member of the
opposition).
The limited case theory is at present most broadly accepted
among linguists in our country and abroad.
The fourth theory, advanced by G.N. Vorontsova is called theory
of the possessive postposition, or postpositional theory. According
to Vorontsova, there are no cases at all. And s is the
postpositional element, which can be transformed.Of the various
reasons substantiating the postpositional theory the following two
should be considered as the main ones.
First, the postpositional element s is but loosely connected
with the noun, which finds the expression in its use not only with
single nouns, but also with whole word-groups of various status,
e.g. somebody elses daughter, the man I saw yesterdays son.Second,
there is an indisputable parallelism of functions between the
possessive postpositional constructions and the prepositional
constructions. This can be shown by transformation of the above
example: somebody elses daughter the daughter of somebody else.The
category of gender Gender, in the English language, is a
distinction of certain words according as they indicate sex or the
lack of it.
Gender, in English, belongs only to nouns and pronouns. No other
words have any distinctions of gender.
The category of gender is expressed in English by the obligatory
correlation of nouns with the personal pronouns of the third
person.
The category of gender is strictly oppositional. It is formed by
two oppositions related to each other on a hierarchical basis.
One opposition functions in the whole set of nouns, dividing
them into person (human) nouns and non-person (non-human) nouns.
The other opposition functions in the subset of person nouns only,
dividing them into masculine nouns and feminine nouns.
As a result of the double oppositional correlation, a specific
system of three genders arises, which is represented by the
traditional terminology: the neuter (i.e. non-person) gender, the
masculine (i.e. masculine person) gender, the feminine (i.e.
feminine person) gender.
The strong member of the upper opposition is the human subclass
of nouns. The weak member of the opposition comprises both
inanimate and animate non-person nouns. Here belong such nouns as
tree, mountain, love, cat, swallow, ant, crowd, etc. The strong
member of the lower opposition is the feminine subclass of person
nouns. Here belong such nouns as woman, girl, mother, bride, etc.
The masculine subclass of person nouns comprising such words as
man, boy, father, bridegroom, etc. makes up the weak member of the
opposition.
The oppositional structure of the category of gender can be
shown schematically on the following diagramme
According to James Fernald there are 3 genders in English
Masculine: all nouns denoting being of the mail sex
Feminine: all nouns denoting being of the female sex
Neuter: all nouns denoting objects of no sex
J. Leech gives the following classification of English
genders:Gender
Human (personal) Non-human (non-personal)
-masculine
-feminine
-dual
-common
-collective
English words can be:
Morphologically marked for gender (actress - actor)
Semantically marked for gender (boy-girl, king-queen) Lexically
marked for gender (boyfriend-girlfriend) LECTURE #4 PRONOUN AND
ADJECTIVEThe pronoun
The definition of a pronoun as a separate part of speech has
caused many difficulties. More that once in the history of
linguistics the very existence of a pronoun as a part of speech has
been denied. However, attempts of this kind have not proved
successful and in present-day grammars, both English and Russian,
pronouns are recognized as a part of speech, which have the
categorical meaning of indication. The pronouns, though pointing to
things cannot be modified by adjectives, cannot be connected with
any article or modified by a prepositional phrase.
Classification of Pronouns (Western Approach) Personal
Pronouns
A personal pronoun refers to a specific person or thing and
changes its form to indicate person, number, gender and case.
Personal pronouns are subdivided into Subjective Personal
Pronouns, Objective Personal Pronouns and Possessive Personal
Pronouns.
A Subjective personal pronoun indicates that the pronoun is
acting as the subject of the sentence.
The subjective personal pronouns are I, you, she, he, it, we,
they
You are surely the strangest child I have ever met.
An objective personal pronoun indicates that the pronoun is
acting as an object of a verb, compound verb, preposition, or
infinitive phrase. The objective personal pronouns are: me, you,
her, him, it, us, you and them.
Deborah will meet us in the market.
A possessive pronoun indicates that the pronoun is acting as a
marker of possession and defines who owns a particular object or
person. The possessive personal pronouns are: my, your, her, his,
our, their; mine, yours, hers, his, its, ours and theirs.
The smallest gift is mine.2) Demonstrative pronounsA
demonstrative pronoun points to and identifies a noun or a pronoun.
The demonstrative pronouns are: this, that, these and those. This
and that are used to refer to singular nouns or noun phrases and
those are used to refer to plural nouns and noun phrases.
This must not continue.3)Interrogative pronouns.An interrogative
pronoun is used to ask questions. The interrogative pronouns are:
who, whom, which, what and the compounds formed with the suffix
ever (whoever, whomever, whichever, whatever)
Whom do you think we should invite?4) Relative pronounsYou can
use a relative pronoun to link one phrase or clause to another
phrase or clause. The relative pronouns are: who, whom, that and
which. The compounds whoever, whomever, whichever are also relative
pronouns.
The candidate who wins the greatest popular vote is not always
elected.5) Indefinite pronouns
An indefinite pronoun is a pronoun referring to an identifiable
but not specified person or thing. An indefinite pronoun conveys
the idea of all, any, none, or some.
The most common indefinite pronouns are: all, another, any,
anyone, anybody, each, everybody, everyone, everything, few, many,
nobody, none, one, several, some, somebody, someone, something.
The office had been searched and everything was thrown onto the
floor.6) Reflexive pronouns
You can use a reflective pronoun to refer back to the subject of
the clause or sentence. The reflexive pronouns are: myself,
yourself, herself, himself, itself, ourselves, yourselves and
themselves.
The Dean often does the photocopying herself.7) Intensive
pronounsAn intensive pronoun is used to emphasize its antecedent.
Intensive pronouns are identical in form to reflexive pronouns.
I myself believe that aliens should abduct my sister.
The Prime Minister himself said that he would lower taxes.
They themselves promised to come to the party even though they
had a final exam at the same time.
Categories in pronouns (Russian approach)Case. Some pronouns
distinguish between two cases which are best termed nominative and
objective. These are the following: nominative (I, he, she (it), we
(you), they, who); objective (me, him, her, (it), us, (you), them,
whom)The two pronouns in brackets, it and you might have been left
out of the list, but we have included them because they share many
other peculiarities with the pronouns I, he, she, we and they. No
other pronoun, and, indeed, no one other word in the language has
that kind of case system.
A certain number of pronouns have a different system. They
distinguish between a common and a genitive case (or nominative /
possessive). These are somebody, anybody, one, another, and a few
more.
All other pronouns have no category of case (something,
anything, nothing, everything, some, any, no, my, his, mine, hers,
etc)
Number. The category of number has only a very restricted field
in pronouns. It is found in the pronouns this/ these, that/those,
other/others (if not used before a noun).
As to the pronouns I/we; he, she, it/they, it must stated that
there is no grammatical category of number here. We is not a form
of I, but a separate word. In a similar way, they is not a form of
he, she or it, but a separate word.
A peculiar difficulty arises here with reference to the pronouns
myself/ (ourself) ourselves; yourself/ yourselves; himself,
herself, itself/ themselves.
If we compare the two pronouns myself and ourselves, we shall
see that the difference between the first elements of two words is
purely lexical, whereas the second elements differ from each other
by the same suffix s that is used to form the plural of most nouns.
Thus we are brought to the conclusion that ourselves is essentially
a different word from myself.
There are no other grammatical categories in the English
pronouns: there is no category of gender. The pronouns he, she, it
and also the pronouns his, her, its; his, hers; himself, herself,
itself, are all separate words. Thus, she is not a form of the word
he but a separate word in its own right.The Adjective
The adjective expresses the categorical semantics of property of
a substance. It means that each adjective used in the text
presupposes relation to some noun the property of whose referent it
denotes, such as its material, colour, dimensions, position, state
and other characteristics both permanent and temporary.
I want a yellow balloon.
Adjectives are distinguished by a specific combinability with
nouns, which they modify, usually in pre-position, and occasionally
in post-position; by a combinability with modifying adverbs.
In the sentence the adjective performs the functions of an
attribute and a predicative.
I will be silent as a grave. I will be like a silent grave.
To the derivational features of adjective belong a number of
suffixes and prefixes of which the most important are: -ful
(hopeful), -less (colourless), -ish (reddish), -ous (famous), -ive
(demonstrative), -ic (basic), -un (unhappy), -in (inaccurate), -pre
(prehistoric).
Classification of adjectives
All the adjectives are traditionally divided into two large
subclasses: qualitative and relative. Relative adjectives express
properties of a substance determined by the direct relation of the
substance to some other substance, e.g. wood a wooden hut, history
a historical event, colour coloured postcards, surgery surgical
treatment.
Qualitative adjectives , as different from relative ones, denote
various qualities of substances, which admit a quantative
estimation. The measure of a quality can be estimated as high or
low, adequate or inadequate, sufficient or insufficient, optional
or excessive. Cf: an awkward situation a very awkward situation, a
difficult task too difficult task, a hearty welcome not a very
hearty welcome.
Only qualitative adjectives have the ability to form degrees of
comparison, eg a pretty girl a prettier girl.
The category is constituted by the opposition of the three forms
known under the heading of degrees of comparison, e.g a pretty
(girl) a prettier (girl), the prettiest (girl).
The category is constituted by the opposition of the three forms
known under the heading of degrees of comparison; the basic form
(positive degree), having no features of comparison; the
comparative degree form, having the feature of restricted
superiority (which limits the comparison to two elements only); the
superlative degree form, having the feature of unrestricted
superiority.
John was the strongest boy in the company.
Positive degree is a weak member of the opposition, comparative
and superlative degrees are strong members.
Some linguists approach the number of the degrees of comparison
as problematic on the grounds that the basic form of adjective does
not express any comparison by itself and therefore should be
excluded from the category. This exclusion would reduce the
category to two members only, i.e. the comparative and superlative
degrees.
Another problem is whether relative adjectives could have degree
of comparison. The adjective wooden is basically related, but when
used in broader meaning expressionless or awkward it acquires an
evaluative force, and can presuppose a greater or less degree of
denoted property.
E. g: the superintendent was sitting behind a table and looking
more wooden than ever. (A. Christie).
A more complex problem in the sphere of degrees of comparison is
that of the formations more difficult, (the) most difficult, i.e.
the analytical forms of comparison. The first view that formations
of the type more difficult, (the) most difficult are analytical
degree of comparison may be supported by the following
considerations:
The actual meaning of formations like more difficult, (the) most
difficult does not differ from that of the degrees of comparison
larger, (the)largest. Qualitative adjectives, like difficult,
express properties which may be presented in different degrees, and
therefore they have degrees of comparison. The second view is that
the combinations more difficult, (the) most difficult are not the
analytical expression of the morphological category of comparison,
but free syntactic constructions. The reasons are the following: 1)
the more/ most combinations are semantically analogous to
combinations of less/least with the adjective which, in the general
opinion, are syntactic combinations of notional words; 2) the
most-combinations, unlike the synthetic superlative, can take the
indefinite article, expressing not the superlative, but the elative
meaning (i.e. a high, not the highest degree of the respective
quality).
The speaker launched a most significant attack on the Prime
Minister.
The most significant of the arguments in a dispute is not
necessarily the most spectacular one.
A most significant attack in the first example gives the idea of
rather a high degree of the quality, the phrase the most
significant of the arguments expresses exactly the superlative
degree of quality.Statives
Among the words signifying properties of a noun referent there
is a lexemic set which is considered by many scholars to be a
separate part of speech. These are words built up by the prefix a
and denoting different states, mostly of temporary duration, e.g.
afraid, adrift, ablaze. In traditional grammar these words were
generally termed predicative adjectives.
Later the English qualifying a-words were subjected to a
lexico-grammatical analysis and given the part- of-speech heading
the category of state or statives.
The part-of-speech interpretation of the Statives is not shared
by all linguists working in the domain of English.
The main meaning types conveyed by statives are:
The psychic state of a person (afraid, ashamed, aware)
The physical state of a person (astir, afoot)
The physical state of an object (afire, ablaze)
The state of an object in space (askew, awry, aslant)
Statives are not used in attributive preposition, but like
adjectives, they are distinguished by the left-hand categorical
combinability both with nouns and link-verbs.
The household was all astir.
The basic functions of the stative are the predicative and the
attribute, e.g. He soon fell asleep (predicative). A man alive to
social interests (attribute).
Statives do not take the synthetic forms of the degrees of
comparison. Of us all, Jack was the one most aware of the delicate
situation which we found ourselves.
The semantic and functional analysis shows that statives forming
a unified set of words, do not constitute a separate lexeme class
as the noun, the verb, the adverb, etc; rather it should be looked
upon as a subclass within the general class of adjectives.LECTURE
#5 THE VERBGrammatically the verb is the most complex part of
speech. It performs the predicvative function of the sentence. i.e.
the functions establishing the connection between the situation
namedin the utterance and reality.
The general cateforial meaning of the verb is process presented
dynamically, i.e. developing in time. E.g. I do love you, really I
do. The verb can be modified by the adverb and can take a different
object. E.g. Mr. Brown received the vistor instantly, which was
unusual.
In the sentence the finite verb performs the function of the
verb-predicate, expressing the categorial features of predication,
i.e. time, aspect, voice and mood. Structural classificationThe
verb stems may be simple, derived, sound-replacive,
stress-replacive composite and phrasal.
The original simple verb stems are not numerous, such as
verbsare go, take, read, etc. But conversion of the noun-verb type,
greatly enlarges the simple stem set of verbs, since it is the most
productive way of forming verbs in modern English. Cf.: a cloud to
cloud, a house-- to house, a man to man, a park to park, etc.
The sound-replace and stress-replaccive types of derivation are
unproductive. Cf.:food to feed, 'import to im'port, transport to
tras'port. Derivational verbsThe typical suffixes of the verb are:
-ate (cultivate), -en (broaden), -ify (clarify), -ize (normalize).
The verb-deriving prefixes are: be- (belittle, befriend), and
en-/em- (engulf, embed). Some other characteristic verbal prefixes
are: re- (remake), under- (undergo), over- (overestimate), sub-
(submerge), mis- (misunderstand), un- (undo), etc.
The composite (compound) verb stems correspond to the composite
non-verb stems from which they are etymologically derived. Here
belong the compounds of the conversion type (blackmail n. - to
blackmail v.) and of the back-formation type (baby-sitter n. - to
baby-sit v.) The phrasal verb stems occupy an intermediary position
between analytical forms of the verb and semantic word
combinations. Two types
The first is a combination of the head-verb have, give, take and
ocassionally some others with a noun. The combination has its
equivalent as an ordinary verb. Cf: to have a smoke to smoke, to
give a smile to smile, to take a stroll to stroll.
The second is a combination of a head-verb with a verbal
post-position that has a specificational value (phrasal verbs). Cf:
stand up, go on, give in, be off, get along, etc. Semantic and
lexico-grammatical classificationThe class of verbs falls into a
number of subclasses distinguished by different semantic and
lexico-grammatical features. On the upper level of division two
unequal sets are identified:
- the set of verbs of full nominative value (notional verbs)
- the set of verbs of partial nominative value (semi-notional
and functional verbs).
Notional verbs undergo the three main grammatically relevant
categorizations. The first is based on the relation of the subject
of the verb to the process denoted by the verb (subject-process
relation). The second is based on aspective characteristics of the
process denoted by the verb (aspective verbal semantics). The third
is based on the combining power of the verb in relation to other
notional words in the utterance (valency).
On the basis of the subject-process relation, all the notional
verbs can be divided into actional and statal.
Actional verbs express the action performed by the subject, i.e.
they present the subject as an active doer, e.g. do, act, perform,
make, go, read, learn, discover, etc. Statal verbs denote the state
of their subject, e.g. live, survive, suffer, worry, stand, see,
know, etc.
On the basis of aspective verbal semantics two subclasses of
verbs should be recognised in English: limitive and unlimitive. To
the subclass of limitive belong such verbs as arrive, come, leave,
find, start, stop, conclude, aim, drop, catch, etc. Here also
belong phrasal verbs with limitive postpositions, e.g. stand up,
sit down, get out, be off, etc. To the second subclass belong such
verbs as move, continue, sleep, work, behave, hope, stand, etc,
presenting a process as not limited by any border point.
According to valency the notional verbs should be classed as
complimentive and uncomplementive. Uncomplementive verbs fall into
two unequal subclasses of personal and impersonal verbs. The
personal uncomplementive verbs refer to the real subject of the
denoted process (work, start, pause, hesitate, act, function,
materialize, laugh, grow, etc). The subclass of impersonal verbs is
small and strictly limited. Here belong verbs mostly expressing
natural phenomena (rain, snow, freeze, drizzle, thaw, etc).
Complementive verbs are divided into the objective and adverbial
sets. The objective complimentive verbs are divided into
monocomplimentive verbs (taking one object-compliment) and
bicomplimentice verbs (taking two compliments). The examples of
monocomplimentive verbs are have, take, forget, enjoy, look at,
point to, belong to, relate to, etc. The bicomplimentive objective
verbs are explain, mention, devote, say, forgive, cooperate,
apologize for, pay for, remined of, tell about.
Adverbial complimentive verbs include two main subclasses. The
first is formed by verbs taking an adverbial compliment of place or
time (be, live, stay, go, ride, arrive). The second is formed by
verbs taking an adverbial compliment of manner (act, do, keep,
behave, get on). Semi-notional and functional verbs serve as
markers of predication in the proper sence, they show the
connection between the nominative content of the sentence and
reality. They include auxiliary verbs, modal verbs, semi-notional
verbid introducer verbs and link-verbs. Auxiliary verbs are be,
have, do, shall, will, should, would, may, might. Modal verbs are
used with the infinitive as predicative markers expressing
relational meanings of ability, obligation, permission,
advisability, ets. The modal verbs are can, may, must, shall, will,
ought, need, used (to), dare. The verbs be and have in the modal
meanings be planned, be obliged and the like are considered by many
modern grammarians as modal verbs and are included in the general
modal verb list. Semi-notional verbid introducer verbs are seem,
happen, turn out, try, fall, manage, begin, continue, stop, etc.
compare They began to fight and They began the fight. The verb in
the first sentence is a semi-notional predicator, the verb in the
second sentence is a notional transitive verb normally related to
its direct object. Link verbs introduce the normal part of the
predicate (the predicative) which is commonly expressed by a noun,
an adjective or a phrase of a similar semantico-grammatical
character. Two types1. Pure link-verb be2. Specifying
link-verbs
The specifying link-verbs fall into two main groups: those that
express perception and those that express non-perceptional, or
factual link-verb connection. The main perceptional link-verbs are
seem, appear, look, feel, taste; the main factual link verbs are
become, get, grow, remain, keep. Person and NumberThe categories of
person and number are closely connected with each other. The
expression of the category of person is confined to the singular
form of the verb in the present tense of the indicative mood and,
besides presented in the future tense. In the present tense the
expression of the category of person is divided into three peculiar
subsystems. The first subsystem includes the modal verbs that have
no personal inflexions: can, may, must, shall, ought, need, dare.
So, in the formal sense, the category of person is wholly
neutralized with these verbs, it is left unexpressed. The second
subsystem is made up by the unique verb be, which has three
different suppletive personal forms: am for the 1st person
singular, is for the 3rd person singular. Are can't be taken for
the specific positive mark of the second person for the simple
reason that it coincides with the plural all-person marking.
The third subsystem presents the regular, normal expression of
person. The personal mark is confined here to the third person
singular (e)s [-z, -s, -iz], the other two persons (the first and
the second) remaining unmarked, e.g. comes-come, blows-blow,
stops-stop, chooses-choose. The expression of grammatical number by
the English finite verb from the formally morphemic point of view
is hardly featured at all. The more or less distinct morphemic
featuring of the category of number can be seen only with the forms
of the unique be, both in the present tense and in the past tense.
(am-are, was-were). LECTURE #6 THE TENSES AND ASPECTS OF THE
VERBThe immediate expression of grammatical time, or tense (Lat
Tempus), is one of the typical functions of the finite verb. The
category of tense reflects the objective category of time and
expresses the relations between the time of the action and the time
of the utterance. In English there are three tenses (past, present
and future) represented by the forms wrote, writes, will write.
Some doubts have been expressed about the existence of a future
tense in English. Otto Jespersen denied the existence of a future
tense in English, because according to Jespersen the verbs shall
and will preserve their original meaning (shall an element of
obligation and will an element of volition). Thus, in Jespersen's
view, English has no wau of expressing pure futurity free from
modal shades of meaning. However, this reasoning is not convincing.
Thought the verbs shall and will mau in some context preserve their
original meaning, as a rule there are free from these shades of
meaning and express mere futurity in numerous examples. I am afraid
I will have to go back to the hotel.
So the three main divisions of time are represented in the
English verbal system by the three tenses. Each of them may appear
in the common and in the continuous aspect. Thus we get six
tense-aspect forms. Besides this six, there are two more, namely
future-in-the-past and future-continuous-in-the-past. They don't
easily fit into a system of tenses represented by a straight line
running out of the past into the future.
A different view of the English tense system has been put
forward by Prof. N. Irtenyeva. According to this view, the system
is divided into two halves: that of tense centring in the present
and that of tehse centring in the past. The former comprises the
present, present perfect, future, present cintinuous and present
perfect continuous. The letter comprises the past, past perfect,
future-in-the-past, past continuous, and past perfect
continuous.
Acccording to A. Korsakov English tenses are subdivided into
absolute and anterior, static and dynamic tenses. By dynamic tenses
he means what we call tenses of the continuous aspect, and by
anterior tenses what we call tenses of the perfect correlation. The
category of time correlationThe category of time correlation is
based on the opposition non-perfect/perfect. The main approaches*
The category of perfect is a peculiar tense category, a category
which should be classed as the categories present and past. This
view was held by Jesperson.
* The category of perfect is a peculiar aspect category. The
opposition is common aspect, perfect aspect or retrospective
aspect. This view was held by Prof. G. Vorontsova.
* The category of perfect is neither one of tense nor one of
aspect, but a specific category different from both. This view was
expressed by Prof. A. Smirnitsky who introduced a special term time
correlation.
* The perfect form presents an action as prior to some other
action (point, a period of time); it is the strong member of the
opposition.
* The non-perfect form denotes either a simultaneous or a
posterior action. But we cannot say that a perfect form always
precedes another action: the present perfect form can be used in
sentences which contains no mention of any other action.He has
broken a cup.
On the other hand, the use of a non-perfect form doesn't
necessarily imply that the action did not precede some moment in
time. I remember seeing you. The category of voiceThe category of
voice expresses the relations between the subject and the object of
the action. He invited his friends. He was invited by his friends.
The grammatical category of voice is represented by the opposition
of active and passive voices (invites - -is invited; is inviting is
being invited; invited was invited; has invited has been invited;
should invite should be invited). The passive form is the strong
member of the opposition. In colloquial speech the role of the
passive auxiliary may be performed by get or become. Arguable
question:
* At various times the following three voices have been
suggested in addition:
- the reflexive, as in He dressed himself,
- the reciprocal, as in They greeted each other, and
- the middle voice, as in The door opened.The category of
aspect
The category of aspect is a grammatical category showing the
manner in which the action is either performed or represented. In
English this category consists of two constituents, the common and
the continuous aspect. They form a binnary opposition, the unmarked
member of the opposition (common aspect) being opposed to the
marked member (continuous aspect): call - ------ +be calling. The
categorial meaning of aspect indicates that the speaker wants to
attract attention to the process/state described in the sentence
itself. The strong member of the opposition is a continuous form,
which presents an action as a process developinf at a certain
moment or a limited period of time: These flats are being built so
fast that they are changing the profile of the city. The common
aspect just names the action: Look at the way he walks. As a rule
the contionuous form is not used with verbs, denoting abstract
relations, such as belong, and those denoting sense perception or
emotion, e.g. see, hear, hope, think, love. But there are numerous
examples of their usage in the continuous form. In this case they
change the meaning of the verb which comes to denote either an
activity (I am thinking of him. I think, you're right) or the
temporary character of the state. (You're being silly!).
G.O. Curme (A Grammar of the English Language) distinguish 4
aspects: durative aspect, point-action aspect which he subdivided
into ingressive anf effective, terminative aspect and iterative
aspect. Durative aspect represents the action as continuing. He is
eating. Point-action aspects call attention, not to an act as a
whole, but to only one point, either the beginning or the final
point. The ingressive type is often expressed by begin, start, in
connection with the infinitive or get, grow, fall, turn, become,
run, set, take in connection with a predicate adjective,
participle, noun or a prepositional phrase. He awoke early. He
often gets sick. Effective type of point-action aspect directs the
attention to the final point of the activity or state. The two
friends fell out. He knocked him out. Terminative aspect indicates
an action as a whole. He handed me a book. I overlooked this item
in my calculation. Iterative aspect indicates an indefinitely
prolonged succession. He pooh-poohs at everything. He threw his
head back and haw-hawed. The category of moodMood shows the degree
of reality or possibility of an action. The verbal category of mood
serves to express the speaker's attitude towards the factuality of
a state-of-affairs as real, existing in fact, or as hypothetical,
i.e. not necessarily real. The definition given by Academician V.
Vinogradov is the following : mood expresses the relation of the
action to reality, as stated by the speaker. Generally two groups
of moods are distinguished: the real or fact moods and the unreal
or non-fact, oblique moods. The indicative is the only real mood in
the English language. It represents an action as a real fact. The
forms of the Indicative mood are the tense-aspect forms of the
verb. There are two non-fact moods in English: the Imperative and
the Subjunctive. The Imperative mood is represented by one form
only, without any suffix or ending. It expresses advice, request,
recommendation, order and so on. Leave me alone! The Subjunctive
mood represents an action as unreal. I wish I had known it.
Another approach is that the category of mood consistrs of three
constituents, the Indicative and the Subjunctive I and II. They
form a binary apposition, the unmarked member (indicative) being
opposed to the marked member, which appears in two variants
(subjunctive I and II):
call - -------- + call 0 (no -s/tense, correlation, aspect)
call -ed
The categorial meaning of mood indicates the hypothetical nature
of the states-of-affairs described as seen from the speaker's point
of view.
The boss insisted that Tom arrive at eight sharp. (Subj I)
She suggested that I be the cook. (Subj I)
It's time John went on a diet. (Subj II)
I wish I had thought of him before. (Subj II)
The function of the unmarked form negates this categorial
meaning in that it indicates the reality of the
state-of-affairs.
Prof. Smirnitsky proposed a system of six moods.Indicative. He
came there. The sun rises in the East. Imperative. Read the letter.
Go there. Subjunctive I (be/go for all persons). I suggest that he
go there. If it be so. Subjunctive II (were for all persons, and
forms knew, had known). I wish I were present. If I knew... If I
had known...Suppositional (analytical forms should/would +
infinitive) Should you meet him, tell him to come. I suggest that
he/you should go there.
Conditional (analytical forms should/would + infinitive in the
main clause of unreal condition sentences) What would you answer if
you were asked?OTHER WAYS OF EXPRESSING MODALITY.Lexical-syntactic
means combination of modal verbs may/might, can/could, must,
should, will/would, ought to, etc with the infinitive. (Don't wait
up for me, because I might be late. If anything could happen I can
take care of myself). Lexical means modal words maybe, perhaps,
possibly, probably (Perhaps he has something on his conscience, and
wants advice) and the other words (nouns, adjectives, verbs) of
modal semantics, which introduce subordinate clauses and acts as
predicators (wish, it's time, possible, probable, change,
possibility, etc). It's time we were moving. It's possible there
might be large changes around here. Syntactic types of sentences
and subordinate clauses (imperative, clauses introduced by
conjunctions as if/as though, conditional, etc) Take it easy! She
really looks sometimes as if she isn't all there. Different
combinations of the above means.
Intonation, prosody. LECTURE #7 Syntax. Phrase
Syntax (from Greek syntaxis arrangement) is a study of the
arrangement, or connection of words. Here we should distinguish two
levels: that of phrases (or word-groups) and that of sentences.
No unity in opinion
Accoerding to Russian linguists the term word-combinatin can be
applied to such groups of words which contain at least two notional
words, forming a grammatical unit, e.g. fine weather, to speak
English fluently, etc.
Western scholars have a different view of the problem. They
consider every combination of two or more words which constitutes a
unit to be a phrase. They don't limit the term phrase to
combination of notional words only and draw a sharp distinction
between the two types of word groups such as: wise men and in the
morning.
According to H.Sweet when words are joined together
grammatically and ogically without forming a full sentence, we call
the combination a word-group. According to Pr. Ilyish, a phrase is
any combination of two or more words which is a grammatica unit but
not a n analytical form of some word (as, for instance the perfect
forms of verbs). The constituent element of a phrase may belong to
any part of speech.
Difference between a phrase and sentence
A sentence is a basic unit of communication. A phrase is a unit
of nomination.
A pharse has no intonation just as a word has none. Intonation
is one of the most significant features of a sentence, which
distinguishes it from a phrase.
A classical word-group is a non-predicative unit, because a
word-group does not carry predication (only sentence can carry
it).
A word group is a static explanation, a sentence carries some
dynamic force.
Each component of a phrase can undergo grammatical changes
according to grammatical categories represented in it. In the
phrase write letters the first component can change its tense or
mood and the second component its number.
With the sentence things are entirely different. A sentence is a
unit wih every word having is definite form. A change in the form
of one or more words would produce a new sentence.
Classification of phrases
According to Henry Sweet the most general relation between words
in sentences from a logical point of view is that of adjunct-word
and head-word, or we may also express it of modifier and modified.
Thus in the sentences tall men are not always strong, all men are
not strong, tall and all are adjunct-words modifying the meaning of
the head-word men.
This distinction between adjunct-word and head-word is only a
relative one: the same word may be a head-word in one sentence or
context, and an adjunct-word in another, and thw same word may even
be a head-word and an adjunct-word at the same time. Thus in he is
very strong, strong is an adjunct-word to he, and at the same time
head-word to the adjunct-word very, which again, may itself be a
head-word, as in he is not very strong.
E. Kruisinga's classification
In Kruisinga's grammar we find an elaboration of the same
principle in his theory of close and loose word-groups (a Handbook
of Present-Day English). We speak of a close group when one of the
memebers is syntactically the leading element of the group. We
speak of a loose group when each element is comparatively
independent of the other members (men and women).
Close groups are subdivided according to their leading member
into:
verb groups (you can go; finished undressing; to hear a noise;
he goes);
noun groups (a village church, Mary's dress);
adjective groups (very beautiful);
adverb groups (very well);
prepositional groups (in the morning).
Loose syntactic groups are subdivided into linking groups (five
and twenty) and unlinked groups (a low soft breathing). O.
Jespersen's classification
Syntactic theory of Otto Jespersen comprises the concept of
junction and nexus (i.e. of attributive and predicative relations)
as we as the theory of ranks, applied both to relations between the
members of a word-group and he parts of a sentence. In a junction
the joining of the two elements is so close that they may be
considered as one composite name.
A silly person fool
The warmest season - summer
A very tall person - a giant.
The nexux is indipendent and forms a whole sentence, i.e. give a
complete bit of information. The door is red. The dog is barks.
We can also establish different ranks of words according to
their mutual relations as defined or defining. In the combination
extremely hot weather the last word weather, which is evidently the
chief idea, may be called primary; hot which defines weather
secondary and extremely, which defines hot, tertiary.
M. Bloch's classification
Prof. Bloch singes out three types of phrase:Notional phrases:
traffic rules, to go fast, John and Mary, he writes, etc. Formative
phrases: at the table, with difficulty, out of sight, etc.
Functional phrases: from out f, so that, up to, etc.
S.G. Barkhudarov's classificationAccording to Barkhudarov a
phrase is a combination of two or more notional words, connected by
means of subordination, coordination and predicative relation if it
cannot function as a sentence. He distinguished coordinate word
groups, subordinate word groups and predicative word groups.
Coordinate word groups are groups of words, which have the same
function, they are joined together either syndetically or
asyndetically (you and me, Mary and Peter, The spidery, dirty,
ridiculous business!).
Subordinate word gropus always have the head and tha adjunct.
They are further classified according to the way the headword is
expressed into: Nounal word groups (mild weather, a country
doctor)Adjectival word groups (dark red, very strong, very
nice)Verbal word groups (to hear a noise, to write a
letter)Adverbial word groups (very wel, pretty easiy, very
suddenly).
A predicative word group is a special kind of word group with
predicative relations between the nominal and the verbal parts (not
the general predication of the sentence but a secondary one is
meant). Here belong five main types of complexes:
The Complex Object (I want you to do smth)
The Complex Subject
The For-phrase
The Gerundial Complex
The Absolute Nominative Participial ConstructionL. Bloomfield's
classificationLeonardi Bloomfield (April 1, 1887 April 18, 1949)
distinguishes two main classes of phrases: endocentric phrases
(containing a head: word or centre) and exocentric phrases
(non-headed).
Phrase Endocentric (headed)Exocentric (non-headed)
Subordination Poor JohnCoordinationMary and PeterSyntacti
predicate relationsJohn ran awayMorphological prepositional
phrasebeside John
The difference between endocentric and exocentric phrases
The head word of an endocentric phrase can stand for the whoe
phrase in a larger construction.
In the sentence Poor John ran away, the noun John may substitute
for Poor John. In the sentence Mary and Tom ran away, both Tom and
Mary may stand for the whole phrase: Mary ran away, Tom ran away.
Thus, the phrases Poor John and Mary and Tom are endocentric.
The constituents of exocentric phrases can't stand for the whole
group in a larger structure: John ran, beside John.
In the sentence Poor John ran away you can omit either John or
ran.
Modern approach to the classification of the phraseAccording to
the modern approach phrases are subdivided into headed and
non-headed. Headed phrases have the head and the anjunct. They are
futher classifies according to:
1) the distribution of the anjunct into: progressive (right-hand
distribution of the adjust), e.g. to write a letter, a candidate to
the prize and regressive (left-hand distribution of the adjunct),
e.g. a country doctor, mild weather.
2) the way the head-word is expressed into:Nounal or
sunstantival, e.g. sport eventAdjectival, e.g. very
beautifulVerbal, e.g. to write a letterAdverbia, e.g. very
wellNon-headed phrases are divided into:
1) independent (the constituents are relatively independent),
e.g. Mary and John, he writes and dependent (the constituents
depend on the context), e.g. my own (dog), his old (friend).
2) one-class (constituents belong to the same part of speech),
e.g. Oxford and Cambridge and different-class phrases (the
constituents belong to different parts of speech), e.g. I see.
Syntactic relations between words (components) of a word
group
The main syntactic reations between components of a phrase are
coordination, subordination, interdependenc and cummuation.
In coordination the constituents of a phrase are interdependent
of each other and we can change their paces, e.g. Mary and John
(John and Mary), boys and girls (girls and boys).
In subordination we have the head and the adjunct, and the
adjunct is subordinated to the head. Such syntactic reations are
found in a headed phrases, e.g. beautiful girl, county doctor.
Interdependenc is reations between subject and predicate. The
constituents are interdependent; the subject depends on a predicate
and visa versa, e.g. he smies, I knew. The forth main type of
syntactic reations in a phrase is cummuation, which can be found in
non-headed dependent phrases, e.g. my old (friend), his own (dog).
The difference between cummulation and coordination is that in
coordination you can change the places of the constituents but in
cummulation you cannot do that.
To additional types of syntactic reations in a phrase refer
agreement, government, and enclosure.
By agreement we mean a method of expressing a syntactical
reationship, which consists in making the subordinate word take a
form simiar to that of the word to which it is sunordinate. In
Modern English this can refer only to the category of number: a
subordinate word agrees in number with its head-word. It can be
found in two words only this and that, which agree in number with
their headword.
The verb agrees in number with a noun or pronoun in the 3rd
person singular. He studies Grammar. But not aways. The United
Nations is an international organisation, or My family are early
risers. Such sentences prove that there is no agreement of the verb
with the noun.
By government we understand the use of a certain form of the
subordinate word required by its head word, but not coinciding with
the form of the head word itself.
The role of government in Modern English is almost
insignificant. The only thing that may be termed government in
Modern English is the use of the objective case of personal pronoun
and of the pronoun who when they are subordinate to a verb or
follow a preposition (invite him, saw him).
There is another means of expressing which plays a significant
part in Modern English. Is may be called enclosure. The most widey
known case of enclosure is the putting of a word between an article
and noun to which this refers to. A beautifu girl, the country
doctor.
LECTURE 8. Pragmatics
Pragmatics is a systematic way of explaining language use in
context. It seeks to explain aspects of meaning which cannot be
found in the plain sense of words or structures, as explained by
semantics. As a field of language study, pragmatics is fairly new.
Its origins lie in phylosophy of language and the American
philosophycal school of pragmatism. As a discipline within language
science, its roots lie in the work of (Herbert) Paul Grice on
conver5ational implicature and the cooperative principle, and on
the work of Stephen Levinson, Penelope Brown and Geoff Leech on
politeness.
Pragmatics includes:speech act theory
felicity conditions
conversational implicature
the cooperative principle
conversational maxims
relevance
politeness
phatic tokens
deixis.
Speech actsWe use language all the time to make things happen.
We ask someone to pass the salt or marry us. We order a pizza or
make a dental appointment. Speech acts include asking for a glass
of beer, promising to drink the beer, threatening to drink more
beer, ordering someone else to drink some beer, and so on. Some
special people can do extraordinary things with words, like
baptizing a baby, declaring war, awarding a penalty kick,
sentencing a convict.
Linguists have called these acts speech acts and developed a
theory called speech act theory to explain how they work. Merely
saing the words doesn't accomplish the act. Judges (unless they are
also referees) cannot aword penalty kicks, and football referees
(unless they are also heads of state) cannot declare war. Speech
act theory is not the whole of pragmatics, but is perhaps currently
the most important establised part of the subject.
The philisopher J.L. Austin (1911-1960) claims that many
uterances (things people say) are equivalent to actions. When
someone says I name this ship... or I now pronounce you man and
wife, the utterance creates a new social or phsychological reality.
Speech act theory broadly explains these utterances as having three
parts or aspects: locutionary, illocutionary and perlocutionary
acts.
Locutionary acts are simply the speech acts that have taken
place.
Illocutionary acts are the real actions which are performed by
the utterance, where saying equals doing, as in betting, plighting
one's troth, welcoming and warning.
Perlocutionary acts are the effects of the utterance on the
listener, who accepts the bet or pledge of marriage, is welcomed or
warned.
Some linguists are attempted to classify illocutionary acts into
a number of categories or types. J.R. Searle gives five such
categories: representatives, directives, commissives, expressives
and declarations.
Representatives: here the speaker asserts a proposition to be
true, using such verbs as: affirm, believe, conclude, deny,
report.
Directives: here the speaker triesto make the hearer do
something, with such words: ask, beg, challenge, command, dare,
invite, insist, request.
Commissives: here the speaker commits himself to a (future)
course of action, with verbs such as: guarantee, pledge, promise,
swear, vow, undertake, warrant.
Expressives: the speaker expresse an attitude to or about a
state of affairs, using such verbs as: apologize, appreciate,
congratulate, deplore, detest, regret, thank, welcome.
Declarations: the speaker alters the external status or
condition of an object or situation, solely by making the
utterance: I now pronounce you man and wife, I sentence you to be
hanged by the neck until you be dead, I name this ship...
Pragmatic types of sentences according to O.G.
Pocheptsovconstative
directive
guestion
promissive
menacive
performative.
Felicity conditionspreparatory conditions
conditions for execution
sincerity conditions
They take their name from a Latin root felix or happy. They are
conditions needed for success or achievement of a speech act. E.g.
only certain people are qualified to declare war, baptize people or
sentence convicted felons.
Preparatory conditions the status or authority of the speaker to
perform the speech act, the situation of other parties and so on.
e.g.
In the UK only monarch can dissolve parliament.
In the case of marrying, there are other conditions that neither
of the couple is already married, that they make their own speech
acts, and so on.
Conditions for execution
External circumstances must be suitable, e.g. Can you give me a
lift? requires that the hearer has a motor vehicle, is able to
drive it somewhere and that the speaker has a reason for
request.
Sincerity conditionsIn some cases, the speaker must be sincere
(as in apologizing or vowing).
Conversational implicature
In a series of lectures at Harvard University in 1967, the
English language philosopher H.P. (Paul) Grice outlined an approach
to what he termed conversational implicature how hearers manage to
work out the complete message when speakers mean more than they
say. e.g. Have you got any cash on you? where the speaker really
wants the hearer to understand the meaning: Can you lend me some
money? I don't have much on me.
The conversational implicature is a message that is not found in
the plain sense of the sentence. The speaker implies it. The hearer
is able to infer (work out, read between the lines) this message in
the utterance, by appealing to the rules governing successful
conversational interaction. P. Grice proposed that implicatures
like the second sentence can be calculated from the first, by
understanding three things:
1. the usual linguistic meaning of what is said.
2. contextual information (shared or general knowledge)
3. the assumption that the speaker is obeying what P. Grice
calls the cooperative principle.Conversational maxims and the
cooperative principle
The success of a conversation depends upon the various speakers'
approach to the interaction. The way in which people try to make
conversations work is sometimes called the cooperative
principle.
Paul Grice proposes that in ordinary conversation, speakers and
hearers share a cooperative principle. Speakers shape their
uterances to be understood by hearers. The principle can be
explained by four underlying rules or maxims which are called
conversational maxims or Gricean maxims.
They are the maxims of quality, quantity, relevance and manner.
Quality: speakers should be truthful. They should not say what they
think is false, or make statements for which they have no evidence.
Quantity: a contribution should be as informative as is required
for the conversation to proceed. It should be neither too little,
nor too much. Relevance: speakers' contributions should relate
clearly to the purpose of the exchange. Manner: speakers'
contributions should be clear, orderly and brief, avoiding
obscurity and ambiguity.
The politeness principle
The politeness principle is a series of maxims, which Geoff
Leech has proposed as a way of explaining how politeness operates
in conversational exchanges. Leech defines politeness as forms of
behavior that establish and maintain comity. That is the ability of
participants in a social interaction to engage in interaction in an
atmosphere of relative harmony.
Leech's maxims
Tact maxim (in directives and commissives): minimise cost to
other; [maximise benefit to other]Generosity maxim (in directives
and commissives): minimise benefit to self; [maximise cost to
self]Approbation maxim (in expressives and representatives):
minimise dispraise of other; [maximise praise of other]Modesty
maxim (in expressives and representatives): minimise praise of
self; [maximise dispraise of self]Agreement maxim (in
representatives): minimise disagreement between self and other;
[maximise agreement between self and other]Sympathy maxim (in
representatives): minimise antipathy between self and other;
[maximise sympathy between self and other]
Phatic tokens
These are ways of showing status by orienting comments to
oneself, to the other, or to the general or prevailing situation
(in England this is usually the weather). Self-oriented phatic
tokens are personal to the speaker: I'm not up to this or My feet
are killing me. Other-oriented tokens are related to the hearer: Do
you work here? or You seem to know what you are doing. A neutral
token refers to the context r general state of affair: Cold, isn't
it? or Lovely flowers.
DeixicAccording to Stephen Levinson: Deixic concerns the ways in
which languages encode...features of the context of utterance...
and thus also concerns ways in which the interpretation of
utterances depends on the analysis of that context of
utterance.
The linguistic forms of this pointing are called deictic
expressions, deictic markers or deictic words.
Deictic expressions include such lexemes as:
personal or possessive pronouns (I, you, mine, yours)
demonstrative pronouns (this, that)
spatial/temporal adverbs (here, there, now)
other pro-forms (so, do)
articles (the).
Deixis refers to the world outside a text.
LECTURE 9. Composite sentence
The modern approach to the composites is that it is a syntactic
unit having more than one predicative line (s predicate groups).
The term composite was introduced by H. Poutsma, thus we got the
thrichotomic division of sentences into simple? Compound and
complex (together the composite).
Compound sentence
One of the usual approachesto a compound sentence is that it is
a sentence, whoseparts are independent to such an extent that Ch.
Fries considers a compound sentence just a matter of intonation and
pronounciation, and the difference between a simple sentence and a
part of a compound sentence is just punctuational. The parts of the
composite sentences are clauses.
The compound sentence is a sentence which consists of two or
more independent clauses connected by means of coordination,
e.g.She was tired and we decided to stay at home.
The clauses of a compound sentence may be connected syndetically
(by means of coordinating conjunctions or conjunctive adverbs) and
asyndetically (without any conjunction or adverbs).
There are four types of syndetic cordination in a compound
sentence1) copulative ()
and, not only...but, both, neither...nor, norI neither want to
stay at home, nor do I want to go to the mountains. 2) disjunctive
()
or, either...or, or else, otherwiseEither I do it or I'll punish
you! 3) adversative ()but, yet, still, however, nevertheless,
whereas, whileShe was tired yet she helped me. 4)
causative-consecutive (-)
for (.., ), therefor, so, accordingly, then, henceI don't see
anything for it is dark. Complex sentence
A complex sentence consists of a principal clause and one or
more subordinate clauses. Clauses in a complex sentence may be
linked in two ways:
1) syndetically, i.e. by means of subordinating conjunctions or
connectives.
There is a difference between a conjunction and a connective. A
conjunction only serves as a formal element connecting separate
clauses, whereas a connective serves as a connecting link and has
at the same time a syntactic function in the subordinate clause it
introduces. More and more, she become convinced that some
misfortune had overtaken Paul (conjunction).All that he had sought
for and achieved seemed suddenly to have no meaning
(connective).
2) asyndetically, i.e. without a conjunction or connective. I
wish you had come earlier.
A subordinate clause may follow, precede, or interrupt the
principal clause. His steps quickened as he set out for the hotel.
As the family had no visitors that day, its four members dined
alone together.
It was dull and dreary enough, when the long summer evening
closed in, on that Saturday night.
A complex sentence may contain two or more homogeneous clauses
coordinated with each other. They were all obstinately of opinion
that the poor girl had stolen the moonstone, and that she had
destroyed herself in terror of being found out.
A subordinate clause may be subordinated to the principal clause
or to another subordinate clause. Accordingly we distinguish
subordinate clauses of the first, second, third, etc. degree of
subordination. I think I have noticed that they have an
inconsistent way of speaking about her, as she had made some great
self-intere