Chaire Galaxies et Cosmologie The black hole at the center of our Galaxy Françoise Combes
Chaire Galaxies et Cosmologie
The black hole at the center of our e b ac o e at t e ce te o ouGalaxy
Françoise Combes
Our galaxy: the Milky WayBlack hole
100 000 light-years
Images in optical, infra-redg
Bar
Peanut-shapeBulge
2MASS
Zoom towards the galactic center in infraredZoom towards the galactic center, in infrared3 107 stars/pc3
Eckart et al
Shows a density cusp towards the Center50°, dust lane 300 bright stars, in 1 light-year
Galactic nucleus – in Radio
Size 4°=560pc=1700ly
Sagittarius A (Sgr A*) defines the Galactic center. It is a bright radio source (VLA) SNR = Supernova remnant
Galactic center CompositeGalactic center – Composite
The Galactic center in X-rays infrared RadioThe Galactic center in X-rays, infrared, RadioVery complex structure, filaments, supernovae bubbles, molecular
clouds, star formation?clouds, star formation?X-rays come from binaries, SNR, but also hot diffuse gas
6
Galactic center – in X-rays
Size 400 x 900 ly SgrA*
Color=energyRed= lowBlue= high Size 400 x 900 lyBlue high
The Galactic center in X-rays, by the Chandra satellite Hundreds of white dwarfs, neutron stars, stellar black holes + hot gas
(qq106°) which partly escapes 7
Astrometry and proper motions t th l ti tat the galactic center
1 light year 20 light days
VLT- adaptive optics
Adaptive optics effectsAdaptive optics effects
Corrects the effects of atmosphericturbulence
0.24ly
Galactic nucleus – in Infrared
Ra= GM/Vb2
= 0.5pc 0.05pc0 15l=0.15ly
=55 light days
The stars rapidly rotating around a point mass, with Keplerianorbits. Sagittarius A*
Animation of stars motions, in the center of the Milky Way
A complete orbit: S2p
19922010
1992
M= 4.30(±0.20)stat(0.30)sys x106 M
R = 8 28 (±0 15) (±0 29) kpc
2001SgrA*
R0= 8.28 (±0.15)stat(±0.29)sys kpc
2002
2001SgrA
Ghez et al. 2008, Gillessen et al. 2009a,b
Infrared flare of the Galactic black hole
1.7microns, NACO, VLT, 30min, May 2003
Discovery of a gas cloud in 2011Discovery of a gas cloud in 2011m
/s)
esse
(km
Vite
Distance to the black hole in arcsec (=0.1 ly)
Orbit of the gas5cloud (10-5 Mo)
137 years of period
How did the gas arrive there?
Destruction of a star by tidal forces?
Simulations of thestretch of the gas cloudst etc o t e gas c oudon its orbit
The last images (26 March 2015)g ( )
The cloud has survived the pericenter in May 2014The cloud has survived the pericenter in May 2014 There exists a star at the center
Interaction and merger with Andromeda
Perspectives for the Milky Way…In a few Gyrs
Merger of the black holes
gravitationnalwaves
Around SgrA*, star clusters• DBXX-YY Star clusters in the galactic center, in X-ray
CNR: circumnuclear ringMi i i l 60M2-3pc in radius
HCN in orangeI i d i
Mini-spiral 60M
Cavity 200M
CNR 106M
20
Ionizd gas in greenInclination of 20° /plane
7 104 cm-3
300K
Blue : ionized diffuse gasBlue : ionized diffuse gasCC: central cavitySupernova remnant (SNR) and halo
I d th d l lIn red, the dense moleculargas, in CNR and a seriesof clouds (EC, SC),of clouds (EC, SC),
MR: Molecular RidgeNR North Ridge, etc.
Star formationand feedback
21
and feedback
From Ferrière (2012)
Radio emission in the galactic centergAlthough L= 10-9 LEddington, SgrA* is a radio source
22Mini-spiral of ionized gas
Non-thermal radio filaments, synchrotron, yFilaments can be very thin, often perpendicular to theGalactic plane but not alwaysGalactic plane, but not alwaysDuring 20 years, the magnetic field was imagined poloïdal
But the formation of young stars is dominating
23
Processusocessus• Galactic B field, reconnections,• Ejection of ionized gas, magnetized by the black hole • Interactions with molecular clouds
• In fact, mean B field is weak, but strong turbulence, strong vorticity, g y
• Simulations: life-time of vortex 106-7 years, re-amplification of B field
• Characteristic scale 10pc
24Federrath 2015
Zoom inside the molecular ringg
25Genzel et al 2010
The paradox of young stars p y gclose to the black hole
1 light year
1
IRS16 SW (Ofpe/LBV)
The paradox of young stars close to the black hole
0
1close to the black hole
2.04 2.06 2.08 2.10 2.12 2.14 2.16 2.18 2.20
wavelength (m)
0
0.1
IRS16SE2 (WN5/6)
-0.1
2.05 2.10 2.15 2.20 2.25 2.30 2.35 2.40
wavelength (m)
1 0
0.9
1.0
1 light year2.10 2.15 2.20
The paradox of young stars close to the black holeclose to the black hole
~180 OB stars in the central parsec !
They could account for the fluxes in FIR, UV & EUV of the galactic center and for the excitation/ionisation of the HII region of SgrA West g g
1 light year
The paradox of young stars close to the black holeclose to the black hole
They show anThey show an ordered motion
1 light year
The paradox of young stars close to the BHTo form stars, one needs a cloud dense enough not to bedistroyed by tidal forces
nRoche ~6 1010 (R/0.1pc)-3 cm-3
But the gas density is much lower!
Formation in a dense accretion diskStars rejuvenated by collision?Migration after formation far from center?Migration, after formation far from center?
Two disks, warped and thick, or a more complex structure?
Mass versus distance at the centerEckart & Genzel 1999: the nuclear star cluster is not sufficient• Today M(BH) = 4 106M (Chatzopoulos et al 2015)Today M(BH) 4 10 M (Chatzopoulos et al 2015)
31
Distribution of stars at the center• One observes the stellar
cusp predicted by theoryS cusp predicted by theory (Young 1980) in r-7/4
• But with variations
100
csec
-2)
S-starsred clumpdepth
according to stellar types• Young and blue stars form
10
y (s
tars
arc
B
ga cusp at the center
• But not the old and red 1
ace
dens
ity
O/WR late
ones0.1
tella
r sur
fa
AGB • Old stars 106 M
• Young1.5 104 M
0.01
1 10
st AGB
32
1 10
distance from SgrA* (arcseconds)
High velocity stars• Passage of a binary star close to the BH• Prediction of Hills (1988) 1st observation in 2005 by W BrownPrediction of Hills (1988), 1 observation in 2005 by W. Brown
Stars at V > 1000km/sescape the Galaxy
Not to be confused withthe « runaway » starscoming from the diskcoming from the disk( ~400km/s)
Hyper Velocity Stars = HVSHyper Velocity Stars = HVS
33Hills 1988, Yu & Tremaine 2003, Brown 2005, 2015
High velocity stars• Capture processus of Hills, ejection rate of 10-4/yr (Zhang 2013)
Rbt: binary tidal radius
Rt tidal radius for anindividual star
Proba of 75% of ejectionwith high velocity of the binaryY
(AU
)
of 2x 3 MoSeparation a= 0.5AU
For a peri-apse of 30 AU
(r) = 8/r2 per kpc3
34
(r) 8/r per kpc
X (AU)
HVS: hyper velocity starsyp y
Predicted ejection rate 10-4 /yr ~103 HVS in 100 kpc
Brown et al. 2005, 2006, 2008, 2010, Hills 1989, Yu & Tremaine 2003
p
Different processus produce different distributions of HVS
36
Is SgrA* the actual center of the Galaxy? VLBI precise positionningVLBI precise positionning
Here is seen the Sun motion, ,with respect to QSO SgrA* is fixed, at rest
Milli-arcsec scale
The Sun rotation around theGalactic center is in 200 MyryThe motion is seen in a fewweeks
37The position of Sagittarius A* in the sky at various epochs with respect to remote quasars, Reid et al 2004, 2009
Is SgrA* really compact? VLBI at several wavelengths 5 to 43 GHzVLBI at several wavelengths, 5 to 43 GHz
The image of SgrA* isg gsmoothed, due to the ionizedmedium along the line of sight
Effect varies in -2
At high fréquency, the scatteringIs less5 -43 GHz corresponds to6cm -0.7 cm
38The shape of Sagittarius A* in the sky at various wavelengths
Size of SgrA* at =1.3mmg
I d h b d• In red, the observed size follows thescattering in -2
Size (mas)
scattering in -2
I i t i i iIn green, intrinsic size, which begins to dominate at 1.3mmdominate at 1.3mm
Size=35 as = 0 3 AUSize 35 as 0.3 AU~size of the black hole
shadowshadow
39Wavelength (cm)
Size of SgrA* and variabilityg y
Si d• Size corrected from scattering -2
Si 0 1 1A
Major axis
Minor axisSize 0.1 mas = 1AU,
150 millions of km
The shadow of the BH, about 5 times Rs =about 5 times Rs = 40 millions km
Close to the BH!Close to the BH!
40
Shadow of the SgrA* black hole
• Different models of emission around SgrA*( d 1)• (supposed << 1)
• The shadow d t h tcorresponds to photons
swallowed by the BH (image by the lens of(image by the lens of the horizon)
• The size of the shadow is always comparable
• Falcke et al 200041
Visibility of the SgrA* black holeGas in freefall
mm-VLBIModel i=45° 0.6 mm 1.3mm
a=12
falll
Em~r-2
Falcke et al 2000Unit GM/c2 = 3as
x y
42
a=0Em=cst
GRAVITY at VLTI• The instrument will become operationnal in 2016
I f d i f b d K (2 2 ) b 4 fi d UT f 8• Infrared interferometry, band K (2.2) between 4 fixed UT of 8m, and the mobile auxiliary telescopes AT (1.8m)
• Eq i alent to an instr ment of base 180m• Equivalent to an instrument of base 180m • 5as precision, for K=15 in a few minutes
E l ti f l ti i ti t ll bit d b i ht t th l t• Exploration of relativistic stellar orbits and bright spots on the last stable orbit, etc…
43
Scenarios to probe with GRAVITY
M i i f l i h• Magnetic reconnection of clumps in the jet
• Bright spots in orbit around the BH• Bright spots in orbit around the BH• Fluctuations of the disk
44Hamaus 2008
Combination of thebeams by opticalfibres in thefibres in thetunnels
45
Event Horizon Telescope EHTEHT
• EHT is the combination of millimetric telescopes with ALMA• EHT is the combination of millimetric telescopes, with ALMAOperating in VLBI allover the world
d l f h li h i di d f bl k h lModel of the light ring, predicted for a Kerr black holea~0.9 to 0.94, i=50-60°The ring becomes an arc: deflection of light rays and relativistic
46
The ring becomes an arc: deflection of light rays, and relativisticDoppler boost (Ricarte & Dexter 2015)
Spectrum of SgrA* with jetSpectrum of SgrA with jet• The synchrotron emission becomes optically thick, at low
frequency
Falcke et al 2011
47
a c e et a 0
Spectrum of SgrA* and ADAF model • ADAF model for the quiet state of SgrA*, Yuan et al (2003)• Synchrotron (--) Compton - -) + free-free = Total (______)Synchrotron ( ) , Compton . ), + free free Total ( )
21cm 100opt UV X ADAF= Ad ection21cm 100opt UV X ADAF= AdvectionDominated Accretion Flow10-5-10-6 M/yr
flare
Inside the Bondi radius
RB ∼ 105RS ≈ 0.04 pc ≈ 1’’, B Swhere the gas thermal energy is equal to its potential energy in the gravitational field of the t e g a tat o a e d o t eblack hole
With outflow: RIAF
48
With outflow: RIAFRadiatively Inefficient Accretion Flow
Spectrum during a flare• Spectrum of SgrA* multiplied by 100 in NIR and X-rays, but
inchanged in radioNIR f h i i f l h d i• NIR comes from synchrotron emission, from electrons heated in a transient fashion, as well as X-rays (at top)
• C ld l f I C t th ( iddl )• Could also come from Inverse Compton, e- on the mm (middle)• Or Synchrotron Self Compton (e- on themselves, bottom)
49
Flares in X-rays and NIR of SgrA*• Origin is still mysterious• Matter ejection (jet) bright knots on the last stable orbit orMatter ejection (jet), bright knots on the last stable orbit, or
fluctuations on the accretion disk• Ponti et al (2015) 80 flares in X-rays( ) y• An outburst during the few months after the passage of G2 at
pericenterp• Increase by a factor 3.7 of the luminosity of SgrA* in 2013-14 • These variations of flares and luminosity is typical of quiescent y yp q
black holes
50
Flares at various • Simultaneity, or time delay: X-ray and NIR simultaneous, Radio delay• Flares more frequent in NIR. Duration typically 30min
Fl bFlares can beinterpreted as anadiabatic expansion
Pure synchrotron emissionwith n= 106.5 cm-3
+Synchrotron Self-ComptonSSC 107.5 cm-3
Turn over at 300-400GHzLorentz factor = 103
51Eckart et al 2012
Model of flare, with bright spots, g p• Simulation of light rays, and lens effects
Flux, i=70° Flux, i=90°
R 1LSOR=1LSO1.21.52 0 LSO2.0 LSO
Phase
Kerr a=0.52LSO
52
i=70°
Hamaus 2008
Correlation Radio-X and flares• An X flare per day, but with
no radiono radio• Is there a barrier for LX?
• Could be checked with the other low luminosity AGNother low luminosity AGN
53Markoff 2005
Discovery of reflected super-luminic Fe Kline
54
55Ponti et al 2010
Variability over 10 yearsy y• The emission of Fe K line varies in the
« Bridge » but not in some neighboring« Bridge », but not in some neighboring clouds
• Swept region 2 arcmin~ 15 ly in aSwept region 2 arcmin~ 15 ly in a time-scale of 2-3 yrs vapp=5c
• Not inside, since it should be ~1/r2Not inside, since it should be 1/r
FeKFeK
56Ponti et al 2010
Gas reservoirsGas reservoirsaround the center
L = 10-8 LE ?L x 160 in aflareflare
6pc
57300pc
6pc
Rodriguez-Fernandez & Combes 2008
Power increase by a factor 1000, during at least 10 yrsL/LE= 10-5 instead of 10-8
Front of light emitted 400 yrs ago
L/LE 10 instead of 10
F t f li ht itt dFront of light emitted100 yrs ago
L(SgrA*) = 1.4 1039 erg/s
58Sun100 yrs ago= 1036 erg/s today
Chandra: blue, 1 point = 300s Influence of G2? Due to better statistics
59XMM: red, after subtraction of point sources, cf the magnetar SGR 1745-2900
Ponti et al 2015
The strong flares end of 2014, are they due to G2? Here the epochs without observation have been suppressed
60
Black hole at the center of our galaxyStellar orbits, V > 1000km/s, Mass of the hole ~4 106 MoCloud G2, or gas enveloppe around a star?
Multi-wavelength environment, NIR & X-ray, binariesand compact objects diff se gasand compact objects, diffuse gas
VLBI radio mm, close to the black hole shadow, Kerr or not ?VLBI radio mm, close to the black hole shadow, Kerr or not ?Measure of the spin & relativistic effects. Test of gravity- EHT
GRAVITY in near-IR. Approaching the horizon
Still many questions: multi wavelength spectrumStill many questions: multi-wavelength spectrumOrigin of flares, last stable orbit, or jet?
61Paradox of the young stars (10Myr), HVS…