The Wes Project Global Programme

FORDEVELOPING-UNDER DEVELOPEDCOUNTRIES Executive Project SummaryThis investment presentation is intended for review by potential financial institutions and investors toprovide funds of 55,987,257,650 for The WES Project, developing and under-developed countries.The purpose of this presentation is to introduce an objective analysis for the development of the WESProject. Thepresentationprovidesthereferencematerial thatwill demonstrateanapproximate8timesreturnof grossrevenueoninvestment of 55,987,257,650. Theproject will optimizedthezoning, aprojectionofthehighestandbestuses;andthefuturepotential for First WorldClassWater-Energy-Sewage Scientific Multipurpose Complex Development.SurveyEconomic and Political EnvironmentAdvantages and economic potential that are offered to foreign investments in developing and under-developingcountriesareexcellent. TheWESProjectDevelopmentwill attractanincreaseof135-158%moretouriststotheaverageof the10,102,500touristsper year, createemployment forapproximately 385,850 persons and provide social and economical benefits for a population of over275,000,000 personsProposed GoalTo build a self sufficient Wind Energy Power Mega Project, that will provide complete energy servicesfor (a) Sea Water Desalination, (b) Energy and (c) Sewage System for approximately 55 million users.Method of Achieving GoalsToachieveour goals, weshall enterintojoint ventureswithinternational entities, namelyfromFrance, Denmark, England, Switzerland, China, and government supports from other countries.MarketServices will be supply at an economical rate, lower that the costs that are now being offered to boththe public and private sectors.Funding Request ExpectationsA start-up fund of 500M, to commence the anti-project, city, urban and rural planning, property andoperation expenses, a draw down of 323M/Quarter for approximately seven (7) years to a total of55, 987,257,650Exit StrategyThe WES Development shall be manage by MERO INTERNATIONAL, where services will be providedand project is calculated on a thirty (30) years repayment plan.P-4WATERWind Powered Sea Water DesalinationMore and more countries have started to cover their water consumption by means of seawater desalination plants. At the same time new technologies for sea water desalinationhave been rapidly developed and the efficiency ofsuch plants is continuously beingincreased. Consequently, prime costs and operation costs have been considerably reduced.Every kind of water desalination requires electrical power. To produce this electrical powerby usingconventionalenergysourcesmeans increasingtheCO2, whichaffects theenvironment. WES can provide a new water desalination system, which operates with windand solar energy as a stand-alone-system.P-5ELECTRICITY Wind Powered ElectricityWind Powered Energy is a free, renewable resource, so no matter how much is used today, there willstill be the same supply in the future. Wind Energy is also a source of clean, non-polluting, electricity.Unlike conventional power plants, wind plants emit no air pollutants or greenhouse gases. The termsWind Energy" or "wind power" describe the process by which the wind is used to generate electricity;wind turbines convert the kinetic energy in the wind into mechanical power, generators are use toconvert this mechanical power into electricity.WES development may compete with other uses for the land, and those alternative uses will be morehighly valued electricity generation. However, wind turbines can be located on land that is also used forgrazing and/or farming.P-6SEWAGEWind Powered Sewage SystemFIVE-STAGE PROCESSINGThe sewage is processed in five stages: The inlet works screen items like wood, bricks, rags, paper, plastic and grit.Primary settlement uses gravity to settle the finer solids as raw sludge.The remaining 'settled sewage' flows to the biological treatment plant for secondary treatment, wherepolluting organic matter and ammonia is consumed by bacteria.The resulting 'mixed liquor' (activated sludge and effluent) passes for final settlement. The treatedeffluent flows over the weirs as clean water, where it is strictly monitored before being discharged.Sludge treatment thickens and mixes raw and activated sludge before they are pumped to the sludge-powered generator.Reduction in Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Estimating the Potential Contribution from Wind PowerP-7Nuclear Power PlantTo turn nuclear fission into electrical energy, the first step for nuclearpower plant operators is to be able to control the energy given off bythe enriched uranium and allow it to heat water into steam.Enricheduraniumis typically formedintoinch-long(2.5-cm-long)pellets, each with approximately the same diameter as a dime. Nextthepelletsarearrangedintolongrods, andtherodsarecollectedtogether into bundles. The bundles are submerged in water inside apressure vessel. The water acts as a coolant. For the reactor to work,the submerged bundles must be slightly supercritical. Left to its owndevices, the uranium would eventually overheat and melt.To prevent overheating, control rods made of a material that absorbsneutrons are inserted into the uranium bundle using a mechanism thatcan raise or lower the control rods. Raising and lowering the controlrods allow operators to control the rate of the nuclear reaction. Whenan operator wants the uranium core to produce more heat, the controlrods areraisedout of theuraniumbundle(thusabsorbingfewerneutrons). Tocreatelessheat, theyareloweredintotheuraniumbundle. Therodscanalsobeloweredcompletelyintotheuraniumbundletoshut thereactor downinthecaseof anaccident or tochange the fuel.P-8P-9Radioactive SubstancesThe uranium bundle acts as an extremely high-energy source ofheat. It heats the water and turns it to steam. The steam drives aturbine, which spins a generator to produce power. Humans havebeen harnessing the expansion of water into steam for hundreds ofyears.In some nuclear power plants, the steam from the reactor goesthrough a secondary, intermediate heat exchanger to convertanother loop ofwater to steam,which drives the turbine.Theadvantage to this design is that the radioactive water/steam nevercontacts the turbine. Also, in some reactors, the coolant fluid incontact with the reactor core is gas (carbon dioxide) or liquid metal(sodium, potassium); these types of reactors allow the core to beoperated at higher temperatures.Given all the radioactive elements inside a nuclear power plant, itshouldn't come as a surprise that there's a little more to a plant'soutside than you'd find at a coal power plant.P-10Primary Fuel Use for Electricity Generation Natural gas is increasingly becoming the fuel of choice for newelectricityprojects around the globe. Over the 1996-2020 projection period, natural gas isexpected to gain share in North American electricity generation markets relativeto coal and nuclear power. South America is expected to increase natural gasconsumption to supplement its large base of hydroelectricity generation.WesternEuropeismovingfromnuclear togreater relianceongas. EasternEuropeisexpectedtomovefromcoal togas. Andamajorshareofcapacityexpansion in Asia and the Middle East will rely on natural gas.Overall,natural gas is expectedtoaccount for25percentof worldelectricityfuels market in 2020, as compared with 16 percent in 1996. Favouring naturalgasareincreasedconfidenceintheavailabilityoffuturesupplies, significantimprovements in gas turbine technology, the relatively smaller negative effectsof gas-fired generation on airquality than those of other fossil fuels, and theincreasing availability of imported liquefied natural gas (LNG). Althoughcurrently accounting for only 5 percent of world gas consumption, LNG exportshave grown by 38 percent since 1992.Pipeline trade in natural gas, currently almost triple the volume of LNG trade, isalso growing rapidly. In recent years, exports of natural gas from Canada to theUnited States, from Norway and Russia to Western Europe, and from Algeria toItalyandSpainhaveledtheincrease. Uponthecompletionof anumber ofpipelineprojectsunderconstructionornowbeingplannedinSouthAmerica,Argentina, Bolivia and Venezuela will become major exporters of natural gas andChile and Brazil will become major importers.P-11Region and Fuel 1996 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020Industrialized 77.983.289.593.998.7102.4 Oil5.25.85.35.25.55.7 Natural Gas 7.79.713.816.220.523.2 Coal28.029.830.531.332.333.2 Nuclear19.820.019.619.217.015.5 Renewables17.217.820.321.923.324.8 EE/FSU 24.423.826.127.428.930.8 Oil2.72.82.83.03.13.2 Natural Gas9.69.711.312.714.216.1 Coal6.45.95.95.34.43.9 Nuclear2.82.82.93.03.12.7 Renewables2.92.73.13.44.14.9 Developing 41.146.458.269.881.493.8 Oil5.35.97.08.29.410.7 Natural Gas5.26.38.811.814.818.3 Coal18.520.325.130.335.541.2 Nuclear1.51.72.43.03.53.6 Renewables10.612.214.916.518.220.0 Total World 143.4153.4173.8191.1209.0227.0 Oil13.314.515.116.418.019.6 Natural Gas22.525.633.940.849.657.7 Coal52.856.061.566.972.278.3 Nuclear24.124.524.925.223.621.7 Renewables30.732.738.341.945.649.7 Note: EE/FSU = Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union P-12P-13Benefits of Natural GasUsing natural gas in place of other fuels can help ease a number ofenvironmental concernsgreenhousegasemissions, acidrain, smog, solidwaste and water pollution. When natural gas is burned, it produces virtually noemissions of sulfur dioxide or particulate matter and far lower levels of"greenhouse" gases and nitrogen oxides than such competing sources of energyasoil andcoal. Inaddition, unliketheoil, coal andnuclear processes, thenatural gas process produces virtually no solid waste and has much less impacton water quality.The inherent cleanliness of natural gas when compared with those other fuels,coupled with the high efficiency of natural gas equipment, means thatsubstitutinggasfortheotherfuelscanhelpreducetheemissionof theairpollutants that producesmogandacidrainandthat couldexacerbatethe"greenhouse" effect. The natural gas system is extremely efficient as are mosttypes of appliances and equipment that operate on natural gas. Energyefficiency refers to the energy input per unit of useful energy output. The higherthe energy efficiency, the greater the conservation of energy and the lower theenvironmental impacts.When the entire cycle of producing, processing, transporting and using energyisconsidered, natural gasisdeliveredtotheconsumerwitha"total energyefficiency" of about 90 percent, compared with about 27 percent for electricity.Moreover, gas appliances and equipment are extremely efficient as evidencedby the fact that the residential use of gas per customer is about 16 percent lesstoday than it was in 1980.P-14P-15Natural GasNatural gas is the most economical energy choice. Natural gas is usually the mosteconomical formof energyavailableregardlessof whichcompetingfuel it ismeasuredagainst, theapplicationinvolvedorthegeographical locationoftheconsumer.For instance, usingthe1999averagenational energypricespublishedbytheDepartment of Energy, heating an average-size house in a moderate climate costs5 percent less to heat with gas than with heating oil and 33 percent less than withan electric heat pump. Similarly, using gas to heat household water is about halfas expensive as using electricity. Even with the aggressive demand levels of theaccelerated projection, gas will remain price-competitive.Natural gas is a highly reliable North American energy source. Approximately 85percent of the natural gas consumed in the United States is produced domesticallyfromthenation'sextensivegasresourcebase. Nearlyall oftheremaining15percent is produced in North America, primarily in Canada. In comparison, closeto60percent of theoil usedintheUnitedStates is importedfromforeigncountries, some of which are politically unstable.Furthermore, natural gas is a reliable source of fuel not only because most of thesupply is domestic, but also because the pipeline delivery system is undergroundand protected from weather-related disruptions.This reliability is one of the reasons businesses that cannot afford powerdisruptions find gas-fired distributed electricity generation so attractive.P-1695-MW, 3+2 combined-cycle block with5001P, with 2 X 114 MW GT11N2 GasTurbines. Fuel: Natural Gas-Slovenia420-MW, Single shaft combined-cycleblock with SGT5-4000F Gas Turbine. Fuel:Natural Gas-NorwayP-17P-182 X 185 MW 1+1 combined-cycle blockswith 9001E gas turbines. Fuel: CoalSyngas, Natural Gas-Czech RepublicCHP plant with 2 X 5.25 MW CX501KB7SGas Turbines. Fuel: Natural Gas-PolandP-19P-20Electric GenerationBecause of its many economic and environmental benefits, Natural Gas hasbecomethefuel of choicefor energygeneration. Inthe1990s, therewasadramatic shift to Natural Gas for the generation of energy. Large coal and nucleargenerating plants were the clear choice of electric utility planners in the 1970sand1980s, but a combinationof economic, environmental andtechnologicalfactors have resulted in a pronounced movement to gas. In fact, virtually all newgenerating capacity being added today will rely on gas.Gas-firedcombined-cycletechnologyistheoverwhelmingchoiceinthesenewgeneratingplants. Combined-cycleplantsofferextremelyhighefficiency, cleanoperation, low capital costs and shorter construction lead times. The efficiency ofcombined-cycle units is now approaching 60 percent compared with roughly 34percent efficiency for traditional boiler units regardless of the fuel source.Higher efficiency means lower fuel bills and less pollution. For example, replacinga coal generating unit with a gas-fired combined-cycle plant could eliminate sulfurdioxide emissions (the primary cause of acid rain), cut carbondioxide (theprincipal greenhouse gas) by as much as two-thirds and cut nitrogen oxides (theprimary cause of smog) by as much as 95 percent. Also, not only is the lead timeforconstructionofacombined-cycleunitshorterthanthatofanewcoal-firedplant, but construction can be implemented in a modular fashion. Gasconsumption by central-station electricity generating plants will more than doubleover the next 20 years; Gas consumption at central-station electricity generatingplants (including electric utility plants and independent power producers) iscurrently at 3.3 quads per year.P-21Two 400-MW, 1+1 combined-cycles withGT13E2 Gas Turbines CHP. Fuel: NaturalGas-FranceCHP plant with 2 X 7.3 MW Taurus 70 GasTurbines. Fuel: Natural Gas-PolandP-22261-MW, 3+1 combined-cycle CHP blockwith SGT-800 Gas Turbines. Fuel: NaturalGas-Sweden98-MW, 1+1 combined-cycle block withV64.3A Gas Turbine. Fuel: Natural GasCzech RepublicP-23630-MW, 3+1 combined-cycledesalination plant with GT13E2 GasTurbines. Fuel: Natural Gas-Bahrain465-MW, 2+1 CCGT block with V94.2 Gas Turbine. Fuel: Natural Gas-BelgiumP-24780-MW, 3+1 combined-cycle withW501FD Gas Turbines. Fuel: NaturalGas-Brazil146-MW, 2+1 combined-cycle with V64.3Gas Turbine, 374-MW, 2+1 combined-cycle with V94.2 Gas Turbine. Fuel:Natural Gas-FinlandP-25Fueling the FutureNatural Gas & New Technologies for a Cleaner 21st Century" to address a paradox thathas bedevilled the world natural gas industry. How can a fuel that is abundant, safeand reliable to deliver, more environmentally friendly than oil or coal, and nearly fourtimes as efficient as electricity from the point of origin to the point of use, power just avery small portion of the worlds of the economy? This paradox is all the more puzzlinggiven thefact thatithasbeenpolicy, asaffirmedto encourage thebroaderuseofnatural gas. "FuellingtheFuture"bothpositsandprovesthat an energypolicyencouragingtheuseof natural gashasnot beenfullyrealized. It thenoutlinesacomprehensive strategy showing how fulfilling the potential of natural gas will helpthe world meets its energy needs for the next 20 years. Specifically, it addresses thequestions of how much natural gas might be used and in what applications, as well aswhat national benefits environmental, economic, conservation might result fromsuch increased use. In sum, "Fuelling the Future" offers the energy decision-makers,fromtheleaders totheconsumers, analternativeeconomicfutureinwhichanaffordable, efficient and readily available energy source powers, newadvancedtechnologies for the betterment of all.Key PointsUsingnatural gasinplaceof otherenergysourcesprovidesmultiplenational andconsumer benefits. Substituting natural gas, primarily for electricity, coal and oil, helpease a number of environmental concerns, including greenhouse gas emissions, acidrain, smog, solid waste and water pollution In 2020.P-2623467DIRECTOR51CDC8910DIRECTORPROJECTMANAGEMENTTECHNICAL EXPERTISEINTERNATIONAL COMMERCECOMMUNITIESCOMMUNITIESCOMMUNITIESP-27Management OverviewTheWESProject contemplates tothedevelopments of newstrategies that will permit anammonicsocio-economicgrowthandbalance, benefitingtheprovincessubdevelopment inUnder-Developed and Developing Countries.Enter which:(1) Diversify the use and to increase the capacity of the system of interregional water, energyand sewage infrastructures, distribution and services.(2) Safeguard the mobilization of goods and services, that anticipate in the development plans ofthe nation.(3) Complementary, tooptimize andtoextendother ways of goods andservices for thedevelopmentof tourism, small andmediumindustries; stimulating the development ofinter-model systems(4) Facilitate training and transfer of technology.(5) Establishexcellent socio-commercial relations, throughtheadvanceof technologyandmulti-lateral benefits.(6) Fortalice the interchanges of universitystudents, with countries that provide advancetechnology, in our given state of the arts.(7) Implement projectstoorient theimprovement of publichealth, education, housingandindustries.(8) Provide socio-economic developments programmes for young working adults.P-28The WES Project need leaders at all levels of the corporation that can bridge businessstrategy and emerging technologies, identify opportunities for growth, profitability,transform innovation into commercial success and promote leadership in technologymanagement and innovation.In adjusting to a turbulent economy, many businesses follow a recession strategy thatresults in reducing core technical competencies and cutting investment in innovation andproducts development. We on the other hand will enhance our futures commitments byfocusing on increasing innovative activities in preparation for a global market rebound,managing and dealing with risk and uncertainty, understanding how motivation,innovation and uncertainty are interrelated.Recognising and balancing the critical functions necessary for carrying out innovation,designing managerial systems, including dual ladder, career assignment, evaluation,reward, and recognition systems and developing critical skills for reducing productsdevelopment cycle time. Managing technology transfer, communication andunderstanding the role of technical architecture by recognising the effectiveness ofalternative organisational structures including project, functional, and matrix-typeapproaches.THE WES PROJECTP-29PROJECTMANAGEMENTMERO INTERNATIONAL PROVIDE:PROJECT MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATE THE WES PROJECT TRANSFER OF TECNOLOGY MANAGEMENTHUMAN RESOURCESTRAINING & STRATEGIESSOCIAL DEVELOPMENTP-30TECHNICAL EXPERTISEINTERNATIONAL COMMERCEJOINT VENTURES PROVIDE:TECNHICAL EXPERTISESINTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL ADVISORSTRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGYECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTSUPPORT-CONSOLIDATE THE WES PROJECT PROVIDE: MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT,MACHINERY, SERVICEAND MAINTENANCEP-31CENTREDATA& COMMUNICATIONCDCP-32THE SCIENTIFICFACTORSThe vital cycle of the system, are the factors that are moreinfluential than the affect of the result or that are more oftenreside in the first place. On this point, the decisions are due andbase on the competent economic evaluation with the considerationfor suitable financing, socio-economic, the regulating businessatmosphere that it frequents, and the technological considerations.In recent years, the importance of project development and socialprogress in management, reflects the acceptance in several degreesof the following elements: (1) the approach of management process,(2) the mutual aid between management, science and technology aredecisive, (3) the approach of the behaviour of management, scienceand technology for the development of human resource, (4)sustainable competitive advantage, and (5) the economic evaluationand the availability of finances. P-33THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORSt bPr { T t } = P (i) , E [ T ] = t [ P (t) ]u=0t=aPr = Project RiskT = Time Deliveredi = Insecurity R = Requirement t = Time ScheduledPt = Probability T = R + t, R = 0P-34SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT MERO HOSPITALP-35TRAINING STRATEGIES EDUCATIVE PROGRAMME BOOKSCOURSESSEMINARSP-3620 Aos de GarantaHOUSING PRO-PANELSYSTEMMODERN TECHNOLOGY P-37Investment ReturnsAfter Project CompletionYearlyYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5AssetsCash 46,063,043 $ 53,975,570 $71,783,443 $75,823,156 $83,773,461 $ Inventory - $ - $ - $ - $ - $Accounts receivable 1,720,000 $ - $ 256,950 $ 384,000 $ 1,303,286 $ Total Current Assets 47,783,043 $ 53,975,570 $72,040,393 $76,207,156 $85,076,747 $ Capital assets 2,425,000 $ 23,857,070 $19,570,656 $20,572,656 $18,573,657 $ Other f ixed assets 7,000 $14,000 $ 484,000 $ 546,000 $ 612,000 $Gross fixed assets 2,432,000 $ 23,871,070 $20,054,656 $21,118,656 $19,185,657 $ Accum Depreciation and Amortization 1,400 $197,089 $ 1,298,960 $1,604,877 $1,914,094 $ Net fixed assets 2,430,600 $ 23,673,981 $18,755,696 $19,513,779 $17,271,563 $ TOTAL ASSETS 50,213,643 $53,793,247 $ 90,796,089 $ 95,720,935 $ 102,348,310 $LiabilitiesAccounts payable 1,518,333 $ 2,875,026 $3,579,408 $3,888,301 $3,975,000 $ Current liabilities 1,518,333 $ 2,875,026 $3,579,408 $3,888,301 $3,975,000 $ Mortgage f inance - $ 1,795,000 $3,649,134 $4,266,470 $4,873,655 $ Total Liabilities1,518,333 $ 4,670,026 $7,228,542 $8,154,771 $8,848,655 $ Share Capital 35,850,000 $ 36,250,000 $36,575,000 $53,125,000 $58,575,000 $ Retained earnings 12,845,310 $ 12,873,221 $46,992,547 $34,441,164 $34,924,655 $ Total Equity48,695,310 $ 49,123,221 $83,567,547 $87,566,164 $93,499,655 $ TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY 50,213,643 $53,793,247 $ 90,796,089 $ 95,720,935 $ 102,348,310 $P-38P-39YEARLYYear 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5CASH FLOW FROM OPERATIONSNet Income (Loss) 5,975,310 $ 8,850,750 $ 10,746,926 $ 18,530,750 $ 23,018,189 $ Change in Working Capital 1,750,000 $ 2,287,005 $ 2,091,128 $ 2,810,445 $ 3,919,286 $ Plus Depreciation 5,750 $195,689 $1,101,871 $ 305,917 $309,217 $Interest - $- $177,160 $705,600 $700,525 $Net Cash Flow from Operations 7,731,060 $ 11,333,444 $ 14,117,087 $ 22,352,712 $ 27,947,217 $ CASH FLOW FROM INVESTMENTSFixed Assets 2,432,000 $ 31,039,070 $ 53,816,415 $ 62,000,000 $ 76,585,750 $ Net Cash Flow from Investments 2,432,000 $ 31,039,070 $ 53,816,415 $ 62,000,000 $ 76,585,750 $ CASH FLOW FROM FINANCINGCash f rom Equity 25,000,000 $ - $(28,750,000) $- $- $ Cash f rom Debt Financing - $22,847,600 $ (88,265) $ (93,340) $Net Cash Flow from Financing 25,000,000 $ 22,847,600 $ (28,750,000) $(88,265) $ (93,340) $Net Cash Flow 35,163,060 $ 65,220,114 $ 39,183,502 $ 84,264,448 $ 104,439,627 $ Cash at Beginning ofPeriod 5,500,000 $ 40,663,060 $ 105,883,174 $ 145,066,675 $ 229,331,123 $ CASH AT END OF PERIOD 40,663,060 $ 105,883,174 $ 145,066,675 $ 229,331,123 $ 333,770,750 $ Cash Flow ProjectionsAfter Project CompletionP-40P-41CONCLUSIVE SUMMARYThis presentation treats in great details issues and factors which will influencethe investment in The WES Project as a Humanitarian Programme; at a sum of55,987,257,650, to build Water-Energy-Sewerage Infrastructure for Under-Developedand Developing Countries.The project comprise of water, alternative energy and sewerage infrastructure, housingfacilities, employment, public services, schools, hospitals, roads, bridges, tourism, heavy,mediumandlight manufacturingfacilities, trainingcentre, kinder facilitiesandotheramenities to enhance the state of the arts of The WES Project.A favourable decision would take into consideration the following factors:There are five major advantages to The WES Project, which allows dueconsideration to investor(s) for immediate development.Government Multi-Purpose DevelopmentPrivileged locations which will lead to natural increase in value over timeTourist developments surrounded by untouched, nature, beaches, rivers, lakes and waterfalls; providing ample opportunity for water activities and also an unparalleled level ofenjoyment.Multiple access andtransport communication, endowa windowinto the world ofindustries; revealing the many opportunities for international companies to enhancemarket value.Global, national and regional trends will indicate that The WES Project couldrealize substantial growth as a result of the imminent approval of international businessatmosphere.In accordancetothe examples of financial benefits included in this report, the developerhas theopportunitytobuild infrastructures for the benefits of humanity, unmatchedona per capita basic. Theworldisnowshowingthattheexistingpolitical andsocialstability will herald a comprehensive and coherent economic advantages, should we allwork together. The WESProject will enhanceaglobal opportunityto help make theworld a betterplace bybeing a part and partaking with global responsibilitytoprovide technical assistance, transfer of technology, and social development to for theimprovement of better living conditions.CONCLUSIONThe consolidation of this system, would be to develop and implement asocio-economic matrix of lineaments in technology transfer, which wouldbring changes in the paradigm of public services with privateparticipation, that will lend a united presents in most countries.This would allow the indexing of technology, resources and training in aplan of actions, that would bring benefits to the communities, organisedby the municipal authorities, states and central government; thatfortified and satisfied the improvement public services.In this sense we could say, that the new form to manage and to planprogrammes would generate socio-economic and political changes for thebenefit of the Citizenship. In order to conclude this system, we need tomake it work as an in-house matrix, that would accumulate all the dataof public services, through a satellite communication network, whichwould provide statistics and effective communication to the municipalityto guarantee the permanence of registries and pursuit of data, that wouldallow the taking of suitable actions.P-42We named the movement The Century of Humanityfounded on the principle ofour work; which createdfacilitation and promotion of divinity, humanitarianactivities and socialawareness to societies, to improve healthcare,housing, better living, and abject extreme poverty situation ofvulnerable human beings.Throughout the world, in countries rich and poor, there are people thathave no or little access neither to basic physical, housing andhealthcare nor to immunizations from infectious disease.Some peoplehave no access because they lack the resources to buy and the statedoes not provide it. Others may be able to afford healthcare butbecause there are no services available in their communities they mustdo without it. In some countries because of discrimination or socialstigmas such as a persons status as a prisoner, refugee, immigrant ora member of a lower class or caste they are deprived of this basichuman right. Our belief is that allpeople should have access toaffordable universal healthcare, housing and better living conditions.In a world of such wealth and abundance, rights and freedoms, there isno justification for an individual to be without divinity, healthcare andproper living conditions.Entity Charitable, International Non-Governmental Organisation, Non-ProfitMedicineEmergencyResearchOceanographic Studies Socio-Economic DevProject The WES ProjectAuthorized PersonMervyn Maastricht Carl McYearwoodTitle ChairmanSkype Contacts MEROINTERNATIONALDENTBLANCHE1 DBBANCORPOSBFM-LLCMMCM_1Email [email protected],web.de,usa.comInceptions 1959, 1971, 1982, 1991, 1994, 2000Federal Registration H-99-0371561, CAC-02498533-96, ITC47-VOLO359DGJ-30688935-3, NIT 0131693141MERO INTERNATIONALP-43THANK [email protected],[email protected] [email protected],[email protected] WES PROJECT NOTESP-46THE WES PROJECT NOTESP-47