The way towards a mobile society [email protected] Finnish Tourist Board, Helsinki in co-operation with the WG E: 'Nordic group'
Mar 27, 2015
The way towards amobile society
[email protected] Tourist Board, Helsinki
in co-operation with the WG E: 'Nordic group'
Who loves wires?
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Mill
ion
Use
rs
Wireless Internet users Fixed Internet users
More users with wireless Internet access than with
fixed access in 2005
5
85
12
107
40
126
97
143155 158
191171
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Revenues Take Off in 2003?
About 10% of mobile phones sold in Western Europe during 2000 are WAP-enabled.Forecasted increase, 27% in 2001
The problem with WAP today
• 20 s connection time• dropped calls• charging by the minute• Scandinavian slow replacing
towards wap phones < > services missing (the chickenor the egg?)
connecting
Standard competition holds up development of advanced services
Sophistication in services
Con
sum
er Ad
option
WAPSMS GPRS 3G/4G
PALM VII
CDPD
iMode
Sprint Wireless Web
AT&T PocketNet
cdmaOne
PCSWAP
Jphone
iDEN
Ezweb
The Wireless Market
AdvertisingWireless Internet, SMS, PDA
ShoppingGoods and off-line services
OtherFinancial, E-mail, Search, Positioning, Games
M-Commerce Market Drivers• Decreasing average revenue per user drives networksoperators to implement new services• The increasing number of mobile phone subscribers• Increasing exposure to fixed line e-commerce amongEuropeans• Supplier push (from equipment vendors)• New billing principles (flate-rate, value-based)• UMTS licensing• Application developers• Content providers• Content aggregators• Mobile portals (aggregates applications and content)• Consumers (consumer profiles and business segments)• Payment agents (not only banks……..)
Many Rely on Advertising and Shared Air Time Revenues
0 5 10 15 20 25
Other revenues
Other revenue from operators
Liscensing and Syndication Fees
Consumer Purchases
Consumer Subscriptions
None, revenue comes from our non-wireless business
Consumer Pay Per Use
Shared air time revenue from operators
Advertising/Sponsorship
N = 34 (multiple answers allowed)N = 34 (multiple answers allowed)
What revenue streams does your wireless business have (or plan on having)?
. . . but Expects Most Revenues From Commerce and
Advertising
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Other
User transactions
Lisensing and syndication fees
B2B business
Subscribtion
Operator Fees
Consumer pay per use
Advertising
Commerce
N = 34 (multiple answers allowed)N = 34 (multiple answers allowed)
Which do you expect to be your most important revenue stream in two years?
Time Critical Services Dominate Today, Messaging No. 2
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Gambling
Images
Horoscope
Banking
Location and navigation nfo (maps etc.)
Weather
Ring-tones
Sports
Travel, currency & leisure info
Games
Directory
Shopping
Messaging (other than e-mail)
Stock quotes
News
N = 34 (multiple answers allowed)N = 34 (multiple answers allowed)
What is the most used wireless content/service on your site? (up to three answers)
... but believe in E-mail, Commerce and Games
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Ring-tones
Weather
Images
Location and navigation nfo (maps etc.)
Sports
Travel, currency, leisure & entertainment info
Film reviews & bookings
Fin. Serv.
Gambling
Directory
News
Messaging (other than e-mail)
Stock quotes
Games
Shopping
N = 34 (multiple answers allowed)N = 34 (multiple answers allowed)
What do you expect to be the most used content/service in two years from now? (up to three answers)
Consumers Ask For Communication, Banking and
News Services . . .
Source: Jupiter Net Query
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Banking
Directions
News
Sports
Yellow pages
Movies
Chat/IM
Games
Stocks
Shopping
Restaurants
Gambling
Europe
Which wireless data services would you like to use?
Scandinavian countries are aware
of banking services . . .
Source: Jupiter Net Query
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Banking
Directions
News
Sports
Yellow pages
Movies
Chat/IM
Games
Stocks
Shopping
Restaurants
Gambling
Fi
UK
Which wireless data services would you like to use?
Spending still small when compared to the PC platform
Shopping
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2000 2005
bill
ion
eu
ros
Mobile Web DTV
Advertising
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
2000 2005b
illio
n e
uro
s
Mobile Web DTV
Time to move onTime to move on
Cost, Functionality and Consumer Awareness Are Top
Inhibitors
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Other
Current advertising potential of WAP
WAP security
Variety of WAP-enables phones (screen size, etc.)
Closed mobile operator gateways
Consumer payment standards
Different WAP-implementation in different devices (phones)
Current functionality of the WAP-standard
Consumer interest/awareness
Cost of using WAP
N = 34 (multiple answers allowed)N = 34 (multiple answers allowed)
Which of the following factors are significant
inhibitors to the growth of your wireless
business?
Some thoughts on UMTS
• Expensive European air... Different procedures for obtaining a license
• EU was for the first time in winning position > slowing down the speed, when users need to pay roaming fees
• No timetable for 3G
Important key weaknesses for further development
• Existing IT-infrastructure is the greatest handicap in the move to optimised m-commerce business processes (ex. transport operators legacy systems do not permit e-ticketing or mobile ticketing)• Not enough hotels and rest. have a web presence• Surfing WAP-sites is slow• Difficult to find WAP-sites• Secure and convenient payment methods still to come
What will be the future?
GPRS will be the Inflection Technology for
'Wireless Internet' in Europe
• Operators roll out services across Europe during 2001• GPRS terminals available in limited numbers today• Widely available during 2001 and common during 2002• Flat rate offers allow extensive usage, charging per bit
allow low entry level, no dropped calls, 1 sec connection
Stakeholders -Many Players Fight For the Same Customers
Network Access Content Terminals
Other
Operators / ISP’s
Mobile phone manufacturers
Wireless Portals
Web PortalsPlayers fight for anticipated profits in content, services and commerce
Operators have a strong position
1. More difficult to change start page, gateway and set bookmarks
2. High traffic charges give operators the possibility to subsidize content and services
3. Operators can charge customers phone bills / no payment standard
4. Positioning information held by the operator5. Established customer relation / access to customer
data
The tourism industry needs to partner
• Be creative in partnering with others(Operators is one example) • For the next three years, content, commerce and service companies must make partnerships to reach a broad user base• Wireless internet revenues will not support independent content providers. The strategy should be to use wireless content to strengthen online / offline services.
CasesFinland and Denmark
Finlandwap.finlantravelguide.com
• Travel services in English with national coverage• Content based on existing database with travel options
jointly produced by the Finnish Tourist Board and the Finnish travel trade
• Launched January 2001• Free of charge, available to anyone
with a WAP enabled phone• A platform for local add-on services• Directions for using the WAP-service:
www.finland-tourism.com
Denmarkwap.visitdenmark.com
• Denmark offers wap service to tourists when in the country
• Addition to what you can find when planning the trip on www.visitdenmark.com
• Service due to expand over the years
• Cooperation with local tourism partners for up-to-date info essential
Key issues from the WG E 'Nordic group'
Key Issues• Development of new technologies for mobile Internet willcontinue. The tourism industry needs to get involved!
• The need for standardisation and structuring of information has been exposed by the development of Internet, now is the chance to deal with these issues in the beginning of mobile Internet.
• Surveys of Internet behaviour of tourists was slow to start, now is the time to start market research of mobile Internet on a European level
• Research in mobile Internet and it’s impact on tourism is limited
Need for EU initiatives
• Co-ordination between databases for mPortals of NTOs’
• Create forums where technology providers and developers can meet with the tourism stakeholders (public and privat) to analyse problems, support the development of partnerships and agree new access conditions and pricing models
• Further support of joint research such as the 5th FrameworkProgramme
• Arrange conferences on this topic for the tourism industry
Sources
• Jupiter Research• C. Marcussen, Bornholms Research Centre• Durlacher, M-Commerce Report 1999• Mobile Forum Oulu• WG E Nordic Group