The Tripod 7Cs™ and the Influence of Teaching on American Adolescents’ Skills, Mindsets, and Agency: from a Cross-Sectional Study of over 16,000 Sixth-to-Ninth Grade Classrooms Ronald F. Ferguson, PhD Harvard Kennedy School and Tripod Education Partners, Inc. November 28, 2018 Assessment Research Consortium Fall Summit Find the study at http://agi.harvard.edu/projects/TeachingandAgency.pdf Tech appendix at http://agi.harvard.edu/projects/StatTables.pdf
58
Embed
The Tripod 7Cs™ and the Influence of Teaching - Center for ...
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
The Tripod 7Cs™ and the Influence of Teaching
on American Adolescents’ Skills, Mindsets, and Agency:from a Cross-Sectional Study of over 16,000 Sixth-to-Ninth Grade Classrooms
Ronald F. Ferguson, PhDHarvard Kennedy School and Tripod Education Partners, Inc.
November 28, 2018
Assessment Research Consortium Fall Summit
Find the study at http://agi.harvard.edu/projects/TeachingandAgency.pdfTech appendix at http://agi.harvard.edu/projects/StatTables.pdf
N=One student from each of 14,461 classrooms, 9696 teachers, 486 schools, 26 districts.
random effects version, Universal regressions 3rd batch, sheet 3
EVIDENCE STUDENTS CAN DISTINGUISH THE Cs FROM ON ANOTHER
0.204 0.2100.228
0.256 0.264
0.2960.308
0.280
Care Confer Captivate Clarify Consolidate Challenge Control All
Personal Support Curricular Support Press 7C’s Composite
Average of MET Middle School Correlationsbetween Value Added and 7Cs Ratings for Reading and Math
(All are statistically significant at 0.01 or above.)
ClassroomManagement
Agency is essentially the capacity and propensity to take purposeful initiative. Effective agents do not respond passively to their circumstances; they seek meaning and act with purpose to produce the changes they desire in their own and others’ lives.
Agency as the Umbrella Concept
Trust vs. MistrustHappiness
Anger
Cooperation vs. MisbehaviorPunctuality
Good Conduct
Ambitiousness vs. AmbivalenceMastery Orientation
Sense of Efficacy
Diligence vs. DisengagementEffort
Help Seeking
Satisfaction vs. DisappointmentPerceived Learning
Satisfaction with Achievement
Expected Grade in Class
Success Skills and Success MindsetsConscientiousness
Growth Mindset
Future Orientation
Agency-Related Factors in this Report
TripodEngagement Goals
Mindset Outcomes
Exhibit 13
Engagement Target One: Trust vs. Mistrust
-0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60
ClassGPA
Teasing
CONTROL
require persistence
require rigor
instructive feedback
lucid explanations
clear up confusion
CONSOLIDATE
CAPTIVATE
CONFER
CARE
CH
ALL
ENG
EC
LAR
IFY
<>
Happy in Class
A Students B Students C Students
-0.40 -0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
ClassGPA
Teasing
CONTROL
require persistence
require rigor
instructive feedback
lucid explanations
clear up confusion
CONSOLIDATE
CAPTIVATE
CONFER
CARE
CH
ALL
ENG
EC
LAR
IFY
<>
Angry in Class
A Students B Students C Students
Exhibit 14Engagement Target 2: Cooperation vs. Misbehavior
-0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
ClassGPA
Teasing
CONTROL
require persistence
require rigor
instructive feedback
lucid explanations
clear up confusion
CONSOLIDATE
CAPTIVATE
CONFER
CARE
CH
ALL
ENG
EC
LAR
IFY
<>
Punctual to Class
A Students B Students C Students
-0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
ClassGPA
Teasing
CONTROL
require persistence
require rigor
instructive feedback
lucid explanations
clear up confusion
CONSOLIDATE
CAPTIVATE
CONFER
CARE
CH
ALL
ENG
EC
LAR
IFY
<>
Good Conduct in Class
A Students B Students C Students
-0.80
-0.60
-0.40
-0.20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
Q1Care Q2Care Q3Care Q4Care Q5Care
Exhibit 15: Happy in Classby quintiles of classmates' care and other Cs
Q1_Oth6Cs Q2_Oth6Cs Q3_Oth6Cs
Q4_Oth6Cs Q5_Oth6Cs Overall
-1.00
-0.80
-0.60
-0.40
-0.20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
Q1Care Q2Care Q3Care Q4Care Q5Care
Exhibit 16: Good Conduct in Classby quintiles of classmates' care and other Cs
Exhibit 26Success Skills (re. Conscientiousness Skills) and Success Mindsets
-0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
ClassGPA
Teasing
CONTROL
require persistence
require rigor
instructive feedback
lucid explanations
clear up confusion
CONSOLIDATE
CAPTIVATE
CONFER
CARE
CH
ALL
ENG
EC
LAR
IFY
<>
Develop Future Orientation
A Students B Students C Students
-0.15 -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20
ClassGPA
Teasing
CONTROL
require persistence
require rigor
instructive feedback
lucid explanations
clear up confusion
CONSOLIDATE
CAPTIVATE
CONFER
CARE
CH
ALL
ENG
EC
LAR
IFY
<>
Develop Growth Mindset
A Students B Students C Students
EMERGING GUIDELINES FOR
TEACHING
TO CULTIVATE AGENCY
Care
Be attentive and sensitive, but avoid a
tendency among sensitive teachers to
coddle students in ways that hold them to
lower standards and undermine their
agency.
Confer
Encourage and respect students’
perspectives and honor student voice, but
also stay focused on instructional goals;
avoid extended discussions that have no
apparent purpose and thereby fail to model
self-discipline and effective agency.
Captivate
Strive to make lessons stimulating and
relevant to the development of agency. If
some students seem unresponsive, do not
assume they are disinterested. Some
students—and especially those who
struggle—purposefully hide their interest
and their effort.
Consolidate
Regularly summarize and check for
understanding, because consolidation helps
to solidify learning and models your agency
as a teacher, even when students seem
reticent or disinterested.
Clarify
Clarify by clearing up confusion: take regular
steps to detect and respond to confusion in class,
but in ways that share responsibility with students
for doing the thinking.
Clarify with lucid explanations: strive to develop
clear explanations—especially for the material that
students find most difficult—including lucid
examples of how the skills and knowledge you
teach can support effective agency.
Clarify with instructive feedback: give instructive
feedback to help scaffold student agency in
correcting their own work and building their own
understandings.
Challenge
Challenge by requiring rigor: press students
to think deeply instead of superficially about
their lessons; set and enforce performance
goals that require students to use reasoning
and exercise agency.
Challenge by requiring persistence:
consistently require students to keep trying
even when work is difficult—to give their best
efforts and produce their best work—knowing
that few things could be more important for
developing agency.
Classroom Management
Strive to achieve respectful, orderly, on-task
student behavior in your class by teaching in
ways that clarify, captivate, and challenge—in
support of agency—instead of imposing
control by intimidation and coercion.
Responses to Student Feedback on the 7C
Reflecting and Deflecting
Reflecting #1
What did you learn from the student feedback?
I learned that some of my own personal challenges manifest themselves in my classroom and therefore in my students' work habits. I am not great at managing my own time and lack organization. These were clear weaknesses expressed in the survey (i.e. students do not believe they are learning to use their time wisely or becoming more organized). This also shows up in "Our class stays busy and doesn't waste time."
Reflecting #1
How did you respond to that feedback?I took the survey and appreciate the quick turnaround in the feedback, but I really didn't have much follow through. The survey's were not much talked about and I didn't think about it much.
What difference do you think it made?There’s always next year?
Reflecting #2What did you learn from the student feedback?
My "confer" score was among my lowest and I was surprised to learn that my students felt that I don't answer their questions or don't explain the answer well enough for them to understand.
How did you respond to that feedback?
I gave each student 2 index cards - one they had to hand in with a current question on it and one they could keep to submit to an anonymous question box in the future which I check regularly. From the list of questions generated from the cards, I made some time for review in class and in subsequent classwork so that I better covered the material they had lingering questions about.
Reflecting #2
What difference do you think it made?
For the short term, I think I answered all of the questions that were lingering. In the long term I'm not sure if they feel more comfortable asking questions or feel that I explain everything clearly enough for them to have mastery of the topic.
Reflecting #3
What did you learn from the student feedback?
I was confirmed in some of my assessment of myself and surprised by other parts. I knew I needed to work on consolidating, for example, but was surprised that I was weak on 'clarify'. I felt sure that was an area where I was strong...always prided myself in explaining things in a lot of different ways to kids! I knew I would be high on 'challenge', but thought I would be much lower on 'care' than I was. The kids see me as softer than I see myself.
Reflecting #3
How did you respond to that feedback?
I definitely went to work on consolidating learning at the end of classes. I gave more exit-questions, summarizers, tickets-to-leave. I saw how clarifying it is for me - I can measure better whether the learning objective was reached or not. The kids feel better...“Oh! I actually did learn something today". I laid off on judging myself so much for being too hard on the kids...maybe I'm not so cold after all. The 'clarity' is the hardest. I think I'm more lost there that I like to admit.
Reflecting #3
What difference do you think it made?
It made me consider the students more - to look at myself more objectively, as if I were one of the kids. What IS it like to be in my class-room? How do I help students learn, or not? It also gave me very specific things to work on in my practice.
Reflecting #4
What did you learn from the student feedback?
That sometimes I move to fast with vocabulary/concepts.
How did you respond to that feedback?
I have added more activities to reinforce vocab and added more time for processing.
What difference do you think it made?
I think for those particular students it has aided their grasp of the unit.
Deflecting #5
What did you learn from the student feedback?
That my period 6 class has a different reaction to how I care than I do.
How did you respond to that feedback?
I looked at their responses to try to figure out how they interpreted the questions.
What difference do you think it made?
Unfortunately, very little b/c I do not think that data is reliable.
Deflecting #6
What did you learn from the student feedback?The feedback was somewhat confusing as the students interpreted questions differently on the rating scale. The scale did not accurately assess all of the questions.How did you respond to that feedback?I continue to teach as I always have.What difference do you think it made?Not much. The survey seems to imply that all the responsibility for student success is on the teacher.
Parallel Status and Development Measures
DEVELOPMENT STATUS
Conscientiousness
▪ In this class, students learn to be more organized.
▪ I am the type of person who is well organized.
▪ In this class, students learn to keep trying when work becomes difficult.
▪ I am the type of person who keeps trying even when I feel like giving up.
▪ In this class, students learn to become better at using time wisely.
▪ I am the type of person who uses time wisely.
▪ In this class, students learn to focus more on the quality of their work.
▪ I am the type of person who focuses on the quality of my work.
0.46
0.520.54
0.22
0.15 0.16
-0.10
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
C Students B Students A Students
Multiple Regressions Predicting Conscientiousness Status, by GPA.
Predictor: Own Conscientiousness Status Reported in Another Class
Predictor: Own Efficacy Status Reported in Another Class
Predictor: Own Sense of Purpose Status Reported in Another Class
Predictor: Classmates' Development in this Class*
Predictor: Classmates' Development in their Other Classes*
Data 20,000 6th to 9th graders who were each surveyed in multiple classrooms.See the appendix to the report for which the URL is here on the cover.
Well-Established Engagement Constructs
Tripod Engagement Goals Emotional Engagement
Behavioral Engagement
Motivational Mindsets
Trust vs. Mistrust: Students should feel a positive sense of belonging in the classroom.
Emotional
Cooperation vs. Misbehavior: Students should behave respectfully and follow school rules.
Social
Ambitiousness vs. Ambivalence: Students should feel motivated to master their lessons and be optimistic about prospects for success, undeterred by social comparisons.
Motivational
Diligence vs. Disengagement: Students should exert their best effort and persist in the face of difficulty. Academic
Satisfaction vs. Disappointment: Students in the class should experience a sense of fulfillment and increased efficacy because of what they experience and learn.
Emotional
How the Tripod Engagement Targets are Related to Well-Established Constructs in the Engagement Literature
Selected engagement Items associated with factors that affect or demonstrate personal agency in a particular classroom.
TRUST vs. MISTRUST
HappyNot Angry:
✓ This class is a happy place for me to be.✓ Being in this class makes me feel angry. [Reversed]
COOPERATION vs MISBEHAVIOR
ConductPunctuality
✓My behavior is a problem for the teacher in this class. [Reversed]
✓ I don't really care whether I arrive on time to this class.[Reversed]
AMBITIOUSNESS vs. AMBIVALENCE
Mastery GoalsEfficacy
✓One of my goals in this class has been to learn as much as I can.✓ I’m certain I can master the skills taught in this class.
DILIGENCE vs. DISENGAGEMENT
EffortPersistenceHelp SeekingHelp AvoidanceHiding EffortHolding Back
✓ I have pushed myself hard to completely understand my lessons in this class.✓ In this class, I stop trying when the work gets hard. [Reversed]✓ I would ask the teacher for help if I needed it.✓ If I were confused in this class, I would handle it by myself, not ask for help.✓ Sometimes I pretend I'm not trying hard in this class, when I really am.✓ I sometimes hold back from doing my best in this class, because of what others
might say or think.
SATISFACTION vs. DISAPPOINTMENT
SatisfactionEfficacy
✓ I am satisfied with what I have achieved in this class.✓ I have been able to figure out the most difficult work in this class.
TRIPOD ENGAGEMENT GOALS
CCSR NONCOGNITIVE FACTORS
1.
Social Skills
2.
Academic Behaviors
3.
Academic Mindsets
4.
Learning Strategies
5.
Academic Perseverance
1. Trust Vs. Mistrust
2. Cooperation vs. Misbehavior
3. Ambitiousness vs. Ambivalence
4. Diligence vs. Disengagement
5. Satisfaction/Efficacy vs.
Discouragement
SUCCESS SKILLS, SUCCESS MINDSETS
6. Conscientiousness
7. Growth Mindset
8. Future Orientation
A Crosswalk between the CCSR Noncognitive Factorsand Tripod Agency-Related Factors
Cultural Responsiveness
Ron Ferguson, July 2011
Cultural Responsiveness
Care: I express caring to every student, being especially sure to not neglect students from any racial, ethnic or social class background. I try to be aware of my biases and to avoid allowing them to affect my interaction with students.
Ron Ferguson, July 2011
Cultural Responsiveness
Confer: I elicit and value the classroom contributions of students from all racial, ethnic, social class and cultural backgrounds.
Ron Ferguson, July 2011
Cultural Responsiveness
Captivate: I make an effort to use curriculum materials and to design lessons that will be interesting and
relevant to students from a variety of backgrounds. I make a special effort to
pay homage in my lessons and curriculum to the contributions of people from the
groups represented in my class.
Ron Ferguson, July 2011
Cultural Responsiveness
Clarify: I try to understand and respond to any systematic patterns of misunderstanding characteristic of students who have had particular life experiences.
Ron Ferguson, July 2011
Cultural Responsiveness
Consolidate: I help my students to build integrated understandings of the material that we cover in my class. I am conscious of the fact that my students are building their individual identities and life strategies and I help them to integrate our lessons with their own ideas so that they come away with more complete and coherent understandings of their current and future selves and the contributions they may make to their families, community and society.
Ron Ferguson, July 2011
Cultural Responsiveness
Challenge: I challenge all students to think rigorously and to persist in the face of difficulty; I don’t give up on anyone and I don’t let anyone give up on them self.
Ron Ferguson, July 2011
Cultural Responsiveness
Classroom Management: I try to understand students’ interpretations of the actions that I take and I use disciplinary practices that fit the infraction and make sense to them.