N ew D ata Pre vio u s D a ta 0 .1 1 10 100 10 00 D ista nc e (k m ) 4 5 6 7 8 M agnitude 0 .1 1 10 100 1 000 D ista nc e (k m ) 4 5 6 7 8 M agnitude N ew D ata Pre vio u s D a ta N ew D ata Pre vio u s D a ta 0 .1 1 10 100 10 00 D ista nc e (k m ) 4 5 6 7 8 M agnitude 0 .1 1 10 100 1 000 D ista nc e (k m ) 4 5 6 7 8 M agnitude 0 .1 1 10 100 10 00 D ista nc e (k m ) 4 5 6 7 8 M agnitude 0 .1 1 10 100 1 000 D ista nc e (k m ) 4 5 6 7 8 M agnitude D ecision Variable Intensity M easure D am age M easure Engineering D em and Param eter B ase S hear D rift D am age Threshold Collapse O nset FEM A 273 Perform ance Levels IO LS CP PBEE today $,% replacement Downtim e,days C asualty rate 0 25% 50% 100% 0 1 7 30 180 0.0 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.25 PEER contribution B ase S hear D rift D am age Threshold Collapse O nset FEM A 273 Perform ance Levels IO LS CP PBEE today $,% replacement Downtim e,days C asualty rate 0 25% 50% 100% 0 1 7 30 180 0.0 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.25 PEER contribution The story continues… Jack Moehle
11
Embed
The story continues… Jack Moehle. PEER Graduation “Take a couple years off and find out what you really want to do.”
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
New Data Previous Data
0 . 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0Distance (km)
4
5
6
7
8
Mag
nitude
0 . 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0Distance (km )
4
5
6
7
8
Mag
nitude
New Data Previous DataNew Data Previous Data
0 . 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0Distance (km)
4
5
6
7
8
Mag
nitude
0 . 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0Distance (km )
4
5
6
7
8
Mag
nitude
0 . 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0Distance (km)
4
5
6
7
8
Mag
nitude
0 . 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0Distance (km )
4
5
6
7
8
Mag
nitude
Decision VariableDecision Variable
Intensity MeasureIntensity Measure
Damage MeasureDamage Measure
Engineering Demand Parameter
Engineering Demand Parameterdrift as an EDP
Mean Annualized Loss = $34,000
Mean Annualized Loss = $34,000
Decision VariableDecision Variable
Intensity MeasureIntensity Measure
Damage MeasureDamage Measure
Engineering Demand Parameter
Engineering Demand Parameter
Engineering Demand Parameter
Engineering Demand Parameterdrift as an EDPdrift as an EDP
Mean Annualized Loss = $34,000
Mean Annualized Loss = $34,000
Base Shear
Drift
Damage Threshold
CollapseOnset
OPEN
OPEN
OPEN
FEMA 273 Performance LevelsIO LS CP
PBEE today
$, % replacement
Downtime, days
Casualty rate
0 25% 50% 100%
0 1 7 30 180
0.0 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.25
PEER contribution
Base Shear
Drift
Damage Threshold
CollapseOnset
OPEN
OPEN
OPEN
OPEN
OPEN
OPEN
FEMA 273 Performance LevelsIO LS CP
PBEE today
$, % replacement
Downtime, days
Casualty rate
0 25% 50% 100%
0 1 7 30 180
0.0 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.25
PEER contribution
The story continues…
Jack Moehle
PEER Graduation“Take a couple years off and find out what
you really want to do.”
Tall Buildings Initiative
Los Angeles Tall Buildings Structural Design Council
FEMA
Courtesy Solomon Cordwell Buenz
• Two-year initiative
• Broad community support
• Final guidelines ca 2008/2009
NEES GC ProjectRisk Mitigation for Older Concrete Buildings
Example ongoing projects in PEER Lifelines
• Bridge model calibration for linear and nonlinear response (Stojadinovic)
• Seismic soil pressures on retaining structures (Sitar)
• Organizational decision processes for lifelines mitigation investment priorities (Meszaros)
State of California funding
• General Fund– PEER operations, including outreach
• Transportation Fund– Resources available for an
extended research program on transportation-related subjects.
NSF final review report
• Over the ten years, PEER has mobilized a formidable, multi-disciplinary, intellectual group and melded this into a powerful team with a common purpose. As a result, PEER has taken the emerging performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) concepts of the late 1990’s and has developed them into a practical integrated framework, supported by a wide portfolio of tools.
NSF final review report
• The PEER leadership team has been exemplary in guiding the Center to its success. This was evident in the strong esprit-de-corps amongst all PEER members and through the authoritative set of summary presentations. The latter seamlessly conveyed a coherent and readily understandable picture of what is a radical new paradigm for a notoriously conservative industry.
NSF final review report
• Follow-on funding commitments totaling $11.4m from the State of California, Caltrans, PG&E, the University of California and other stakeholders will underpin PEER’s longer term continuation. Its relationships with the California Seismic Safety Commission (CSSC) and with city governances should enable PEER to grow its influence on public policy and decision making.
NSF final review report
• PEER has, in its ten years of effort, developed a productive, sustainable partnership with industry, government agencies, and professional engineering associations in research, education and technology transfer.