Top Banner
The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States
19

The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Mar 27, 2015

Download

Documents

Paige Coleman
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States

Page 2: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Blindness separates people from things.Deafness separates people from people.

--- Helen Keller

Page 3: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Improvements in Hearing Screening Equipment

Page 4: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Number of Hospitals Doing Universal Newborn Hearing Screening

3 3 11 26 60 120243

462712

934

2050

-100100300500700900

110013001500170019002100

Nu

mb

er o

f P

rog

ram

s

Page 5: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Endorsements for Universal Newborn Screening

• National Institutes of Health

• American Academy of Pediatrics

• Maternal and Child Health Bureau

• Centers for Disease Control & Prevention

• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing

• American Academy of Audiology

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

• National Association of the Deaf

Page 6: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Why is Early Identification of Hearing Loss so Important?

• Hearing loss is the most frequent birth defect.

Page 7: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Rate Per 1000 of Permanent Childhood Hearing Loss in UNHS Programs

Sample Prevalence

Site Size Per 1000

Rhode Island (3/93 - 6/94) 16,395 1.71

Colorado (1/92 - 12/96) 41,976 2.56

New York (1/95 - 12/97) 69,761 1.95

Texas (1/94 - 6/97) 52,508 2.15

Hawaii (1/96 - 12/96) 9,605 4.15

New Jersey (1/93 - 12/95) 15,749 3.30

Page 8: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Incidence per 10,000 of Congenital Defects/Diseases

30

12 11

6 52 1

0

10

20

30

40

Hearing Loss

Cleft lip or palate

Down Syndrome

Limb defects

Spina bifida

Sickle Cell Anemia

PKU

Page 9: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Why is Early Identification of Hearing Loss so Important?

• Hearing loss is the most frequent birth defect.

• Undetected hearing loss has serious negative consequences.

Page 10: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Reading Comprehension Scores of Hearing and Deaf Students

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Deaf

Hearing

Age in Years

Schildroth, A. N., & Karchmer, M. A. (1986). Deaf children in America, San Diego: College Hill Press.

Gra

de

Eq

uiv

alen

ts

Page 11: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Effects of Unilateral Hearing Loss

MathLanguage

MathLanguage

Social

MathLanguage

MathLanguage

Social

0th 10th 20th 30th 40th 50th 60th

Percentile Rank

Normal Hearing Unilateral Hearing Loss

Keller & Bundy (1980)(n = 26; age = 12 yrs)

Peterson (1981)(n = 48; age = 7.5 yrs)

Bess & Thorpe (1984)(n = 50; age = 10 yrs)

Blair, Peterson & Viehweg (1985) (n = 16; age = 7.5 yrs)

Culbertson & Gilbert (1986)(n = 50; age = 10 yrs)

Average ResultsMath = 30th percentile

Language = 25th percentileSocial = 32nd percentile

Page 12: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Why is Early Identification of Hearing Loss so Important?

• Hearing loss is the most frequent birth defect.

• Undetected hearing loss has serious negative consequences.

• There are dramatic benefits associated with early identification of hearing loss.

Page 13: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

0.8 1.2 1.8 2.2 2.8 3.2 3.8 4.2 4.80

1

2

3

4

5

6

Identified <6 mos (n = 25)

Identified >6 mos (n = 104)

Age (yrs)

Lan

gu

age

Ag

e (y

rs)

Boys Town National Research Hospital Study of Earlier vs. Later

Moeller, M.P. (1997). Personal communication, [email protected]

129 deaf and hard-of-hearing children assessed 2x each year.

Assessments done by trained diagnostician as normal part of early intervention program.

Page 14: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Tremendous ProgressDuring the Last Decade

• Less than 30 hospitals with UNHS in 1993; compared with more than 2000 today

• More than 2 million babies are screened every year prior to discharge

• 34 states have passed legislation related to newborn hearing screening

Page 15: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

The Other Side of the Coin . . . .

• 2,200 hospitals are not yet screening for hearing loss

• Almost 2 million babies are NOT screened every year prior to discharge

• Existing legislation is of variable quality

• Only 9 states (accounting for 7% of the births) have implemented reasonable statewide programs

• Follow-up rates are often alarmingly low

• Some hospitals have unacceptably high referral rates

Page 16: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Good work,but I think we mightneed just a little more detail righthere.

Implementing Effective EHDI Programs

Then amiracleoccurs

out

Start

Page 17: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Status of EHDI Programs in the United States

• Universal Newborn Hearing Screening

• Effective Tracking and Follow-up as a part of the Public Health System

• Appropriate and Timely Diagnosis of the Hearing Loss

• Prompt Enrollment in Appropriate Early Intervention

• A Medical Home for all Newborns

• Culturally Competent Family Support

• Elimination of geographic and financial barriers to service access

Page 18: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Goal of Workshop

• As a result of this workshop, participants will:

– Develop a plan for implementing an effective statewide UNSHI program

– Outline the contents of the grant application to be submitted June 15th

– Understand how grant applications will be reviewed so that critical components can be included

Page 19: The Status of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the United States.

Resources are available to helpwww.infanthearing.org