Top Banner
©2017 MFMER | slide-1 The “Standard” 3D Exam Kent H. Rehfeldt, MD, FASE Associate Professor of Anesthesiology Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN No Disclosures
83

The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

Dec 12, 2021

Download

Documents

dariahiddleston
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-1

The “Standard” 3D Exam Kent H. Rehfeldt, MD, FASE Associate Professor of Anesthesiology Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN

No Disclosures

Page 2: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-2

Standard 3D Exam

Is 3D “standard” ?

Are certain 3D images required / recommended intraoperatively ?

If standard, how and when should we obtain them ?

Page 3: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-3

Goals / Objectives

• Examine guidelines for the use of 3D TEE in intraoperative / procedural settings

• Determine how / when 3D imaging should be employed during exam sequence

What should we do with 3D, and how should we do it?

Page 4: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-4

Comprehensive 2D TEE

JASE 2013

“The comprehensive imaging examination… presented in a suggested order.”

Page 5: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-5

“Recommended views…of cardiac structures.”

Ventricles, atrial septum, valves

Page 6: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-6

Suggested approach to image acquisition

Page 7: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-7

Page 8: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-8

Page 9: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-9

Standard 3D exam ?

Ventricles, atrial septum, valves

Page 10: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-10

vs

Exam protocol Recommendations

Not TEE specific

Page 11: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-11

Standard 3D

exam ? “…opinions of the

writing group…”

3D Recommended for: • LV volume, EF • Mitral • Catheter procedures

2012

Page 12: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-12

What is a “standard” 3D Exam?

Page 13: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-13

• “…the requirements for the perioperative arena are different … and time limited”

• “Intraoperative 3D imaging is performed as a supplement to 2D imaging.”

• “There is no standardized sequence for conducting an intraoperative 3D examination.”

J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth Vol30,No2(April),2016:pp470–

2016

Page 14: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-14

The standard 3D exam:

• Individualized

• Driven by specific clinical situation

3D TEE: • Time consuming • Often incompatible with

ongoing surgery

Page 15: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-15

Decisions:

• What structure(s) to image with 3D

• What 3D mode to use

…and when ?

Page 16: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-16

Quick Review: Modes of 3D

“Live” “Zoom” “Full

volume”

Page 17: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-17

Quick Review: Modes of 3D

Simultaneous orthogonal

“Live” or single –beat, probe responsive

ECG-gated, reconstructed multi-beat

Page 18: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-18

Wide sector “zoom” vs full volume

• Different volume format • Zoom may default to single beat • Both can be single beat (“live”) or multi beat gated

zoom

Modest improvement in resolution with smaller sector

Page 19: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-19

“Live” 3D : Single beat, probe responsive • Movement of probe = movement of image, real-time

• Can be:

• Narrow sector

• “Zoom” = focused wide sector

• Full volume, single beat

Increased sector size decreases temporal

resolution

Page 20: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-20

“Live” 3D : Single beat, probe responsive

• Why choose live / single beat?

• ECG-gated not feasible (interference, motion, irregular rhythm)

• Higher temporal resolution (narrow sector)

• Monitor real-time procedures

Page 21: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-21

The Trade Off

J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth Vol30,No2(April),2016:pp470

Page 22: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-22

Clinical Scenarios: When is 3D “standard”?

Debatable, but…

Page 23: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-23

Catheter based procedures

Page 24: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-24

3D capability of high value

• Visual devices in multiple planes simultaneously (A-P, M-L)

• Simultaneous orthogonal / narrow / focused wide (zoom)

• Familiar image orientation facilitates communication

Page 25: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-25

J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;20:1131-1140.

Page 26: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-26

• Pre-op: TTE and CT, +/- TEE • Procedural: TTE vs TEE

• 3D recommended for paravalvular leak detection (simultaneous orthogonal or single-beat / live)

Page 27: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-27

TAVR

“TTE annulus or outflow tract measurements are not accurate for selection of prosthetic valve size. TEE, especially with 3D imaging techniques, provides better anatomic delineation of the shape of the aortic annulus.”

Page 28: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-28

2016

TEE needed at some point to exclude thrombus.

Page 29: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-29

3D TEE with MPR more accurately sizes LAA

Page 30: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-30

2016

Page 31: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-31

Percutaneous Mitral Procedures

Trans-septal puncture

Live, probe-responsive mode to monitor catheter movement

Page 32: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-32

Percutaneous Mitral Procedures

• Live, probe-responsive mode to monitor catheter movement

• Adequate sector to encompass the valve

• Single-beat • Either wide sector/zoom or full-

volume

A

P

M L

Page 33: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-33

Percutaneous Mitral Procedures

Dual image format. Both LA and LV perspectives.

Page 34: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-34

Percutaneous Mitral Procedures

At completion, consider multi-beat mode for better spatial, temporal resolution.

Page 35: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-35

Valve Pathology, Repair, and Replacement

Page 36: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-36

Valve Repair / Replacement Pre-bypass Diagnostic Exam

Narrow sector not ideal: piece-meal exam

Page 37: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-37

Valve Repair / Replacement Pre-bypass Diagnostic Exam

• Wide sector/zoom or full volume to encompass valve

• ECG-gated for best temporal and spatial resolution

Page 38: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-38

Valve Repair / Replacement Pre-bypass Diagnostic Exam

Narrow sector reasonable for AV SAX

Page 39: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-39

Value of 3D Multi-planar Review • Ability to adjust planes simultaneously ensures location of

measurements

Need adequate temporal and spatial resolution • Pick diastolic frame • Trace orifice

Gated, full volume

Page 40: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-40

3D Assessment of Regurgitant Orifice • Not always as circular as we think

• Defeats geometric assumptions, calculations

Echocardiography. 2017;1–10

Page 41: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-41

3D Assessment of Regurgitant Orifice

• Re-thinking regurgitant orifice by 3D

vs

Page 42: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-42

3D Assessment of Regurgitant Orifice

• Re-thinking regurgitant orifice by 3D

vs Need adequate temporal and spatial resolution • Pick systolic frame • Trace orifice Gated, full

volume

Page 43: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-43

Post valve intervention 3D imaging options

• Challenging environment post-CPB (single beat?)

• Adequate temporal and spatial resolution + encompass valve

Page 44: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-44

Post Valve Intervention 3D imaging options

• Challenging environment post-CPB

• Adequate temporal and spatial resolution + encompass valve

Page 45: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-45

Mitral Replacement Paravalvular regurgitation

4 chamber

Ability to translate 2D images into 3D mental picture

Page 46: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-46

Mitral Replacement Paravalvular regurgitation

Commissural

Page 47: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-47

Mitral Replacement

Paravalvular regurgitation

2 chamber

Page 48: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-48

Mitral Replacement Paravalvular regurgitation

Long axis

Page 49: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-49

Mitral Replacement

Paravalvular regurgitation

Single beat mode immediately after bypass

• Spatial • Temporal • Encompass

valve

Page 50: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-50

Mitral Replacement

Paravalvular regurgitation

4 chamber

Facilitates communication. May be quicker.

Page 51: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-51

Another 3D option for prosthesis assessment Simultaneous orthogonal

Page 52: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-52

3D facilitates communication Standard display

12

9

Page 53: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-53

Left Ventricular Function

Page 54: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-54

Left ventricle

• 3D interrogation consistently recommended

• Strongly consider 3D volume, EF:

• Global or regional function abnormal at baseline

• Global or regional function at risk for decline

Page 55: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-55

Left ventricle

• Not feasible in all

Page 56: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-56

Left ventricle

“3DE is the only echocardiographic technique that measures myocardial volume directly, without geometric assumptions regarding LV shape and distribution of wall thickening.” ASE Chamber Quantification 2015

Measurement of ejection fraction

Page 57: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-57

Left ventricle

“3D echocardiographic measurements are accurate and reproducible and should therefore be used when available and feasible.” ASE Chamber Quantification 2015

Page 58: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-58

Left ventricle

“To ensure reasonably accurate identification of end-systole, the temporal resolution of 3D imaging should be maximized without compromising spatial resolution.” ASE Chamber Quantification 2015

• LV requires wide angle /full volume • Multi beat, gated capture

• Acquire early

Page 59: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-59

Left ventricle

Need spatial and temporal resolution

Page 60: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-60

Left ventricle

• Spatial res: edit, update border tracking • Temp res: identify end-systole, end-diastole

Page 61: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-61

Left ventricle

Benefit of 3D: - Detects foreshortening

3D TEE LV volumes greater than 2D TEE, though EF similar

Anesth Analg 2014;118:711–20

Page 62: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-62

3D TEE Advantage for EF determination?

Anesth Analg 2014;118:711–20

VS

No significant differences in LV EF determination by 2D versus 3D intraoperative TEE

Page 63: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-63

3D Assessment of LV EF

• Value in setting of wall motion abnormalities

Page 64: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-64

Left ventricle Measurement of ejection fraction post-bypass: CABG

Page 65: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-65

Left ventricle Measurement of ejection fraction

Page 66: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-66

Left ventricle Measurement of ejection fraction

Page 67: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-67

Page 68: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-68

Right Ventricle

Page 69: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-69

Right Ventricle

• Difficult to assess

• Only assess limited portions (FAC, TAPSE, S’)

• After cardiac surgery, longitudinal measures reduced, not representative

“…with appropriate 3D platforms and experience, 3DE-derived RV EF should be considered.” ASE

Chamber Quantification 2015

Multi-beat, gated acquisition, 20-25 volumes/sec

Page 70: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-70

Congenital

Page 71: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-71

J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2017;30:1-27

“There have been no randomized trials relating to procedural success, morbidity or mortality related to the application of 3DE.”

“…our consensus view of the added value of 3DE to assess some major groups of lesions.”

“3DE should be regarded as a technique that complements rather than replaces 2DE for assessment of CHD.”

Page 72: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-72

Utility of 3D TEE: ASD, MV, AV > VSD

Page 73: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-73

Page 74: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-74

Secundum ASD

Improved understanding: • Size • Geometry • Rims

Page 75: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-75

Simple muscular VSD

RV perspective

• Size • Geometry • Surrounding structures

Page 76: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-76

Suggested Intra-op TEE Exam Sequence: 3D Era

1. Comprehensive 2D, Doppler exam

2. Identify structures of interest for 3D exam

3. Acquire specific 3D images / datasets

4. Post-acquisition analysis of 3D images / data

Page 77: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-77

Time-sensitive nature of 3D acquisition

Race against

time

J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth Vol30,No2(April),2016:pp470

Page 78: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-78

Suggested Intra-op TEE Exam Sequence: 3D Era

1. Comprehensive 2D, Doppler exam

2. Identify structures of interest for 3D exam

3. Acquire specific 3D images / datasets

4. Post-acquisition analysis of 3D images / data

Page 79: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-79

Procedural-driven 3D image acquisition

Obtain gated, multi-beat clips early

Page 80: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-80

Take Home Points

Page 81: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-81

The Standard 3D Exam

•3D imaging is patient / procedure specific • No comprehensive, universal protocol for 3D exam

•3D complementary to 2D exam

•Mode of 3D exam dictated by: • Structures of interest

• Patient factors

• Procedural factors

Page 82: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-82

The Standard 3D Exam

•Cases with high 3D yield • Catheter-based

• Valve repair / replacement

• Pre-operative diagnostic

• Post-intervention assessment

• Congenital

• Ventricular function

Page 83: The “Standard” 3D Exam - APIL

©2017 MFMER | slide-83

Thank You ! [email protected]