The Scientific Method: Research in Science How do we learn anything about the Universe? The key element is curiosity! One of your main goals as a teacher Is to maintain that innate characteristic in your students or to try to restore it if poor teaching has beaten it out of them.
29
Embed
The Scientific Method: Research in Science How do we learn anything about the Universe? The key element is curiosity! One of your main goals as a teacher.
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
The Scientific Method: Research in Science
How do we learn anything about the Universe?
The key element is curiosity!
One of your main goals as a teacher Is to maintain that innate characteristic in your students or to try to restore it if poor teaching has beaten it out of them.
The First Steps in the Scientific Method
1. Observe: use your senses or augmentations of them (microscope or telescope). Example: the sky is blue.
2. Hypothesize (come up with a possible explanation of the observation).
Someone has painted it blue. The blue color is a reflection of the oceans.
Blue light is more easily scattered than red in the atmosphere, so the blue sky is scattered sunlight.
3. Test HYPOTHESIS through a PREDICTION. If the latter is true, then if sunlight passes through more of the atmosphere, the sun should lose green and yellow light too and appear red. (When does this happen?)
Blue light scatters more in the atmosphere• Off molecules (strongly) and off dust (less so, however).
Testing Hypotheses
4a. perform EXPERIMENT
4b. OR make new OBSERVATION Sun is indeed red/orange near dawn and dusk
5a. If in agreement, perform new test (and keep doing so).
5b. If in disagreement, discard or modify hypothesis
GO BACK TO STEP 2!
Only if MANY tests are passed can a HYPOTHESIS be called a THEORY.
If the THEORY applies in a wide range of situations, it may be raised to the status of a LAW (e.g., Newton's LAW of Gravity)
In SCIENCE nothing is ever PROVEN
STILL, even a LAW can be wrong (or partly right): Einstein showed that Newton's Laws of motion and
gravity don't hold exactly if:• velocities are close to the speed of light
(special relativity) OR if• lots of mass is concentrated in a small volume
(general relativity).
SO NOTHING IN A REAL SCIENCE IS EVER ABSOLUTELY PROVEN TRUE, although most of what is discovered and tested in a "hard" science is VERY LIKELY to be correct.
Healthy Skepticism
• is imperative for learning science.• Encourage your students to ask challenging
questions.• Don’t penalize them for too much curiosity,
but don’t go off on tangents for too long.• If you don’t know the answer, admit it.• But promise to find out an answer, and then
The REAL Scientific Method• But the preceding is idealized. • In reality, even good scientists often don't discard
hypotheses when they fail an experimental or observational test.
• Why not?• A. Experiment is wrong.• B. Experiment is misinterpreted.• C. Psychological/sociological/political difficulty in
giving up long-held beliefs. • Eventually the weight of evidence becomes
overwhelming and there is a PARADIGM SHIFT or SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTION. (e.g., Copernican, Darwinian, Quantum Mechanics)
Characteristics of Sciences and Not Sciences
• The above are characteristics of ANY SCIENCE. • The key point: scientific results are falsifiable. • If they cannot eventually be tested, they fall outside the
realm of science and enter philosophy, religion, etc.• Pseudo-sciences do not allow themselves to be tested
and “true believers” refuse to consider strong evidence against their validity. Examples: ?
• astrology, alchemy, numerology, palmistry, crystal/pyramid power
What A Science
Must Have
Types of Sciences
• What about: anthropology, economics, history, political science, psychology, sociology?
• These social or "soft" sciences rely to one extent or another on scientific methods, but also invariably carry a great number of preconceptions that allow for many disparate interpretations to be drawn from the same data. Usually too many complications.
• In the natural or "hard" sciences, the range of “allowed” interpretations is usually much less and new experiments or observations can be designed to choose the best.
Astronomy vs. Astrophysics• Aside from the OBSERVATIONAL - EXPERIMENTAL
dichotomy, since the advent of calculus we have distinguished these approaches from THEORETICAL science, driven by applied mathematics.
• ASTRONOMY IS AN OBSERVATIONAL SCIENCE.• ASTROPHYSICS IS AN OBSERVATIONAL -
THEORETICAL - EXPERIMENTAL SCIENCE.• Today we typically use these terms interchangeably
since so much of what we learn combines observations with theory and some experimental work (laboratory astrophysics).
• We also must consider COMPUTATIONAL science as a (nearly) equal partner now that computers are so powerful.
• How many times larger is the typical separation between stars to the typical diameter of a star?
• A) 103
• B) 105
• C) 107
• D) 109
A question:
• How many times larger is the typical separation between stars to the typical diameter of a star?
• A) 103
• B) 105
• C) 107
• D) 109
Time Scales of the Universe• Time since the Big Bang: ~1.37 x 1010 yr• Galaxies formed: ~1.3 x 1010 yr ago• Solar system formed: 4.55 x 109 yr ago• Oldest rocks on Earth: 3.8 x 109 yr BP• Earliest life forms: ~3.5 x 109 yr BP• Earliest hominids:~2 x 106 yr BP• Mountains: Appalachians:~2.5 x 108yr BP;
Rockies: 7 x 107 yr BP• Human lifespan: ~75 yr• Oscillation time for visible light: ~2 x 10-15 s• Time for light to pass the nucleus of an atom: ~3 x 10-24s
A question
• How many times older is the universe than our solar system?
• A) 1
• B) 2
• C) 3
• D) 4
A question
• How many times older is the universe than our solar system?
Exoplanets• How to find planets around other stars?• Direct imaging extremely hard. Why?• Astrometry: look for wiggles in stellar orbits; tried for
decades: usually failed• Spectroscopy: look for very small shifts in wavelengths
of stellar absorption lines: has worked since 1995 and given us most of the hundreds of exoplanets known.
Exoplanets, II• Photometry: look for tiny dips in light for planets
that move in front of stars: • How much to you expect light to drop for Jupiter?
For Earth?• Why a low probability for a given star?
Exoplanets, III
• Microlensing: also photometry, but dramatic increase in light due to gravitational focusing by star & extra bump from planet. Discovered serendipitously while searching for MACHOs.
Kepler Mission• NASA’s current planetary search mission, up
since 2009: 1.5 m primary; 0.95 m photometer w/ 95 Mpixels
• Stares at a big chunk of the sky (105 sq deg) in Cygnus w/ >105 pretty bright stars (9th-16th mag)
• Already discovered 100s of candidates with dozens of confirmed planets and with follow-up, characterized several. 6 planets in one system!
• http://kepler.nasa.gov/• Assignment for Friday: pick a Kepler educational