Top Banner
TOPIC : Science Vs Nature in Mary Shelly‘s - Frankenstein PAPER - 5 : The Romantic Literature STUDENT’S NAME : Gohil Yashpalsinh B. CLASS : M.A. Sem-2 ROLL NO. : 16 YEAR : 2013 SUBMITTED TO : Ms. Heenaba zala
7

The romantic literature science vs. nature in mary shelly‘s frankenstein

Dec 04, 2014

Download

Education

 
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: The romantic literature science vs. nature in mary shelly‘s frankenstein

TOPIC : Science Vs Nature in Mary Shelly‘s - Frankenstein PAPER - 5 : The Romantic LiteratureSTUDENT’S NAME : Gohil Yashpalsinh B.CLASS : M.A. Sem-2ROLL NO. : 16YEAR : 2013SUBMITTED TO : Ms. Heenaba zala (English Department,               Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji  Bhavnagar University)

Page 2: The romantic literature science vs. nature in mary shelly‘s frankenstein

Mary Shelley (née Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin; 30 August 1797 – 1 February 1851) was an English novelist, short story writer, dramatist, essayist, biographer, and travel writer, best known for her Gothic novel Frankenstein: or, The Modern Prometheus (1818). She also edited and promoted the works of her husband, the Romantic poet and philosopher Percy Bysshe Shelley. Her father was the political philosopher William Godwin, and her mother was the philosopher and feminist Mary Wollstonecraft.

Page 3: The romantic literature science vs. nature in mary shelly‘s frankenstein

in

Page 4: The romantic literature science vs. nature in mary shelly‘s frankenstein

• Victor Frankenstein as God.

• Human creation by using science.

• Victor as an irresponsible creator.

Page 5: The romantic literature science vs. nature in mary shelly‘s frankenstein

• The monster relinquished by his creator.

• Search for the creator.

• Bitter hatred from the society.

• Revenge.

Page 6: The romantic literature science vs. nature in mary shelly‘s frankenstein

CONCLUSION

• De-centering the centre.

• Science at the centre.

• Nothing can replace the Nature.

• So, the Nature is always at the centre.

Page 7: The romantic literature science vs. nature in mary shelly‘s frankenstein

Thank you.