© NERC All rights reserved The Glaciation of the North Sea Basin: implications for Carbon Capture and Storage Sites Tom Bradwell School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, UK and British Geological Survey, Edinburgh, UK
© NERC All rights reserved
The Glaciation of the North Sea Basin: implications for Carbon Capture and Storage Sites
Tom Bradwell
School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, UK and British Geological Survey, Edinburgh, UK
© NERC All rights reserved
CO2 storage
Basic criteria for site selection • Adequate storage capacity
• Adequate CO2 injectivity
• Security of storage
• Minimal environmental impact • Cost
Apologies...
© NERC All rights reserved
Effects of glaciation on storage reservoirs
• Geological properties of overburden
• Sediment characterisation • Discontinuities & heterogeneities • Major fluid flow pathways
• Geomechanical response to glacial loading-unloading cycles
• Stress fields & neotectonics • Rock/sediment mechanics • Porosity & permeability changes
• Hydromechanics
• Hydraulic pressurisation • Freshwater ingress
• Diagenesis & lithification
• Glacigenic (Pleistocene) reservoirs
Seal integrity
© NERC All rights reserved
“The North Sea Basin is the most important CO2 storage region for the whole of Europe” Stuart Haszeldine, 2008
FAR
UK
NOR
DAN
GER
NED
BEL
FRA
North Sea Basin
Setting
NW Europe
NSB
© NERC All rights reserved
Carbon Capture & Storage
Potential sites in North Sea Basin
Sleipner
www.npd.no
SCCS, 2014
© NERC All rights reserved
North Sea Basin
Cenozoic Geology
Seismic data courtesy of Schlumberger WesternGeco
Courtesy of Sam Holloway
Almost 1000 m of Quaternary (glacial/interglacial) overburden sediments in central NSB
Ottesen & Dowdeswell, 2014
© NERC All rights reserved
North Sea Basin
Cenozoic Geology
Seismic data courtesy of Schlumberger WesternGeco
Courtesy of Sam Holloway
Almost 1000 m of Quaternary (glacial/interglacial) overburden sediments in central NSB
Graham et al., 2011
© NERC All rights reserved
North Sea Basin
Quaternary history
Record of oxygen isotopes from deep-sea sediments (Shackleton et al., 1990).
Oxygen isotope fluctuations from Greenland Ice Core record (Wolff et al., 2010).
Quaternary stratigraphy, seismic character and inferred glaciation extent (Graham et al., 2011).
© NERC All rights reserved
Geological properties
Glacial sediments
Glacial sediments are very diverse and heterogeneous…!
Overconsolidated, low porosity, clay-silt mtx diamicton, with subhorizontal fissures subglacial till
Poorly consolidated, high porosity gravels & sands, low-angle bedding glaciofluvial outwash
Finely laminated, clay/silt/sand, variable porosity glaciolacustrine rhythmites
© NERC All rights reserved
Geological properties
Glacial sediments
• Characterization can be difficult • Detailed 3D descriptions needed • In situ engineering properties (over time?) • Depositional process & genesis
Thick bedded, high porosity outwash sands & gravels dominant in temperate (high discharge) systems
Fractured and dislocated bedrock, forming openwork or high permeability authochthonous breccia (glaciotectonite)
Locally highly heterogeneous; sub- pro- & supraglacial
© NERC All rights reserved
Geological properties
Glaciotectonic structures
• Deformation and discontinuities very common; can be pervasive • Faulting and folding – from micro (~mm) to macro (~km) scale
Phillips et al., 2010
© NERC All rights reserved
Geological properties
Glaciotectonic structures
• Strong glaciotectonic deformation common around dynamic ice sheet margins south NSB • Shear stress concentrated along weaker strata
• Freezing on and ?thrust-stacking of porous, well-consolidated pre-Quat. Strata
• Thrust depth varies; <50 to 500 m (extreme).
• Structures disrupt seal integrity; high permeability?
Large-scale glaciotectonic complex, ~400 m deep; 1.5 km long; SE Danish sector. L.T. Andersen (2012, PhD thesis)
Glaciotenic thrust belt complex, SW Alberta. (Kellett, 2007)
© NERC All rights reserved
Geological properties
Fluid migration pathways
• Faults / fracture zones
• Tunnel valleys and channels
• ‘Chimneys’ and pockmarks
• Other vertical porous bodies (e.g. sand wedges)
© NERC All rights reserved
Potential fluid migration pathways
Tunnel valleys
Seven separate generations recognised in NSB
Stewart & Lonergan, 2011
Graham et al., 2011
© NERC All rights reserved
Potential fluid migration pathways
Tunnel valleys
open TV Fill
closed TV Fill
• Often comprise coarse-grained, high porosity, laterally extensive units
• Undulating erosional base
• Intersecting & branching plan morphology
• Can be buried (closed) or open (on seabed)
• Highly variable sediment-ological composition
• Over-pressurised pore fluids?
• Terrestrial analogues rare
© NERC All rights reserved
Potential fluid migration pathways
Tunnel valleys
• Size, high porosity and intersecting nature of NSB tunnel valleys could allow fluid migration
• adverse impact on storage potential of underlying formations
• Over-pressured fluids affect injectivity
Kristensen et al., 2007
Still uncertainty over genesis: rapid vs long-term (?subglacial) glaciofluvial erosion
Kristensen et al., 2007
© NERC All rights reserved
Fluid escape features
Pockmarks
• Glacial and/non-glacial origin • <1-10 m deep; 1-200 m wide • Evidence of fluid escape at seabed • Common in NSB, esp. in berg-ploughed seabed and fringing moraines
Large pockmark
Pockmark chain
Strange groove
Gales, Bradwell, Stoker, in prep.
© NERC All rights reserved
Fluid escape features
Pockmarks
10 m Gas blanking
© NERC All rights reserved
Fluid escape features
Pockmarks
10 m
Seabed expression of bedrock fault
reactivation?
seismic ‘chimneys’
© NERC All rights reserved
Fluid escape feature
Pockmarks
25 ms
Gas blanking
Fluid migration? ‘chimneys’
BGS 1991/3_DTBoomer_line22
Pockmarks Giant pockmark
Example from central NSB
© NERC All rights reserved
Geomechanical response
Glacial loading-unloading cycles
• Ice sheets exert massive loading force on sediment & rock
• Changes to porosity & permeability;
may never readjust
• Stress propagates to depths >50 km, depending on load
• Experimental work shows increased horizontal stresses even 10ka after ice sheet disappearance
• Impacts on storage & retention potential of subsurface fluids
Klemann & Wolf, 1998
© NERC All rights reserved
Glacial rebound and neotectonics
Evidence from Fennoscandia
• Recorded seismic events cluster along western margin of NSB
• Tampen Spur high seismicity area associated with zone of dense fracturing ?weakness zone
• Some evidence for neotectonics (esp. in N Scandinavia)
• No direct correlation between uplift rates/pattern and seismicity
• Only 30 yr timeseries; more data needed to test theory
Sleipner
TS
all <6.5
Bungum et al., 2010
© NERC All rights reserved
Glacial loading and stress fields
Ice sheet models
• Modelled ice sheet geometries used to calculate spatio-temporal rebound and stress patterns
• Wide range of glacio-isostatic & lithospheric loading
scenarios for northern NSB
Wu et al., 1999
Grollimund & Zoback, 2003
© NERC All rights reserved
Glacial loading
and stress fields
Model results
• Reasonable match between model- and observed stress fields
• Evolution of modelled stress values (at 3000 m depth)
• 1st-order approximation?
Grollimund & Zoback, 2003
© NERC All rights reserved
Glacial loading
and stress fields
Model results • At maximum ice sheet thickness,
lithospheric flexural stress (forebulge) adds to high vertical loading stresses
• Stress beneath ice sheet centre largely
unchanged • After deglaciation (~15 ka extent) stress
magnitudes return to pre-100ka values
• Permanently increased horizontal stress values around edge of former ice sheet
Grollimund & Zoback, 2003
Brooker & Ireland, 1965
© NERC All rights reserved
Glacial loading
and stress fields
Conclusions
• Weight of advancing ice over-pressurizes subsurface, raising fluid pressures release?
• Ice loading stress increases (?decreases) fracture permeability • At LGM, weight of ice sheet
stabilizes faults preventing fluid leakage; temporary caprock?
• Leakage promoted during glacial-
interglacial transitions, when stress state change most rapid
• Sites just outside former ice sheet margins most susceptible to fluid leakage
Grollimund & Zoback, 2000
Neuzil, 2012
© NERC All rights reserved
Glaciation of North Sea Basin
Conflicting models
Ice sheet models for British Isles (Last Glacial Maximum) a. Boulton et al., 1977 b. Boulton et al., 1995 c. Boulton et al., 1991 d. Lambeck et al.,1993
Wide ranging scenarios for Northern NSB !
NB: Lambeck et al. 1993 disproved
© NERC All rights reserved
Glaciation of NSB
More recent work
• Digital shelf-wide bathymetric datasets key to new insights (e.g. Olex; regional MBES)
• Ice sheet evidence abundant offshore, esp. in northern NSB
• Ice sheet moraines mapped
from seabed geomorphology
C
B
A
B
Tunnel valley
Bradwell et al., 2008
© NERC All rights reserved
Glaciation of North Sea Basin
More recent work
Bradwell et al., 2008
© NERC All rights reserved
Glaciation of NSB
More recent work
• Ice sheet moraines indicate confluence in northern NSB during MIS 2-3
• Tampen Ridge / Witch Ground
Basin acted as suture zone for BIS & FIS ice sheets
C
B
Clark et al., 2012
Ice sheet
suture zone
• Marine cruise planned summer 2015 (Britice-Chrono)
• Understanding ice sheet dynamics, east of Shetland
Bradwell et al., 2008 & in prep.
© NERC All rights reserved
• New hypotheses re. ice sheet growth/retreat impact on lithospheric loading (e.g. Cavanagh & Haszeldine, 2014)
• Ice sheet growth is slow and steady gradual lithospheric loading in NSB
• Ice sheet retreat is rapid (<< 1ka); NSB breakup by RSL/flotation
• Instantaneous removal of loading pressures (grounded floating)
• Exceeds geomechanical limit of shales micro-fracturing?
Glaciation of NSB
New ideas & implications
Cavanagh & Haszeldine, 2014
© NERC All rights reserved
Glaciation of North Sea Basin
New models
Hubbard et al., 2009 Clark et al., 2012
© NERC All rights reserved
Glaciation of NSB
Recent revisions
Sejrup et al., 2014 (in press)
• Collective evidence points towards large independent Shetland-Orkney ice centre,
following BIS-FIS separation
• ~1 km thick with dynamic margins
• Strongly differs from early models
• Implications for glacial history and loading history of northern NSB
Hall, 2014
Bradwell & Stoker, in press
© NERC All rights reserved
Clark et al., 2009
Glaciation of NSB
Summary
Boulton & Hagdorn, 2006
• Ice sheet evolution in NSB coalescence & separation
• Note position of Sleipner relative to ice margins (a,b,d)
• Northern NSB can be both ice free and ice centre within ~5 ka
• Very complex stress conditions experienced; unlike anywhere else in W Europe
NB: Still >>under-estimating ice thickness in Shetland sector
© NERC All rights reserved
Some conclusions
• Glacial sediments In NSB are diverse & heterogeneous; porosity & permeability highly variable; discontinuities common across scale-range • Glaciotectonics common around (former) dynamic ice sheet margins in NSB; shallow strata disrupted up to 500 m below sea bed • Fluid pathways exist in glacial overburden; formation age unknown; fluid migration & seabed seepage occur at present day
• Tunnel valleys & ‘chimneys’ are most significant pathways; could affect seal integrity (& injectivity) • Former ice sheet margins have complex stress fields and rebound histories (esp. northern NSB)
• Neotectonics is often invoked (e.g. FIS margin) but evidence is still equivocal • Empirical data and models show/predict coalescence of ice sheets in northern NSB.
• Ice-free to thick ice-sheet cover in ~5 ka, central NSB; and rapid (marine) deglaciation <1 ka
• Still uncertainty about timing and pattern of deglaciation; and number of glaciations…
© NERC All rights reserved
Acknowledgments
The whole GlaciStore Team!
Thanks for listening…