Top Banner
THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger
24

THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Jan 03, 2016

Download

Documents

Darrell Short
Welcome message from author
This document is posted to help you gain knowledge. Please leave a comment to let me know what you think about it! Share it to your friends and learn new things together.
Transcript
Page 1: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE

Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word

Julia Romberger

Page 2: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Overview

• Theoretical Basis• Useful Concepts for Analysis• Types of Iconic Representations• Examples of Discourse

Communities in MS Word• Implications

Page 3: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Andrew Feenberg

Technology is the medium of everyday life in modern societies. Every major technological change reverberates at many levels, economic, political, religious, cultural. Insofar as we continue to see the technical and the social as separate domains, important aspects of these dimensions of our existence will remain beyond our reach as a democratic society. The fate of democracy is therefore bound up with our understanding of technology (Questioning Technologies, Preface p. vii)

Page 4: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Theoretical Basis for Interrogation of the GUI

Page 5: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Modernism & the GUI

• “remains true to modernist values of clarity and functionality” - the space of the screen is “ruled by straight lines and rectangular windows” (Manovich, 2001, p. 63).

• “reflects larger social logic, ideology, and imaginary of the contemporary society” (Manovich, 2001, p. 118).

• master narratives of capitalism and a Tayloristic sense of efficiency is evidenced through features like automation and pre-arranged templates and wizards, (Lyotard, 1997)

Page 6: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Gender & the GUI

• early writing software was intended to make “inefficient secretarial (women’s) work” subscribe to an ideal that “appealed to a masculine ideal of machine-like efficiency and limitless energy” that were to be ascribed to the secretary (Pringle, 1989, p 182).

• See Grammar and Spell-checkers

Page 7: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Concepts for Analysis

Page 8: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Multiliteracies

“To find our way around this world [of interactive media, desktop publishing, and computer interfaces] requires a new multimodal literacy.”

Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. Ed. Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis

(2000)

Page 9: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Discourse Communities

• ”socio-rhetorical network” that “form[s] in order to work towards sets of common goals” (Swales, 1990; Porter, 1992).

• presuppose a knowledge base, of both a specific lexis which might be used in specialized and technical ways and of ‘pre-texts’ and genres appropriate to communication within the community (Porter, 1992; Swales, 1990).

Page 10: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Rhetoric and the Interface

Discourse Community and Subjectivity

[P]roduction and consumption of discourse are seen as interpenetrating processes that instead of being directed by the intentions of purpose of the discourse user actually contribute to the user’s own self-understanding and self-definition. (Porter, 1992, p. 195)

Page 11: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Types of Iconic Representations

Page 12: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Iconic Icons

• Denotes its object by virtue of… likeness to or resemblance of that object, on the basis of some quality or characteristic inherent in the icon (Mullet & Sano, 1995, p. 172–173).

• These show causality. If the user clicks on this button or selects that menu item, what is shown on the button or represented by the iconographic menu item occurs.

Page 13: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Indexical Icons

• “[R]efers to its object indirectly, by means of an association … by virtue of its being actually affected or modified by the sign object” (Mullet & Sano, 1995, p. 173).

Page 14: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Symbolic Icons

• “[D]enotes its object by convention alone, and … depends upon agreement between the parties in communication” (Mullet & Sano, 1995, p. 173).

• The symbolic icon relies heavily on foreknowledge on the part of the user who is assumed to have had contact with and extensive use of computers before the encounter.

Page 15: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Examples of Discourse Communities in MS Word

Page 16: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Microsoft Word’s Lexicon

• Drop CapFrom Graphic DesignRefers to the position of the initial capital letter in a paragraph or on a page. This generally done for aesthetic reasons.

• Comment vs. AnnotateComment has undergone a historical shift from annotate.

Transition to more common term might be due to Annotate’s linkage with academia.

Page 17: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Microsoft Word’s Icons

• Clipboard = Paste

• Sticky Note = Comment

• Paintbrush = Formatting Tool

Page 18: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Microsoft Word’s Interactivity

• Typewriter Interactivity

Page 19: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Microsoft Word’s Interactivity Cont.

• Automatic Linking

Page 20: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Microsoft Word’s Interactivity Cont.

• Changing Automatic Formatting

4 step process

Page 21: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Implications

Page 22: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Advocate for Industry Change

• Documentation for software includes definitions and discussions on what metaphors are used.

• Usability testing asks the participants to read interfaces in addition to performing tasks.

Page 23: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Rhetorical Interrogation

• The myriad discourse communities in electronic media used to compose may create large roadblocks to learning critical technology literacy and critical composition of the electronic media.

• The increasing complexity of the interface also impacts attempts to bridge the digital divide.

Page 24: THE RHETORIC OF THE INTERFACE Discourse Expectations in Microsoft Word Julia Romberger.

Rhetorical Interrogation cont.

• Continuing rhetorical interrogation into assumptions in technology about what constitutes literacy can both empower and raise critical awareness in users in productive ways as they work on their own communications.